Nemesis in the news, start of the announcement

Today on the radio, while listening to NPR. they spoke about Planet X. Do the Zetas would like to comment about the appearance of this article on the MSM?
[and from another]
Today on the radio, while listening to NPR, they spoke about Planet X. It is also on their website. An article on the same subject can also be found in sciencemag.org and from Cal Tech. Three places that are by any measure, (main stream) have come out with articles about a ninth or tenth planet, depending on the article. All of these on the same day apparently. This does not look like creeping disclosure anymore but open disclosure of the existence of the planet. If you read the articles you will see that the facts about Nibiru are incorrect except for it’s existence as a member of our solar system, as well as the fact that it affects certain of our other planets. What can the Zetas tell us about these preliminary admissions of the existence of planet X from several mainstream sources? Will these be used to gauge public reaction? Or perhaps will this be the setup for a more official pronouncement? 
[and from another]
I guess this is yet another announcement nudge? Can the Zetas comment? 
[and from another]
This news already all over Russian web. The article states that an American and Russian astronomers found some anomalies in the gravity of a few of distant planets and came to an assumption that the anomaly could be caused by a very large planet much bigger than Earth. Is this a preparation for the announcement on Nibiru?  Would the Z’s care to comment?
[and from another]
Today, all the news channels in Russia has passed the information about the detected 9 planet in our solar system. And just yesterday Lavrov met with Kerry. It is this preparation for the upcoming announcement.
[and from another]
Checking the reaction of the humans and preparing for announcement?
[and from another]
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/a-giant-unknown-planet-might-ex…
Astronomers at the California Institute of Technology announced on Wednesday they’d found evidence for a massive, faraway planet. If true, it would constitute the ninth planet in our solar system, an honor once bestowed on Pluto, which has since been demoted to dwarf-planet status. They’ve nicknamed the new object Planet Nine. Planet Nine’s mass is believed to be about 10 times that of Earth, and it’s distance, 20 times farther away from the sun than Pluto. Evidence of its existence comes instead from dwarf planets and other icy objects around it. 
[and from another] 
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-nept…
The new evidence comes from a pair of respected planetary scientists, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, who prepared for the inevitable skepticism with detailed analyses of the orbits of other distant objects and months of computer simulations. Scientists say their calculations stack up. Batygin and Brown inferred its presence from the peculiar clustering of six previously known objects that orbit beyond Neptune. If Planet X is out there, Brown and Batygin say, astronomers ought to find more objects in telltale orbits, shaped by the pull of the hidden giant. But Brown knows that no one will really believe in the discovery until Planet X itself appears within a telescope viewfinder. They hope other astronomers will join in the hunt.
[and from another]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3408618/The-solar-ne…
Most of the planets around other sunlike stars have no single orbital range—that is, some orbit extremely close to their host stars while others follow exceptionally distant orbits. 
[and from another]
https://www.rt.com/usa/329632-new-planet-solar-system/
Its presence there would explain a number of mysterious features of the field of icy objects and debris beyond Neptune called the Kuiper Belt. The six most distant objects in that area all follow elliptical orbits that point in the same direction in physical space ? a highly unusual and surprising pattern.
[and from another]
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22
Recent analyses have shown that distant orbits within the scattered disk population of the Kuiper Belt exhibit an unexpected clustering in their respective arguments of perihelion.
[and from another]
http://time.com/4184942/planet-9-new-pluto-solar-system/
[and from another]
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/01/20/463087037/hints-o…
[and from another]
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/20/us/possible-ninth-planet/index.html
[and from another]
http://www.bbc.com/russian/science/2016/01/160121_ninth_planet_case
[and from another]
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/01/20/researchers-di…
[and from another]
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/researchers-find-evidence-for-yet-unsee…
[and from another]
http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_29408753/scientists-good-e…
[and from another]
http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/discovering-planet-nine

SOZT
Why is this article simultaneously exploding on major media? It is not describing Nibiru, aka Planet X. It is describing the Sun’s binary twin, 
http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s36.htm
which we have  described as being 18.74 Sun-Pluto distances 
http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s106.htm
away from the Earth’s Sun. Note this object, termed Planet 9, is described as being “20 times farther away from the sun than Pluto”. Precisely. Zetas right again! We have described this binary twin since the start of the ZetaTalk saga,  
http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s100.htm
and the perturbations caused by this binary twin of the Sun have been known to ancient astronomers. 

There is great confusion between the Sun’s binary twin and Nibiru, a planet that orbits both foci. Nibiru comes from the direction of the binary twin, and returns in that direction. In the early 1980’s, what is now being termed Planet 9 was being termed Nemesis, and is the reason that NASA/JPL went looking for the source of this perturbation in 1983 with an infrared balloon sent above the atmosphere. They found an object out in the direction of Orion. Nibiru, at that time, was approaching for its next passage around the Sun. A front page article in the Washington Post, 
http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword26c.htm
published December 31, 1983 documented this search.  

What is the reason for the media blitz at this time? Astronomers are clearly aware of the Sun’s binary twin, and the existence of Nibiru, and have for decades been severely repressed from speaking about these issues. Many deaths have resulted to keep this secret, on the excuse that the public would panic if they knew. Now that Nibiru is so visible 
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/19de2015.htm
that the public is regularly seeing a Second Sun and the brilliant Moon Swirls, as well as the body of Nibiru itself with its double helix of its two most dominant Moon Swirls, the announcement is viewed as inevitable. We have described the planned announcement as a multi-pronged event 
http://zetatalk.com/ning/09ja2016.htm
that cannot be sabotaged. This is one of the prongs. 
EOZT

Prior 2001 ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s106.htm
For those not closed minded, we will describe the eccentric orbit of Planet X, between your Sun and its dark twin. This unlit binary sun lies some 18.74 times the distance from your Sun to Pluto, at a 11 degree angle from the ecliptic, in the direction of the constellation of Orion.

Prior 1995 ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s36.htm
The Earth and the dark star that is the second foci of [Nibiru’s] orbit do not rotate around each other any more than the planets in your Solar System rotate around each other. This second foci of the 12th Planet has not been located by your astronomers because it is dark, not lit, and does not happen to block any view your astronomers are particularly interested in. They think it empty space. Unlike the Sun, this dark twin never lit. Although comparable in size and mass, its composition was subtly different, and it has no potential for becoming a lit sun under the present conditions in your part of the Universe. It has no planets of any size to mention, though is orbited by a lot of trash. Should one wish to search for it, it stands at an angle of 11 degrees off the Earth’s orbital plane around the Sun, in the same direction we have given for the approach of [Nibiru]. Not being a luminous body, and not giving off any radiation detectable by human devices, you will be unable to locate it, but this does not mean that it is not there. 

Prior 1995 ZT: http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s100.htm
[Nibiru] is circling on a long elliptical orbit around the sun and its dead companion which lies at a distance some 18.724 times the length from the sun to Pluto. 

Prior ZT: http://zetatalk.com/ning/09ja2016.htm
The announcement is again close at hand, a multi-pronged announcement so powerful and from so many sources that it could not be denied.

Source: http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-january-23-2016