Dial M For Muslim

If we can all take a step back for a moment and look at the cultural divide that has now become more vocal, I would hope that we can set aside our fears and anger for just a moment and take the time to look at what is happening around us. Perhaps we can now see there is a vast conspiracy of well crafted sabotage and destabilization being used to topple the foundation of the United States.

This conspiracy probably will not be acknowledged because of the chaos and division the country is experiencing in this moment of time.

I know that the word “conspiracy” is a magic word for some people. There are so-called critical thinkers that reject the idea there is a conspiracy afoot to destroy this country and of course there are others who suspect the Jews, the bankers, the Jesuits, the Masons, and the Illuminati as being the perpetrators of such a clandestine plan.

Now, we are also entertaining the idea of an Islamic conspiracy that is waiting in the wings to take over and impose Sharia Law.

We have indicated in past programs the conspiracy to bring down this country and its constitutional republic can be compared to an octopus or a Hydra where the tentacles reach from one head or possible “Synarchy” and includes many of the so-called accomplices that were previously mentioned.

On the subject of destabilization or sabotage, we can look back in both random history and conspiracy history and find that there have been coups, assassinations, proxy wars, armed rebel groups, and even false flags that have triggered wars both civil and worldwide.

We are now at a point in history where there are wars and rumors of wars and actions that indicate there is a war in process.

The reason I say this is because we are now seeing that the rule of law and the constitution are now being ignored for a fast solution to social and cultural divides.

During the United States Civil War, there was a maxim that was adopted by the North that said, “In times of war the laws fall silent.”

At that time in history, many cherished laws and safeguards of personal liberty did fall silent.

Whenever our country has gone to war, some infringement on civil liberties have occurred. Internment camps were set up after Pearl Harbor during the invasion scare. Several thousand Italian-Americans and eleven thousand German-Americans were interned during the war, but these were individuals who were picked up because investigations indicated that they could be a domestic threat.

The west coast Japanese were simply scooped up with no individual investigations. J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI, opposed the internment of the Japanese, regarding it as completely unnecessary, but his views sadly were ignored. About 120,000 Japanese -Americans were interned during the war, the vast majority loyal Americans.

On November 20, Donald Trump told an NBC News reporter that he would “certainly” implement a system to register and track Muslims in the United States ironically on December 7th Pearl harbor day , he proposed a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,”including Muslim-American citizens.

Trump was accused of wanting to reproduce discriminatory policies like those of pre-war Europe, when Jews were forcibly registered. It also reminds us of the dangerous slope that happened after Pearl Harbor.

While this is not an endorsement for Trump, I have to say that what he was proposing is to be expected. With the timeline of events that happened before these proposals and the San Bernardino terror event it is obvious that the other presidential hopefuls that are accusing Trump of being a bigot are doing so because they want to pretend that they are taking a “higher ground” approach.

Trump is now up in the poles and the media is wondering how this is happening.

It is obvious why.

Trump is merely indulging a sentiment that was already widespread.

The Trump commentary about Muslim refugees has now been decried, analyzed and scrutinized on every news cast and every major network. It even has spawned some Republicans to demand that he withdraw from the Presidential race.

He has even been compared to Hitler.

However, we must look closely as to how the other presidential hopefuls “higher ground” option is just an obnoxious attempt at dirty politics.

Both Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz had, weeks earlier, called for accepting refugees from Syria only if they are Christian — thus effectively banning Syrian refugees who are Muslim.

The distinction between their Muslim-banning plan and Trump’s is really nonexistent.
So why is it that Trump’s comments drew widespread outrage?

Is it because we are seeing a spin provided by the media that feigns political correctness in the face of extreme intolerance of radical Islam in this country?

Could it be that the media is about to cave in and indulge in accusations of open anti-Muslim prejudice in order to add fuel to a culture war that has already begun?

The proposal to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees has now created an emotional and in some cases hostile arguments between the political left and right. As I have said many times the debate about this issue is primarily about confirmation bias which considerably furthers the misconceptions that media likes to create to aggravate the public and provokes an air of anger, frustration and fear.

While these issues should be delicately balanced with the logic recourse of vetting refugees in order to prevent the arrival of “refujihadis.”

Those who say they are progressives continually remind us that they are “humanitarians” because they believe that President Obama is right to invite these refugees into the U.S., where they will be resettled at taxpayer expense.

They keep referring to those who are reticent about the refugee proposal as xenophobes.

The harsh rhetoric brought on by the “let them in” crowd seems to make them feel good about themselves.

This passes as an attribute of high morality in their opinion.

All this has done is attracted bullying, moralizing fanatics, whose identity and livelihood depend upon growth and expansion of their particular kind of victimization.

Everyone now is a victim or is offended at everything and huge leaps of logic are being lodged at people who want to play it safe. There is something to be said about the old idiom, “Once bitten twice shy.”

Equally there are ignorant leaps of logic that are being lodged at people who say that there is a difference between Islam and the Islamic state. People forget that President George W. Bush said the Islam is a religion of peace and cautioned that it would be wrong to say that all Muslims are a threat to this country.

It is imperative that we understand something about the basic traditions of Islam so that we can establish the historical and principled differences between Islam as it is practiced by the vast majority of Muslims worldwide and the ideas and tactics of the Islamic radicals that advocate terrorism.

The sad thing is that it won’t be done by average Americans because we have normalized the idea that they are the enemy, that they are all Middle Eastern and that their Quran is the basis for a violent and satanic religion.

The Islamic extremists have now gained some legitimization as a byproduct of traditional Islam. This can be compared to the idea that fundamentalist Mormons who practice polygamy are a byproduct of traditional Mormonism. The fundamentalist Mormons get attention because the polygamist Mormons have been in the news and have been associated with gun crimes, domestic violence and pedophilia.

Traditional Mormons do not practice polygamy; however there are still people today who believe they do. Mormons worship Jesus Christ and use the bible as the word of god; Fundamentalist Christians say that the LDS usage of the book of Mormon as divinely inspired scripture revokes this and is considered a blasphemous work by a false prophet.

Traditional Mormons are successful, peaceful, and are hardworking individuals. They are also mostly conservative and preach American moral values.

However, it is now a hard sell for people who say that Islam is a religion of peace. There are at least 1.5 billion Muslims in the world. It has been said if they wanted to kill every non believer they would be able to with sheer numbers alone.

It is said that radical Islam makes up only 1% of the Muslim population – don’t let the 1% fool you because 1% of 1.5 billion is 15 million. That is a sizeable amount of people who allegedly hate you. In comparison there are about 8.9 million people in New York. So with these numbers can we logically say that all of the Muslims wish to kill us all?

The trouble here is that the 15 million hide amongst the 1.5 billion.

But wouldn’t it be logical to assume that these 15 million loud and violent people committing heinous acts could be apostates? As for other Muslims not rebuking them for their actions, when was the last time you heard of a major religion rebuking one of their members for committing a crime?

Some people claim that the Catholic church does not satisfactorily rebuke pedophilic priests. And that the Pope is still trying to avoid responsibility.

Once again this is yet another sick byproduct of major religion that continues, and you wouldn’t say that all Catholics or that all priests are pedophiles.

No matter what I am saying – there will still be many people who will think that I am defending evil by trying to ease a bit of the trouble and anger that has been seen as pervasive.

America’s climate of anti-Muslim hatred and fear, appears to be rampaging out of control. And it has very real and legitimately scary implications for the millions of Americans who follow Islam.

However, the fear and anger is legitimate and expected, to dismiss it as just Islamophobia is based in ignorance. We must look into ourselves and ask just how angry are we? How far will we go to eliminate the anger? What course should the government take to reduce the violence and what can Muslim groups do to stop the apostate byproduct of what they call their religion of peace?

This climate of anger, fear and misunderstanding will continue to get worse until American society can recognize this problem and begin to honestly address it — even if it is uncomfortable, even if many of us struggle to look past skin color headscarves and prayer rugs to see human beings that bleed like we do.

We know that ISIS has been brutal and have committed crimes against humanity, but must we continue to punish all Muslims for the actions of these bloodthirsty degenerates?

Bigotry, prejudice and scapegoating, like most social pathologies, is an irrational social force that is dragging us into an abyss. We now normalize the unthinkable.

It can easily be defined as a political malevolence fomented by a far-reaching conspiracy of cultural terrorists. There is no coup or overreaching surveillance program or false flag event that can remedy what is happening.

We can’t let the hateful subcultures and the media shape our collective perception of who or what the enemy is.

You cannot help but question the objectivity and motive of a government that is known for its ability to destabilize other countries to further their ambitions of empire building.

What makes us think that their ambitions for global oligarchy wouldn’t include creating a way by which every citizen would turn on each other and create a civil war remedied by a paramilitary death squad?

As we shall soon see, one needn’t stockpile weapons or espouse reactionary beliefs to fall under the watchful eye of a government that is contributing to the fall of a once thriving and efficient constitutional republic.

Text – Check out Ground Zero Radio with Clyde Lewis Live Nightly @ http://www.groundzeromedia.org