Putin ISIS posture

I have a question regarding latest confirmation from Russia that plane “Flight 9268 over Sinai Peninsula it was taking down by a Bomb!” Until Tuesday, Russia had played down assertions from Western countries that the Oct. 31 crash was the work of terrorists, saying it was important to let the official investigation run its course. But four days after Islamist gunmen and bombers killed at least 129 people in Paris, Alexander Bortnikov, the head of the FSB, said in televised comments that traces of foreign-made explosive had been found on fragments of the downed plane and on passengers’ personal belongings.”We can unequivocally say it was a terrorist act,” Bortnikov said at a Kremlin meeting . We know from previous ZT that is not true! Or is something else at play? Russia sure do not need motives because already they fight ISIS, so is pointless to blame them? Before this announcement from the Russia  the Obama met Russian President Vladimir Putin in an informal meeting lasting around 30 minutes at the G20 summit on Sunday 11 15 2015, is Putin(Russia ) “white lying” for the greater good to take some pressure from Obama or he want support from russians population? [and from another] Putin looks very depressed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp5R3OuXxX4   Also Russia targets ISIS with 34 cruise missiles, strategic bombers – Def Min briefing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrwsB0PiRws  [and from another] http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/17/us-egypt-crash-russia-blast-idUSKCN0T60PS20151117#MSIvABCgmd57KAJI.97  President Vladimir Putin vowed to hunt down those responsible for blowing up a Russian airliner over Egypt and intensified air strikes against militants in Syria, after the Kremlin concluded a bomb had destroyed the plane last month, killing 224 people. Putin ordered the Russian navy in the eastern Mediterranean to coordinate its actions on the sea and in the air with the French navy, after the Kremlin used long-range bombers and cruise missiles in Syria and announced it would expand its strike force by 37 planes. Russia had played down assertions from Western countries that the Oct. 31 crash was the work of terrorists, saying it was important to let the official investigation run its course. But four days after Islamist gunmen and bombers killed at least 129 people in Paris, Alexander Bortnikov, the head of the FSB, said in televised comments that traces of foreign-made explosive had been found on fragments of the downed plane and on passengers’ personal belongings. [and from another] https://www.rt.com/news/322536-russia-isis-targets-plane/  Both Russia and the US-led coalition, which is conducting its own separate campaign against IS in Syria and Iraq, increased pressure on the terrorists in response to the spree of violence in Paris. On the day Moscow officially confirmed a terrorist attack as the cause of last month’s downing of a passenger plane in Egypt, the Russian military hit over 200 terrorist targets in Syria in 127 sorties. The escalated Russian operation involved not only warplanes flying from an airfield near Latakia, but also strategic bombers operating from Russian territory. [and from another] http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/16/us-g20-turkey-idUSKCN0T409Y20151116  World leaders vowed tighter border controls, more intelligence sharing and a crackdown on terrorist financing after the Paris attacks, but there was little sign at a summit on Monday of a dramatic shift in strategy against Islamic State in Syria. G20 leaders agreed to step up border controls and aviation security, in a joint statement that marked a rare departure from their usual focus on the global economy. U.S.-led efforts to fight Islamic State were complicated when Russia joined the conflict a month and a half ago, targeting what the West says are mainly foreign-backed fighters battling President Bashar al-Assad, Moscow’s ally, rather than focusing on Islamic State. Obama met Russian President Vladimir Putin in an informal meeting lasting around 30 minutes at the summit, a discussion which Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said had been constructive but not groundbreaking. Obama made no mention of their meeting at his news conference. [and from another] http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-france-warship-russia-20141125-story.html

A321 was clearly affected by more than a bomb, as it changed course to head for Cairo, leaving the waters of the Gulf of Aquba, moving slowly for some minutes and reporting mechanical problems before it exploded. Do bombs explode slowly? The fuel pumps were crippled by electro-magnetic pulse (EMP), pumping inadequate fuel during a slowdown. Then, in the flip side of EMP, a pulse occurred, racing the motors in a rush that provided both heat and spewing fuel for the explosion. Nancy clarified in a recent newsletter that any excuse to ground planes or avoid EMP zones will be used now, in future, but no EMP admission should be expected. 

Putin is using the downing of the Russian airliner A321 as an excuse to step up the pace in the battle against ISIS.  Was it not just a year ago that France refused to deliver a warship to Russia, citing the Ukraine conflict? Suddenly, as a result of the attack on Paris, France and Russia are partners against ISIS. Of course, Russia too is a target of ISIS, so Putin needs no excuse to step up the pace, so why has the pace been quickened? It is clear during the G20 that Putin and Obama had heads together in a private chat. Both Putin and Obama are prepared to participate in the announce admitting the pending passage of Nibiru, and want ISIS put to rest before then. 

Given the state of the planet, with the wobble and Earth changes such as earthquakes and EMP affecting both man and his machinery increasing regularly, at what point are matters at rest enough for the announcement to have a safe place? There will be no such quiet time, no point when migrant distress or sociological restlessness has gone to sleep. No point when the crops are in and panic in the public will not increase the food shortages. Rioting will be on the increase. Demands from all quarters, the “have-nots” making demands on the “haves”, the threat of having a corrupt or short sighted nominee about to become President in the US. All will only increase. In short, the announcement team should just do it, without further delay. 

Source: ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for November 21, 2015