Environmentalist Calls for Nuclear War

Radicalized Democrats want to cripple the economy and impose socialism with their Green New Deal. But that isn’t the last word in environmentalist radicalism. Global warming true believer Samuel Miller-McDonald is calling for a nuclear war in the name of the global warming hoax.

Brace yourself. Staring into an abyss of absolute insanity can be jarring:

A six-degree increase risks killing most life on earth, as global warming did during the Late Permian when volcanoes burned a bunch of fossilized carbon (e.g., coal, oil, and gas). Called the Great Dying, that event was, according to New York Magazine, “The most notorious [extinction event…]; it began when carbon warmed the planet by five degrees, accelerated when that warming triggered the release of methane in the Arctic, and ended with 97 percent of all life on Earth dead.”

When I was a little kid crawling around on the rug with brightly colored plastic dinosaurs, I knew that the earth was once much warmer than it is now, and that there was an abundance of exotic life that was killed off when the climate turned cold. I guess they don’t teach that stuff in kindergarten anymore. Even so, common sense demonstrates that a warmer climate makes for more life, not less. Where is life more abundant, at the equator or the pole?

Like warmth, carbon dioxide also makes for more life. The more CO2, the more plant growth. The more plant growth, the more food for people and animals alike.

Yet envirojacobins will do anything to restrict the CO2 emissions that accompany literally all human activity — and I do mean anything.

Human civilization will not grind to a stop just because left-wing fanatics imagine carbon to be bad. Therefore, a wrench must be thrown in to clog the gears.

One wrench that could slow climate disruption may be a large-scale conflict that halts the global economy, destroys fossil fuel infrastructure, and throws particulates in the air. At this point, with insane people like Trump, Putin, Xi, May, and Macron leading the world’s biggest nuclear powers, large-scale conflagration between them would probably lead to a nuclear exchange.

World leaders are all insane, unlike Miller-McDonald, who after stating that “Nobody wants nuclear war” goes on to explain why we should have a nuclear war.

An exchange that shuts down the global economy but stops short of human extinction may be the only blade realistically likely to cut the carbon knot we’re trapped within. It would decimate existing infrastructures, providing an opportunity to build new energy infrastructure and intervene in the current investments and subsidies keeping fossil fuels alive.

If civilization survives, we will rebuild without fossil fuels — at least in M-M’s cheesy fantasies.

[A] nuclear exchange could … provide justification for nationalizing energy industries with the interest of shuttering fossil fuel plants and transitioning to renewables … [a]nd it may toss particulates into the atmosphere sufficient to block out some of the solar heat helping to drive global warming. … [N]uclear war could be a rational course of action.

That blocking out of the sun used to be known as nuclear winter, which really would reduce life on earth. But Double-M dismisses nuclear winter as a threat because it “is based on shaky science” — unlike anthropogenic global warming, which is based on models that often turn out to be wrong, but which liberals feel in their hearts to be true.

Congratulations, Samuel Double-M. Power Line has awarded you a Green Weenie Award.

The laughs will stop when people this malevolently insane take control of the government. Already, they largely control the Democrat Party.

On a tip from 1-Bodhisattva.

The post Environmentalist Calls for Nuclear War appeared first on Moonbattery.