John Carpay: An expert opinion on bill C-63 and Bill C-367 and Canada’s slide into oligarchy

Story details can be read at RAIR Foundation. Below is the speech John Carpay, perhaps the most significant lawyer in Canada in terms of defending liberty and Canada’s traditional values of individualism and rights, gave in April in Ottawa. Below that, the two videos of the Q&A.

Bill C-63 is getting a LOT of international attention as Canada appears to be leading the way for the dissolution of Freedom of speech for the communist revolution that has taken place across the world where Western Civilization was the norm. This talk is quite a bankable one in terms of the reality of bill C-63. John Carpay has taken a cautious approach though. The truth could end up being quite a bit worse than this. But this is an excellent place to begin an understanding of the nature of this very controversial bit of legislation.

One additional point on Carpay’s discussion on aspects of C-63 that would make certain religious texts illegal:

Bill C-367: An Attack on Religious Freedom

Bill C-367, proposed by the Bloc Québécois, seeks to remove the exemption for religious texts from hate speech legislation. Carpay argues that this bill could criminalize religious teachings on topics like homosexuality, potentially leading to prosecutions of religious leaders for quoting or teaching from their sacred scriptures.

Currently, the Criminal Code allows defenses against charges of willfully promoting hatred if the statements in question are based on religious texts. Removing this defense, Carpay contends, would open the door to a wave of prosecutions against pastors, rabbis, imams, and other religious leaders for simply expressing their faith-based beliefs.

This would also open the door to continued selective enforcement against religious beliefs that are unfavourable to the leftist agenda. As Trudeau himself tried to pass M-103 early in his role as Prime Minister, which would make special status for Islam and criminalize those who criticized it, it is not difficult to predict which religions would face prosecution under C-63.

Add to that, Trudeau’s banning of all who oppose abortion from summer jobs funding, and the picture is complete. This would be used to criminalize Christian views on Abortion, but not Islamic views on non-Muslims.

As always, we ask that you clikc the little gear at the bottom right of the play window, and select the highest quality for best viewing enjoyment.

Speech:

Q&A I

Q&A II