Profile image
By BARRACUDA (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Giant Fossilized Human Foot Print Found In South Africa!

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Giant Footprints

Did giants once roam the earth? Most people are absolutely astounded to learn that, yes, there is a tremendous amount of evidence that giants once existed on this planet. Sadly, most of this evidence has been suppressed by the “scientific community” because it does not fit in with the evolutionary narrative that we are all supposed to believe. Any evidence that emerges that threatens the theory of evolution (especially if it supports the Bible) is rapidly “reinterpreted”, hushed up or brushed under the rug. The reality is that most members of the “scientific community” will simply not even consider any evidence that giants once existed because according to them it “can’t” possibly be true. Their preconceptions make it impossible for them to consider evidence that is staring them right in the face. In the rest of this article we will discuss some of the giant footprints that have been found and much of the other evidence for giants that has been found all over the earth. Try to keep an open mind as you view this evidence.

Let’s start with Goliath’s Footprint in South Africa. A picture of Goliath’s Footprint can be seen at the top of this article. This giant footprint is located near the town of Mpaluzi, close to the Swaziland border. It is approximately four feet long and it is starting to get a lot more publicity around the globe.

The following is video of this amazing footprint. If you look carefully, you can even see that there were five toes and that the big toe was the largest of the toes. This video is absolutely amazing….

Evolutionary scientists say that this footprint is somewhere between 200 million and 3 billion years old.

Of course that is complete and total hogwash, but it does lead to an interesting point.

Over the years, a whole host of “human footprints” have been found in rock layers that are supposed to be millions upon millions of years old.

For example, the following comes from an article about the discovery of 70 human footprints in a rock layer that was “supposed” to be 3.6 million years old….

In 1976 famed anthropologist Mary Leaky discovered 70 human footprints in stone in Tanzania known as the Laetoli tracks. Leaky felt they looked like they were made by modern human beings, but that created a problem. The depressions left by our ancestors were in a stratum dated at 3.6 million years. No modern human could have laid down that track since we were not around yet according to evolution.

Since humans were not supposed to have been around back then, obviously that creates a huge problem for evolutionary scientists.

Instead of letting the evidence lead them to conclusions, they take their preconceived theories and try to force the evidence to fit into them.

Getting back to giant footprints, most people simply do realize that they have even been found inside the United States.

For example, the following comes from an article that appeared in the Hayward Semi-Weekly on September 29th 1925….

The footprint, thought to be of prehistoric origin, discovered by James Higgins high on the rock formations of Bushy Peak, is claimed to be duplicated in at least two other spots in Washington Township.

Pioneer residents claim a “footprint” similar to the description given by Higgins of the one on Bushy Peak, only of greater size can be seen on the John Bunting ranch near the Mission San Jose.

This footprint measures nearly eight feet in its length. It is said, and is very deeply embedded In solid rock.

The third mysterious foot mark is said to hare been seen on the Indian Reservation, near the Pleasant Valley road, between Sunol and Pleasanton. This foot-print, like the others, is of immense size and deeply marked on a granite cliff.

This next example comes from an article that appeared in the Oakland Tribune on October 6th, 1926….

The discovery by Professor George D. Louderback of the University of California of depressions resembling the footprints of prehistoric man and animals on a cliff near San Jose about five feet in length, are to present an absolutely new problem to anthropologists.

The prints tally somewhat with similar impressions found at Livermore some months ago, according to Professor Louderback, with the exception that the Livermore finds were about ten feet in length.

In the early part of the 20th century there were even reports of fossilized giants being found in America. For example, the following comes from an article that appeared in the Postville Herald on November 7th, 1919….

The fossilized remains of a giant measuring 32 feet 10 Inches in height were, according to a report recently discovered by workmen near the little village of Nanacamilpa, State of Vera Cruz.

The natives, who still cling to many of the traditions of their Indian ancestors, declared the giant was related to the gods of their forefathers.

They erected a catafalque in the plaza on which the giant rested in state for many days, covered with flowers and at night carefully guarded. The discovery attracted the attention of scientists here. Manuel Ganomo director of anthropology at the National museum, expects to leave soon for Nanacamilpa to investigate.

So why have most of us never heard of these things before?

Why does the scientific community continue to insist that giants are a fairytale?

Even as late as the 1960s, giant footprints were being discovered in America. The following comes from an article posted on the website of Bibleland Studios….

In the late 60’s C.N. Doughtery (co-author of Valley of the Giants) moved to the Glen Rose area and began to hear the same stories of the tracks. But these stories included large man tracks. In their book he explains that when asking the locals how big the human tracks were they would slowly spread their hands apart till about the 18-24 inch mark.

Could man once have been 12 feet tall?

Doughtery walked the river month after month waiting for the right conditions to spot these alleged goliath sized impressions. Two years later his efforts paid off and spotted not one but two giant men tracks. The prints measured 21 and one half inches long and 8 inches across the toes with a seven foot stride from heal to heal. Go ahead and measure across your toes and see what do you get. I have a size 12 EEE foot and it is 4 inches across by 11 inches long. I’m 6’2” tall and my stride from heal to heal is a little over 2 feet with a normal walking gate. If you do the math you will see that a man with 22 inch feet and a 7-foot step would be approximately 12 foot tall!

Some amazing discoveries have been made in other countries as well. A little over 100 years ago an entire fossilized giant was supposedly found in Ireland. The following comes from an article about giants on another website….

An article from Strand magazine (December,1895) reprinted in “Traces of the Elder Faiths of Ireland” by W.G. Wood-Martin mentions this fossilized giant discovered during mining operations in County Antrim, Ireland: “Pre-eminent among the most extraordinary articles ever held by a railway company is the fossilized Irish giant, which is at this moment lying at the London and North-Western Railway Company’s Broad street goods depot, and a photograph of which is reproduced here. . . This monstrous figure is reputed to have been dug up by a Mr. Dyer whilst prospecting for iron ore in County Antrim. The principal measurements are: entire length, 12ft. 2in.; girth of chest, 6ft. 6in.; and length of arms, 4ft. 6in. There are six toes on the right foot. The gross weight is 2 tons 15cwt.; so that it took half a dozen men and a powerful crane to place this article of lost property in position for the Strand magazine artist. Dyer, after showing the giant in Dublin, came to England with his queer find and exhibited it in Liverpool and Manchester at sixpence, sixpence a head, attracting scientific men as well as gaping sightseers”.

Posted below is a picture which is supposed to be of this fossilized giant….

But the evidence for giants is not limited to old discoveries. As I have written about previously, evidence of giants continues to be found in many areas of the globe.

The photos posted below are of bones from a “giant man” that was discovered near the city of Borjomi, Georgia (not the Georgia in the U.S.) in 1998. It has been estimated that the “giant man” was about 9 to 10 feet tall and that the skull was about 3 times the size of a normal human skull.

Steve Quayle recently posted these pictures to make a point. The “accepted version of history” that we all have been taught just does not add up. There was a whole lot more going on in the ancient world than we were ever allowed to learn. There are great mysteries about our past that are just now starting to be revealed.

In his recent report, Quayle also mentions a number of other “giant skeleton” discoveries that have been made in Georgia over the last century….

The finding of giants in the Caucasus mountains is nothing new. A Four-meter human skeleton was found by two amateur archaeologist in Georgia near the village of Udabno in the summer of the year 2000, and skeletons of giants were also found at a cave near Gora Kazbek, Georgia in the 1920′s, not to mention the discoveries by Soviet scientists in the 1950′s.

The truth is that there is abundant evidence of ancient giants all over the globe. The amazing ruins at Baalbek are just one prominent example. But most people won’t even allow themselves to consider the evidence because it is just “too bizarre”.

But all of this does fit in very well with what we find in the Scriptures. In the Bible, it tells us that giants lived on earth in the days before the Flood.

Genesis 6:4 says this…..

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

The ancient book of Enoch, which is quoted in the Biblical book of Jude, also claims that giants once existed on earth. In Enoch 6:1-3, it tells us that fallen angels came down to earth, took wives and had children with them….

And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: ‘Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.’

For much more on what the Bible has to say about these giants, please see the following article: “The Truth About UFOs And Aliens

And for much more information about evidence for giants all over the world, check out this information that Steve Quayle has gathered.

So what do all of you think about this evidence that giants once lived on this earth?

Feel free to leave a comment with your thoughts below….

 

http://unexplainedmysteriesoftheworld.com

Report abuse
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite
Prodovite

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question Razz Sad Evil Exclaim Smile Redface Biggrin Surprised Eek Confused Cool LOL Mad Twisted Rolleyes Wink Idea Arrow Neutral Cry Mr. Green

    Total 10 comments
    • One Who Knows

      We are not the only carbon based life forms to walk the earth.

    • Synickel

      The Sons of God, when used in the Bible, does not refer to angels, but to the people who were the followers of God. The daughters of men, refers to the people who chose to rebel against god. It was a matter of genetic vitality that these two separate civilizations created giants. It’s scientific logic.

      Jesus said that angels do not marry. They were created for a different purpose than man. God told man to be fruitful and multiply to inhabit the earth.

      The civilization as it was before the flood, was filled with vitality and had not degraded as it did after the flood. They were giants compared to us.

    • Anonymous

      The sons of God are the fallen angels.”The sons of God saw that the daughters of men are beautiful…..” When the sons of God would be men, than this passage would make no sense because men would know their daughters already. Read Gen. 6 again…

    • O. Ryan Faust

      dogg, you are simply poorly informed. Your assertion that the sons of God are just nice guys and not something else is sophomoric.

      Just because a being is not an angel doesn’t automatically mean they were men. The Bible doesn’t say they were angels, it says they were sons of God. Adam was a son of God, but his descendants are not, his descendants are sons of Adam. “Sons of God” is a specific category of being, and they are not descendants of Adam.

      Besides, when nice guys marry the daughters of guys that aren’t so nice, giants are not born to them.

      There’s abundant archeological proof that giants did inhabit the earth, and the Bible contains an explanation.

      How they got here is not explained so well.

    • Stink Neck

      A BIG clap clap clap for dogg above! At least someone see’s through the garbage theories of the giants being offspring of angels. The idea is actually satanic that they can procreate.

    • Stink Neck

      Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

      Romans 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.

      Galatians 4:6 And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.

      Philippians 2:15 That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;

      1John 3:1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

      1John 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

      JOHN 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.
      43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
      44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
      45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

    • Pateriot

      This is definately not granite. I’m guessing its terra cotta, macrame, foam, or some other easily fakeable medium. If it is old (older then a coupple of hundred years, it was probably faked by c arving it out of sandstone. What it is not, is credible evidence of giants millions of years ago! How gullible can people be?

    • Bonnie Wills

      The phrase, “Sons of God,” actually occurs ten times in the Bible, most notably in the first and second chapters of Job, when they appear before the Throne, and Satan is among them. How then could this possibly refer to humans? B’nai Elohim, is the Hebrew phrase(the meaning is different in Greek)and the word Elohim refers to any spiritual being that can take on physical form. Yes, we were told that angels do not marry, but that is why we were also told that these angels had left their proper position (Jude 1:6). The word translated as angels, by the way, simply means messenger, not a certain species. Humans can be angels as well, when sent with a message from the Lord. Check out the history of Rockwall county, Texas and you will discover more evidence of giants.

    • patriot156

      The sons of God exactly means angels read revelations. And there was war in heaven and satan and his angles made war with god and his. Satan was not victorious and was cast to earth Satan as an angel is the same as saying osns of God Gen 6 is refereing to what happened after their battle in heaven then they came to earth and matted with us.

    • David Blaine

      Debunked nearly as soon as the article came out two years ago.

      http://creation.com/giant-footprint

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.