The Legality of LGBTQ(P)

The Assault of a Nation

There is a lot to say about the constitutionality of the LGBT belief system and what it practices.

It used to be illegal for two men to have intercourse and, technically, it still is: here is why.

The act itself is at its core is an assault: one man is doing physical harm to the other. The results of such relations lead to torn and destroyed sphincters, diseases (more prevalent being syphilis) and a host of psychological defections such as depression, anxiety and addiction.

You cannot legally consent to assault. The Constitution itself is contingent upon the body of citizens upholding it. If you assault the citizenry, you are assaulting the Constitution itself also (that’s why its literally called a ‘constitution’). To allow these assaults legally is actually criminal on the part of lawmakers; they are openly consenting to the assault of what amounts to the possession of rights.

We are not property, nor slaves to the Constitutions of our respective nations, but we are charged with maintaining and upholding them. In that sphere we find our responsibilities to our own bodies and persons.

As a result of this clear and obvious fact, the selling of oneself (as a prostitute) also become delegitimized as an option (seeing as that would also be to sell the Constitution). This was a common practice and legal in the “wild west” and I think a large part of the spiritual problem that the US currently has.

But What About “The Contest”

These assaults that men and women are consenting to are illegal, but they are not to be confused with ‘contest’. Back in the day, two men could agree to a contest, a duel, in which there is one clear winner and one loser. This contest does not constitute assault because it is not consensual nor is harm necessarily rendered to both parties.

If people understood the spirit of the US Constitution (and it is a little sad that I, as a non-US citizen have to explain this) you would be able to tell the difference. Freedom extends as far as what you are doing being free or not. That is to say, it is not “free choice” to chain someone (or yourself) in a basement and starve them to death for the simple reason that this is not an action of freedom but against freedom.

In the case of the LGBTQ(P) movement, its is much the same; it is not an act of freedom of expression to be under the impression that a man can substitute a women in an intimate context because it is by nature an exercise of ignorance and confusion.

This is a huge problem in the US at this time, and much of the rest of the world has conformed to the derangement that sexual deviance is a right. It is NOT Constitutionally guaranteed in any nation; its very nature is to destroy ‘constitution’: a person’s physical state with regard to vitality, health, and strength.

And that bizarre power of ignorance comes in; it is a selfishness whereby some have chosen to focus on themselves so heavily they cannot see the harm they are doing to others.

I beg you to reconsider.

God bless you all.