RT video Will Iran Sanctions Force World to De-dollarize ?

@ 00:00 – 00:37……. BLACKLISTED by….US Treasury…… ……WILL BE…….

….ANY INDIVIDUAL or, INSTITUTION………that does business with……..

…..700 individuals, enTITie$ AND other crucial components of IRAN’$ OIL sector.

*

AND the “speculated” result MAY BE…..de-dollarization

IF………de-dollarization is a RESULT of the U.S. Treasury ACTions……..I can only assume the…….

PRIVATELY OWNED/NON-GOVERNMENT……. RAT$child & Co: owned ……..JooWi$H BANKSTER……IR$/Fed/U.S. Treasury

are LOOKING for a…….$CAPEGOAT…..on which to PIN the COLLAP$E of ….The U.S. HYGEINE WIPE dollar…..upon

*

HOW-DARE……PRIVATE “banksters”……DECLARE……SANCTIONS on IRAN….in the name of America

*

U.S. Treasury is a……..PRIVATE BusiME$$ $

*

PETITIONER ……….ISSUES WARNING TO IRS

May 5, 2018 SUPREME COURT CASE

“United States TREASURY”

As you may know, the PAYEE LISTED in EVERY IRS request or DEMAND FOR PAYMENT i$ “United States TREASURY.”

Although Congress mention “United States TREASURY” 14 times in Title 12 U.S.C. Banks and Banking, three times in Title 26 U.S.C. Internal Revenue Code, and six times in Title 31 U.S.C. Money and Finance, THERE IS NO STATUTE THAT expressly creates, establishes, or DEFINES “United States TREASURY.”

$ $ $

The CLOSEST THING to identifying how “United States Treasury” was created or what it I$ or means, is found in regulations WRITTEN by NON-OFFICER of the United States, PRIVATE-SECTOR worker SECRETARY of the TREASURY at 31 C.F.R. Money and Finance, Part 203 Payment of Federal Taxes and the Treasury Tax and Loan Program, Subpart A General Information, § 203.2 Definitions:

“TREASURY GENERAL ACCOUNT (TGA) means AN ACCOUNT MAINTAINED IN THE NAME OF the United States Treasury AT AN FRB [FEDERAL RESERVE BANK].”

$ $ $ $ $

There being NO CONGRESSIONAL STATUTE THAT creates, establishes, or DEFINES it, “United States TREASURY” appears to be A FICTITIOUS NAME CREATED by SECRETARY of the TREASURY, IN WHICH certain PRIVATE BUSINESS BANK ACCOUNTS ARE MAINTAINED FOR HIS PERSONAL USE, either directly as a signatory or by proxy (junior employee in private-sector Department of the Treasury).

$ $ $ $ $

IF this is TRUE it means that ultimately EVERY PENNY COLLECTED IN so-called INCOME TAX GOES not TO anyone in government but rather the exclusive, unilateral control of non-governmental, non-officer of the United States, PRIVATE-SECTOR WORKER Secretary of the Treasury (see 31 U.S.C. § 321(d)(1) and (2) for verification of this point).[1]

It also would mean that GOVERNMENTal United States of America would have NO CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING TO SUE any alleged taxpayer in any United States District Court FOR ALLEGED UNPAID TAXES for lack of a case or controversy between the litigants—BECAUSE THE actual PARTY IN INTEREST IS not governmental United States of America but PRIVATE-SECTOR BUSINESSMAN SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, VIA HI$ DBA and ALTER EGO “United States Treasury.”

https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2018/05/05/irs-attacks-non-judicially-petitioner-punctures-purported-authority-for-said-attack-issues-warning-to-irs/

* * *

SUPREME COURT Case

March 29th 2018

Petitioner files three new motions to dismiss for other fatal defects; US ATTORNEY SILENT FOR LAST THREE MONTHS

Following the judge’s February 5, 2018, Order referring the case to the magistrate to conduct all pretrial proceedings, PETITIONER FILED the following three separate motions TO DISMISS with prejudice (i.e., dismissal barring prosecution of any later suit based on the same claim), each with its own particular reason:

1. THE COURT LACKS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Every act of every government officer, state or federal, must be authorized by at least one provision of the Constitution;
………….

……there is no provision of the Constitution that gives the Court the capacity to take jurisdiction or enter an order against Petitioner in Harris County, Texas.

The Court (and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE) is OPERATING in Harris County, Texas, WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.

…..there is nothing that the US ATTORNEY could have said in opposition without incriminating himself.

2. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE A PRIVATE-SECTOR BUSINESS WITH NO AUTHORITY OVER PETITIONER

Petitioner on February 27, 2018, filed an amended motion to dismiss with prejudice which asserts that, because…….. …
NEITHER the $O-CALLED SECRETARY of the TREASURY NOR HIS UNDERLING, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, IS A COMMISSIONED OFFICER OF The UNITED STATES: (a) NEITHER IS A GOVERNMENT OFFICER, (b) BOTH ARE PRIVATE-SECTOR WORKERS, (c) the ORGANIZATION OVER WHICH EACH ADMINISTERS and which issued the subject IRS administrative summons, i.e., IRS, IS NOT PART OF THE GOVERNMENT, (d) IRS is a private-sector organization (business), (e) the only cause of action a private-sector business such as IRS could bring against Petitioner is for breach of contract, (e) there is no evidence of any contract between IRS and Petitioner, and, therefore (f) the government’s case must be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

……..

Every justice and judge of the United States and every United States attorney knows that the Internal Revenue Service is part of the PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE.

To provide evidence that IRS is not part of government, PETITIONER on March 1, 2018, served United States Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson (custodian of the Great Seal of the United States) with two subpoenas COMMANDING his PRODUCTION, at 10:00 A.M. on March 22, 2018, OF THE COMMISSION AS AN OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES, in effect as of May 30, 2017 (date IRS administrative summons was served on Petitioner)—bearing the signature of the President of the United States and Great Seal of the United States—OF (1) CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY Steven Terner MNUCHIN, and (2) former Commissioner of Internal Revenue John Andrew Koskinen.

The 10:00 A.M. March 22, 2018, DEADLINE CAME AND WENT, with no word from Secretary of State Tillerson.

NO COMMISSION, AS AN OFFICER OF the UNITED STATES, EXISTS FOR EITHER MAN because EACH IS A PRIVATE-SECTOR BUSINESSMAN. $ $ $

Because Secretary of State Tillerson failed to obey the subpoenas for production of documents, Petitioner on the afternoon of the same day, March 22, 2018, filed a motion to compel compliance with Subpoenas for the production of documents, and request for an order to show cause why non-party Rex W. Tillerson should not be held in contempt and submitted a proposed Order for the judge to sign.

Secretary of State Tillerson can avoid a contempt citation simply by providing Petitioner with written certification that there is no document in his custody responsive to either of the subpoenas.

3. IRS NOT PART OF “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”—WHO HAS COMMITTED FRAUD ON THE COURT

“FRAUD on the court” is defined as follows:

“fraud on the court. A lawyer’s or party’s misconduct in a judicial proceeding so serious that it undermines or is intended to undermine the integrity of the proceeding, ● Examples are bribery of a juror and introduction of fabricated evidence.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Bryan A. Garner, ed. in chief (St. Paul, Minn.: West Group, 1999), p. 671.

The instant petition represents by inference that INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is part of alleged “United States of America.”

Being an organization whose SENIOR EXECUTIVE I$ A NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS MAN, IRS CANNOT BE PART OF ANY GOVERNMENT —either the alleged “United States of America” (MORIBUND SINCE June 30, 1864, 13 Stat. 223, 306, sec. 182 ) or District of Columbia, a municipal corporation (16 Stat 419).

Whereas, ONLY A DULY COMMISSIONED OFFICER OF THE UNITED STATES CAN ADMINISTER OVER A GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION, Internal Revenue Service cannot be part of government and alleged “United States of America” has made a FAL$E REPRESENTATION and COMMITTED FRAUD on the court.

Because alleged “UNITED STATES of AMERICA” HA$ NO right to title or OWNERSHIP OF any alleged claim of A PRIVATE BUSINESS (IRS), alleged “United States of America” has failed to state a claim (of its own) upon which relief can be granted.

All the above MONKEY BU$INE$$ is evidence of UNCLEAN HANDS on the part of alleged “United States of AMERICA,” a factor which, according to the rules of equity, deprives alleged “United States of America” of relief in this or any other such forum.
………….

https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/petitioner-files-three-new-motions-to-dismiss-for-other-fatal-defects-us-attorney-silent-for-last-three-months/

*
UPDATED…..

US ATTORNEY IGNORES all HIS MATERIAL FAILURES and asks for a contempt Order; Petitioner responds

June 8, 2018……….

United States of AMERICA’$ FRAUD ON the COURT (MISREPRESENTATION THAT non-governmental PRIVATE-SECTOR Internal Revenue Service I$ PART of UNITED STATES of AMERICA ) and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Document 36); and

The next day, June 6, 2018, PETITIONER FILED AN OBJECTION…FOR SUBSTITUTION of THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST—PRIVATE- SECTOR BUSINESSMAN SECRETARY OF the TREASURY, a.k.a. and DBA “United States Treasury”—for ALLEGED PETITIONER United States of America.

The day after that, June 7, 2018, PETITIONER DEMANDED DISCLOSURE OF WHETHER REAL-PARTY IN INTEREST SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY I$…..
(a) A GOVERNMENT OFFICER seeking to enforce GOVERNMENT LAWS…….OR
(b) A PRIVATE-SECTOR BUSINESSMAN…SEEKING TO ENFORCE the terms of $OME PRIVATE CONTRACT;
the motion docket date (date by which any response from United States of America is due) of which is June 28, 2018.

https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2018/06/08/us-attorney-ignores-all-his-material-failures-and-asks-for-a-contempt-order-petitioner-responds/

* * *

https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com

* * *

@ 00:50 Mike (Pinocchio) Pompei

“….OUR OBJECTIVE is to starve the Iranian “REGIME” of the revenue it uses to FUND VIOLENT & DESTABILIZING

ACTIVITIES….THROUGHOUT the Middle East and indeed, AROUND the WORLD…..”

*

“…OUR objective…….”

I$ that a reference to the………PRIVATE bank$ter ZIONI$T famiLIE$…….who OWN the TREASURY/Fed/IR$

You must be insane, Trump has a Rothschild in his cabinet that he appointed!