Ukraine on verge of victory, just needs 20 nuclear bombs, says Top Ukrainian lawmaker.

Russian military forces have advanced 8.6 kilometers since liberating Avdeyevka on Saturday, says it also announced: “Russian troops have completely liberated the coke and chemical plant in Avdeyevka from Ukrainian forces”—the MoD then grimly warned: “During the special military operation, cases of US chemical weapons used by the armed forces of Ukraine were recorded” and shockingly documented: “NATO military personnel, under the guise of mercenaries, participate in hostilities…They control air defense systems, tactical missiles and multiple launch rocket systems, and are part of assault detachments”—all of which was joined by the MoD announcing that Russian military forces killed over 330 Ukrainian soldiers during the past 24 hours and revealing: “In all, the Russian forces have destroyed 571 Ukrainian warplanes, 266 helicopters, 12,723 unmanned aerial vehicles, 470 anti-aircraft missile systems, 15,098 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,222 multiple rocket launchers, 8,091 field artillery guns and mortars and 18,801 special military motor vehicles since the beginning of the special military operation in Ukraine”.

With tens-of-billions of dollars worth of NATO weapons and hundreds-of-thousands of Ukrainian soldiers now obliterated, this report notes, it was just revealed about the socialist Western colonial leaders responsible for this needless carnage: “The Munich Security Conference has wrapped up and it appears the attendees were totally obsessed with Ukraine to the exclusion of pretty much everything else going on in the world…Apparently, the whole idea of the gathering was to make people believe in the ‘Russian threat to Europe’ so they don’t resist or object too much when the coffers are pried open and a ton of their tax money is dumped straight into the military industrial complex”—a revelation joined by the news about corrupt puppet leader Ukraine President Vladimir Zelensky meeting his Western puppet masters at the Munich Security Conference: “German magazine Der Spiegel published an illuminating article called: Der Erschöpfte Präsident: The Exhausted President…The magazine notices his hoarse voice as a consequence of his endlessly being round and round on the fundraising – and frankly scare-mongering – carrousel…Zelensky tried to dispel doubts before all decision-makers in Europe and the United States – whether Ukraine could survive a war with Russia…And yet his despair cannot be ignored…In Munich, confronting the heads of the intelligence services of the allied western nations was the difficult situation in which Ukraine’s army has fallen”.

In further assessing the just completed Munich Security Conference, this report continues, the Politico article “‘There’s Only Plan A’: Defense Leaders Fear Failure In Ukraine” observed: “Attendees of the Munich Security Conference were worried about Ukraine’s prospects against Russia and American commitment to Kyiv…Ukraine’s worsening prospects on the battlefield and questions about America’s commitment to Kyiv dominated the annual event…The plan now, as detailed or lamented in interviews with eight U.S. lawmakers and five foreign officials, is to just keep the Ukrainian military from collapsing…Many sidestepped the question of what a Ukrainian victory would look like, or when it might happen”—an observation joined by the Responsible Statescraft article “Munich Dispatch: After Adiivka, Zelensky Insists Russians Are Losing”, wherein it observed: “The Russian capture of the city represents the most significant defeat for Ukraine since the failure of its counter-offensive last year…On the loss of Avdiivka, Zelensky said that Ukraine had lost one soldier for every seven soldiers who have died on the Russian side…This, however, is difficult to reconcile with the reports about the rushed Ukrainian retreat, with a Ukrainian soldier explaining that “the road to Avdiivka is littered with our corpses”…Throughout his speech, Zelensky repeatedly referred to the importance of defending what he called the “rules-based world order” by defeating Russia”.

Encapsulating the “Munich Madness” of socialist Westerncolonial leaders, this report details, was that after President Zelensky insisted Russia is losing, it saw top Ukrainianlawmaker Aleksey Goncharenko issuing the demand to socialist Biden Regime official United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken: “Once again I will say directly and openly: I support the return of nuclear weapons to Ukraine…And I believe that this is our only option for survival…We don’t need a thousand…We need 20 nuclear missiles”—a demand of apocalyptic lunacy that joined Ukrainska Pravda publishing a breakdown of military-age men in Ukraine revealing: 26% – live in Russian-controlled territory…25% – are employed…13% – are invalids…11% – are on military duty…11% – live abroad…5% – are business owners…That leaves 950 thousand (9%) who can be drafted.

The world-renowned American military analysis organization Global Firepower, whose motto is: “War does not determine who is right – only who is left”, this report notes, recently released its “Global Firepower 2024” findings, wherein it documented: “Russia remains the second largest military power globally, trailing only the United States”—Russianmilitary forces have 2.4 million active duty soldiers and 25 million people with combat experience in reserve—and Russia also possesses the world’s largest nuclear weapons arsenal.

Among those whose job it is to know how powerful the Russian military is, this report continues, is NATO Commander Admiral Rob Bauer, who this mourning observed in hindsight: “The West grossly overestimated Ukraine’s chances of battlefield progress against Russia last year”—an observation that joined the world’s richest person Elon Musk assessing: “The longer this goes on, the better Russia will do”, and who most factually observed: “Citizens of Western countries are being told that Ukraine is winning when in fact it is losing…We are told that there is no opportunity to make peace when in fact we have rejected multiple opportunities for a negotiated settlement…When the war is finally lost, when the whole country lays in smoldering ruins on a funeral pyre of their own making, the liars will say: “Well we tried””. 

With it known that Elon Musk is “the smartest person in any room anywhere” because its been beyond all dispute documented: “Elon Musk’s IQ falls between 150 – 155, making him one of the most intelligent people on the planet”, this report details, the “liars” he called out belong to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), that’s directed American foreign policy and its failed wars since 1921, and issues its marching orders via its Foreign Affairs publication—Russian international affairs journalist Victoria Nikiforovais an expert on the Council of Foreign Relations, and in her just released article “The United States Is Developing A Surrender Plan” observed: “The successes of the Russian army did not go unnoticed overseas…The battles for Avdiivka were still going on, and the main US political magazine Foreign Affairs had already published an article “Why America Can’t Have Everything”…It represents a plan for the hegemon’s careful escape from hot spots – so to speak…American political scientist Stephen Wertheim states that the United States has failed all the foreign policy tasks that it set for itself in 2021: it got bogged down in Ukraine, failed to protect its military in the Middle East, and relations with Russia and China have reached the point where a third world war is completely real”.

In 2020, this report concludes, Council of Foreign Relationsmouthpiece political scientist Stephen Wertheim released his book “Tomorrow, The World: The Birth Of U.S. Global Supremacy”, that Foreign Affairs named “the best book of the year”—but in an abrupt turnaround from joyously proclaiming America as the ruler of the world when President Donald Trump was in power, he just released his Foreign Affairs open letter “Why America Can’t Have It All”, wherein he warned: 

The Biden administration took office intending to inject strategic focus into U.S. foreign policy. 

The president and his team promised to end the United States’ forever wars and make the country’s international engagements serve the needs of a disaffected public.  In its first year, the administration terminated the two-decade-old war in Afghanistan, pledged to “right-size” the U.S. military presence in the Middle East, and even pursued a “stable and predictable” relationship with Russia.

By placing less emphasis on certain regions, the logic went,Washington could concentrate on what most affects U.S.interests: managing competition with China and tackling transnational threats such as climate change and pandemics.

Today that vision lies in tatters.  The United States is now immersed in multiple wars in Europe and the Middle East, precisely where the administration sought to keep things quiet. Meanwhile, relations with China and Russia have deteriorated so strikingly as to raise the realistic prospect of the first major-power conflict since 1945.

The Biden administration wanted to prioritize what in its view mattered most while declining to disentangle the United States from what mattered less.

This is a form of wishful thinking—perhaps as naive as invading countries to liberate them—and ought to be recognized as such. 

The Biden administration is not the first to indulge in it.  The rationale for American global dominance after the Cold War, as articulated by the Pentagon in 1992, was that by maintaining military primacy in most world regions, the United Stateswould suppress competition among other countries, dissuade challengers from emerging, and keep the peace at a reasonable cost to Americans. 

But the unipolar era is over.  Going forward, the options are stark: the United States can selectively retrench and control costs and risks, or it can stick with global primacy and lurch from crisis to crisis.

The United States does not need global military dominance in order to thrive. 

What it must do is rescue its liberal democracy, rebuild its party politics, and restore the confidence of its people.  Clinging to primacy sets back this great task.  It creates a foreign policy that is perpetually out of control, and a country that is losing its sense of self-control