On Trump, McAmnesty, Obama, and Bachmann

Someone wrote the following regarding my article on “Announcing the Next President of the United States”:

The following paragraph unfortunately eliminates all your mentioned candidates (and I and others, personally called Bachmann’s offices to request that she lead on the issues below…nothing).  The closest [candidate] didn’t lead when she had the opportunity during the campaign.  As for McAmnesty, he wasn’t “laid-back”; he went way out of his way to throw it, to tank.  As you may know, I do polling, tracking, etc., and whenever, through nothing that he did, McAmnesty’s numbers started getting better, he immediately pandered to illegal aliens, even in Spanish and on Spanish TV, knowing it would infuriate anyone but his paid-off loyal base.  His targets were those supporting him as the “least worst.”  Still, many held their noses and voted for him.

“We want a candidate who will champion the birth certificate, eligibility, and social security number issues.  We want a candidate who will take it to Obama and will not fear the racial backlash issue.  We want a candidate who has guts, will fight for ‘We the People,’ and will not cower and retreat whenever things get heated.  In the words of President Harry Truman, ‘If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.’  We want a candidate who will hang in here no matter how heated the race becomes.”

I responded with the following:

So, why did you not list the candidates that you prefer?  My list in this article is what, in my opinion, I surmised to be what most of the voters out there prefer.  PLEASE provide me with your list, so, if it makes sense, I’ll put out an addendum or revision to my article.

If I remember correctly, you were enamored with Donald Trump.  Is he still on your favored list?  The word from Dr. Jerome Corsi is that Trump was working with Obama during the time Trump was demanding the long-form birth certificate (BC).  Trumps involvement, though helpful to us, was all part of the Obama conspiracy.  After Trump was paid off with a big, renewed “The Apprentice” contract of around $500 million by Obama’s lapdog NBC sponsor, trump decided not to run.  Now, that flip-flopper is hinting that he may jump back into the race.  He is a dangerous man.

Too me (everything is perception), McAmnesty was half dead, much less laid back.  He opposed water boarding—calling it torture.  He did not want to address Obama’s BC and eligibility, even though the Obama team brought McAmnesty’s eligibility up for investigation and vote by the U.S. Senate.  He did not want to let Sarah Palin do her thing as his running mate, so his campaign team muzzled her.  McAmnesty’s numbers were polling better only because of Sarah Palin.  McAmnesty had no fire in the belly.  Some people even said that McAmnesty was a RINO plant to throw the election to Obama.  I believe that to be true as he is a progressive.  Furthermore, yes, I did hold my nose and voted for him—but only because Sarah Palin was on his team.

For the reasons you stated, I personally stated my objections to Michele Bachmann in one of my previous articles.  Obviously, you must have missed it.  Send me your list ASAP so I can calibrate your thinking.  Thanks.

Guest’s reply:

I did….  As of now, there is none of “choice” other than, once again, least worst.  As for The Donald, I still like what he did with the eligibility issue.  Not anyone who puts down what he did on it simply understands the benefit of such exposure over the alternative, which is none.  Moreover, McAmnesty tanked his job.

My reply:

In other words, you don’t have a list of preferred “real” candidates.  Who is your least worst?  Yes, I cannot fault Donald Trump for bringing the BC and eligibility issues to light.  Even though, it still may be part of an Obama plot to release a faulty BC just to get the attention on it by the birthers, as it has, thereby, taking their attention off the other issues like the fraudulent assassination of Osama bin Laden.

Guest’s reply:

Not “in other words,” but in those very exact words.  As it stands now, MAYBE Sarah Palin.  IMHO, when she was chosen to run with McAmnesty, it was with the thought that this “unknown,” from a state not even connected to the “USA” homeland would hurt (not help) the ticket.  So “they” screwed up in reverse…nearly.  They [the McAmnesty campaign team] even had to start attacking her when they saw what was happening with the polls.

That is the correct word “may”…not proven “is” yet, though it might be (and we’re big WorldNetDaily fans).  To me, eligibility is issue, topic, focus ONE.  Everything else is null and void… “USA Restorative.”

My reply:

Trump killed himself politically by dropping F-bombs before groups of women in Las Vegas.  It shows he lacks common sense and decency, which equates to stupidity.  I really liked all he said until he started doing bizarre things.  He didn’t even know the difference between the Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and the Certificate of Live Birth.  In my mind, the revelation by Dr. Jerome Corsi sealed Trumps fate.

Guest’s reply:

Big deal.  He’d still probably beat out the remaining “candidates.”  I agree on his lack of knowledge between the COLB and the Certificate of Live Birth.  Big deal.  Our people don’t even know the difference between impeachment and ineligibility.  If the Republican Congressmen were half as stern on Barack Hussein Obama (BHO) as you are on Trump, this whole thing would never have happened in the first place.  Moreover, what did the Republican Congressmen do with that…and everything else including eligibility and the Congressional Research Service (CRS) garbage?  Nothing!

###