Presidential Primates: How You Will Evolve Into An Unperson

As I was searching the internet for any and all information about Batman v Superman that will be opening in theaters soon, I stumbled upon a cool video find. It was a behind the scenes look at a new Planet of the Apes film called, “War for the Planet of the Apes” due in theaters next summer. I was thrilled as I was a bit alarmed. I realized that while I am a big fan of the old and the new Planet of the Apes and that I eagerly await the new film, I am also reminded how the Apes films are reflective of the times and serve as a bit of predictive programming in a sense of at least good commentary on the current human condition. The idea that yet another film I want to see has war in the title like, Captain America: Civil War, I am beginning to wonder if it is a foreshadowing of things to come.

When I was kid, Planet of the Apes films illustrated a very interesting variant in social studies, politics and civics. The films were science fiction allegories with a parapolitical undertone.

From the old simian epics to the ape films of today, we observe they are timeless because we learn there is not much difference between mankind and its war-like attitude and the beastly apes that learn they are not immune to destroying their peaceful world by conducting a controlled demolition of their government.

The ape’s society is structured much like ours – the politicians – the stately orangutans – control society through their position as holders of the faith. Their interpretation of the sacred scrolls narrates a misplaced, mythical history of the apes. It is only interpreted by the high council. There are few who know the ape history and can quote it accurately.

The Orangutans are the judiciary, the ruling elite controlling the minds of the masses, decreeing what is right and wrong, and one can argue, somewhat wisely, keeping humans at an arm’s length as the slaves of society. They are also the only “group” who knows the truth of what really happened in the past – a secret carefully guarded for the good of the entire ape race. In it also lies the truth of man’s downfall.

Then, there is the military force, policing society. Manned entirely by the brutish, less cunning gorillas, they symbolize the brute force of society, ready to crush any dissent, rebellion or new ideas that confuse their own narrow vision and mind.

Finally, there are the chimpanzees – the forward looking, progressive thinkers, just beginning to challenge society’s norms. They are the scientists, they are fully awake, and they question authority. But, they are also a powerless minority.

Is this not civilization as we see it today?

In the modern world the same ruling elite control the minds of the masses and they are constantly there to remind us that they are the only ones that can interpret the laws fairly, disseminate information objectively and create an enemy indefinitely. The themes of racial divide and human dominance are observed by the elite and so they develop and carry out a number traumatizing events that keep humans enslaved in their own fear.

In the movie, Planet of the Apes, the dominant apes learn that dehumanizing their enemy, which in this case is man, is very efficient at reversing the power relationship. The apes can be blamed for creating the slave race, but the blame can also be placed on the humans because through fear and intimidation they willingly gave up their personal freedoms and their power.

They surrendered to the elite.

Obviously, the dystopian fantasy of apes taking on the status of abusive power hungry technocrats can be seen as a silly allegory to some, but it takes on a very serious look at human nature and how easy it is for a society to knuckle under to beasts who promise that all of our problems can be solved if we just trust the beasts, their philosophy of a war-like government which somehow will lead us into a safe and peaceful future.

It needs to be said the lawgivers and the presidential primates do not tell you that in order to achieve such peace certain individuals will have to suffer the bloody torture and abasement which of course, has its own manifest impact. The normalizing of all of this for those whom we have demoralized through propaganda is a forbidding vision.

The technocrats say this type of thinking is harmless, but what they won’t tell you is that it is efficient. It is efficient in creating the self-destructive human that justifies war and murder as he wanders aimlessly through his emotional arguments for wanting to torture and kill others that he doesn’t agree with religiously, politically and ideologically.

The beasts in power do not suggest a desire to escape the cycle of the division and war because it is not beneficial to their agenda of culling humans that they see as undesirable and unable to follow orders.

The establishment knows a little something about human nature and how people eventually become enemies unto themselves and that all it takes is a tyrannical authority figure to legislate their slavery, and all he has to do is establish a government that can exploit hatred and victimization.

George Orwell devised the word ‘unperson’ to describe someone who had so offended official thought, he or she was vaporized — not just liquidated but wiped from the record for eternity.

In that way, the unperson couldn’t set a bad example. All memory of the impertinence would be forgotten.

In 1984, Winston Smith became an unperson because he was too intelligent and free-thinking for the Authoritarian Political Party. He was a loyal member of the Party and was devoted to the revolution, but because of his passion, the Party feared he could be a dangerous foe if he ever changed his mind.

I think people deep down want to be free thinkers, but they can’t. Not with all of the peer pressure and organized propaganda that is used to breed a hive mind that creates political bigotry in the guise of political purity.

We are now in the middle of the same situation. The fact that fiction can leap from a book or a movie about hostile takeover and despotism into our reality is frightening and should be seen as a warning to everyone about where our country is heading, ideologically.

It seems the new American strategy is that if we find someone who says anything we are uncomfortable with, the best thing for them is to be beaten, or exploited, censured, censored, arrested and eventually silenced.

It appears far easier for Americans to dismiss someone than to engage them and challenge their position.

I believe it needs to be pointed out there is most definitely a conspiracy to change the ideology of America and its social values. This is being done to guarantee a blow back of those individuals that are ready to radicalize and create a reason for the new American police state.

We all are guilty of accusing one another of betraying some nebulous cause that no one can truly define. We are quick to call any cause an agenda which becomes an unwitting pejorative towards those who consider themselves critical and objective thinkers.

It may or may not be a byproduct of religion, however, it can be because all religions shun unpersons, which are all those that are their nonconformists.

Like good little programmed monkeys, we follow through with the “disconnection” and “suppression” of unpopular independent thought.

When people ask me why I do not participate in political circus I say it is a conflict of interest. I am then told that other talk show hosts have said openly what their choice is for president and that I should too.

I then say it is not only a professional conflict of interest but a moral one as well.

Everyone seems to have an opinion as to who I want for president, who I want to represent my country. Well, I have finally decided to no longer hide my stand and to reveal what some call my agenda.

What I see in the political arena today are a group of primates that are indifferent to the suffering of others. They impart empty words that lack empathy and sympathy. What I hear from them are words of intolerance, callousness, and contempt for the common good of mankind.

I believe if you search your feelings you have to admit this is true.

I will not and do not want to associate or even be a part of a political party that sees independent thought as a sign of weakness. I don’t believe that a leader has to be hard and ruthless to be effective.

If we give consent to any of this then we will reap the whirlwind. There is something to be said for humility, sternness, intellect and self-discipline. I do not want to participate in the ritual of praising and giving someone the keys of power, that sees himself or herself as greater and larger than life itself, with a distinct and sickening mark of superiority.

I will not allow myself to participate in the dark and hollow agenda of putting America in the unreal position of becoming a country that is obsessed with having an embarrassing and expansive amount of hubris.

I don’t want to associate with any political cult that is so caught up in their own ideology, they have to harass those who don’t agree with them, create hollow mass protests to bait the police state, and resort to violence during peaceful assembly.

I do not support and will not support a political rally or organization that holds the immoral value of encouraging death to those who threaten their power hold on the world.

I would like to be the one who chooses not to be associated with political figures that hide behind children and God in order to further their political clout.

I don’t need to be a part of a political party that believes America can be great again when it already is, and that it should be taken back, in order to homogenize a diverse culture.

I don’t want to hear we have to destroy our way of life and rebuild it from scratch. When I hear this rhetoric, it sounds akin to the same ideologies espoused by Napoleon, Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini.

I do not support and will not support any candidate who presents his so-called truths as if they were the laws of nature and that no doubt should be allowed to enter into your mind about what they wish to do to “improve our way of life.”

I do not support any candidate who sees certain groups of people as parasitic and that stand on the idea that most Americans do not know what is best for them.

I will not support a candidate that exploits religious or spiritual or values instead of demonstrating through example how they benefit everyone. This means that in my opinion it is un-American for a candidate to impose his or her own religious or spiritual values on anyone.

I believe that a Presidential hopeful should think about how his or her decisions can make it possible for the people he or she represents, to obtain jobs that provide enough money to create a sustainable life, provide increase that can allow the purchase of food which is not genetically modified, water that is not chemically poisoned, and receive medical attention that eliminates their mental and physical pain.

I am looking for a candidate that talks about healing rather than hating.

I don’t want to be a part of any club that will make me an unperson if I decide to not participate in the controlled demolition of my country and its Constitution.

I want the government to govern. I want them out of my business, and I don’t need to be reminded that the nightmares they manufacture are needed in order to remind us that we need them.

We don’t always need them and I don’t always have to tell people how to vote and who I am voting for.

I vote for myself and you should vote for yourself too.

Text – Check out Ground Zero Radio with Clyde Lewis Live Nightly @ http://www.groundzeromedia.org