Stunning 9/11 Videos Show "Missile" Emerging From South Tower
11/12/2014 – Content revised to include Fake Plane Evidence
Evidence shows the cruise missile emerging from the South Tower had to be photoshopped to overlay the image of the “fuselage” in order to impress the viewer that the aircraft magically survived a trip through structural steel to emerge relatively unscathed out the other side.
More Fake Plane Videos at Daniel Towsey Wordpress
PART 1 - Richard D. Hall
PART 2 - Richard D. Hall
This next video is an excerpt from one of several captured from different cameras that show what is intended to look like the aircraft fuselage emerging intact from the South Tower.
Video examination of the B-767 fuselage surviving an impossible trip through the South Tower to emerge miraculously intact out the other side.
Several different cameras appear to capture the fuselage exiting the South Tower in the video below. This may seem convincing until we confront the impossibiity of this event and how every network cooperated to misrepresent the images and the story using crisis actors, fake witness accounts and image editing to coverup the truth about the 9/11 Fale Flag.
Start watching at the 6 minute mark (click here) to see several impacts from different cameras that reveal a “missile” as it emerges from the South Tower. The Complete 12 minute video collection of 30 camera angles of South Tower impacts uploaded on Jun 29, 2011 (Click Here)
The alleged passenger jet that struck the South Tower behaved more like a remote-controlled “missile” photoshopped to approximate the appearance of a commercial Boeing-767 aircraft. Image editing errors reveal the “real’ missile in certain frames.
Whistleblower
“I am a former airline captain with over 9,000 flight hours, Captain on both the Boeing 747-400 and 737-300. After viewing many posted videos on “Youtube” I can tell you without hesitation that clearly aircraft number 2 B-767 – was radio controlled into the building – [World Trade Center] Tower 2. The “pod” mounted on the bottom of the aircraft, is manufactured by “Martin Marietta” Corporation in Los Angeles. The pod has been used extensively by the USAF for outfitting drone aircraft for over 22 years, and you can clearly see it in (4) of the amateur videos- just before impact, with Tower 2.” - Capt. Thomas Deatherage – Former commercial airline pilot. Aircraft flown: Boeing 737, 747. Certified Flight Instructor (single and multi-engine and instrument). 9,000+ total hours flown. – See more
SEPTEMBER CLUES: Examines Media Image Editing Blunders That Expose Fake Plane
Analysis with photographs of the modified aircraft with cylindrical objects mounted to bottom of the aircraft (Chris Bollyn)
THE MYSTERY POD – The Lockheed Martin AN/AAS-38 “Nitehawk” is a missile pod system for use with laser-guided munitions. A similar missile pod is seen on the underside of the plane that struck the South Tower on 9/11.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,599,135,665 |
| Stories: | 8,138,140 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
The planes were a hologram made to deceive the public the cause of the explosion. the explosion was caused by a small contained nuclear blast the triggered a thermite plasma chain reaction that caused the buildings to disintegrate. A plane could not, no matter how reinforced, enter a building of that size and strength and emerge through to the other side. If so, why did it not continue to emerge or why did it not blow up? This guy is a shill. The Pilots for 9/11 truth is probably a disinformation group just like the Engineers and Architects for 9/11 truth. Don’t believe this for a second. I do believe it was an inside job but no planes were used. There are videos of people on the ground not reacting to anything until the explosion. They surely would have looked up well ahead of time if a plane flying that low was approaching to see it fly overhead. This is ridiculous.
I totally agree. This video and the crisis actor screaming have already been exposed at Septemberclues.info where they expose all these media generated fake videos. This article appears to be more gate keeping to protect the brainwashing media.
Agree, no aircraft involved, a 100 ton aircraft will yield nearly 100 ton of wreckage, where did that go ?? Oh, you say it vaporized from the heat of the jet fuel ? 1,800 deg. F is not hot enough to even melt it,
How can we tell if some one has already ingested too much fluoride?
They believe this.
billR… Bull’s eye! “Thermite plasma chain reaction” Pull it!
Right ! holograms. Ha-ha ..You too would believe anything.
Beastus,
Only a hopeless moron would believe that two planes could fly right through steel and concrete built to resist them and not leave a single scrap of the plane on the ground below. Please explain why every network blacked out the scene where the computer generated plane emerged from out the other side and then appeared to get pulled back in. Fox used a two second blackout and the rest floated their banners up to the top of the building to try and cover up their humongous error that gave the whole scam away.
I am not going to discount what you say about this. I am only going add one thing.
A good friend of mine was in New York that day. Downtown. He said to me that he watched the airplane fly through the sky and hit the building. He saw it because he heard it. The sound drew his attention and he watched a plane hit the building.
I know he wouldn’t lie about something like that. He has no reason to.
hateriarch your friend saw an airplane. A military drone.
Haterlark were you paid to say that? the reason I ask is that I saw plenty of footage before the planes hit and no one looked up until there was an explosion not even in the interluded between the crash and the explosion which itself is an impossibility.
if it *were* a “hologram,” then why not simply make a hologram that looks exactly like any other American Airlines passenger jet?
seriously, though – can any of you “no planes” believers please answer my question?
why make a “hologram” that differs considerably from a run-of-the-mill American Airlines passenger jet?
StraightDopes,
It wasn’t a holagram. It was a special effects movie. If you saw the first broadcast, you saw the plane come out the other side of the building and get pulled back in. That is because the special effects movie that Fox was showing went awry. The helicopter pilot was special effects video expert and it was a partial live-computer generated special effects scene. The cartoon like cutout of the plane actually takes 6 seconds after the plane miraculously passes right through the steel and concrete but you can see the cutter charges going off to cut out an image of the plane.
It was a video masking technique and they blew it and got caught. Fox then covered up the scene with a 2 second blackout. All the networks were in on it because some of them floated their ID banners up to the top of the building to cover up that scene.
You can see all the details of this at Septemberclues.info where many of the crooked scumbags including these paid actors have been exposed.
Then why not make a “special effects movie” that was perfect?
Anon -
i saw September Clues quite a while ago, and wasn’t very impressed.
you’re not really answering my question – whether “hologram” or special effects, why not just use an illusion (let’s just use that word – “illusion,” or “illusory plane”) that looked exactly like a normal American Airlines passenger jet???
also, have you checked out any of Anthony Lawson’s videos on September Clues? they’re posted on youtube. check them out, if you haven’t yet.
hologram, no. CGI video, yes. perfect, no. but it doesn’t have to be perfect to fool all of us, for years.
but that’s not really an answer, LifeIs. i think we can all agree that an enormous amount of planning went into the events of 9-11-01, and what you are suggesting is that when it came to the plane(s), the conspirators suddenly got inexplicably sloppy and made a plane that bore little resemblance to an actual AA passenger jet, and then said, “ehhh… good enough for government work!”
it just doesn’t make too much sense.
and neither does the fact that, in some of the videos, you can clearly see people turning around to watch the impact of the jets into the towers, since they have been alerted by the sounds of the incoming planes.
and please check this out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4rvTxcMSY
i think that video does an excellent job at demonstrating the overwhelming implausibility of the “no planes” hypothesis.
CrowPie asks my question very succinctly.
StraightDopes i didn’t say there wasn’t a plane. I said the planes were military drones, small planes.
You didn’t see any real video of the incident. Where is the footage shot by Dominick Suter’s Urban Moving Systems crew? We’re not allowed to see it.
We have no authentic pictures of the planes or the impacts, or the damage, or the fires, or the collapses. Because the collapses were not caused by hijacked planes.
Real video would show fireballs coming up from below ground level, as described by witnesses. The fireballs that burned many of them, with radiant heat from a distance.
Why not make a PERFECT special effects movie?
1. There is no such thing.
2. They don’t need to work so hard. People have to look for the faults. And most do not.
3. Those who do look for the faults STILL tend to assume they are looking at real pictures,
so they argue foolishly about the meaning of details.
LifeIs:
>We have no authentic pictures of the planes or the impacts, or the damage, or the fires, or the collapses.
this isn’t any sort of evidence; this is a claim that requires that we first accept the premise that all the video we saw was faked. this, of course, requires that ALL the amateur photographers/videographers/etc. that were in NYC that day were somehow in on the scam, which is *extremely* hard to believe. this is the sort of claim that is also impossible to refute, since when someone shows you video, you will simply dismiss it out of hand as “not being real,” apparently without any sort of proof whatsoever. think about it: if they set up the scam THIS way, then if ONE. SINGLE. PERSON. were in NYC that day filming the events on their own private phone or camera and managed to get that film released to the public, then the whole entire fraud would fall apart. do you honestly think the planners of 9-11 were this sloppy and shortsighted?
speaking of sloppy, back to that plane that doesn’t really look like an American Airlines passenger jet. you said “there is no such thing” as a “perfect” special effects movie. but i’m asking why they didn’t simply use the “illusion” of an AA passenger jet that ACTUALLY LOOKED JUST LIKE an AA passenger jet?? they obviously could have done that. you say “people don’t look for faults,” but this just plain isn’t true – i’m asking you right now about the second jet, and the apparent “pod” on the bottom, and PLENTY of people have noticed that – it’s obviously not just me. so, why not just use the illusion (apologies to Guns n Roses) of an ACTUAL AA passenger jet? why go out of your way (and that’s what they must have done) to make it look DIFFERENT than an AA passenger jet??
also, what are you referring to when you said:
>Real video would show fireballs coming up from below ground level, as described by witnesses. The fireballs that burned many of them, with radiant heat from a distance.
i can think of at least ONE video – i believe it was shot by a gentleman on the coast of New Jersey, looking across the Hudson River – that does indeed show smoke rising from the bottom of the buildings, not too long before they collapsed.
and that ONE gentleman is emblematic of the problem i mentioned before: what if just one person who was not in on the scam was filming or taking pictures that day? then, the whole scam would be unmasked. the criminals are simply not that short-sighted.
StraightDopes, how do we know the video we saw is fake?
Good grief. Look at the “mystery pod” pictures. That plane is supposed to be
moving at 550 miles per hour, and it’s supposed to be less than a thousand
feet overhead. Do the math. Frames per second math. It would be a BLUR.
It would be covering EIGHT HUNDRED AND SEVEN feet per SECOND.
Divided by say 30 frames per second?
The plane would be covering TWENTY-SEVEN feet PER FRAME.
AMATEUR Video, oh, really.
Oddly, most folks in 2001 didn’t have cameras with them, at the ready. That is why we have “amateur” video and photographs from professionals. As documented really well here:
http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_2.shtml
And here is what happens to photographs that contradict an official lie. The government seizes them and hides them, as seen here:
http://articles.latimes.com/1996-01-18/local/me-25805_1_kennedy-fall
And more recently, in the Urban Moving Systems (Mossad) video, from 9-11,
which we have not seen.
Here is more evidence of fakery from the videos themselves:
http://septemberclues.info/power_of_imagery.shtml
http://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/911-wtc-planes-videos-proven-to-be-fake/
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.html
http://www.911closeup.com/nico/rendering_mistakes.html
http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI_aprilfools.html
Some of the evidence is found in witness statements:
http://911closeup.com/nico/witness_contradictions.html contains many witness statements
about planes.
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2007/12/ground-level-fireballs-disprove.html
Evidence that disproves the official story is buried. Ask William Rodriguez.
“During the 9/11 hearings, NBC brought a crew out to my house and spent a day taping my story but they never did air a word of it,” said Rodriguez. “Since then, some reporters and commentators have subtly warned me to keep quiet, told me my life could be in jeopardy and warned me that I really didn’t understand who I was dealing with.”
“His eyewitness account, backed up by at least 14 people at the scene with him, isn’t speculation or conjecture.”
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/24-Jun-2005.html
“Rodriguez’s evidence was not given in public and was not specifically itemized in the Commission Report.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rodriguez
The burden of proof is on the networks, who have been caught lying many times, and who
have broadcast fake video before.
And who have claimed in court that they have a right to lie.
https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/flashback-cnn-busted-producing-fake-news-from-first-gulf-war/
http://www.philly2philly.com/politics_community/politics_community_articles/2009/6/29/4854/fox_news_wins_lawsuit_misinform_public
” In a six-page written decision, the Court of Appeals decided the FCC’s position against news distortion is only a “policy,” not a “law, rule, or regulation.”
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1310807.html
Straightdopes, if you want to know why there’s a fake mystery pod in a fake video, ask the people who made it.
Next time we need to avoid being so emotional and hysterical if such an event ever again. Such behavior works in the best interest of those who establish the official drama. We need to be stoned cold sober and look around next time. Take pictures of the surroundings.
We’re already there. Sandy Hoax, Boston Bombing, the Aurora Colorado Theater Massacre, the Syrian gas, ISIS, al CIADUH, and MH-17 have all been exposed now in record time. We’re onto them now, and they know it. When it comes to the US Mafia and their mouthpiece, the US State Propaganda Ministry, it is now always presumed that telling the truth is the rare exception, not the rule. If their lips are moving, as with their US Mafia Congresswhores, it’s usually another snowjob in the making.
It was nothing more than video graphics and precision-placed bombs….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja67D0vKh6U#t=18
The Ziocon/CIA/CFR-controlled US State Propaganda Ministry was caught redhanded that day with several major screw-ups that this video graphics expert, Ace Baker, exposes quite nicely in this excellent film. For the video graphics portion start at around the 1 hr:50 minute mark and prepare to have your mind blown wide open.
here is an outstanding refutation of simon shack and ace baker’s “work” (ace baker strangely faked his own suicide while on the air with jim fetzer during fetzer’s radio show. i think people behave this way after they reflect on their “work” and are overwhelmed with guilt, so they intentionally discredit themselves rather than disown their “work,” and perhaps earn themselves a REAL shotgun blast)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4rvTxcMSY
please take a look at it, Sic Semper (and all you no-planers) and tell me what you think.
Sic Semper:
here is a debate of sorts between “ace baker” and a CGI expert by the name of Steven Wright:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei-acAHYb8c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqLWT7332Qg
after watching that, i’m relatively certain that any honest observer would have to disregard “ace’s” conclusions.
i’m not a huge fan of james randi or the organization that puts out this show (though much of randi’s work is laudable – the phony tv preacher/”faith healer” stuff comes to mind), but i think the host’s ad hominem attack on baker’s sanity might actually have some validity to it, considering the fact that he bizarrely faked his own suicide on a radio show.
again, it’s either demonstrative of the fact that he is seriously unbalanced, or perhaps regrets his own efforts as part of a psy op.
@ StraightDopes,
If you watched my video, you would see where he confronts Steve Wright as well and proves Steve’s comments and attempts at refutations to be ludicrous on their face. Steve tries to say that the AGC (Automatic Gain Control) on the camera is why Faux News and CNN go to “black screen”. He says the AGC was reacting to the explosion, which is on its face utterly ludicrous and an insult to anyone’s intelligence and even common sense. By that ridiculous logic, every explosion seen on camera that day would have caused “black screen”, which wasn’t the case. To prove his point, Ace Baker pointed his camera at the bright sun and the AGC NEVER engaged whatsoever. The Chopper 5 cameraman, Kai Simonsen, who was also a video graphics expert, was also interviewed by Ace Baker. When asked why the camera went to “black Screen”,e also insulted our intelligence by claiming he was installing a zoom lens at the time, which is poppycock as well. Kai Simonsen is also lying through his teeth.
Sic Semper:
my sincere apologies for not having first watched the video you posted before posting my own comment. but with all due respect, the video you posted is THREE HOURS LONG. might you be able to cue it up to the relevant portion and post a link, or maybe give me a time marker?
i guess it is the contention of the no-planers that all those videos that show people reacting to the sound of the incoming airliners, are somehow faked as well?
and how do you interpret ace baker’s suicide stunt on fetzer’s show? to me, these are the actions of a man who is not exactly screaming “credibility.” i think the whole debate on the existence of airlines that day serves to discredit the 9-11 truth movement for a couple reasons: first, it just sounds like outright lunacy to anyone who might be new to the very many questions, “coincidences,” and impossible contradictions and inconsistencies regarding that day. second, we needn’t even demonstrate the specifics of how the building were destroyed; we need only show how flatly impossible the official conspiracy theory is, and how it requires a childish level of credulity and the complete suspension of disbelief in order to believe it.
bringing up this “no planes” stuff only serves to discredit the movement. even if you sincerely believe that no actual planes were used that day, then SURELY you would have realized it must have been designed that way by those who pulled it off in order to make those who would bring up the no-planes stuff automatically discredit themselves in the eyes of those who bought into the official story… in which case, it would make perfect sense for those of us who reject the official conspiracy theory to simply focus on those eminently provable things i mentioned in the first point: the impossible contradictions, inconsistencies, “coincidences,” etc., and stay away from things which might be designed to make us look foolish.
am i making my point clear?
@StraightDopes,
Start from the 1 hr:50 minute mark.
Critics of this post have a good point. I added content including Richard D. Halls’s compelling evidence of image editing that was too well researched to ignore.
billR thermite was not needed, and it would have taken a lot of time and work to set it.
The nuclear blasts were underground. They made cavities under the central cores. The cores fell downward and pulled the buildings in on themselves.
This is why witnesses saw “fireballs” coming up from below ground level. It is why the ground shook before the collapses.
It is why steel was red hot, glowing, in the debris, several weeks after.
Thermite doesn’t do that, unless you have truckloads of the stuff.
It is why the USGS samples of dust from around Manhattan contained byproducts of uranium decay.
The bombs were d-t fusion bombs, which use minimal amounts of uranium. The flashes are almost all gamma and X rays. They produce an EMP, and they produce minimal amounts of fallout. They are neutron bombs.
People saw “small airplanes” hit the towers. Military drones.
The video we all saw was CGI.
I am tending to agree that there were nuclear devices planted in the basements, however, that would not explain all of the little explosions and the well ordered sequence of collapse. I saw a post on an obscure website from someone claiming to have been paid “six figures” to help replace the fire extinguishers mounted on the columns with fake ones containing shaped charges. I think that would be necessary, in addition to the devices in the basement to explain everything.
Soooo IF everyone is coming to the conclusion of the FACT that 9/11 was an inside job WHO cares how they get there.
I was with my dad and my brother watching all this in the first few minutes. BOTH of them are Commercial and small plane and helicopter pilots.
BOTH of them said a MISSILE went into the Pentagon and that NO commercial plane made that 2 second clip that was the ONLY one released by the GOV.
I pointed out that there are likely to be a couple of hundred cameras pointed at the ridiculous hole and WHERE is all that????
All of us KNEW the FEDS were LYING from day ONE and anyone who does not know this today is an idiot.
AMERICANS KNOW our gov. did this but would rather spend a decade arguing about HOW it happened and NOT WHY it happened and MOST even KNOW WHY but would rather DO NOTHING TO STOP THEM while arguing online.
9/11 was the beginning of the END of AMERICA and NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE about THAT!!
Soooo IF everyone is coming to the conclusion of the FACT that 9/11 was an inside job WHO cares how they get there.
I was with my dad and my brother watching all this in the first few minutes. BOTH of them are Commercial and small plane and helicopter pilots.
BOTH of them said a MISSILE went into the Pentagon and that NO commercial plane made that 2 second clip that was the ONLY one released by the GOV.
I pointed out that there are likely to be a couple of hundred cameras pointed at the ridiculous hole and WHERE is all that????
All of us KNEW the FEDS were LYING from day ONE and anyone who does not know this today is an idiot.
AMERICANS KNOW our gov. did this but would rather spend a decade arguing about HOW it happened and NOT WHY it happened and MOST even KNOW WHY but would rather DO NOTHING TO STOP THEM while arguing online.
9/11 was the beginning of the END of AMERICA and NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE about THAT!!
THE PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH are no disinformationists and NEITHER are the ENGINEERS and ARCHITECTS for 9/1 TRUTH and so WHAT does that make you???
THE HOLOGRAM thing is TRUE and has been proven by many, many people BUT people who DON’T know about it still think the GOV. photo-shopped the pictures.
Soooo IF everyone is coming to the conclusion of the FACT that 9/11 was an inside job WHO cares how they get there.
I was with my dad and my brother watching all this in the first few minutes. BOTH of them are Commercial and small plane and helicopter pilots.
BOTH of them said a MISSILE went into the Pentagon and that NO commercial plane made that 2 second clip that was the ONLY one released by the GOV.
I pointed out that there are likely to be a couple of hundred cameras pointed at the ridiculous hole and WHERE is all that????
All of us KNEW the FEDS were LYING from day ONE and anyone who does not know this today is an idiot.
AMERICANS KNOW our gov. did this but would rather spend a decade arguing about HOW it happened and NOT WHY it happened and MOST even KNOW WHY but would rather DO NOTHING TO STOP THEM while arguing online.
9/11 was the beginning of the END of AMERICA and NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE about THAT!!
THE PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH are no disinformationists and NEITHER are the ENGINEERS and ARCHITECTS for 9/1 TRUTH and so WHAT does that make you???
THE HOLOGRAM thing is TRUE and has been proven by many, many people BUT people who DON’T know about it still think the GOV. photo-shopped the pictures AND MANY think that planes hit the building BUT airplane wings cannot penetrate steel and BOTH the Pilot and Engineer and Architects for TRUTH on 9/11 said so. THEY nuked it and used holograms to FOOL the masses. IT worked.
there are competing conspiracy “theories”, but they only compete with the OCT not the conspiracy reality, as they all have anomalies, inconsistencies, improbabilities, and out right impossibilities that will keep them forever in the realm of “theory” unsupported by fact. These conspiracy “theories” that eschew the OCT only to embrace other utter nonsense (like: planes didn’t hit the WTC, holograms and “video trickery” were used instead; the three WTC skyscrapers demolished on 9-11 were destroyed by exotic, space-based, directed energy beam weapons; a commercial jet really did hit the Pentagon) are in reality all part of a concerted COINTELPRO-style USG disinformation campaign designed to splinter and marginalize those of us who have solved the Rubik’s Cube of 9-11. These “theories” don’t compete with what is known to be true by the vast majority of the 9-11 Truth Movement, they are deliberate and elaborate disinformation campaigns designed to make those of us who do know the truth look foolish by association. Smiles…. smooth operator…. here’s the real deal truth…. if you care to…. http://whodidit.org/
So far, it looks like the Mossad planted the demolition explosives and Saudi Arabia provided and funded the terrorists with the complicity of the Bush family, but your beliefs are exactly why some of my friends and relatives don’t believe me and the CIA succeeds in covering things up using ridicule.
either way, it was an inside job done by our gov to get people on board to invade more helpless countries ans steel their resources.. at least this guy is providing his theories to this incident and not just agreeing with what people were told to believe by cnn
You all have it wrong. The buildings themselves were holograms, since the originals were stolen by a group of grey aliens led by King Tut’s love child in 1999.
IF it emerged from the other side where did it go? cos we saw nothing falling down.,and neither going up.
Flying beer cans could not punch thru concrete and steel and come out the other side. Where were the plane parts????? There were none except the landing gear found by what CNN?? with a rope tied to it. Really??
Flying beer cans could not punch thru concrete and steel and come out the other side. Where were the plane parts????? There were none except the landing gear found by what CNN?? with a rope tied to it. Really?? Another Hollywood production.
So, NO OTHER photographer had this in their video? They had to do a FOIA to get this one? Doesn’t that make anybody a bit suspicious?
Another video showed NOTHING hitting the towers. Obviously, one video is FAKE. Which one?
Simon Shack had this video and a whole lot more on his series “September Clues” many years ago. Look for the “Nose Out” video.
If they can produce an entire city, with cabs, people, buses, buildings etc, and fool the Chinese who woke up to this new city that appeared overnight, do you not think they can fool you with hologram aircraft and more? This was done twice to the people in china having an entire city appear overnight with all the trimmings, and then go away just as quickly. No planes hit the twin towers. No matter how strong they were, they are still flying beer cans when it comes to the fuselage
, and would not have gone entered intact nor come out the other side. A missile along with preset explosives in the buildings is what hit the buildings and brought them down. just a missile alone would not make the buildings fall at free fall speed and turn everything to dust. It was a combination of events and or things. How do you explain no plane parts, and not one desk, computer, phone file cabinet found intact or even resembling such? It was all turned to dust. A building #7 goes down at free fall speed and is exactly as towers 1&2 without any aircraft hitting it, with the only saying pull it. Planes did not cause this wake up.
Far more revealing is the Pentagon – a small round hole with intact, unbroken windows on either side and no aircraft wreckage – and we’re supposed to believe a massive jetliner evaporated on impact there?
The B-25 Empire State Building crash was a 1945 aircraft accident in which a B-25 Mitchell piloted in thick fog crashed into the Empire State Building. The plane was fully loaded and the resulting fire burned for 40 min. One of the engines was found over a block away. The accident did not compromise the building’s structural integrity. The building was open for business the following Monday.
As a trucker who worked on clearing debris out of the site, I only tell you this much. I hauled 135,000 pounds( thats about 70 ton) of airliner, debris and parts, from the site to another location for FTSB examination. Does that change your mind no. I thought so, it’s pretty closed.
Interesting, how did you separate it from the building debris?
StarRyder you would be more convincing if you knew that (a) the NTSB – not FTSB – investigates crashes and (b) in THIS case the FBI took over.
When the NTSB denied a Freedom of Information Act request for information about wreckage and “black box” recorders, in 2008:
” the Safety Board assisted the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as the FBI investigated the circumstances under which the four aircraft crashed, pursuant to Congress’s direction requiring the Board to relinquish its investigative priority to the FBI when the Safety Board and FBI determine that an intentional criminal act likely caused the accident at issue”
” the Safety Board does not have any records that describe the “process” by which the Board or the FBI identified wreckage.”
http://911blogger.com/node/17139/print
StarRyder here’s your problem. For aluminum and composite airplanes to cut through the steel perimeter columns – which were spaced 3 feet apart —
— which is a smaller width than the engines of the alleged planes —
the plane would have to be going so very fast, that the metal would liquify.
So, as guerre de nom asks, how would you identify plane debris?
The parts that went through the windows would be in tiny pieces. And oh, by the way, aluminum burns.
And those planes COULD NOT fly that fast, at low altitude. Wind resistance increases as a square of velocity. Passenger planes flying at THREE TIMES the speed that is normal at that altitude
would experience NINE TIMES the aerodynamic load.
American Airlines flight 587 crashed on November 12, 2001, when its tail fin snapped off.
It was flying at normal speed, but the pilots applied too much rudder, in response to a crosswind.
Now imagine what would happen if you tried to maneuver a passenger plane flying three times that fast, with NINE times the aerodynamic load.
The wide-body jet sized holes in the buildings we saw on television were CGI. All of the video we saw was CGI.
Those were not passenger planes seen on radar, and they are not the “small planes” seen by witnesses crashing into the towers. Those were military drones.
And drones are much smaller than 757s and 767s…. Global Hawk is 13 tons, it has composite wings, and a top speed of 357 mph.
So, no, you didn’t transport 70 tons of airplane.
The 2013 find of an airplane wheel, between two buildings in Manhattan, with the rope used
to lower it in place still attached, is positive proof of fraud. Does it change your mind that someone planted wreckage 12 years after the event?
StarRyder… I call BS… There would be at least “one” cellphone image of airplane debris somewhere/anywhere and there has been absolutely nothing, “nothing”. And if you were honest/credible you would’ve taken a photograph of the airplane debris with your cell phone and provided a link to the image so I call BS.
Cellphones with cameras were barely on the market in North America in 2001.
Cellphones with cameras were barely on the market in North America in 2001
Three69ingSquirrels…you are correct, It appears cellphones with cameras did not come into the picture until 2004ish. I stand corrected.
This is total insanity. Were there any truth to the idea that the planes had “hardened fuselages” one woul dneed to ask: 1. when was this accomplished 2. How did these planes get back into normal service carrying unsuspecting passengers and 3. if they were hard enough to pas right thru the towers how come no intact fuselage or parts bigger than 2-3 feet were never found? What you are seeing in the video, assuming it wasn’t photoshopped, is the air compression wave of what once was the forward part of the airplane ( a shaped shock wave if you will) Were it an intact fuselage, why is it not visible falling to the ground after the impacts?
These “Inside Jobs” stories are an affront to those who died and is sheer imagination of people who have axes to grind against the US Gov’t and the Bush administration.
I originally “joined” this blog in the hopes of hearing truths and stimulating meaningful discussions. Instead this entire site is unadulterated BS and with this post I end my association . Those who want to believe this crap will say “Good Riddence”. To them I say: 1. get a life and 2. find something worthwhile and constructive to do!
if your going to splice 2 photos together at lest keep the engs Evan
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/137505-us-air-forces-1950s-supersonic-flying-saucer-declassified
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sir08GXl4tc
never believe the government they are not your friend
if your going to splice 2 photos together at lest keep the engs Evan
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/137505-us-air-forces-1950s-supersonic-flying-saucer-declassified
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sir08GXl4tc
never believe the government they are not your friend
This is total insanity. Were there any truth to the idea that the planes had “hardened fuselages” one woul dneed to ask: 1. when was this accomplished 2. How did these planes get back into normal service carrying unsuspecting passengers and 3. if they were hard enough to pas right thru the towers how come no intact fuselage or parts bigger than 2-3 feet were never found? What you are seeing in the video, assuming it wasn’t photoshopped, is the air compression wave of what once was the forward part of the airplane ( a shaped shock wave if you will) Were it an intact fuselage, why is it not visible falling to the ground after the impacts?
These “Inside Jobs” stories are an affront to those who died and is sheer imagination of people who have axes to grind against the US Gov’t and the Bush administration.
I originally “joined” this blog in the hopes of hearing truths and stimulating meaningful discussions. Instead this entire site is unadulterated BS and with this post I end my association . Those who want to believe this crap will say “Good Riddence”. To them I say: 1. get a life and 2. find something worthwhile and constructive to do!
With all the important stuff that is happening in the world, some folks are still fixated on this. go figure.
With the bizarre comments about holograms being used etc, it is pretty sad and amazing to me.
I agree that termite was used not only on the twin towers but in bldg. #7, but the way it got there is convoluted with this misinformation.
No doubt part of the misinformation intent of the current propaganda machine.
Sorry ‘Not buying this.
Exploding bolts and electrically activated ignitors cut the perimeter panel steel into smaller chunks which were easily pushed aside. Exploding bolts AND thermite steel cutter applied from a standard caulking gun were onsite and installed since 1969.
Mr Fred Rogers the steel box perimeter columns were three feet apart. If that helps.
Exploding bolts and electrically activated ignitors cut the perimeter panel steel into smaller chunks which were easily pushed aside. Exploding bolts AND thermite steel cutter applied from a standard caulking gun were on site and installed since 1969.
The damage to public debate caused by Fetzer’s hologram folly is evident. He was not there and knows nothing about steel. Please ignore hologram nonsense masking U.S. military participation.
With all the important stuff that is happening in the world, some folks are still fixated on this. go figure.
With the bizarre comments about holograms being used etc, it is pretty sad and amazing to me.
I agree that thermite was used not only on the twin towers but in bldg. #7, but the way it got there is convoluted with this misinformation.
No doubt part of the misinformation is the intent of the current propaganda machine.
Sorry ‘Not buying this.
But I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.
With all the important stuff that is happening in the world, some folks are still fixated on this. go figure.
With the bizarre comments about holograms being used etc, it is pretty sad and amazing to me.
I agree that thermite was used not only on the twin towers but in bldg. #7, but the way it got there is convoluted with this misinformation.
No doubt part of this misinformation is the intent of the current propaganda machine.
Sorry ‘Not buying this.
But I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.
This is all disinformation, the planes were holograms, otherwise the tail and wing would have sheared off from hit solid steel thicker than tank armor! Go to youtube and search “nosed out 9/11″ and you’ll see proof that it was a hologram as you see the holographic cockpit come out the other side and POOF evaporate like somebody turned off the switch! This was all a hoax to make you believe in the hijackers! There were no hijackers! These buildings were demolished using micro nukes – this has been proven now with the Snowden leaks that only VeteransToday.com put out! Turn off ALL fake news! Turn off all controlled opposition alt media that censors VeteransToday – they are all liars!
How stupid are you? Because holograms don’t work like they do in Star Trek, with force fields. Real holograms require a recording medium, whether that’s film, reflective foils, fine dust, etc. To get true colors, you’d need at least three lasers of different colors working in perfect synchronicity. Then you’d have to somehow fake the sound of jet engines.
Since 1) it was a clear, nearly cloudless day, there wasn’t anything for the lasers to focus on to create an image; 2) people heard the jet engines; and 3) we have real debris from other planes like Flight 93, plus cell phone calls from passengers on those planes, your claim of holograms is just stupid and near insane.
It’s apparent to me that you don’t know jack about how holograms work at all.
“Real debris from flight 93″??? REALLY? GOOGLE FLIGHT 93 CRASH SITE. THERE’S A SMALL HOLE IN THE GROUND WITH ZERO WRECKAGE, LUGGAGE, BODIES, ETC. NOTHING, BUT A LITTLE TRASH. THE CLEAN UP CREW LEFT, STATING “THERE WAS NOTHING THERE” JUST A HOLE IN THE GROUND! LIKE PENTAGON. HOLE WAY TOO SMALL FOR JET AND AGAIN, NO WRECKAGE. MISSILE FOR SURE. PHONE CALLS WERE A JOKE, TOO. ONE DUDE WAS RECORDED SAYING ” MOM THIS IS…STATED HIS FIRST AND LAST NAME! DO YOU SAY THAT WHEN CALLING YOUR MOTHER?? SERIOUSLY! PLANES JUST CANT FLY THROUGH BUILDINGS! IF ONE HITS WATER, IT’S ANNIHILATED. THERE ARE SO MANY ENDLESS GOOFS IN THIS HOAX, IT’S INSULTING TO ANYONE WITH AN IQ OVER 10. I KNOW A JEWELER WHO WAS ACTUALLY THERE IN HIS GROUND FLOOR STORE AND HE HEARD EXPLOSIONS! I TOLD HIM THOSE WERE BOMBS IN THE BASEMENT WHERE INTENSELY HOT STEEL WAS BOILING FOR WEEKS LIKE A FOUNDRY. PLUS, BLDG 7 WAS REPORTED “FALLING DOWN’ BEFORE IT ACTUALLY DID BY BBC. NO PLANE HIT THAT! HUNDREDS OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STATED NO WAY CAN BUILDINGS FREE FALL THAT FAST STRAIGHT DOWN, UNLESS IT’S CONTROLLED DEMO. PERIOD. PLUS, EVERYTHING WAS “DUSTIFIED”. NO CHAIRS, CABINETS, TABLES, EQUIPMENT, NOTHING. ALL FROM JET FUEL?YEAH, RIGHT. USE YOUR HEAD! BUT A HIJACKERS PASSPORT SURVIVED. AMAZING. EVEN MILES AWAY ON ROOSEVELT BRIDGE WINDOWS BLOWN OUT OF CARS, TIRES MELTED, NO BODY DAMAGE. GOOGLE DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS. (AS USED ON PAUL WALKER AND MIKE HASTINGS). EXTREME HEAT IS THE KEY IN ALL CASES. JEWELER STILL BELIEVES PLANE THEORY, EVEN THOUGH HE SAW NO LUGGAGE, WRECKAGE; WHATSOEVER FROM A JUMBO JET! HE SHOWED ME BLACK PLANE VID AND I SAID “WHERE’S THE LOGO???” SHUT HIS ASS UP. THINK THEYD USED CORRECT LOGOS ON HOLOGRAM. PLUS, JETS CANT FLY AT THAT ALTITUDE LIKE THAT AVIATION EXPERTS SAY. ALSO, 2 OF THE 4 PLANES WERE STILL LISTED IN CIRCULATION BY FAA UNTIL EVERYONE STARTED NOTICING AND ASKING WHY! ALSO, GOOGLE 911 DEAD WITNESSES. MANY DIED FROM DIFFERENT CAUSES BECAUSE THEY KNEW THE TRUTH AND WERE TALKING. THERE’S SO MUCH MORE, IT WOULD TAKE ALL NIGHT AND MORE SPACE THAN HERE. MOST OF US AREN’T SHEEPLE, THANKFULLY. ALL WE CAN DO IS PRESENT INSURMOUNTABLE EVIDENCE. IF YOU’RE STILL STUPID ENOUGH TO REFUTE INNUMERABLE VISIBLE, DOCUMENTED FACTS BY EXPERTS, THERE’S NO HOPE. CLEARLY AMONGST ACTV-1 VICTIMS (CHLOROVIRUS, THE NEWLY DISCOVERED STUPID DISEASE)
MrAnthony there are varying descriptions of the engine sounds. “Small plane” and “turboprop” are two.
They were the sounds of the jet engines of the drones that were used.
We have the April 26 (should have been April 1st) 2013 “real debris,” landing gear “found” between two buildings, supposedly unnoticed for 12 years, with the rope that was used to lower it into place still attached. Is THAT the kind of “real debris from planes” you meant?
We had one small part of a jet engine, in Manhattan, supposedly found, supposedly from one of the 9-11 planes. From the size of it, I’d guess it was a drone engine.
Gee, I’d expect you to give up the cell phone story, after the FBI admitted that Ted Olson didn’t speak with Barbara at all. Barbara the box cutter story source.
And after we learned there were two “let’s roll” hero stories, one for the American audience and one for the Israeli one. (Daniel Lewin.)
And after we learned that the software to make your voice sound like anybody’s voice has been widely available since 1995.
As for hijacking a Boeing passenger plane, that’s impossible. The actual pilot is a computer, and the computer can be remotely controlled. In the event of a hijacking, it would be remotely controlled.
What happened on 9-11 was the product of over 100 years of Zionist scheming to blackmail/bully the nations of the world by terrorism.
Protocol 9:13 (not 9-11)
“You may say that the GOYIM will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a maneuver of such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail – the undergrounds, metropolitans, those subterranean corridors which, before the time comes, will be driven under all the capitals and from whence those capitals will be blown into the air with all their organizations and archives.”
There are competing conspiracy “theories”, but they only compete with the OCT not the conspiracy reality, as they all have anomalies, inconsistencies, improbabilities, and out right impossibilities that will keep them forever in the realm of “theory” unsupported by fact. These conspiracy “theories” that eschew the OCT only to embrace other utter nonsense (like: planes didn’t hit the WTC, holograms and “video trickery” were used instead; the three WTC skyscrapers demolished on 9-11 were destroyed by exotic, space-based, directed energy beam weapons; a commercial jet really did hit the Pentagon) are in reality all part of a concerted COINTELPRO-style USG disinformation campaign designed to splinter and marginalize those of us who have solved the Rubik’s Cube of 9-11. These “theories” don’t compete with what is known to be true by the vast majority of the 9-11 Truth Movement, they are deliberate and elaborate disinformation campaigns designed to make those of us who do know the truth look foolish by association. Smiles…. smooth operator…. here’s the real deal truth…. if you care to…. http://whodidit.org/
James Smith as long as you imagine that the video you saw from the TV networks was real, you are missing the main point.
The “news” is controlled.
James Smith here are some very recent examples of fake news video:
Today: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2835663/Syrian-hero-boy-FAKE-Footage-youngster-dodging-sniper-fire-rescue-girl-actually-shot-Gladiator-film-set-Norwegian-director-using-professional-actors.html
and: http://www.activistpost.com/2014/11/wests-propaganda-war-on-syria-exposed.html
2012: http://www.infowars.com/syria-danny-caught-staging-cnn-war-propaganda-stunt/
2011: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13744980
Now look at the top of this page at the frames from the video of the underside of the plane…from the Christopher Bollyn site.
You are looking directly up…perpendicular to the direction of travel of a plane that is supposed to be flying at 550 mph. It is supposed to be less than a thousand feet away.
It is supposed to be covering 807 feet per second.
If the video is recording at 30 frames per second, the plane is supposed to be covering 27 feet per frame.
Even if you could TRACK the plane with your camera, at that distance and speed,
which you can’t….
You would still have every part of that image in a 27 foot long streak, a blur.
There would be no detail.
There would be no recognizable image.
Get a clue. Fake plane pictures means the planes were not what we were told.
Any one who believes this bull crap has got to have a screw or two loose. Holograms,
Missals, Thermo nuclear devices, exploding bolts planted in 1969. Our own government doing this. You people need to see a shrink, and I suggest you do it today. Just because your stupid, does not mean the rest of us are.
RETW
*cough* we don’t have any authentic video. And the “hologram” story is a disinformation joke. If we had actual video, and not CGI from a movie studio, we would see what eyewitnesses described.
“Small planes,” military drones. Explosions and fire from bombs and fuel (the “ups batteries”) planted in the towers.
And the “fireballs” coming up from below ground, the shaking of the ground before the collapses, the burns on people who were not near any fire. Caused by the subterranean nuclear bombs that made cavities in the rock below the central cores.
The cores dropped and pulled the towers in on themselves.
The absolute proof of nuclear devices comes from the USGS analysis of the dust produced by the WTC.
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/
The barium and strontium, which shouldn’t be there at all, vary in proportion to each other.
They came from the same source.
April 3, 2011, New York Post: “Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has found that firefighters who dug for victims at the World Trade Center are getting cancer at a higher rate than firefighters before 9/11 — and some types of cancer are “bizarrely off the charts,” say sources briefed on the seven-year, federally funded study.”
He has not yet disclosed the data, but sources say he has cited unusual rises in three blood cancers — leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma — as well as esophageal, prostate and thyroid cancers. ”
The US air defense system didn’t intercept the “jetliners,” so military pilots couldn’t see them. We heard the passenger plane story from the television networks. We saw only video from the television networks. And from the infamous “Naudets” (anagram of Duane St.) who just happened to be there aiming a camera in the right direction.
RETW i prefer to use the term “misinformed,” rather than call you stupid.
It was just video graphics, folks…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja67D0vKh6U#t=18
The US State Propaganda Ministry was in on this from the get-go and willingly participated in this Psy-Op.
*cough* we don’t have any authentic video. And the “hologram” story is a disinformation joke. If we had actual video, and not CGI from a movie studio, we would see what eyewitnesses described.
“Small planes,” military drones. Explosions and fire from bombs and fuel (the “ups batteries”) planted in the towers.
And the “fireballs” coming up from below ground, the shaking of the ground before the collapses, the burns on people who were not near any fire. Caused by the subterranean nuclear bombs that made cavities in the rock below the central cores.
The cores dropped and pulled the towers in on themselves.
The absolute proof of nuclear devices comes from the USGS analysis of the dust produced by the WTC.
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/
April 3, 2011, New York Post: “Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has found that firefighters who dug for victims at the World Trade Center are getting cancer at a higher rate than firefighters before 9/11 — and some types of cancer are “bizarrely off the charts,” say sources briefed on the seven-year, federally funded study.”
He has not yet disclosed the data, but sources say he has cited unusual rises in three blood cancers — leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma — as well as esophageal, prostate and thyroid cancers. ”
The US air defense system didn’t intercept the “jetliners,” so military pilots couldn’t see them. We heard the passenger plane story from the television networks. We saw only video from the television networks. And from the infamous “Naudets” (anagram of Duane St.) who just happened to be there aiming a camera in the right direction.
Check out this video graphics expert’s expose of the US Media’s culpability in the Psy-Op of 9/11/01. It was all just video graphics and bombs with the Twin Towers – no planes whatsoever. This video by Ace Baker has been the one that has changed the minds of many 9/11 truthers who formerly dismissed No-Planers as buffoons. This guy gives incontrovertible highly damning evidence that eviscerates the US Mafia’s fairytale. Proving it was no planes is the linchpin that when proven destroys the entire US Fairytale on its face and w now have that proof…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja67D0vKh6U#t=18
Check out this video graphics expert’s expose of the US Media’s culpability in the Psy-Op of 9/11/01. It was all just video graphics and bombs with the Twin Towers – no planes whatsoever. This video by Ace Baker has been the one that has changed the minds of many 9/11 truthers who formerly dismissed No-Planers as buffoons. This guy gives incontrovertible highly damning evidence that eviscerates the US Mafia’s fairytale. Proving it was no planes is the linchpin that when proven destroys the entire US Fairytale on its face and we now have that proof…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja67D0vKh6U#t=18
Airplane fuselages are made of aluminum. Their nosecones are made of HOLLOW THERMOPLASTIC, yet they would have you believe that the nosecone emerging after plowing through 2-inch thick steel box columns OUT THE OPPOSITE END OF THE BUILDING is completely undeformed and intact, in fact no different from its shape before it entered the building. You are not that stupid, People. WTFU!!! That is CARTOON PHYSICS which is exactly what you get with video graphics screw-ups. This so-called “Pinocchio’s Nose” is one of the biggest damning pieces of evidence that the US State Propaganda Ministry was complicit and an active participant in this crime of High Treason. Ace Baker, a video graphics expert, catches the US State Propaganda Ministry redhanded in this video which should be VIRAL. This is the linchpin that destroys every last vestige of the traitorous US Mafia’s Fairytale…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja67D0vKh6U
Re: Part 1: If you get past the fuzzy images in the video, you can see the engines and wings on the plane which is referred to as the “ball”.
Simon Shack had this video and a whole lot more on his series “September Clues” many years ago. Look for the “Nose Out” video on Youtube.
When you saw later in the day of 9/11/01, one of the other video graphics showing an aluminum plane slicing through 2-inch thick steel box columns like a hot knife through melted butter, you were witnessing cartoon physics, not reality. Newton’s 3rd Law of Physics – for every action, there’s an equal but opposite reaction – allows us to frame this in terms of relative motion. Translation: We can take the same scenario of a 767 aluminum plane traveling at 542 mph hitting a stationary steel tower at 0 mph and flip it around to where we have a stationary 395,000 lb aluminum aircraft at 0 mph hitting a 500,000 ton mostly steel and concrete building moving at 542 mph. (As a very important sidenote: Actually, it is aerodynamically impossible for a 767 to travel at 542 mph at approximately 1000′ above sea level without seriously imploding on itself from aerodynamic pressure and cavitating the turbine engines, but for the sake of argument bear with me here!). Now, as you can clearly see by Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion, the stationary 395,000 lb (full maximum payload – worst case scenario, but not actual weight of an aircraft only traveling 2,000 miles that day from Boston to LAX) aluminum aircraft hitting a mostly steel and concrete 110-story 500,000 ton Tower traveling at 542 mph would explode like a mosquito hitting your windshield on the interstate. THAT’S what you should have seen that day IF it were real and not defying Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion. It’s that simple, folks. You were just watching a cartoon – no different than The Road Runner.
such wrong mindedness.
9/11 Taboo – Share it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Y4zfl8yy4
See 16:40
Ockham’s Razor points to CGI to explain the planes flying faster than physics will allow and other anomalies like the nose exiting the far side of the South Tower
The Pentagon was a cruise missile or shaped charge.
Flight 93 was shot down as the debris was found scattered over 8 miles.
@billR, I agree with the tactical mini nukes theory for the destruction of twin towers as well as a shaped charge, thermite, C4, etc.
Building 7 was a conventional demolition, but rigged weeks or months in advance.
Don’t forget to check out 9/11 Taboo! The physics cannot be disputed!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Y4zfl8yy4
Very good video, too. On the money and god music, too!
I feel as if I’m the only one here that even “watched” these 2 videos. The previous comments all seem to point other directions or speak as if they are fighting to dismiss the content of this video, even calling it nonsense, then make points that are exactly as the video portrays! Perhaps you people are part of the extreme propagandists trying to confuse the masses as well? Hmm. I have no idea, but all I ‘do’ want to say is: Ty ty TY! to Richard Hall, for this is the one video that puts it all together and truly makes absolute sense to me. It’s obvious that Mr. Hall put a great deal of scientific research, using his expertise and background knowledge, into this. In my opinion, it’s the most likely “theory” (if ‘theory’ can be based on facts) of anything I’ve seen yet. My only question to him would be, “What about the holes themselves?…why do the holes have the ‘wing-shaped’ appendages if they were caused by the ‘balls’? (Which, in reality, if actual planes had caused the holes in the buildings, I don’t believe they would have had these winged extensions anyway, or, if anything, they’d be much much less prominent).
Sarkoloff the video that says what comments have said was added in response to the comments.
See above:
“Hsaive
Critics of this post have a good point. I added content including Richard D. Halls’s compelling evidence of image editing that was too well researched to ignore.”
We have never been allowed to see the video made by Dominick Suter’s “Urban Moving Systems”
(Mossad agents) crew.
Why.
Because it would contradict the fake video we all saw from the television networks. And from
the “Naudet brothers.”
EXACTLY! And by the same token, the authorities have never dug up the alleged crashed plane under the indention in the Earth in Shanksville, PA, because they know there is NO PLANE whatsoever there. You would think that if UAL93 was under that indention in the Earth, the authorities would have it dug up not only for investigative purposes but also for closure for the families who lost loved ones on the flight. I mean, for God’s sake, the authorities built a “memorial” there for the loved ones to have closure. Why then would they not dig up the plane, too???
The biggest weapon used on 911 was witchcraft on a grand scale and it is still in operation today thanks to the mind set of the american people which allows them to be controlled.
.Deprogram yourself and take up the good fight for truth and justice. Why hasn’t the american government been taken to court for 911 when half the country knows they did it? The average American cannot do this but there are plenty of talented people who can.
jacko April Gallup tried – a corrupt judge threw out her case. Beverly Eckert advocated investigation of 9-11. She got killed.
If you want to read the complete inner logic of the covert state I suggest reading John McMurty at:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-moral-decoding-of-9-11-beyond-the-u-s-criminal-state-the-grand-plan-for-a-new-world-order/5323300
These conspiracy theories are an insult and a disgrace. Please get some help. Unreal. Try getting out of your basement, go out and see some of the world. Go get some help, get some meds something. The theories are getting crazier as the years go by.
nappinglady – 1931 lies are an insult and a disgrace. Truth is not.
I’ve wondered about the passenger lists on the 3 planes used (or supposedly used) on 9/11. Has anyone researched these names, from birth to…well, now? Either a lot of names were made up, or a lot of people didn’t disappear who should have.
It’s time to call for the IMMEDIATE ARRESTS OF: jACOB rOTHSCHILD, nATHAN rOTHSCHILD, gEORGE bUSH, SR, bARBARA bUSH, SR., gEORGE bUSH,JR., jEB bUSH, dICK cHENEY, eLLIOT aBRAMS, lARRY sILVERSTEIN, jOHN bOLTON, pAULA dOBRIONSKI, rOBERT kAGAN, wILLIAM kRISTOL, rICHARD pERLE, pETER W. rODMAN, wILLIAM sCHNEIDER, jR., pAUL wOLFOWITZ, dOUGLAS fEITH, dAVID wARMSER, dAVID bROOKS, lAWRENCE kAPLAN, nORMAN pODHORETZ, cHARLES kRAUTHAMMER, mAX bOOT, wILLIAM sAFIRE, FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL aSHCROFT, ALL SHAREHOLDERS OF AMDOCS, LTD.
There are many more, however, these guys and one creepy woman have the story and I am sure they would share the details with some “coaxing” aka tactics that dICK cHeney continues to brag about and admit he would do all over again. They’ve got the intel, perhaps the honest, non-aggressive, peaceful people of The USA, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, Israel, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Syria, Egypt, Russia, Palestine, Mexico, Central America, Peru, Brazil, all African Nations AND THE REST OF THIS PLANET would prosper greatly by televising THEIR “formal questioning”.
It’s time for the TRUTH to be told so we can make the appropriate punishments, apologies, reparations and rebuild relationships that have been sacrificed for the personal wealth and control of those aforementioned. Their personal wealth needs to be confiscated and given to the families of those whose lives they have brutally snuffed out, for the repair of their countries and to leave something for those left behind that they may move forward in prosperity and solace.
If anyone has more important names for the list, please feel free to alert the world of who and WHERE they are.
It’s up to THE PEACEFUL WORLD AT LARGE to bring these so-called “humans” who are the epitome of FILTH to justice, once and FOR ALL! They have made a mockery of LIFE and it is time for their immediate extraction from any form of comfort.
Sorry, it’s incredibly LAME to suggest a Hologram did this crap.
Holograms require a projector and a screen, and are only visible from controlled directions.
SO, unless you got a screen around the whole of New York City, this in ludicrous bullshit.
And Al Qaeda STILL wants and claims credit for 911, as recently as last January.
Which goes to show how stupid any conspiracy theory is in a fundamental way.
In agreement. But conspiracy nuts are looking at anything to boost their paranoia.