Democrats in Washington Backtrack on Plan to Allow Police to Search Gun Owners Homes Without a Warrant

Democrats
in Washington Backtrack on Plan to Allow Police to Search Gun Owners Homes
Without a Warrant

A proposed law in
Washington State has led to widespread uproar, with citizens decrying the
provision that would allow police to search the homes of gun owners without a
warrant up to once per year.

“In order to continue to
possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of
this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the
assault weapon.

The sheriff of the county
may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance
with this subsection.”

In response to the
outcry, multiple Democrats who sponsored the legislation are now backtracking
with claims that they didn’t actually read the bill and that the specific
provision allowing warrant-less searches of all gun owners is being
removed.

“They always say, we’ll
never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you
have to wonder.”

{….}

It’s the long-awaited
assault-weapons ban, introduced last week by three Seattle Democrats.

Two co sponsors were then
quoted in the article as saying that they hadn’t actually read the proposed law
and that staff was to blame for the horrific, unconstitutional provision.

I spoke to two of the
sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is
hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill
authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing
on.

“I made a mistake,” Kline
said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.”

That lawmakers sponsor
bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s disappointing on one of this
political magnitude. Not counting a long table, it’s only an eight-page bill.

The prime sponsor, Sen.
Ed Murray, D-Seattle, also condemned the search provision in his own bill,
after I asked him about it. He said Palmer is right that it’s probably
unconstitutional.

“I have to admit that
shouldn’t be in there,” Murray said.

This proposed law is a
part of a larger tyrannical effort to limit and or restrict the gun rights of
private Americans throughout the country.

As pro gun control
activists, the corporate media, and elements of the federal government continue
to claim that they simply want reasonable gun control, the fact of
the matter is numerous extremely unreasonable laws have been passed and or
proposed in the wake of the horrific mass shooting in Newtown,
Connecticut.

Among the measures is one
that would outlaw the future sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable
magazines. The restriction would prevent quick reloading by requiring bullets
to be loaded one at a time.

Lawmakers also
want to make some prohibitions apply to current gun owners, not just to people
who buy weapons in the future.

{…..}

That’s right, gun
confiscation, a possibility that has been ridiculed by the corporate media and
the left for years is now being openly talked about as if they didn’t just
spend years and years trying to convince the American people that gun
confiscation is simply a right-wing conspiracy theory with no basis in actual
fact.

“Any person who, prior to
the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon
or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to
do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.

Residents will be ordered
to “remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of
Missouri… Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or… Surrender the
assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement
agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.”

The two examples above
are merely an example of the numerous gun control measures that have been
either proposed or talked about by gun
grabbing politicians throughout the country.

Sadly, we are seeing the largest attack on gun rights in the history of
America.

Regardless of what the
gun grabbers claim, the facts clearly show that most if not all plans for gun
control are thinly veiled attempts at much more tyrannical gun
restrictions.

Obviously most can agree
that some sort of background check system should be in place but this is far
from the only thing the gun grabbers are pushing.)

NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News