Profile image
By Mort Amsel (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

U.S. General Admits To Remote Control Of Airliners (Video)

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Alex returns to General Richard Meyers the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, openly admitting to the governments capability of taking remote control of airliners. Here is a theory for you. The US took control of the missing Malaysian Flight 370 and disappeared it via remote control.  Thoughts?)

Support BeforeitsNews by trying our natural health products! Join our affiliate program
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at www.mitocopper.com
Get our Free Ebook, "Suppressed Health Secrets" THEY don't want you to know!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver!  Desroys Viruses, Bacteria, Pathogens!
Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy.
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup!
B-12 - Supports healthy metabolism, brain function, hormone balance!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Never Wax Your Car Again -
Protects vehicles for years with dazzling shine!
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation! See Video!
Prodovite - The Secret To Healing is in the Blood!

Tactical Laser Blinds
Attackers
Bring Batteries Back
toLife!
New Laser Blinds Attackers Instantly! Bring Dead Batteries Back to life!
US Faces 100 Year Drought
Cut Power Bills by 65%
NASA - US Faces 100 Year Drought! Discovery Can Cut Power Bills by 65%
Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 35 comments
    • TombRaider

      “The US took control of the missing Malaysian Flight 370 and disappeared it via remote control.:

      Questions:

      1. Why would the US want to take control of a Malaysian passenger jet?
      2. Was the US even in the area at that time?
      3. Could another air ground source in that area take control of flight 370?
      4. Who else in this geographical region possess this ability?

      • YIPCARL

        The questions should be.

        1. Who was on the plane?

        2. Who are they “blaming” for the crash?

        3. Why and how can the transponder disappear? The only time that’s happened in history was on 9/11.

        Start with those.

        • scott

          There are only three real questions. 1) Who was on the plane? 2) What target was hit by the crash? 3) What agenda was advanced by this crash? … If none of these questions can be answered, it may have really been an accident.

      • fatman45

        1. Because 20-odd Chinese “immigrants” who worked at a top secret electronic warfare contractor in Austin, TX were on that plane headed to Beijing.
        2. US satellites are ALWAYS in the area… wherever the “area” might be!
        3. Unlikely it was a “ground source” since this was over open ocean hundreds of miles from land.
        4. Even if someone else possesses the ability to remote control planes, if the US has the ability to do it then they would have safeguards (much like military satellites do) to prevent unauthorized access.

        • wriv

          Robotically installed incendiary SMAC perhaps or retrofitted with SMAC panels. Uninterruptible has been installed on which craft globally? Remote tech has been used since at least the 20′s. For Boeing, its old hat. Uninterruptible installed since 90′s. Connection to Komatsu? Search Clinton QRS11 quartz rate sensor

    • Nowhereman

      My comment is…… whatever your taking stop now.

    • Gil Carlson

      Anything is possible now! Have you seen this amazing photo?

      Why is this UFO being worked on at Area 51? Oops, maybe I wasn’t supposed to take this photo!

      http://www.blue-planet-project.com/UFO-Sightings.html

      • Mike Rotchurts

        promoting your book?
        on someone elses site lol

    • GK

      LOL. There’s no point in taking control of that flight. No point is making it “disappear.” Besides, if WE can do it, OTHER countries can do it as well – guaranteed. Come up with some hard facts and maybe, just maybe, you MIGHT get someone to listen to you. Until then, idle speculation means absolutely nothing.

    • 911 truthout blogspot com

      Photo Forensics: 9/11 NYPD Drone for Lazy People | Taking back the Narrative
      http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/02/photo-forensics-911-nypd-drone-for-lazy.html

      9 11 Jumper photo under 1400% magnification turns into CIA Drone NIST NYPD FOIA
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkRRKVXwcmk

      9/11 Roll #3 1.jpg – https://t.co/92Dl9rA2j4

    • LifeIs

      (1) The means to remotely control airliners, installed as an “anti-hijacking” “automatic landing” system, has been around a long time.

      And yes, Boeing 757 and 767 airplanes were equipped for this. And were on 9-11.

      As described by Janes: “The fully digital FCS-700 triplex autopilot and flight director system, with fail-operational automatic landing capability, was designed for Boeing 767 and 757 transports.”

      (2) There are newer systems that do the same thing.

      (3) WHY electronically hijack an airliner? To either: (a) seize something that is on the plane, or (b) capture persons who are on the plane, or (c) to murder persons who are on the plane, in a deniable way.

      Duh.

      Doing something, while keeping the “hard facts” of the matter secret, would be the whole idea of electronically hijacking the plane.

      As opposed to say, a commando raid, a “snatch mission,” piracy on the high seas, or other overt acts.

      There’s nothing exotic about remote control. We’ve had remote control planes since World War Two. There’s nothing exotic about electronic hijacking.

      There’s nothing unusual about hijacking. The Russian cargo ship MV Arctic Sea was hijacked in 2009. Israel this month hijacked a cargo ship that was in the Red Sea, destination, Sudan.

      Why suspect the US government? The Niagara Falls of disinformation stories of all kinds in OUR media, accusing people the US and Israel don’t like, tells you who did it.

    • MJ12

      As soon as I saw Alex Jones in the video, I knew this was bollocks!

    • greenghost

      9/11

    • 911 truthout blogspot com

      Oct 2001 = Another technology that the Bush administration is keen to probe would permit an air traffic controller to take over a
      distressed aircraft and land it by remote control. pg 3
      http://www.willis.com/documents/publications/Industries/Aerospace/GAB+-04_10_2001.PDF

      U.S. General Admits to Remote Control of Airliners
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHrcdihDW_0&google_comment_id=z135g1yxdkarcnusp225e14qhpjfgmsk

      Photo Forensics: 9/11 NYPD Drone for Lazy People | Taking back the Narrative
      http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/02/photo-forensics-911-nypd-drone-for-lazy.html

      9 11 Jumper photo under 1400% magnification turns into CIA Drone NIST NYPD FOIA
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkRRKVXwcmk

      9/11 Roll #3 1.jpg 9/11 NYPD Drone 911 Photo of smoking gun small jet plane military https://t.co/92Dl9rA2j4

      http://s1222.photobucket.com/user/danp5648/media/nypdDrone2.jpg.html

    • teresa_sntg

      Thank you for disclosing that supposed technology with The People, but the flight 370 was rescued by The Ashtar Command, and the passengers are safe and happy!

    • DQ

      Thumbs up to all those who asked the right questions and did not just dismiss the article/video. So far, to my knowledge, there is no crash, so where is it? I’ll bet its the USSA involved, they’re everywhere all the time in everyone’s business.

    • 911 truthout blogspot com
    • muscltory

      I contacted the DNA of these missing passengers and found 237 of them in Heaven. Two other passengers were CIA operatives.
      The two planes that crashed into thw WTC were empty and controlled by Richard Cheney.
      I contacted the person[s] responsible for the misdeeds associated with this flight and the DNA of serial killer and CIA driector John Brennan came up immediately.

    • DaniLynnC

      That’s BS. The Government had no reason to take control of that jet. This is all disinfo and distraction. Trying to come up with explanations for an event that defies logic.

      • HereAmI

        Sherlock Holmes had the right idea.
        “When you have discounted the impossible, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth”.
        This is similar logic to William of Ockham’s.
        Probably the first thing to do is to see who was on the passenger list. Would anyone wish to kidnap them, and take them to a secure facility?

        • Mike Rotchurts

          Sherlock Holmes was a fictional character lol but the logic remains…you were better off quoting the author sir Arthur Conan Doyle…the creator of Sherlock holmes

    • raven1

      Possible, but not without the “Twilight Zone” theme playing in the background. :razz:

    • jackattack

      who even cares if this plane bites the dirt. world is overpopulated anyway

    • patriotpj

      Why? Was someone on it that had something on BO?

    • Anonymous

      8 from China-12 from Malaysia all on plane.They all worked for FreeScale Semi Conductor in Austin Tx. The Co. is involved in electronic tech. used for defense purposes, including electronic warfare such as wepons that can cloak or make planes invivible appearing to vanish. This Co. has contracts with our State Dept.

      • MrAnthony

        Yes, because having a plane disappear would attract no attention at all.

        • Mike Rotchurts

          any event will attract attention…its what kind of attention that’s attracted that matters. On one hand you have the “oh no what a tragedy, another plane went down in the sea” type attention and then there is the unwanted attention of “wait a minute lets investigate this further for foul play”
          which do you think the perpetrators prefer (if there were any)?

    • MrAnthony

      Thoughts? You’re nuts.

    • Reaper

      Shades of 9-11

    • CG-23 Sailor

      Your article is rife with typical BS conspiracy theory crap not based in any sort of logic or common sense.

      Your Headline reads “U.S. General Admits To Remote Control Of Airliners (Video)”

      I watched the clip. The General admits NO SUCH THING.
      He states that there are some programs for the prevention of another 9/11 style attack and that those programs are classified.

      The you got the fraking idiot Alex Jones who lives in a fantasyland, with a memo from the President outlining several ideas that are a POTENTIAL capability to be explored.

      Taking remote control of aircraft that have been highjacked was outlined as a path to explore for potential real world action. The Memo was not stating it was a reality.

      But you conspiracy morons always get it wrong and see only what you want to see and reject reality.

    • TRUTH

      Perhaps they have ulterior motives. The gang in malaysia that assisted them to pass the transactions they robbed from all the brokers worldwide by hacking into them and putting them on their servers to better rob them, it was time for assassination of the witnesses.

      What better way. They did not throw them off buildings, they did not bomb their twin towers, they did not kill them then say they committed suicide, no even better they made them disappear from planet earth.

      Maybe they have a hidden place on the moon with dead corpses.

      When will you rid us of the rats.

      TIME TO CALL THE EXTERMINATOR

      ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

      AND US BROKERS HAD ENOUGH OF NOT BEING ABLE TO MAKE A LIVING BECAUSE THEY STEAL THE GOLD WE HAVE FOR SALE, THE DIAMONDS, BONDS, BANK GUARANTEES, MEDIUM TERM NOTES, THE ONES WE AVE FOR TRADES, THE CASH FOR TRADES, THE COMMODITY TRANSACTIONS AND ALL THAT WE KNOW TO WORK TO SUPPORT OURSELVES AND OUR FAMILIES.

      WE HAD ENOUGH, REALLY ENOUGH

      THIS WORLD HAS TURNED INTO DISGUSTING DARKNESS

    • HealingMindN

      Flight 370 also, allegedly, disappeared from radar. Does that remote include satellite control? Transponder control? :?:

    • SGde3a

      Its a Malaysian plane. Malaysia isn’t western-aligned yet. Israel bringing the destruction because they can’t get what they want.

      http://altthainews.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/us-seeks-allied-regime-in-malaysia-as.html

    • LifeIs

      I won’t hold my breath, waiting for “Mr Anthony” to apologize to the folks here.

      As the evidence of hijacking is overwhelming. The engines trying to “phone home,” for 4 hours. The Indian Ocean direction of travel, as observed by radar.

      And where could that plane land in the Indian Ocean… well, there’s our base at Diego Garcia, which we got by kidnapping the population and deporting them en masse, and slaughtering their pets.

      Putting physical hijackers on the plane, or gaining control of the pilots by bribery or threats,
      is a possibility. Electronic hijacking is a lot simpler. Easier to do.

      The clues pointed the right way all along. The US took that plane.

    • lankyjones

      Remote control hijack capability? That may be an extreme exaggeration by realistic technological terms. I remember an in-depth discussion of this subject some time ago. I am not an electronic technician but it was described to me that there are some renegade army factions in possession of some (probably stolen) experimental weaponry capable of rude, gross override of some if not all on-board flight control functions. This is not necessarily possible with every plane. The override is more like a sloppy joy stick with which the bum remote control operator really doesn’t “hi-jack” and fly the plane persay, but can quite disrupt and possibly wreck the plane if the pilot is unable to recover. I find technological stuff interesting but to say that this happened to Maylasia flight 370 would be a fruitless paranoid deduction already. I don’t see the motive factor here either.

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.