The fraud of the IRS

From another Reader! TY!
AFFIDAVIT
Dated April 12, 2012
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA )
)ss
COUNTY OF BERKELEY )
That on April 12, 2012, Richard T. Brown personally came and appeared before me of Martinsburg, WV, known, and known to me,
who after being duly sworn, deposes and says:
I Richard T. Brown, affirm the following:
1. The IRS does not lawfully exist as an agency of the federal government, as it was never created by an act of congress. This has been verified by Congressman Pat Danner, of the 6th District of Missouri and others.
2. 31 USC, Chapter 3, Subchapter 1, shows the organization of the Department of the Treasury. Nowhere does it mention either the “IRS” or “Internal Revenue Service”.
3. The IRS is a Private Corporation, based in Puerto Rico. You can easily verify this athttp://smallbusiness.dnb.com.
4. The Constitution Of The United States, states in Article 1, section 9; “No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken.”
5. Nowhere in the law is “income” defined, but the courts have ruled that “income” is corporate profit or profit from an investment, and not salary or wages.
In the case of Lucas v Earl, 281 US 111 (1930), the U.S. Supreme Court stated unambiguously that;
“The claim that salaries, wages, and compensation for personal services are to be taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual who has performed the services which produced the gain is without support either in the language of the Act or in the decisions of the courts construing it. Not only this, but it is directly opposed to provisions of the Act and to regulations of the U.S. Treasury Dept. which either prescribe or permit that compensation for personal services be not taxed as an entirety and be not returned by the individual performing the services. It is to be noted that by the language of the Act it is not salaries, wages, or compensation for personal servises that are to be included in gross income. That which is to be included is gains, profits, and income DERIVED from salaries, wages or compensation for personal services.
The Court ruled similarly in Goodrich v Edwards, 255 U.S. 527 (1921) and in 1969, the Court ruled in Connor v U.S. 303 F supp 1187, that,
“Whatever may constitute income, therefore must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient. This was true when the 16th Amendment became effective, it was true at the time of Eisner v Macomber supra, it was true under sect 22 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1938, and it is likewise true under sect 61 (a) of the I.R.S. Code of 1954. If there is not gain there is not income … Congress has taxed INCOME and not compensation.”
“Statutes levying taxes should be construed in case of doubt, against the government and in favor of the citizen.” (Miller v Gearing 258 F 225).
6. I have in my possession, a copy of my “IMF” (individual master file), which I obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on Sept. 5, 2003. My “IMF” reveals a (TC150) or a “Transaction Code” which indicates a Virgin Islands transcript, indicating a liability, payment, or other action relevant to a Virgin Islands liability. I do not now and never have had any liability connected with the Virgin Islands.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT
(Signature)
SUBSCRIBED TO AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
April 12, 2012
NOTARY PUBLIC