Mass Media Whitewashes Doerner Manifesto's Condemnation of Criminal Cops

by Monica Davis

The mass media, that is the lame stream, corporate media, is trying to distract the American public.One of the biggest manhunts in history, triggered by the Manifesto of a killer cop  killer, is a toxic sea of corruption, racism, madness and, untimately “suicide by cop”. The media is treating us to a series of  Barney Fife shoot civilians up, and comments on Christopher Doerner’s writing and spelling skills,  ignoring the basic question: do Doerner’s allegations of police brutality and corruption have merit?

Christopher Doerner, a 33 year old former LAPD officer who was fired for allegedly lying about department corruption, is taking his revenge–Rambo style. He’s ammased a cache of weapons, including at least one assault rifle, and has terrified LAPD and the law enforcement community, to the extent that officers are shooting civilians who drive trucks that look like Doerner’s. The department has put former supervisors and members of the police review board which terminated him on round the clock protection.

So far, he’s gettin his revenge by killing the relatives of some of his former supervisors, which is the foundation of his revenge plans:

To those children of the officers who are eradicated, your parent was not the individual you thought they were. As you get older,you will see the evidence that your parent was a tyrant who loss their ethos and instead followed the path of moral corruptness. They conspired to hide and suppress the truth of misconduct on others behalf’s. Your parent will have a name and plaque on the fallen officers memorial in D.C. But, In all honesty, your parents name will be a reminder to other officers to maintain the oath they swore and to stay along the shoreline that has guided them from childhood to that of a local, state, or federal law enforcement officer.

He names names; in his “Manifesto”, but the names we need to be concentrating on are the scores of allegedly racist, corrupt and dangerous cops in the ranks of LAPD.  Not the so called “mispelled ramblings about pop” culture which seems to  fascinate the media. The cover up has already been put in motion with his firing, now he has provided “the establishment” a prime opportunity to demonize him and further whitewash ongoing atrocities in LAPD.

ABC calls the manifesto  ”self-serving ramblings.” He named names–which have been redacted from most news reports. In that manifesto he outed allegedly corrupt and brutal police officers, saying he would wage assymetrical war against them. His attacks will turn the predators into prey, he promised.

Doerner named numerous, egregious violations of suspects’ civil rights including the case of an officer who used excessive force and allegedly kicked a schizophrenic suspect.  For his pains, he was dismissed from the force for “making false statements.”

Not only did he  lose his LAPD job, the accusation that he lied about what he reportedly saw officers doing–abusing prisoners–led to his dismissal from his reserve position in the military. In his Manifesto, Doerner wrote, ”The LAPD’s actions have cost me my law enforcement career. They cost my naval career. … I’ve lost my relationship with my mother and sister because of the LAPD. I’ve lost a relationship with close friends because of the LAPD. In essence, I’ve lost everything because the LAPD took my name and new (sic) I was INNOCENT!!!” 

The media takes LAPD’s word that this former officer is just another vengeful malcontent.  But this is a malcontent with a mission–and now he has nothing left to lose.  This man is prepared to kill–and die.  If anything, he’s planning an eleborate act of suicide by cop.  But he won’t go out silently. He’s already told the world how it’s going to be: ”This is my last resort. The LAPD has suppressed the truth and it has now lead to deadly consequences.”

Doerner said the department tried to neutralize his claims that officers were abusing suspects, by calling HIM a bully. This deadly game is more than five years in the making.

In 8/07 I reported an officer (Ofcr. —–/now a Sergeant), for kicking a suspect (excessive force) during a Use of Force while I was assigned as a patrol officer at LAPD’s Harbor Division. While cuffing the suspect, (—–), —– kicked the suspect twice in the chest and once in the face. The kick to the face left a visible injury on the left cheek below the eye. Unfortunately after reporting it to supervisors and investigated by PSB (internal affairs investigator Det. —–), nothing was done. I had broken their supposed “Blue Line”. Unfortunately, It’s not JUST US, it’s JUSTICE!!! In fact, 10 months later on 6/25/08, after already successfully completing probation, acquiring a basic Post Certificate, and Intermediate Post Certificate, I was relieved of duty by the LAPD while assigned to patrol at Southwest division. It is clear as day that the department retaliated toward me for reporting —– for kicking Mr. —–. The department stated that I had lied and made up the report that —– had kicked the suspect. I later went to a Board of Rights (department hearing for decision of continued employment) from 10/08 to 1/09. During this BOR hearing a video was played for the BOR panel where —– stated that he was indeed kicked by Officer —– (video sent to multiple news agencies). In addition to —– stating he was kicked, his father —–, also stated that his son had stated he was kicked by an officer when he was arrested after being released from custody. This was all presented for the department at the BOR hearing. They still found me guilty and terminated me. What they didn’t mention was that the BOR panel made up of Capt. —–, Capt. —–, and City Attorney —– had a significant problem from the time the board was assembled. Capt. —– was a personal friend of —– from when he was her supervisor at Harbor station. That is a clear conflict of interest and I made my argument for his removal early and was denied. The advocate for the LAPD BOR was Sgt. —–. —– also had a conflict of interest as she was —– friend and former partner from Harbor division where they both worked patrol together. I made my argument for her removal when I discovered her relation to —– and it was denied.

During the BOR, the department attempted to label me unsuccessfully as a bully. They stated that I had bullied a recruit, —–, in the academy when in reality and unfounded disposition from the official 1.28 formal complaint investigation found that I was the one who stood up for —– when other recruits sang nazi hitler youth songs about burning Jewish ghettos in WWII Germany where his father was a survivor of a concentration camp. How fucking dare you attempt to label me with such a nasty vile word. I ask that all earnest journalist investigating this story ask Ofcr. —– about the incident when Ofcr. —– began singing a nazi youth song about burning jewish ghettos.

This will come to an end, and, when it does, will there be an investigation, or a whitewash.  Will the public let itself be satisfied by demonizing a dead man, or will it demand answers?