The official narrative of the September 11 attacks have been questioned since the day of execution. Truth seeking Americans have been waking up to alternative versions of the truth. Citizens have demanded a new investigation into the 9/11 attacks, one involving more input from architects and engineers. Many feel the 9/11 commission didn’t do as thorough of a job investigating the events surrounding the attacks. Are we not being told the truth about the 9/11 attacks? Is the government hiding something they don’t want us to know? In attempts to uncover the truth and get to the bottom what really happened that day, there’s still much America doesn’t know.

Here’s what we do know: On a Tuesday morning, four coordinated suicide attacks, each involving four hijacked commercial passenger jets, struck the United States. The cities targeted were Washington, D.C. and New York City. The 19 hijackers were part of the terrorist group al-Qaeda, formed by Osama bin Laden in the late 80′s. Two planes were flown into the north and south towers of the World Trade Centers (American Airlines Flight 11 at 8:46AM and United Airlines Flight 175 at 9:03AM). The third plane, American Airlines Flight 77, crashed into the Pentagon at 9:37AM. United Airlines Flight 93 was scheduled to crash into the State Capitol Building (as both Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al-Shibh have testified). The crash was averted due to passenger intervention and the fourth jet crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

These facts are not widely disputed. But the theory of why and how these attacks occurred remains the major point of interest. There’s something more that we’re not being told about September 11. But everyone, whether they admit it or not, knows this. What we don’t know is what about the attacks reality. So there are three main theories.

The 9/11 Attacks Theories

The first theory of the 9/11 attacks involves a powerful and complex terrorist organization. This organization was able to penetrate U.S. Intelligence and execute their plans on American soil. They’ve succeeded and were able to damage their targets, killing nearly 3,000 people in the process. How plausible is this theory? Based on the facts above, this happens to be the official narrative. The organization that took responsibility for the attacks, al-Qaeda (which means “the Base” in Arabic), have plotted several other attacks against the United States prior to the 9/11 attacks. The 1998 U.S. Embassy, USS Cole Bombings and the World Trade Center Bombing were all claimed by al-Qaeda. But while this theory is in line with the official narrative, it leaves many people wondering how this would be possible. Most American would like to think that U.S. intelligence was better than this, besides the bureaucracy that pervades the system. How then, could these terrorists possible get by airport security and train for months flying these same models during this operation?

The second theory of the 9/11 attacks involves the United States’ awareness of the attacks. According to this theory, the American government not only supported, but took advantage of the terrorist 9/11 attacks. These strikes would then be used as justification for declaring war on several Middle Eastern countries, already targeted in U.S. foreign policy. The War on Terror was launched shortly after, and several campaigns against both Afghanistan and Iraq began. How plausible is this theory? Based on what is known through history, very. Pearl Harbor was such an incident in which the American government knew about an attack, yet let it occur in order to officially enter war with near ubiquitous patriotic support. It explains how U.S. intelligence seemingly missed the opportunity to stop the 9/11 attacks from happening. Paradoxically, the 9/11 attacks had to happen in order to advance U.S. national security.

The third theory of the 9/11 attacks is the most conspiratorial in nature. This theory purports that the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks. This theory explains much of the mechanics surrounding the 9/11 attacks.

First, the scientific forensic evidence shows Building 7′s collapse in it’s own footprint to be symmetrical (and at free fall acceleration). This building was destroyed in just ten to fifteen seconds, which brings comparison to a classic controlled demolition. Was this a case of government or the terrorist planting devices in these buildings? If so, nineteen fundamentalist hijackers had worked to plant them in three of the most highly secure buildings in New York. This view proves to be very implausible…

Second, between September 6-7 of 2001, the Chicago Board of Option Exchange reported 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call by investors. 4500 put options on American Airlines. Only 748 put options on American Airlines the day before the 9/11 attack at a 6% increase. What this would suggest is foreknowledge of the 9/11 attack. But if this were true, why would the United States government plan and execute the 9/11 attacks? The answer: to reverse the inevitable declining American economy.

But all of these scenarios can’t be right, can they? Actually, yes. And together, they provide a more complete picture of why the attacks of September 11th happened. First, a terrorist cell DID penetrate U.S. intelligence. Al-Qaeda DID have a vendetta against Western Powers. And the terrorists DID plan property damage. However, top officials knew about it and were willing to take advantage of the attack. Through covert operations, and provided training for the hijackers, many of which were Saudis (of who certain princes of the Saudi government funded). Seeing that the terrorists attack were aligned with foreign policy goals years down the road, the government orchestrated supplemental and contigency plans. Flight times were coordinated, a convienent cell phone and camera outage at the appropiate locations were supplement attacks. Building 7 was a contigency plan.

But then, what is the ultimate goal? Was it to start the War of Terror, to enter the region where the petro-dollar is failing? If so, the 9/11 attacks would be the greatest false flag in record history.

Yet, how true is an of this? As of right now, this is merely speculation. But will we ever get to the bottom of this? Yes.

Abandon your assumptions. Stick to your convictions.

Other Articles On Clouverse:

Patriot Movement Questions Official 911 Attacks Story

September 11th Nineteen Hijackers “Other Than We Thought”

Controlled Demolition Evidence Mounts Up

9/11 Holographic Experience “Made For Television”

Saudi Arabia Believed To Be Connected To 9/11