Can Obama and Clinton Look Any More Ridiculous On Iran?

Can Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama Look Any More Ridiculous On Iran? 

Iran has decided to use a U.S. proposal to ship its low enriched uranium (LEU) to third parties for enrichment, that being Brazil and Turkey, as oppose to France.  France was designated by the U.S., as the recipient Iranian LEU, but Iran trusts neither the U.S. nor France as honest partners since France is controlled by European interests that dovetail into America’s hegemonic strategy.  Yet, this exchange negotiated to persuade Iran to forgo the full nuclear enrichment cycle is exactly the strategy proposed by Obama and Clinton that now sends Obama and Clinton into dry-spin.

It has been reported in detail here on “Before Its News” that the US had given Brazil and Turkey the okay to negotiate this agreement, but the hope was that Iran would refuse it and embarass Brazil and Turkey thereby bringing them back to the U.S.-dominated sanction fold.   Here is that story to read after this one; it is a great piece:

beforeitsnews.com/story/51/866/The_U.S.,_Brazil_and_Turkey:_how_to_lose_friends_and_estrange_allies.html

 Regardless of what neocons say, the Iranian nuclear program has not violated any IAEA safeguards and so the repeated descriptions of it being an “illicit program” are nothing more than calls for war by the same lairs who painted us into the corner in Iraq, another neocon propaganda success story.

 Now the U.S. wants sanctions brought against Iran for Iran, Brazil, and Turkey enacting the exact policy the U.S. sought only a few months ago.  If this does not expose the hypocrisy and stupidity of our leaders and their disdain for our intelligence, I don’t know what will.  How can Obama and Clinton expect anyone in the international community to take them seriously?  They have been exposed and disgraced while becoming an irrelevant international laughingstock.

 If people want to know the truth, Jim Lobe, an investigative journalist (one of the few left), has reported accurately for more than 7 years on the Iranian nuclear program.  He has painstakingly documented the lies and corrupt influence the U.S. and Israeli lobby has exerted on the U.N. and the IAEA to the tune of engaging in a massive smear campaign that includes assassinations, war propaganda, wiretaps, blackmail, and an undermining of IAEA and U.N. legitimacy. 

 Lobe’s blog is a highly detailed chronicle that could only be provided by an expert who understands the technical and political situation regarding Iran’s program and is honest in translating it to those who seek to be informed as to the truth. 

 Most likely his blog, located here, www.lobelog.com/, will not stop the Israeli Lobby’s push for war, but it will serve as a step-by-step chronicle of how the Jewish controlled media pushed us into an illegal war with Iran that will fracture and splinter the U.S. as the rest of the non-aligned world unites against the U.S.  Moreover, by the U.S. refusing to be an honest partner, it will demonstrate the only way to avoid “regime change” or other attack by the U.S. is to have a credible nuclear deterrent.

I predicted years ago that there would be a Muslim “Manhattan Project”.  The U.S. failure to attack North Korea over its program is testament to the fact that nuclear deterrent works against the U.S.  Now, North Korea has been identified as providing technical assistance to other countries just as Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan had worked feverishly to let the nuclear genie out of the bottle until he was placed under house arrest. 

 Now the U.S. wants to be seen as an enforcer of international law, but Iran remembers the overthrow of its government by the CIA in 1953 that led to 26 years of torture and murder under the Shah’s repressive regime and then a 7-year war waged by U.S. ally Saddam Hussein whose modern mechanized military, that was supplied and supported by the U.S., was thwarted only by mass human-wave assaults of Iranians.  Now the U.S. wants to play the “International Law” card against the Iranians after years of lawless action.

 Ahmajinedad is misquoted by a mistranslation as saying he wanted to wipe Israel off the map.  This is a lie.  Here is the truth that is documented as official record:  If you go to: www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0612134902101231.htm, there you will discover the actual IRNA quote.

It turns out that Ahmadinejad never said what is being routinely attributed to him. Juan Cole, a professor of Middle Eastern studies at University of Michigan who reads Persian, explains that he actually stated (quoting the late Ayatollah Khomeini): “The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] from the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahvavad).”  This implies no destruction of the land or its people, it really just promotes what the U.S. routinely does – Regime Change.  Just as the Nazi regime in Germany or the Communist regime in the USSR vanished, so would the world be better off if the Zionist regime vanished.

 What has been exposed is irrefutable evidence of media propaganda in action. The AP deliberately altered Ahmadinejad’s IRNA quote to sound more threatening. The Israeli media not only repeated the fake quote, but then steals the original authors’ words.  The unsuspecting public reads this and forms an opinion based on propaganda to manufacture a casus beli and support for an unnecessary war of aggression that is being presented as self-defense and is based on the misinformation.  This is the Lobby at work in overdrive.

 Futurist, George Orwell, in his 1946’s critique called “Right In Front Of Your Nose” takes to task our intellectual manipulation, complacency, and hypocrisy when he writes: 

 “In order to have any efficacy whatever, a world organization must be able to override big states as well as small ones. It must have power to inspect and limit armaments, which means that its officials must have access to every square inch of every country. It must also have at its disposal an armed force bigger than any other armed force and responsible only to the organization itself. The two or three great states that really matter have never even pretended to agree to any of these conditions, and they have so arranged the constitution of U.N.O. that their own actions cannot even be discussed. In other words, U.N.O.’s usefulness as an instrument of world peace is nil. This was just as obvious before it began functioning as it is now. Yet only a few months ago millions of well-informed people believed that it was going to be a success.

 There is no use in multiplying examples. The point is that we are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.

 When one looks at the all-prevailing schizophrenia of democratic societies, the lies that have to be told for vote-catching purposes, the silence about major issues, the distortions of the press, it is tempting to believe that in totalitarian countries there is less humbug, more facing of the facts. There, at least, the ruling groups are not dependent on popular favour and can utter the truth crudely and brutally. Goering could say ‘Guns before butter’, while his democratic opposite numbers had to wrap the same sentiment up in hundreds of hypocritical words.

 Actually, however, the avoidance of reality is much the same everywhere, and has much the same consequences. The Russian people were taught for years that they were better off than everybody else, and propaganda posters showed Russian families sitting down to abundant meal while the proletariat of other countries starved in the gutter. Meanwhile the workers in the western countries were so much better off than those of the U.S.S.R. that non-contact between Soviet citizens and outsiders had to be a guiding principle of policy. Then, as a result of the war, millions of ordinary Russians penetrated far into Europe, and when they return home the original avoidance of reality will inevitably be paid for in frictions of various kinds. The Germans and the Japanese lost the war quite largely because their rulers were unable to see facts which were plain to any dispassionate eye.

 To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle. One thing that helps toward it is to keep a diary, or, at any rate, to keep some kind of record of one’s opinions about important events. Otherwise, when some particularly absurd belief is exploded by events, one may simply forget that one ever held it. Political predictions are usually wrong. But even when one makes a correct one, to discover why one was right can be very illuminating. In general, one is only right when either wish or fear coincides with reality. If one recognizes this, one cannot, of course, get rid of one’s subjective feelings, but one can to some extent insulate them from one’s thinking and make predictions cold-bloodedly, by the book of arithmetic. In private life most people are fairly realistic. When one is making out one’s weekly budget, two and two invariably make four. Politics, on the other hand, is a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean word where it is quite easy for the part to be greater than the whole or for two objects to be in the same place simultaneously. Hence the contradictions and absurdities I have chronicled above, all finally traceable to a secret belief that one’s political opinions, unlike the weekly budget, will not have to be tested against solid reality.”

 Why is it when the U.N. promotes U.S. ideology it is imperative that international law be followed, but when it goes against U.S. interests the U.N. becomes a meaningless institution?  We Americans have been blinded through the simple-minded manipulations of our leaders to the facts that are right in front of our noses.  We were lied to about Iraqi WMD stockpiles, WMD production capabilities and facilities, yellow cake uranium, aluminum tube certifuges, connections between Saddam, al Qeada , bin Laden, and 9/11.  We were lied to about Iraq being a cakewalk, the costs, the lose of lives, and our intention to control Iraqi oil reserves. We deny being told, and now lie to ourselves, about warnings of how the atomization of Iraq would strengthen Iranian influence and destablize the region.  Yet, we are told by our establishment, and still believe in the U.S. policy, that thinks if only we just drop thousands of tons of more bombs and kill millions more of Iraqis, Pakistanis, Iranians, and Palestinains, we can have an Iraqi protectorate that looks like Iowa on the Tigris River that will glorify the U.S. ideology of benevolent hegemony that makes hundreds of billions for our military/inductrial complex thereby bringing wealth and security to America. 

 The fact is that the Iraq War has led to middle class to serfdom and war with Iran will seal our fate as to how our nation destroyed its people and their liberty, prosperity, and peace.  Just as Wall Street destroyed money, Pennsylvania Avenue is determined to destroy all that made America prosperous and safe.

We find no objection to those who promote bald aggression, much less dressed up aggression under the pretense of law used to justify the confiscation of resources over which our government seeks to dictate control, by calling what is essentially theft and murder prepetrated in the aggregete, the euphemism known as “geopolitical strategy”.  This strategy benefits the elite at the expense of the masses in lives lost and wealth destroyed. 

When Americans can understand that they are manipulated by the power elite into believing the U.S. is peaceful, generous, and benevolent while exploiting other nations’ resources for the greedy economic interests of an oligarchy and kleptocracy, only then will they open their eyes as to the murder and theft being perpetrated on a global level. 

 It will not be long before the U.S. government turns on its own people and Americans will get a measure of what have been perpetrated on other peoples of the world by the U.S. government.  Only then will the absudities proposed by government, absurdities that lead to atrocities, be viewed in their proper perspective.  When we hear Sean Hannity say that America “had to be destroyed in order to save it.”, only then we will appreciate the political, economic, and military schizophrenia our government has unleashed throughout the world  with its Bilderburg Group, Tri-Lateral Commission,  Council of Foreign Relations, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund interests.