Private 9/11 Emails with Noam Chomsky

Dear Professor Chomsky,

      Will this video change your mind about 9/11?

 Eric Lawyer Firefighter for 9/11 Truth well-argumented Version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADygllD35t0

9/11 Nanoenergetics verses Noam Chomsky http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rnAwxOF1Ww

You could be the first person of significances to have witnessed explosive nanoenergetics in action. A quick survey will proof this theory.

“Nanoenergetics.” It’s a word that might sound like a new body-enhancement product, but it’s really all about the opposite: ripping bodies apart.”
http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2005/01/nanolife-vs-nanodeath.html
 

9/11 in the Academic Community” (Documentary) addresses this issue for courage or lack-thereof

I am Afraid it doesn’t bear on the overwhelming evidence that the Bush administration wasn’t involved. WTF

Those who think it’s significant should be writing articles in professional journals, convincing the professional societies, etc.  There no justification in hiding behind the pretext that it takes great courage to adopt these positions, which are virtually risk-less as compared with what activists do all the time.

Ironic that somehow he does not adopt 9/11 and David Cole a.k.a David Stein was hunted by the right wing jews and death threats from the terrorist group “Jewish Defense League” in 1997
 

Dan  [email protected]  Oct 20 to Noam

You could be the first person of significances to have witnessed explosive nanoenergetics in action. A quick survey will proof this theory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyjRx065Re8

“Nanoenergetics.” It’s a word that might sound like a new body-enhancement product, but it’s really all about the opposite: ripping bodies apart.”
http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2005/01/nanolife-vs-nanodeath.html

Evidence of bodies being “ripped bodies apart” and basically every single object at WTC  has been documented at NY State Museum at Albany.

Over a 1,000 Toilets have turned into easy-to-ship nano powders, readily passing between skin cells of first responders as nano dust.

Such videos are forbidden from society and Truth organizations such as  AE911Truth.org, .

If you search through the patent office for “nanoenergetics” I am sure you will find a list people who are making this stuff who are just down hall at Academia.

“Nanoenergetics.” It’s a word that might sound like a new body-enhancement product, but it’s really all about the opposite: ripping bodies apart.”

http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2005/01/nanolife-vs-nanodeath.html

“And to repeat, none of this, whatever one thinks of it, bears on the powerful evidence that the Bush administration had nothing to do with it.”

 I believe the evidence in this video is something for chemistry department to look at, after all its a chemical reacting with nano particles is exchanging electrons at near light speeds.  The Bush administration would know about the details, however a lot of people are working on this and success are brought to attention to people who might have broader policy goals in mind and continue up the chain of command not down from the Bush administration. The chemistry part of 9/11 had to be completed first before other arrangements were made. Those arrangement caused the formation the Bush administration. I believe you are looking at this in reverse. Another example is wheel causing the creation of the car.

“I’m familiar with the complaints about fear and repression. They’re a joke to anyone who has had any experience in political activism.”

The one person you talk to about this is Amy Goodman. She was at the scheduled demolition of building 7.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2RexpiIDXs

If you manage to get her to open up to you, then maybe you can understand what the situation is. What happened to her recordings and why she never talks about building 7 and what happened and why was not speaking out  a better option. Was she threatened?  Was a funding offer made? Did she report her experience to Police and gave up? Could it have stopped the war effort in its tracks? Who notified her about building 7 and what did they say was going to happen?

Ask Amy Goodman what happen before, during and after build 7 fell right in front of her.

Your preliminary conditions before you review the evidence seems outdated, undefined and artificially framed around a self made notion to perhaps build a wall for self protection reasons. Drug users use these same wall to deny they have a problem.

Noam Chomsky Oct 20 to me

It’s correct and well-known that the Iraq invasion was planned before 9/11.  Plenty of very credible sources.  That’s one of the major reasons for the conclusion that the Bush administration was not involved in 9/11, for quite obvious reasons, which I’ve repeatedly pointed out, though the words can’t be heard by those who build walls to protect themselves, to borrow your image.

No need to comment on the rest.

The reasons are quite straightforward, and have been presented many times to ears that are unwilling to listen.

Uncontroversially, the Bush administration (or their Masters, in your version) intended to invade Iraq well before 9/ll.  You agree, and have even sent me some of the minor evidence to this effect.
 
Uncontroversially, they blamed 9/11 mainly on Saudis, not Iraqis.

Uncontroversially, they had quite a struggle to gain support for the planned invasion of Iraq, and in fact overwhelmingly failed.  Almost the entire world was opposed, and even in the US in order to gain support they had to launch a huge propaganda campaign, fabricating laughable tales that soon fell apart discrediting them, etc.
 
Uncontroversially, if they had blamed it on Iraqis, they would have had clear sailing: overwhelming support domestically and internationally, a UN resolution, etc.
 
Therefore, they are either complete lunatics or they weren’t involved.
They are not lunatics.

QED

“Therefore, they are either complete lunatics or they weren’t involved.”

Reply