Hacker Allegedly Obtained Emails Implicating Hillary Clinton in Benghazi Attack

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
March 19, 2013

Alternative media is reporting that a hacker named “Guccifer” has hacked into Sidney Blumenthal’s private email account to expose correspondence concerning Hillary Clinton and the murder of CIA spy J. Christopher Stevens.

“Guccifer” is attributed with hacking into “e-mail accounts of family, friends, and political allies of the Bush family has crossed party lines and illegally accessed the AOL account of a former senior White House adviser to President Bill Clinton.”

Blumenthal is a former aide to former President Bill Clinton as well as an established journalist with a focus on American politics and foreign policy with articles published in the Washington Post, Vanity Fair and the New Yorker.

The Clinton administration used Blumenthal to plant positive stories about the former White House and even was integral in the dismissal of the impeachment proceedings regarding Clinton over the Monica Lewinski scandal.

“Guccifer” was able to obtain access to emails dating back to 2005. This hacker specifically targeted Blumenthal with a focus on direct correspondence between him and Clinton. “Guccifer” was successful in syphoning foreign policy and intelligence reports dated to Clinton’s years as Secretary of State under the Obama administration.

A portion of the emails directed from Blumenthal to Clinton were regarding Libya, the “attack” on the compound where Stevens was residing in Benghazi and one marked “confidential” that was dated the day after the destruction of the compound.

Who “Guccifer” is has not been determined; however alternative media explains that “two IP addresses connected to the hacker’s recent online maneuvers have been traced to the Russian Federation. . . However, this could be indicative of nothing since hackers go to great lengths to obscure their trail via proxies, IP spoofing, and powerful anonymizing software like Tor.”

In January of this year, Clinton gave testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in an emotional swan song filled with defensive outbursts and reactionary statements about her sorrow for the families involved. Clinton said: “As I have said many times since Sept. 11, I take responsibility. Nobody is more committed to getting this right. I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger and more secure.”

Clinton maintained that she was focused “on keeping people safe” and that the US government “didn’t know who the attackers were or what their motives were.”

At one point, Clinton began shouting at Senator Ron Johnson, saying: “What difference does it make? With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Clinton claimed that she never saw the requests made by J. Christopher Stevens for more security. In her mind, this incident was one of a long history of violent outbursts that justified the necessity of US Armed Forces in the region to stabilize and maintain order.

Because of lack of funding, Clinton said, the terror attack on Benghazi occurred. She redirected the blame onto Congress who did not approve enough money for the State Department to afford to send adequate security for Stevens.

Clinton told Senator Marco Rubio that Libya must be held accountable for their inability to properly secure the gated-villa in Benghazi. Clinton said: “This was a constant conversation. What I found with the Libyans was willingness but not capacity.”

Senator Rand Paul said that he “would have relieved [Clinton] of [her] post” with regard to how she handled Benghazi. Clinton said that during the “independent” review conducted by the internal agency of the State Department on Benghazi, some personnel had lost their jobs. Paul said that Clinton is “just incompetent”.

Senator John McCain was not “satisfied” with Clinton’s testimony and asked if classified cables showing threats of attack prompted actions to be taken. McCain said: “All of these warnings. And we did not have a single Department of Defense asset available to come to this rescue.”

Clinton remarked that without proper funding, the security shortcomings began an obvious problem with regard to Benghazi.

David Petreaus, former director of the CIA, testified last November that the Obama administration’s account of the attack on Benghazi does not match CIA intelligence provided at the time. Petraeus was adamant that the attack as terroristic in nature. He mentioned that the Department of Justice and US State Department were corroborating his account of the events.

Facts about Stevens’ mission in Benghazi were not mentioned by Clinton, or the SFRC that could explain why the incident occurred. The cover-up continues with Clinton’s testimony.

Stevens was appointed to the status of Ambassador by Clinton as a cover for his work with the CIA. In Libya, Stevens was commissioned to assist in surveillance missions with the CIA on the National Transitional Council (NTC).

When Gadhafi was assassinated, the NTC was installed to stabilize the region for the US. They are a defacto-government headed by known terrorists. The rent-villa in Benghazi was a place for Stevens to stay when he was speaking and dealing with the NTC.

At some point, the NTC became aware that Stevens was monitoring them and sending intelligence to the CIA. During his mission in Benghazi, Stevens was also involved with arms deals between Libya, Saudi Arabia and the Free Syrian Army (FSA). This prompted the response that culminated in the attack on the gated-villa in Benghazi.
The Obama administration, along with Clinton, attempted to cover-up the murder of CIA spy Stevens by invoking his status as Ambassador and incorrectly claiming that the gated-villa in Benghazi was a US embassy. The nearest US embassy is in Tripoli.

Regardless of Clinton’s testimony to the SFRC, the facts surrounding Stevens, his purpose for being in Benghazi and his mission as a CIA spy is not being discussed on Capitol Hill, or being acknowledged by the mainstream or some alternative media outlets. Without complete transparency, the testimony of Clinton is another notch in the cover-up.

2013-04-21 12:54:41

Source: http://www.occupycorporatism.com/hacker-allegedly-obtained-emails-implicating-hillary-clinton-in-benghazi-attack/