Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

John Kerry ADMITS Foreknowledge Of The Demolition Of WCT 7 (Stunning Video)

Saturday, September 14, 2013 6:16
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(N.Morgan) This will sure make the rats scurry! Kerry admits the demolition was intentional. Yes, Mr. Kerry, we’ve known for along time, but thanks for at least admitting it now. More evidence against this act of terrorism by the US government against its own people. From the horse’s mouth.. and John, how about a follow up, like, “HOW could they have had the building brought down in a controlled fashion without prior preparation.. and how could they have prepared for this without FOREKNOWLEDGE of the attacks?

 

 

 

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 22 comments
  • Grover

    Now, FBI must interrogate John Kerry.

  • Ideas Time

    Some will say they went in after a few small fires were set and then rigged the entire building to come down in a couple of hours. Really?????

  • TheEar252

    I Remember watching all of this on live tv as it was happening. The man that owned the WTC said on live tv he was given the order to PULL. For those of you that don’t know what that means , It is a demolition term for bringing down a building with explosives. Not sure why that clip has never been shown by anyone. I did not have a camera back then so I have no proof :cry:

    • Bill_H2

      I also recall the video, the building was deemed unsafe due to structural damage caused by the debris from the fall of two towers and was pulled

    • The Secret Behind Communism

      I too watched that same interview on TV as it happened. Larry Silverstein, the owner said that he had been talking with the fire chief and that the decision was made (all passive voice, as I recall) that the safest thing to do was to “pull it”.

      You can search youtube and see the various videos of it being pulled and you can see the detonation of timed charges blowing out of windows in a timed fashion.

    • LavenderRose

      Here is the clip of of the building owner saying pull it…. http://beforeitsnews.com/watercooler-topics/2013/09/british-man-wins-huge-victory-for-911-bbc-broadcast-building-7-demolition-big-win-in-court-2434100.html why they didnt go to jail is just beyond common belief that government is for the people.

  • AUSSIEwill

    good question

  • crabby

    look this can’t go on like JFK for 30 years an all the purps dead an gone .. we need to RE-investigate
    now while they’re still here on earth..

    pearl harbor less then a week or so to form a investigation committee ,, JFK very quick to form 9/11 ,, 444 days to get the ball rolling an a under inflated beach ball at that..

    but it’ll never happen unless the republickers break lock step with the red team..

    soooo what..!! they were behind 9/11 to usher in a new pearl harbor so to put terror fear in the citizens an chip away at their rights an constitution..

    install the already written patriot act, install a new gestapo like agency DHS an get us into neverending wars ,,, but atleast he didn’t get a BJ..

  • CWHJr

    Oops! He didn’t think that through.

  • CyberChas

    I don’t think there’s any question that they “pulled” Building 7, and then lied about it. However, there WOULD be a reason to have the building pre-set for destruction. As a facility that held CIA and other highly sensitive information, they would have wanted a way to quickly destroy it, if it was “taken” by enemies, so they would have made a destruction process a part of their requirements. An entire building seems like a pretty severe way of doing it, but if they had REALLY (REALLY!!!!) sensitive information there, they would do whatever they had to do.

    Lying about it was really unnecessary, as they could have just said the above and then fallen back to the “wall was going to come down, it was unstable, so we used what we had” reasoning.

    Still suspect that Building 7 is the key to unravelling the truth about 9/11, but be prepared for the above explanation to come out officially when they finally do get caught in their lies.

    • King of Shambhala

      CyberChas, I’m convinced. How do we explain WTC 1 and 2 then? Also preset for destruction?

  • Neil Armstrong

    Kerry’s just really not that bright you could ask him any leading question and he’ll give you an answer that is designed to make it appear he knows what you are talking about. If it really was brought down the charges had to have been put into place long before the attack, becuase it takes days to weeks to put into place the explosive charges necessary for a controlled demolition of a building that large. The rubble surrounding the world trade center did test positive for the explosives commonly used in demolition, I would think the people responsible would keep that information out of the knowledge of people like Kerry but who knows Bush Jr. is more stupider than Kerry.

    • crabby

      marvin bush ,jeb’s younger brother, was head of security at the world trade center

  • LifeIs

    No building has ever been rigged in advance for demolition. That would be dangerous in a fire, for one thing. It would be dangerous, period.

    Silverstein said “pull it,” and he admitted this in an on-camera interview later on. He tried to suggest he meant pull the firefighters out. Well, building owners don’t own the fire department. And firefighters would be called “them,” not “it.”

    And nobody runs around carrying demolition charges into burning buildings. It takes planning and time; it is a lot of work.

    And buildings that were closer to the twin towers didn’t get destroyed by debris from them.

    • crabby

      your statement ‘ no building has ever been rigged in advance for demolition . that would be dangerous in a fire ‘ .. is good logic but not true.. they have demo charges that nothing can activate them except the right digital codes..

      like i wrote above,, marvin bush , george bush’s younger brother , was head of security at the world trade center…

      could of been rigged up august 11th..

      • LifeIs

        Crabby what do you suppose the fire codes say about cutter charges and demolition charges, not to mention micronukes? What do building codes say about the electrical wiring of demolition charges?

        What do you suppose a fire would do to the wiring? Or the nanothermite? Or the explosives?

        What would the insurance company say about live explosives lying around all over? What would the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms say about explosives lying around all over?

        No building has ever been rigged in advance for demolition. Why would they be? No skyscraper has ever fallen over, as a result of fire. The floors may fall, but the steel frame will still be there.

        The fantasy of buildings rigged in advance was invented to explain Larry Silverstein being overheard – and recorded – saying “pull it,” and to explain why the 3 towers fell in their footprints. It is a fantasy.

      • crabby

        what part of a month /weeks/days in advance are you having a problem with..

        marvin bush ,jeb’s younger brother, was head of security at the world trade center..

      • LifeIs

        Crabby you missed this from CyberChas: “As a facility that held CIA and other highly sensitive information, they would have wanted a way to quickly destroy it, if it was “taken” by enemies, so they would have made a destruction process a part of their requirements. An entire building seems like a pretty severe way of doing it, but if they had REALLY (REALLY!!!!) sensitive information there, they would do whatever they had to do.”

        That’s the “in advance” part. The fantasy that the buildings had demolition charges in them, wired up, from the time they were built.

        That fantasy was circulated by Readers Digest, among others.

        The fantasy of buildings rigged in advance was invented to explain Larry Silverstein being overheard – and recorded – saying “pull it,” and to explain why the 3 towers fell in their footprints. It is a fantasy.

        Weeks before demolition is always the case.

  • Lliam

    Good story

    • crabby

      glad to meet you,, Lifeis..same uniform different foxhole..

  • MG

    Grover. What you don’t understand is what was destroyed that day.

    FBI? hah They are in on it. Why do you think Kerry knew? Everyone knew except the public.

    9-11? it was Cheney’s reply to Richard Greer and his 400 nsa, fbi, cia and top brass saying they were about to go to congress and testify that those agencies have been stealing money.

    Remember Cheney doesn’t negotiate.

  • Human Shield

    really? twelve years later and there are people out there that will defend the “official” story of the government’s still. I find that tragic and hilarious at the same time, mostly tragic. Well considering the fact that this nation has let the burglars in the backdoor for a hundred years now and still haven’t notices they’re being robbed (federal reserve) I guess we’ll have to wait another century before it becomes common knowledge that this was the mother of all false flags.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

Top Global

Top Alternative

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.