Update;Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation

Friday, 17 September 2010 10:49   ( Update below this story)

There are only two events known to cause ground-hugging pyroclastic flows (pictured above). Either a volcanic eruption or a thermo nuclear detonation

‘On the morning of September 11th, 2001, we were told a fairy tale. That wide body jets flew into the twin towers and completely destroyed them. Let me repeat that: Passenger planes (large hollow aluminum tubes) flew into industrial steel, marble and concrete sky scrapers, and caused them to turn into a pile of dust. And the worst part about this fairy tale is that we, the American people believed it. Now, nine years later, it’s time to wake up from your slumber and take a good hard look at what did and did not happen on that fateful day. The conventional explanation we were provided, by government and media, for a top-down highly destructive gravitational collapse, in near-free-fall times, is physically impossible, and is thus about as worthy of discussion as is the belief that the Earth is flat.’

Read more: Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation

Beware Bogus 9-11 Mini-Nuke Theory.

August 16, 2010    

by Christian Soderberg in Sweden
for henrymakow.com


The people behind the 9/11 False Flag-event have launched a propaganda blitz to cover their tracks.


For example, the “No planes hit the World Trade Center buildings” theory is a straight out lie.


The war industrial complex and global bankers are putting out these propaganda theories so that when they are discovered to be false, the whole 9/11 truth movement and the scientifically sound investigations will be discredited as “crazy, unrealistic conspiracy theories”.


There were landing gear and other pieces of the planes found around Ground Zero, so the two planes really did hit WTC towers 1 and 2. Here’s photo evidence..

9/11 Aircraft Remains


[Makow- Yeah and Mohamed Atta’s passport too!  My hunch is that, if there were no planes in Pennsylvania, at WTC 7 and at the Pentagon, it would be consistent that no planes hit the WTC. The filmmakers-eye witnesses may have been CIA plants and the planes were photoshopped. The planes enter the buildings like a diver into water. Not realistic. Back to Soderberg…)   


The “nukes in the bed rock” theory also seems very unconvincing.  The video interview with Dimitri Khalezov. claims to know the facts while putting down other independent, more scientific 9/11 research.
Read More Here>>