Assange Accuser CIA Operative

By:  Joseph Zrnchik

Please Distribute Freely

In August of 2010, Assange was invited to Stockholm to speak to a group of people after being invited by Sweden’s Social Democratic Party.  The event organizer was in fact 31-year-old Anna Ardin who serves as the press secretary of the Brotherhood Movement. This group is an offshoot fragment of the Social Democratic Party. Ardin, a  devote feminist, leftist and animal rights activist, previously worked at the Uppsala University as the “Sexual Equality Officer” and dealt with feminist issues for the students’ union. She is also deeply connected to U.S. funded anti-Castro groups.  It is her ties with these groups and her work in the U.S. that is behind the internet being bombarded with speculations regarding her connections to the CIA.  But, we all know the CIA would never engage in trying to discredit its opponents by stealing credit cards, passwords to computers, or planting some pubic hair, nor would they ever keep contact with or try to influence through money, bribes, or coercion for having provided past information for bribes, any political insiders who would be a secretary for a nation’s political party structure they were seeking to ensure remained in Afghanistan.  The CIA just does not do that type of work. Ha!  One can see that the Wikileaks documents show the CIA has Arab leaders and politicians as spies on their payroll, so why wouldn’t they have politicians from Western European nations on their payroll?  Once you take a bride, the CIA has you in their pocket and will keep using you as an asset regardless of the consequences to you.  This is how intelligence agencies work.  As Europe does not have any ban on traveling to Cuba, she went to Cuba and ended up getting herself expelled for what Cuban authorities described as “subversive activities.”

Nevertheless, Arden told Assange on August 11th  he could stay at her apartment as she would be out of town for three days prior to Assange giving his speech (a perfect time to meet with CIA handlers), but she suddenly returns a day early, on a Friday.  Assange offers to leave since she returned early, but she refuses his offer and then they go out to eat.  Upon their return, she admittedly decides to have consensual sex with Assange the day before he is to speak at the event.  During sex, Arden claims Assange purposely broke the condom while continuing in the sex act. 

The next day Assange gives his speech that Ardin helped arrange and Ardin introduces Assange to Sofia Wilen.  Sofia Wilen tried to meet Assange on her own, but when that fails Ardin takes Wilen and introduces him to Assange and says the two should get to know each other.  Wilen is on internet video sitting in the front row at of Assange’s speaking engagement.  It is later discovered that Sofia Wilen is also the young protégé of Ardin and their connection is well established, going back to Ardin’s days as the Uppsala University’s “Sexual Equality Officer”.     

Wilen and Assange hit it off quite well after being introduced by Arden at the speaking engagement as Wilen is about ten years younger than Arden.  The pair depart the speaking engagement together where Assange leaves Ardin.  Assange and Wilen end up going to a movie.  Assange then leaves Wilen at the theater to go back to a party that Ardin was throwing later that night in his honor.  Probably the first time in history a victim had thrown a party for her rapist. Assange tells Wilen he will keep in touch and meet her later, as he is very interested in her.  He then goes to the party and Arden gives him the royal treatment.  During the party Wilen and Assange are Twittering each other.  He later meets up with Wilen and they go out to eat and then she promises to buy Assange’s train ticket for his departure.  They stop at her house to get the money and  admittedly have repeated consensual sex prior to his leaving.  But, during the second round of intercourse Assange rolls over on her and allegedly begins having sex without a condom, which she admittedly goes along with but is angry at Assange for endangering her with the chance of a sexually transmitted disease or pregnancy.  She continues to let him stay there and has sex with him again. 

She then gives him ride, buys him food and pays for his departing train ticket.  Meanwhile, Ardin and Wilen are Twittering each other and others bragging about their sexual conquest of Assange.  Neither says anything negative, but then both meet and begin talking.  All of this sex stuff starts on the 12^th, but the allegations are not taken to the police until August 20^th. 

A temporary prosecutor issues a warrant on the allegations, but upon review of the superior, the rape charges are withdrawn.  Ardin and Wilen, not being a pair that will let Assange’s indiscretions, inconsiderate behavior and chauvinistic ways go unpunished, then get a high-profile attorney from the Socialist Democrats’ party who also happens to be an individual who is writing and pushing for the passage of feminist legislation.  

 Assange’s lawyers have been quoted as saying: “The exact content of Wilen’s mobile phone texts is not yet known but their bragging and exculpatory character has been confirmed by Swedish prosecutors. Neither Wilen’s nor Ardin’s texts complain of rape.”

The two women can be seen in the video of the conference that was on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWh1Mk2_GVg. At 2:00 am, while still hosting the party in Assange’s honor at her home, Ardin tweeted: “Sitting outside; nearly freezing; with the world’s coolest people; it’s pretty amazing.”

After going to police on August 20, she deleted the tweet not knowing it was recorded elsewhere. The post was deleted from annaardin.bloggy.se and twitter.com/annaardin but now can still be seen on a cached site at http://www.samtycke.nu/doc/AnnaArdin_cache19aug.htm.

After sex with Assange on the morning of August 17, Wilen left to buy and then cook breakfast for Assange before having sex with him again and then taking him to the train station where she paid for his ticket.

On August 18, Wilen called up Ardin and told her that she had unprotected sex with Assange. She said she was upset he didn’t use a condom and was afraid she might have contracted an STD or become pregnant. This is when Ardin discovers the nefarious deed of Assange having sex with her protégé.  After compairing notes both women march off in lockstep to the police to filed charges against Assange on August 20th.

But, the establishment media and government officials, or do I repeat myself, want people to believe a professional and activist is a predator and serial rapist that went on sexual rampage.  Is it more likely true that Assange is a monster or that the CIA has some involvement with a political operative?  If I were a Socialist Democrat, I would be careful around both Ardin and Wilen if there was something I did not want the CIA to know.

This nonsense is going to make Sweden and its justice system look like a joke.  It certainly trivializes the offense of rape.  But, it does more than that.  It also demonstrates how the elites manipulate the criminal justice system to be abusive, selective, and unjust.  The authorities initially refused bail and were keeping Assange in solitary confinement.  Does anyone think this type of injustice would be inflicted any anyone else given the exculpatory information and other evidence that shows this is a setup, an abuse of justice and a political prosecution.  Imagine if the truth came out and it ended up being a CIA trap involving conspiracy.  The fact is that those who oppose Assange would then say he deserved what happened and they will do a better job to get him next time.   You see, those who oppose Assange want government lawlessness  and engaging in government lawlessness to maintain government lawlessness is a good investment because the execution of such a plan is nothing more than doubling down on your first bet against a sucker who does not know the big bets involve marked cards from a stacked deck in a rigged game. 

In the end we will find out that Assange had sex with Anna Ardin,  a sexually promiscuous radical feminist who had every intention of screwing him literally and then screwing him legally.  Her claim that a condom broke during sex is an international legal farce.  I am sure this was the only time in history an international manhunt involving Interpol was ever conducted over a broken condom.  The next lady, Sofia Wilen, a friend of Ardin, claims he rolled over on her and started have sex, but yet she had sex with Assange before and after her alleged “rape” by him.  This whole affair is contrived whereby a romantic dalliance, of the type for which Europeans pride themselves in their sexual sophistication, is turned into the Big Bad Wolf sexually mauling the chaste and pure Little Red Riding Hood and her grandmother.  In my opinion, if you are so base in your sexual mores that you offer your vagina to a stranger in sex as casual as a handshake, then you can not act as if your vagina is the Holiest of Holies when someone mistakes you’re your willingness to engage in casual passionate eroticism as being anything more than a handshake.  This is especially true if you has demonstrated sexually willingness during a prolonged and repeated casual sexual encounter that would tend to foster sexual spontaneity. 

If a male had sex with a lady who then later decided to fondle him in a sexually enticing way, would she then be guilty of sexual molestation?  And, if for sake of argument you say yes, then how many police do you think would arrest and prosecutors prosecute such an incident, let alone issue a warrant for an international manhunt to Interpol whereby the “perpetrator” is kept in solitary confinement, denied bail and finally released under house arrest and subject to international extradition, redition, torture and probably murder.  This is a case of absolute legal lawlessness on an international scale.