Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Mort Amsel (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Supreme Court To Consider Banning Concealed Weapons

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

In the latest twist and turn to take place on the issue of gun control in the nation, the U.S. Supreme Court may decide to hear a case that could make it illegal to carry a concealed weapon.
 
This comes after a Federal Appeals Court in Illinois decided that a person’s right to carry a concealed weapon is not protected under the Second Amendment. Colorado, however, recently refused to reconsider a previous ruling that the state’s ban on concealed carrying is unconstitutional. Because of the contradiction, it’s predicted that the country’s highest court will be forced to rule on the constitutionality of it once and for all.
 
What timing.  It can take years and years for the Supreme Court to get a case or even rule on a case so the timing of this one in particular seems alittle political to be doing I think.  These guys are suppose to be apolitical right?  Its a simple job, either it is constitutional or it isn’t.  -Mort



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 14 comments
    • Banderman

      The Supreme Court should consider supporting and defending The United States Constitution. Nothing they do these days resembles anything but political and social engineering; nothing whatsoever to do with the ‘rule of law’.

    • BADGER BADGERISM

      NEW DEAL….anything that COMES OUT OF WASHINGTON DC FOR NOW ON IS NULL AND VOID!

      YOU HEAR THAT DC? YOU PASS THINGS ALL YOU WANT…the PEOPLE ARE LAUGHING AT YOU FOOLS!

    • johnpaul013

      Chief Justice John Roberts has already shown his contempt for our constitution with his decision on the Obamacare issue. To say this is dangerous is an understatment. If something of this nature were to get to the supremes we could be looking at early NAZI Germany(Hitler), early Soviet Union(Lenin/Stalin), early peoples republic of China(Mao) and any other despot that crawled out of the sewers.

    • Wizard Killer

      and what does the CONSTITUTION SAY? THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It doesn’t say that it can be infringed if the bearer of the arms is carrying it concealed. CROCK!

    • Pateriot

      …so the Supreme Court is not outlawing carrying a concealed weapon. They are only deciding if it is a constitutionally protected right, and therefore could/could not be banned by law. A confusing headline.

    • stockoneder

      If you think your rights are determined by 5 people you deserve to lose them. Rights are INALIENABLE. That means they can’t be up to anybody but the individual. Nobody has a right to dictate to you how you exercise your rights. Believing somebody does means you have only the rights they say you do.
      If you belief in the myth of authority you become a slave of that authority. The state is your enemy.

      • Anonymous

        Correct word is UNalienable rights, meaning right from
        God/Mother Nature….. INalienable rights are granted from man/govt. Jefferson’s Declaration draft was corrected by John Adams.
        Tom Lingenfelter 215-230-5330
        see http://www.Heritagecs.com

    • Anonymous

      LISTEN, you don’t have to obey any law that is unconstitutional or against natural law (which the Constitution is based on).

      Instead, when these rats go against it, you either IGNORE the law or ARREST the rats, ok?

      What is causing this is the lack of Christianity in our lives at all levels, from the pauper to the king. You must bring back truth and God into our lives again if we want the blessings of a free and prosperous nation.

      Remember what happened to Adam & Eve. They took God out of their paradise and God kicked them out of the paradise. That is what is happening now.

    • hongryhawg

      I’m fine with open carry.

    • gunrunner

      the judge’s need to remember what to hitler’s judge’s after WW2,,they are not above the LAW.. :evil: there is a lot of rope in our country… :grin:

      • morris adams

        UNLESS you’re a judge who doesn’t, DOES NOT, necessarily think Hitler was a bad thing… how can one be a liberal OR conservative judge? is it not just a judge? that’s the problem. I’d be just as miffed if they (whomever) made it MANDATORY TO CARRY a gun! and as far as rope,, who among US/WE can carry that rope? WE/ME AND YOU have no recourse, no authority, unless we take armed action, then that’s all of a sudden a different action/story all-together. When we (via news and opinion people) know how a particular ‘justice’ IS going to vote is the entire issue. with health care we KNEW beyond any doubt, how kagan sotomayor AND scalia were going to vote (among others) WE KNEW IT. that’s bad because, on both sides, there is an agenda. how come NO DECISION, ”EVERY” DECISION, is not 9-0?? how can you and i (and i don’t even know you) have a differing, legal, interpretive, opinion of ANYTHING?? why does the cut and dried BILL OF RIGHTS have COMPLETELY different meanings to two or more people cut from the same cloth? don’t they all know the law, the same?? GOD!! am i just stupid?? i feel like Anna Farris in house bunny, ”my head is pounding like a nail!”, what’s the mostest saddest is,, the MSM could fix all of this in 2 days. that’s the part that makes me cry. a revolution could be won with no shots fired if they would just do the right thing, for once. and that is their sole true purpose/duty and they refuse. hopefully they’ll be in front of us marching to the ovens. i guess that would be a small moral victory for us, huh?

    • Mike Seebeck

      Uh, you got the states backwards in your rulings. The lack of 2A protection was Colorado (10th) and the CCW ban throwout was Illinois (7th).

    • Anonymous

      The supreme court does not have the authority to make this law. They are there to uphold the law, and not make law. Any law they try to make, or any law or ruling that goes against your god given rights and the rights granted by the constitution, is illegal, and it is your duty to ignore these rulings and so called laws. If you abide by these rulings for fear of prison fine or punishment, you have sold your freedom, rights and liberty down the river and are not a patriot. Long live the Republic.

    • Room With a View

      Wow pretty soon we will be back to the wild Wild West. the idea of all the cowboys toting their guns is pretty sexy dont you think? I am sure that some fashion genius can come up with some really cool designs for the external carrying of a gun. OMG, these lawmakers and judges are so paranoid, still it might reduce the crime rate if your attacker knows what kind of gun you are carrying! NOT. The Supreme Court has lost the plot, Just another nail in the coffin for the constitution, and much easier to disarm the public. so does this mean all. The secret service agents will have to comply as well?

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.