Genuine mass killing or staged event? Could it be something in between?

• Posted by bananaman on October 24, 2017 at 7:00pm
• View Blog

There is a lot of talk among truthseekers concerning the details of “what actually happened ” at any false flag (Whether real or staged) event. 

Frustrations arise as to whose truth is the real truth.

The answers to these questions are rarely as simple as “this or that”. This is true in all other situations that arise in life.

How often have you heard someone saying,”oh if she hadn’t met that guy at work she would still be with me” well, things are rarely that simple. Even the most cursory examination by an objective observer would immediately, upon investigation discover a plethora of other factors.

What actually occurred at the Los Vegas shooting is almost certainly not an either 500 killed by unknown gunman or men (excuse the PC blunder) or a total hoax from start to finish.

It is more likely to be a combination of the two scenarios judging from the evidence pointing to both real killed and wounded combined with repeated footage of   obviously faked witnesses and almost comical scenarios that seem to stick it in your face.

This makes perfect sense if you imagine that what better cover for the real event than a staged event. The recruits of the staged event would have no reason not to believe the entire event is staged to some degree until after the fact and they get to see the evidence of REAL dead and injured. During the event they may believe that the guy that just took a shot to the head “over there” is not just a great crisis actor.

Thus the need for these things to coincide with staged crisis events almost without exception.

However there are limitations. Could they really kill and wound 550 people without massive logistical issues and also radicalise  the extended friends and family of some of those people that don’t buy the “Official version” and turn  into dangerous people, emotional and vocal spreading discontent.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/23/family-las-vegas-victim-wants-…

Why not just take out enough people to make it significant and undeniable with perhaps 20-50 real casualties then exaggerate what happened to appeal to the wider mainstream audience with the logic and critical analysis skills of plankton? Job Done! More boom for your buck, the media are cheaper than 40 dollar whores

This theory is backed up by initial reports from the ground of dead and injured in the vicinity of 10-50 depending how close to the event the news was published. Within the time frame of the first hour appear the most accurate. Before the official story is widely enough distributed but after the actual event. Its usually best to wait until after the actual event.

No one knows what actually happened that night. Some people know more than the rest of us and may believe they know the full story but i can be almost certain that there are things that they don’t know they don’t know, and millions of small details.

The best we can hope for is an educated guess and rule out the most obvious of the deceptions by means of logical analysis and a process of elimination.

There is a line of evidence that he moon is in fact made of cheese. Lunar rock 10017 has a shock wave velocity of 1.84Km/s. This velocity is an indication of the composition of rocks.A study of the shock wave velocity of cheese showed  that there are variations in the shock wave velocities such as 1.65Km/s (Munster,USA) 1.72Km/s (Emental Switzerland) 1.75 Km/s (Chedder, England)   1.75 Km/s (Provolone,Italy) and 1.83 Km/s (Gjetost,Norway) The moon is therefore made of green cheese, there are numerous other bodies of evidence that show that this is not the case. Although there is one piece of evidence that indicates the moon is made of green cheese. A lunar composition of green cheese is not coherent with evidence from direct sampling (yes I do believe thay landed on the moon “amazing eh” ) lunar mapping, lunar magnetism, lunar gravity, orbital features and reflection of sunlight from the lunar surface. If the moon is indeed made of green cheese   then all other calculations, observations and measurements must be in agreement with a green cheese composition.

They are not, accordingly the theory tht the moon is made of green cheese is rejected. This is the way science works. (Ian Plimer, A short history of planet earth)

It’s a bit like playing the old board game “Mastermind”

If you believe in God then your truth is that God knows and i respect your truth, but i’m happy to admit i don’t.

A couple of things i can say with accuracy, 

1. The official version is bullshit

2. Squabbling over “What really happened”  Is not helpful

BM