Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Why Do People Keep Supporting Obama?

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


         

The Man of Many Faces

Someone asked the question: Why are people going to vote for Obama again?  The answer is simple: It is because they are a herd of sheeple who love entitlements and the nanny state.

That is the same reason why most of the Repugnants will be voting for Gingrich—the Repugnant version of Obama!  Gingrich is pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes—sheeple wool, that is.  Like Obama, Newt is a narcissist, orator, all talk but no constructive action, and a divider (his own record of accomplishment proves that while in Congress as the Speaker of the House in the 1990s where both sides of the aisle hated his guts so much that they ran him out of Congress).  Additionally, Newt is a pseudo-conservative, supports some liberal causes, a proven adulterer, lobbied for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae for 1.6 millions of dollars, and desires amnesty for illegal aliens.  Go figure!

However, the thing that slays me the most is with pure constitutional conservatives in the mix (such as Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann), why have the evangelical religious right and the Tea Partiers migrated to Gingrich?  That is something hard to believe.  Obviously, they do not think either Santorum or Bachmann can win but Gingrich can.  The Demonrats just love to have Newt as Obama’s competition in the general election because Newt has tons of skeletons in the closet and a ton of baggage on his back.

The other two remaining candidates are Rick Perry and Ron Paul.  However, Rick Perry is just another Newt Gingrich.  He was a Democrat about a decade ago and served as Al Gorlioni’s campaign manager for president!  He also shot himself in the foot by giving illegal aliens free college educations with free in-state tuition in Texas.  Ron Paul is a Libertarian who should run as a Libertarian.  However, he cannot win as a Libertarian, and that is why he is running as a Repugnant.  Furthermore, his foreign policy stinks.  Statistically, Ron Paul is an outlier.

###




Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 23 comments
    • desertspeaks

      i’d rather have myself lobotomized than vote for newt and I suspect that’s what most of those who will vote for newt have already had done.. that’s the only way he’ll get votes.

      VOTE RON PAUL!!!!

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      Ron Paul is an out-and-out outlier.

    • desertspeaks

      You BOB have obviously failed to learn from history.. If you take time to peruse some history, you will find that the socialist generally murder professors/Phd’s* when they finalize their power.
      *see china, cuba, n. korea, russia, et al; You see bob, they “the socialists/communists” see Phd’s as a potential future danger. So rather than leave you to your own devices in the future, it’s just easier to have their minions exterminate you in the beginning.
      They eat their own bob!! you really should study history!

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      Hi Desertspeaks, I have and do study history. It is presumptuous of you to say that I “have obviously failed to learn from history.” It was philosopher, essayist, poet, and novelist George Santayana who said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” I totally subscribe to that statement regarding history.

      If Ron Paul becomes the Repugnant standard-bearer against Obama, I will certainly vote for Paul. All of the Repugnant candidates are an order of magnitude better than the current usurper in the White House. It is just that I don’t think Paul is the best of the current Repugnant candidates. I don’t like Paul’s foreign policy ideas, and I am certainly not a fan of Libertarianism.

      I hope you will allow me the right to select and support the Repugnant candidate that I like best. I am totally against the Marxist-socialist currently residing in the White House. I am also against China, Cuba, North Korea, Russia et al. I am a “strict constructionist” Constitutional Conservative. Hence, since I am not for socialists/communists, I do not need to worry about them eating their own (i.e., me) because I am not one of them.

      What I am concerned about, however, is if I do not support the candidate who you want to win that I would be eaten by you folks just because I desire to support another of the Repugnant candidates. If you do not allow me my freedom of choice and freedom of speech, then I must worry about you folks and not those I am vehemently against that are currently running the country.

      Think about it. Even good guys can become bad guys if we do not keep them towing the line. In other words, Libertarians can win and take over the country. However, if they do not allow people their basic rights, then they become the enemy. Therefore, I respect your right to have your strong feelings, but it is also my right to have my own strong feelings that are different than yours. All I ask for is mutual respect.

      It is through sad experience that when anyone acquires a little authority, as he thinks, he immediately begins to exercise unrighteous dominion. In that case, Pogo is right when he said, “We have met the enemy, and the enemy is us.” I am not so much concerned about socialists/communists in the countries you mentioned killing professors/PhDs as I am about “the enemy within” the USA killing professors/PhDs.

      So, my friend, desertspeaks, if you don’t know what “outlier” means, look it up in the dictionary. It is not a bad or derogatory word describing Ron Paul. It just says that he is not the typical Repugnant but is a statistical outlier. He should run as a Libertarian presidential candidate in the Libertarian Party, not the Repugnant Party.

      I prefer to be left to my own devices in the future. Since we are presently on the same side, I am concerned about you folks (minions) exterminating me in the beginning just because of my political position, which to not fully coincide with yours. What you are telling me is that you people will eat your own, i.e., me. I think it is you who should study history.

      It is “the enemy within” that we need to watch out for. Today, the enemy within are those who are running our country. Tomorrow, the enemy within could be people who speak like you are speaking to me. So, everything is relative. A friend today may become my enemy tomorrow. Think about what you wrote above. Hearing it from my vantage point is scary because of your veiled threat. Think about what you wrote.

    • desertspeaks

      from your initial article, it’s not clear who you support.. What is clear is your verbal assault on the “repugnants”.. Now having said that, yes you are entitled to support and vote for whomever you choose, even if you are wrong.
      as for “my folks” eating you?.. you were so busy waxing eloquently and thumbing through your thesaurus, you missed “who precisely” would eat you. It most certainly would not be “my folks”. They would be the liberal/socialist/communist/marxist folk, you know, those who you allude to later. You allegedly have a Phd, I presumed you’d be able to pick up on that. My apologies.. I’ll type slower next time. Although I did sort of hint as to whom would be eating whom.. You must have missed the part where I specifically mention SOCIALISTS/COMMUNISTS, BOB!
      Your sense of self is over inflated good sir. If you somehow read into what I posted as a threat, perhaps you’re not quite as smart at that piece of paper on the wall purports you to be. You should inquire with the university that you graduated from and ask for a refund.
      You were so busy trying to persuade “someone” how smart you are that you came off looking like an idiot.. good try though bob!

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      I see you take great pride in personal assaults. If that’s the way you attempt to win debates, you use the same tactics that those progressives who apply Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.” I am glad to see that you are so well educated and possess such a high IQ that you can make the judgments that you do. The most scary thing about you is that we are supposedly on the same side of the political spectrum. However, your politics of personal destruction is scary to say the least. I yield to your brilliance. When people run out of logical arguments, they revert to namecalling, insults, denigrating one’s intelligence, and put-downs–just as you have done above. You are very expert at these tactics. You are a typical, fanatical Ron Paul supporter. There is no way I can match your ability to discuss matters. BTW, I do not use a thesaurus.

    • desertspeaks

      What name “in your mind” did I call you?? again you miss the point..
      You should stop posting, if you are going to continually read things that are not there.
      As for the attacks, I see you’ve learned to use them subtly yourself.. well done! or didn’t you know you did that??
      As for denigrating your intelligence? I’m just pointing out what you provided.
      Fanatical Ron Paul supporter? Not so much.. but given the options currently available and Mr. Paul’s staunch adherence to the Constitution. He would be the obvious choice, even though he is so “repugnant” to you.
      Hmm calling someone repugnant, isn’t that name calling?? and by your definition, something Saul Alinsky would do??
      Not so easy to throw stones when someone points you out is it??
      Now stop calling names, be a human being, be a forthright stand up person without insulting ANYONE.. and we’ll get along just fine..
      If you scroll back to your initial article, you started the name calling.. i presume you can scroll back and read what it is you typed, yes?? i’ll refer you to calling people repugnants, in the event you can’t scroll back.
      On that note, have a nice day :P

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      Your “reflecting” is a Saul Alinsky tactic, which you are very good at doing. You must be a very unhappy, angry man. I feel very sorry for you. I will have a nice day, but I don’t think you will.

    • desertspeaks

      Bob bob bob, its not reflecting, its OBSERVATION and if you don’t like hearing the truth of what it is you do.. stop doing it!
      I did notice you didn’t refute my observations about your alinsky leanings though BOB!
      Why is that??
      Just speculation as to my mindset? again I question the supposed Phd you like to mention. I refer you to your beforeitsnews ID “By Bob Uda, PhD (ABD), UPI”.. It’s almost like you have the degree but didn’t do the work yourself bob. Not unlike Obama!
      Poor Bob, while you enjoy throwing your saul alinsky attacks at people, it seems as though you don’t like it when people point out your saul alinsky traits.. again you cast aspersions bob, that’s very saul alinsky like,.. GOOD JOB BOB!
      You’ve read alinsky so often now, you’ve incorporated him into your mindset. Sadly bob, you FAIL to recognize in yourself what “your mind” see’s in others.
      You probably won’t take that on either bob, but you feign superiority and call names, be it repugnant or alinsky, you continuously do what you accuse others of doing. Alas bob you are blind to your own FAILINGS! why is that bob? you tell me why you aren’t guilty of what you accuse me of?? remember bob, you’re the one with the Phd and I’m just a lowly mechanic so you SHOULD have an answer BOB!

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      You are so ignorant, you don’t even know what ABD stands for. You need to get educated. Look it up, ideeeot!

    • desertspeaks

      all of that, and ADB is the only thing you pick out?? and I’m the ideeeot??? AGAIN I NOTICE YOU COMPLETELY DISREGARD MY QUESTIONS AND STOOP TO CALLING NAMES, very SAUL ALINSKY of you, YOU’VE MASTERED “probably a phd” in SAUL ALINSKY RULES FOR RADICALS BOB!! Your college’s must be so proud!
      No wonder the country is in the state its in when people “like YOU” are in charge of anything.
      Additionally bob, your selective reading “or is it some mental shill for the machine glitch?” completely ignored that I’m just a mechanic, bob.. but what “limited” education I do have, lets me see through your subterfuge!
      Oh, and yes bob I’ve taken time to read your bio, quite impressive on paper.. I do notice BOB that your history has you completely and inextricably connected to HOME LAND SECURITY , BOB!!!
      And you say you’re not a shill for the machine?? SUUUUURE you’re not!!! LOL

    • desertspeaks

      FYI after consideration and finishing answering my email etc; I undertook your advice and looked up (ABD), cuz i jus a ideeeot!
      So, it seems you haven’t done your dissertation and DO NOT have a Phd and yet you still post the Phd with a caveat? a bit misleading to the uninitiated “ideeeeots” wouldn’t you say? and rather self serving!! taking a little ego trip are we??
      Are your saul alinsky attacks on me taking up to much of your invaluable time to complete your dissertation??

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      Have you read Glenn Beck’s book titled “Arguing with Idiots”? You sound just like all of those people he writes about in his book. I don’t argue with idiots. Go get a life. Your writing is atrocious. Did you obtain your education at some dumbed-down college? Just wondering.

    • desertspeaks

      I’ve stated TWICE now that I’m a mechanic.. and you STILL think I attended a college???.. AND YOU SAY I’M THE DUMB ONE??? You’re about as observant as a corpse and nearly as useful!!
      I seriously call into question any degree you purport to have! God forbid you are an actual educator. Your students will have been CHEATED of a decent education! You FAILED MISERABLY to comprehend what is written in front of you!
      If your replies are any indication of your scholastic achievements and intellectual abilities it is a sad state of affairs indeed. As for your alleged degree’s, you certainly DID NOT do your own course work nor do you deserve to have a degree!!!!
      FURTHER:
      Again you cast aspersions and call names and make asinine statements, it’s almost as though I’m corresponding with THE saul alinsky!
      Also, I notice you REFUSE to answer my inquiries! why is that BOB???? Your SAUL ALINSKY tactics are blindingly obvious and YOU STILL DONT see it in yourself.. Do you have a mental blind spot when it comes to your own short comings bob?
      You are just a RINO bob, and since you are completely devoid of any powers adequacy, I’ll explain RINO.. “REPUBLICAN IN NAME ONLY!!!” you are just a democratic SHILL!!!!
      OH and you’re a Glenn Beck devotee! he’s a rino too bob! another shill for the machine! although I will concede Beck did step over his rino line a time or two. Sadly though bob, your ability to recall what it is you’ve read is incomprehensibly inadequate as evidenced in your pathetic little replies here.

      In closing bob, your “just wondering” closing statement, is about the only truthful statement you’ve written thus far. I’m sure you wonder about a lot of things bob. You are probably amazed that the establishment ie your employer hasn’t caught on to why a mentally challenged buffoon such as yourself is still drawing a paycheck..you surely do not deserve one!

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      Thanks for providing me with a lot of good laughs. Have you ever thought of being a comedian? BTW, Glenn Beck is a Libertarian, not a RINO. I am an un-Republican but instead am a “strict constructionist” constitutional conservative. Since I no longer claim to be a Republican, I cannot be a RINO as you so erroneously charge. The Repugnant Party left me in 2008 when they were spending money like drunken sailors.

      You are probably a good mechanic. If that is true, I would say, “Stick to being a mechanic, for that’s where you excel, not on these blogs.” Your writing ability and your ability at applying logic, however, leave a lot to be desired–not to mention your emotional outbursts.

      Do you always get so hot under the collar? You apparently need anger management training. When you attempt to remove a nut, and the wrench slips, and you hurt your finger, do you curse out loud? That’s when you need anger management. Your writing shows that you possess some obvious anger issues.

      Desertspeaks. That sounds like you live out in the Mojave Desert or the desert somewhere between Barstow and Baker, California. If so, we should get together at your local McDonald’s and have a hamburger together. I’m sure you are a very likeable guy in person. Why don’t you reveal your real name and the city/state in which you live on your next post. I have usually found that people who use a pseudonym are very brave when they hide behind a moniker such as desertspeaks. I’d like to come look you up. What say you?

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      @desertspeaks, I checked out your 22 articles since April 24, 2011. Very interesting. I’ll do some research on you.

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      @desertspeaks, you say you are a mechanic. Are you not instead a computer programmer with an interest in astronomy. You have written a couple of articles on space, so that fits in with your astronomy hobby. What say you?

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      desertspeaks
      Posted on May 2, 2011 at 2:47pm
      Not even a PEEP OUT OF GLENN concerning the orly taitz v obama trial happening today! Who’s side is glenn on again???
      You’d think the president being sued for a FALSE Social Security Number and FRAUD would be on every news worthy organization in existence! But not a word! WAG THAT DOG GLENN!!

      ————————————————–

      Looks like you are a birther, desertspeaks.

    • desertspeaks

      Birther, if you mean “a natural born citizen is someone with TWO US CITIZENS as parents being a qualification to hold the office of president”, then yes! I’m not big on usurpers and frauds! Or do you subscribe to the leftist definition bob? Wouldn’t you think something like the president being sued over such monumental issues would be news worthy bob? Why the black out by the press??? NOTE: DOJ’s attack on the Arizona sheriff but the press fails to report on that sheriff’s investigation of the presidents fraud and usurpation. The same sheriff that Six months prior to this investigation the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) had already conducted its own investigation of sheriff Arpaio’s office and not only gave it a clean bill of health, they actually gave a raving review. see article here http://daytontribune.com/ice-agency-report-puts-serious-dent-in-eric-holder%E2%80%99s-doj-case-against-sheriff-joe-arpaio/75961/
      Programmer? really bob, how many times do I have to feed this to you? I’m a mechanic! apparently you don’t think mechanics have hobbies outside of the automotive field. Very closed minded of you bob!!
      And it’s nice to see you reverted back to your ALINSKY attacks bob.. still won’t admit to it though??
      As for what beck is, he’s a SHILL first and foremost! any further conjecture is superfluous! I’d go into further detail but I feel that explaining anything more to a beck devotee would be tiresome and fruitless!
      As for political affiliations, I’ve disavowed both parties for they are the same animal.
      Yes bob I am an excellent mechanic!! I do very well thank you! To my writing abilities bob, my apologies but I wasn’t afforded an education but I get by. If you’re grading my writing abilities bob, I’ll pass because as I stated before your powers of observation leave much to be desired.
      As for anger issues bob, I’m a very well adjusted individual bob but get irked but when you infer that I’m an idiot, then yes bob I take issue. But wasn’t your post
      As for your desire to stalk me bob, sorry not interested but the desert has its perks.
      Four posts to me bob!?! are you going to start charging me rent for the room I occupy in your head now??
      Un republican, very amusing bob, so you’re democrat light?? yeah yeah I know you said libertarian.

    • desertspeaks

      and now that obama has singed ndaa into law, Have a nice life if you can! Poof, we’re all doomed!

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      You are an interesting study, desertspeaks. You seem to take offense at everything I make an assessment on. For example, I just wrote, “Looks like you are a birther, desertspeaks.” You take offense at that and write a diatribe about it. By my making that conclusion, I wasn’t being denigrating to you about it at all. It was just a conclusion I came to from what you wrote. I have nothing against birthers. In fact, I am a birther myself, so I couldn’t be saying anything negative about you just because I said it looks like you are a birther. Thus, you have anger issues that are totally unnecessary. You just need to take a statement for what it is, which is the truth. I can go on and on about everything else you said that you took issue with, but you bore me.

      What is really silly about all this is that we are on the same side yet you look at me as the enemy. Do you deal with everyone you deal with the same way by attacking them just because you have differences with them? That makes life very difficult for you to live. Do you beat your wife by chance? Remember, that is only a question, not an accusation. You should not fly off the handle on everything you are spooked about because of your weird way of interpreting statements that people make. Perhaps a little introspection would help.

      One thing I have learned while interfacing with Libertarians like you. They are rabid supporters of their hero, Ron Paul. They are also of the same personality and reactionary responders, which is exactly the approach you take in dealing with people with which you disagree. Because of that, I would not want to live under a Libertarian world. Libertarians are weird.

    • desertspeaks

      You are a failure at interpreting anything bob. You think that is some type of diatribe? As for my so called diatribe. Just my position on the subject with reference material, and you make the amazing jump to a diatribe with anger issues?? .. sigh. Now you are a pseudo psychologist, you fail at that as well bob.

      NOTE; you still have not addressed your alinsky attacks bob! Your inability to even address the issue gives one pause bob, what is it you are hiding?

      Your “do you beat your wife” inquiry is meant to do what bob? It’s a trigger question bob, to see if I would respond with some outrageous retaliatory response.
      I’ve seen the politicians/media play it very well.. you however, failed again! I suppose you learned that from your Homeland security buddies, the set up question and failure.

      Libertarian? No bob.

      I concluded that Ron Paul is the only person running worth a damn. Alas it may over before it begins.

      I bore you, and yet you took precious time away from finishing your dissertation to reply? You’ll never get rid of that Phd(ABD) caveat if you keep this up bob.
      You know bob, I figure you to be at most, a D student, just below adequate and just barely passing. I felt the need to explain that since you’re not the brightest bulb in the box when it comes to comprehension, as is so well evidenced by your prior replies.

    • Dr. Bob Uda, Ph.D., CM, CHSP, ILO

      You are obviously a genius who belongs in a category of his own. People have said that geniuses are odd people. You epitomize that claim. Perhaps you are a commie, no?

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.