Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Connecticut School Worksheet States Second Amendment Not an Individual Right

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


A Bristol, Conn. dad, Steven Boibeaux, is furious at his son’s school for teaching him and the other eighth grade middle school students that the Second Amendment and gun rights are not individual rights.

The worksheet, published by Instructional Fair used in the kids’ social studies class, reads “The Second Amendment today is surrounded by controversy. This controversy is centered mainly on the two words ‘militia’ and ‘people’. The group that supports gun control does not want the word ‘people’ to have any meaning in the amendment. The gun rights group would not like the word ‘militia’ to mean anything.

“The best way to look at the true meaning of this amendment is to look at what the courts have said about it. The judges and courts of each generation provide the interpretation of the document.

“The courts have consistently determined that the Second Amendment does not ensure each individual the right to bear arms. Instead, the amendment provides the right for the states to arm a militia such as the national guard. The courts have never found a law regulating the private ownership of weapons unconstitutional.”

“I am appalled,” said Boibeaux in an interview with Fox News. “It sounds to me like they are trying to indoctrinate our kids.”

“It’s not up to the teacher to determine what the Constitution means,” continued Boibeaux. “If you want to learn about the Constitution, recite it word for word.”

The worksheet is, of course, completely incorrect as the courts have affirmed the Second Amendment as an individual right and overturned many laws regulating private ownership of firearms, in famous decisions such as District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago, both of which are in stark opposition to the lesson.

It’s also misrepresenting the way the court system works, and it stands to reason that no such worksheet should be used to teach any class.

“This idea that this school is propagating that the Constitution can simply be changed at the whim of someone – or that the Second Amendment does not protect the individual right to bear arms is absolute propaganda and absolutely false,” said Mat Staver of the Liberty Counsel. The school has pulled the worksheet from the curriculum.

“It is no longer an assignment in that particular school,” said Ellen Solek, the superintendent of the school district.

That still leaves a lot of questions. If this worksheet is misrepresentative of the Constitution to this degree, what about the other lesson plans? Did Instructional Fair produce the works prior to Heller and McDonald? Is the lesson still in use at other schools?

This should worry more than just the Boibeaux family. Even if you’re not gung-ho about guns, this lesson is just a fabrication, a lie, and puts not just one teacher, one class or one school in a negative light. This brings up concerns about the entire curriculum.

Do you help your kids with their homework? How about after this?

The post Connecticut School Worksheet States Second Amendment Not an Individual Right appeared first on Guns.com.


Source:


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 1 comment
    • ElOregonian

      This is such B.S. Does anyone even understand our Bill of Rights and how they are fashioned into law? It certainly is not cobbled together on the Senate Floor with a up or down vote!

      The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for administering the ratification process under the provisions of 1 U.S.C. 106b.

      The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval.

      So, anyone who does not understand the process had better bone up on the particulars lest a dictator imposes a “New” definition of our Constitution.

      It has been recorded that of the story of Benjamin Franklin who was approached by a woman as he left the Constitutional Convention.

      She asked:

      “What have you given us?”

      Franklin is said to have replied:

      “A republic, if you can keep it.”

      This exchange was common knowledge 50 years or so ago, as commonly taught to schoolchildren as the story about George Washington’s boyhood experience practicing a woodcutter’s skill on his father’s prized cherry tree and, later, refusing to lie about it. It turns out, the tale about Washington was a lie. But Franklin’s conversation with Mrs. Powell really occurred. Why is it, then, that most people are still aware of the fiction about Washington but are ignorant of the fact about Franklin and, in particular, the truth of Franklin’s comment?

      Sadly, we have allowed our educational system to be commandeered by radical liberal progressives who have erased our heritage from our school books and instead filled them with useless information or outright lies. It happened so slowly that it took one hundred years to transform our children’s understanding and beliefs. Unfortunately, those Progressive Marxist Teachers within our school system have carefully taken over as mentors of our children and have filled their minds full of Marxist Progressive propaganda.

      It will take at least two generations to reverse and reconstitute our Republic correctly by first starting with the repealing the Act of 1871 and returning our Republic from it’s current grotesque abomination as a Corporation, back into a constitutional republic again.

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.