Very Quietly, Obama’s Citizenship Case Has Reached The Supreme Court… Associated Press (AP)

The supreme court are blatant Treasonous Traitors, they will put their tail between there coerced legs and do whatever their told to do about the false flag obama, by their new world order globalists banker freak daddies. Bend over daddies coming home, your a bunch of gutless punks that couldn’t bust their way out of a wet paper bag without the new world order scum holding their slimy fiat money paid off hands. The only way patriots are going to get our country Constitutional again is reenactments of 1776 because they have grossly and egregiously broken every law of the land and need to be arrested right now, period.

you don’t have to ‘lighten up’ nor do you have to ‘go somewhere else’…

So much garbage is presented here and nobody is held accountable. Two weeks ago there were two “News” stories stating that there would be a disaster on 8/6 and 8/7 and both stories “disappeared” on 8/6.

And this story should contain a link to AP if that’s where the story came from but it’s a scam that was debunked by Snopes a long time ago.

Knock it off with the garbage stories, idiots.

Old story, that wasn’t even true to begin with. Doesn’t change the fact that Barry is a lying usurping murderer.

Analysis: Hoax. The original April 1, 2009 posting date suggests it may have been intended as an April Fools prank, but given that the text does little else but parrot actual tenets of the so-called “Birther” movement (those who claim Barack Obama is ineligible for the presidency due to a forged or invalid birth certificate, etc.), it barely qualifies as satire.
•Is it really an AP news story?

No. The Associated Press (“AP”) never published such a story. It didn’t run in any real newspaper, nor on any real wire service. It can, however, be found posted and reposted on hundreds of anti-Obama blogs and websites.

•Is it true that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on Obama’s citizenship and eligibility?

No. The Supreme Court has refused to hear every case challenging Obama’s Constitutional eligibility submitted to date.

•Did a group called “Americans for Freedom of Information” release Obama’s Occidental College transcripts?

No. The organization doesn’t exist — or didn’t at the time the above message first began circulating, at any rate. A similarly-named website went up after the fact, but there’s no evident connection between that website and this fake news story.

•Has anyone released Obama’s Occidental College transcripts?

No, the transcripts haven’t been released (federal privacy laws forbid it), nor has any court of law “ordered” them released. (Source: Occidental College)

•Did Obama attend Occidental under the name “Barry Soetoro”?

No. Soetoro was the surname of his stepfather, but there’s no evidence Barack Obama used it when he attended college. Fellow alumni quoted in the press remember him as “Barry Obama.” According to an Occidental spokesperson quoted on FactCheck.org, the college has no records showing Obama used his stepfather’s last name.

•Did Obama attend Occidental under a Fulbright Scholarship for Foreign Students?

No. According to various news sources Obama did attend on a scholarship, but it wasn’t a Fulbright scholarship, let alone a Fulbright scholarship for foreign students. The Fulbright Foreign Student Program accepts Master’s Degree and Ph.D. candidates only. Obama, an undergraduate, was neither. He couldn’t have been awarded a Fulbright scholarship for foreign students even if he had been born outside the U.S. (Source: Fulbright Program)

•Did the Daily Mail discuss these “revelations” in a news story entitled “Obama Eligibility Questioned”?

No. No such story turns up in a search of the London newspaper’s archive.

•Did Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation release research showing Obama has spent $950,000 or more “to block disclosure of his personal records”?

I’ve found no record of any such “research” having been published. The U,S. Justice Foundation does exist and its executive director is indeed a man named Gary Kreep, but he’s on record saying the above claim is a hoax.

The fact of the matter is that specific expenditures pertaining to litigation on Obama’s Constitutional legitimacy aren’t a matter of public record. What are a matter of public record — and what have have been continually misrepresented as moneys spent specifically on fighting citizenship lawsuits — are the total year-to-year legal expenditures of Obama’s campaign finance committee since 2007. Anyone purporting to know what portion of those funds were actually spent on legitimacy cases is only speculating.

Lastly, it’s disingenuous to characterize Obama’s legal expenditures on these cases as funds dispensed “to block disclosure of his personal records.” While various personal records have been requested in the filings, securing their release was never the point of the litigation, which aimed to have Obama’s candidacy ruled unconstitutional on a panoply of grounds.

PLEASE… stop posting this article! It LOOKS current but it has been circulating since 2009 and it is FALSE.