The Attack Of The White Planes on 9/11 Version 3

Why are Daniel Plesse of St. James, New York, Jeremy Rys of Mansfield, Massachusetts, and Adam Taylor of Steubenville, Ohio, involved with the cover-up of c-DEW technology

Is 2+3=5 a theory

As Dr. Eric Larsen stated:
“The scientific method, as it came into being during the Enlightenment period, is a method of thought known as empiricism or as the empirical method. Under the terms of empiricism, all conclusions are, must, and can be drawn from observable evidence and from observable evidence only. Evidence must precede any and every conclusion to be drawn from it. Then, if sound logic governs in the relationship between evidence and the conclusion drawn from it, that conclusion will be irrefutable

Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but according solely and only to what the empirical evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to conclude or makes it inevitable for them to conclude.”

This is why Dr. Wood’s work is irrefutable. She only presents evidence and an analysis of that evidence. There is no use for a theory in forensic science. Either you know something or you don’t. That is why those in charge of a cover up don’t want people to look at the evidence in Dr. Wood’s book. Dr. Wood does not ask you to believe her. She only wants you to believe yourself and think for yourself and look at the evidence yourself and not argue about opinions of theories of speculation of ideas… That is what keeps a cover up in place.

On page 171 (the start of Chapter 9) of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood there are several quotes at the top of that page from the first responders who survived in stairway B. Do you think those guys had been sitting on top of a nuke without having been cooked to death — if not blown apart? I wonder why they don’t remember having been cooked to death? Nukes produce heat, and lots of it. So why didn’t this magical nuke burn paper or burn all of the folks in Stairway B who would have been right on top of it? Why didn’t this magical nuke leave a seismic signal? Why didn’t this magical nuke leave chemical identification? Why didn’t this magical nuke leave nuclear identification? Why doesn’t anyone remember having lost their vision from being “blinded by the light” from an exploding nuke? Why wasn’t there a steam explosion — resulting from a destroyed bathtub that keeps the Hudson river out? Why didn’t any nation around the world detect that a nuke had been set off?

Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s book can give at least 10 reasons that rule out the theory by “AE911trutherd” that welding material destroyed the WTC. How many can you list? Hint: the bottom of page 45, the top of page 171, the diagrams on page 81 and 84, the diagram at the top of page 11, and of course pages 122 to 127. The list is endless, actually.

Better yet, go to any engineering professor or professional engineer and ask if the welding material, thermite, can turn a building into dust in mid air in 10 seconds – or if thermite can turn a building to powder in mid air. You might leave red-faced, but at least you will know you’ve been fleeced.

Is 2+3=5 a theory?
Is 2+3=6 also a theory?
Is 2+3=7 also a theory?

(sigh) I guess there are so many theories we will never know the answer to 2+3. We just need to move on….nothing to see here.

That’s how “9/11trutherder’s” keep the cover-up in place. They work because people like to follow the herd. Herds are easy to control. Do you think that those who planned 9/11 did not know that?

It’s funny how many people believe that an opinion and an Internet connection makes them a qualified scientist…

The order of crime solving is to determine

1) WHAT happened, then

2) HOW it happened (e.g., by what weapon), then

3) WHO did it. And only then can we address

4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).

Let us remember what is required to convict someone of a crime. You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief. You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it.

Be aware of the deception, distraction, and diversion going on, both intentional and otherwise, leading people to climb on to popular “theories” or “band wagons”. Truth is not established by popularity, although agenda-driven political campaigns are. So we need to establish a better way to sort through the information we find by improving our problem-solving skills.

There are various groups on the internet lead by nefarious figures such as Richard Gage and Jim Fetzer, each with their own set of beliefs and objectives, promoting how it was done, or who did it or why they did it. But none of them have taken the first step of an investigation which is to determine what it is that was done, that is, to first determine WHAT happened. Until they have done that, they are merely speculating or theorizing or hypothesizing or guessing. This is essentially assuming what happened and then proving the assumptions through biased observations (i.e. “cherry-picking” data). Promoting beliefs distracts away from determining WHAT happened. This is why the order of problem solving is so important. Remember, you must first determine WHAT happened BEFORE you can determine HOW it happened and independent of knowing HOW it happened.

Remember how a cover-up works. Get people to theorize and speculate about an imagined problem, then get them to argue opinions with others. Everyone will be arguing about opinions of speculations of theories of opinions of guesswork, and they’ll just go round and round and round and get nowhere. It is amazingly easy to keep a cover up in place! The only way out of that vicious cycle is to deal with the facts and only the facts (empirical evidence).

By reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never hitting the ground.

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

Bombs don’t do that.
Thermite does not do that.
Thermate does not do that.
Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
Nano-thermite does not do that.
New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
Firecrackers do not do that.
Fire does not do that.
Nukes do not do that.
Megga nukes do not do that.
Milli-nukes do not do that.
Mini-nukes do not do that.
Nano-nukes cannot do that.
A wrecking ball cannot do that.
A slingshot cannot do that.
Missiles cannot do that.

We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and we know that the “dustification” was done without Kinetic Energy. That is, “dustification” was not done with high heat nor with some other form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse). The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow (and controlled within fairly precise boundaries) to cause the building to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some kind of (cold) Directed Energy Weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. Energy was directed and manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a giant hammer, or many micro hammers…)

If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with “free energy” (i.e. “off the grid”). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood’s book you can realize there must be a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology capable of providing “free energy” (“off the grid”) exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole world can know that “free-energy technology” exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood’s research.

Our educational systems typically “teach the test” and it is usually a multiple-choice test. We are not taught very good problem-solving skills. So it is very easy to manipulate a population with poor problem-solving skills. Get them to focus on the HOW or the WHO and they will never be able to solve the problem. That is the secret. Look at how the official story was designed. We were told “Bin Laden did it.” But what was “it” that he did? And look at how the Truther Movement is managed. Well meaning people, looking for answers, are directed to focus on HOW or WHO (thermite did “it”, micro nukes did “it“, “it” was an inside job”). Truthers are also conditioned to attack anyone addressing Dr. Wood’s research and are told “she has a bogus theory” when Dr. Wood has no theory, only EVIDENCE. It keeps the well-meaning Truthers from looking at the EVIDENCE.

Why? Look at what the EVIDENCE tells us. It tells us the truth. “Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic.”

The empirical EVIDENCE tells us that the majority of the building turned into dust in mid air. Therefore, something that can do this (turn it into dust in mid air) must exist. That is the proof that it exists. It happened. You don’t need the serial numbers for the gizmo to know what happened. When “white man” first arrived on the American continent with firearms, indigenous people did not need to know the serial numbers of their weapons to know what they can do. They didn’t need to have seen such weapons in order to know that there exists a weapon that can fire a piece of metal fast enough to kill their brothers. Likewise, by the end of the day on August 6, 1945, the people living near Hiroshima, Japan, did not need to understand how a nuclear bomb works in order to know that there exists a technology that can produce enormous amounts of heat or to know that there exists a super-duper Kinetic Energy Weapon (KEW) that is capable of destroying an entire city.

Patent Number 7629918 (b2 multi-functional r/f directed energy weapon)

Patent Number 7282727 (electron beam directed energy device)

Patent Number 7126530 (non-coherent high power directed energy devise)

Patent Number 8285533 (directed energy weapon)

US Patent Number Search
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm

You Won’t Find Truth In A Club

The truth is known, but it appears that many people really don’t want to know the truth. They’d rather argue about opinions about rumors while trying to convince themselves that “nobody knows what happened & we’ll never know.” The facts about what happened have been available for many years. There was a paper refuting Steven Jones’ thermite story within a few months of the promotion of his theory but few paid attention. Jones vilified those who spoke the truth & that is all that was needed. Jones claimed the scientific refutation of his thermite story was a personal attack & his followers believed him without even questioning what they were told. Does this sound familiar, à la Bin Laden 9/11 story?

In 2006, Dr. Wood published a paper with Morgan Reynolds documenting the group of holes in WTC6 & WTC5 as well as the major segment of WTC4 along with WTC3 that went missing & the “dustification” of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. But folks were too involved in stoning Dr. Wood to look at the evidence she presented so clearly. That is, most people seem to prefer drama instead of facts. That’s why it’s used so effectively in cover-ups. Few realize that Wood & Reynolds resigned from the Fetzer-Jones “truth club” in August 2006. Then they published the most effective article to date, addressing a huge amount of evidence that still stands un-refuted to this day.

So why didn’t people realize this

If you remember, pretending to be in a fight with each other over Wood & Reynolds, Jones & Fetzer then launched a new distraction campaign. This had nothing to do with Wood & Reynolds because they had resigned the Fetzer-Jones “truth club” months earlier. But the distraction worked & few looked at the paper Wood & Reynolds published in early October 2006.

What can we learn from this

The truth was right in front of us all along but manufactured controversy was very effective in distracting people away from the facts. There are people trying to convince us that we know so little & that we’ll never know what happened unless some specified criteria is met to the point of ad nauseam. Why would someone want to divert others away from the truth & try to convince them not to look? This is Déjà vu with Jones playing victim & claiming others have personally attacked him as well as the faux Jones & Fetzer fight to distract people away from the facts. The truth is known & has been known to those looking for it past the cover-up. Dr. Wood’s book has nicely gathered up an enormous amount of evidence. She leads the reader through the evidence while asking them questions to help them see it for themselves. Any honest person who reads that book will know what happened by the time they finish it. No exceptions. So why aren’t people reading her book? Because they prefer to create doubt & suspicion & believe false propaganda & argue about opinions of rumors of hearsay…around & around in circles on forums…instead of simply looking at the facts, just like those running the cover-up have taught them to do.

The question is, will people just continue to marginalize those presenting the truth or will they realized they’ve been duped for 12 years & don’t want to continue being duped by those running the cover-up? Dr. Wood has mostly stood alone through all of this. Why has there been such a far reaching campaign to denigrate her? No one has ever refuted anything she has presented. They’ve only refuted the false propaganda about her & assume they were refuting her work.

Let’s learn from this or history will repeat. AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say “damage control”? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. If Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.

Why is there no Wikipedia page for Dr. Wood but one for Richard Gage that redirects to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

Wikipedia Search Results For Dr. Judy Wood
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=%22Dr.+Judy+Wood%22&go=Go

Wikipedia Search Results For Richard Gage (Architect)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Gage_%28architect%29

Try posting a Wikipedia page for Dr. Judy Wood & see how fast it’s deleted

The truth is known & we had a chance. But well-meaning people who joined the “Truther Movement” were herded up & manipulated into trampling it. Groups are easy to manage & manipulate into being in lockstep with their leader. Sheeple need to leave the herd and read Dr. Wood’s book before they are fleeced. You won’t find truth in a club.