Fake Climate Change Studies Aim to Influence Public Opinion Through Propaganda

The Truth Behind The News

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
October 16, 2012

Alarmists from Harvard University published a study claiming that certain thunderstorms expel water vapor miles into the stratosphere, called convective injection, and that this phenomenon is causing the ozone layer to break apart. The study was funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The US being an industrialized nation is a major polluter and therefore thinning the ozone layer over the North American continent, claim the researchers.

This alleged destruction is the justification behind banning chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) to reduce pollution.

James Anderson, professor of atmospheric chemistry at Harvard and lead researcher for the study decries that this new discovery directly links human activity to the destruction of our ozone which will quickly become a global issue. However, going back several decades, Anderson has been supporting colleagues who say that CFCs are the reason for the destruction of the earth’s ozone layer. Now, this new study, which he was a part of, proves his long held theory and adds to the demonization of humanity in favor of saving the planet.

Mario Molina, was influential in having CFCs banned in the 1980s with the support of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the UN and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) because this data backed-up their agenda against human innovation by controlling industry using the dangers of climate change as justification.

In May, a study was released by scientists at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory which showed that pollutants added to the atmosphere by chemtrails is causing not only the toxins to rain down in thunderstorms, but also trap heat within the clouds which is causing a tremendous change in the planet’s natural weather patterns.

Scientists at universities are indoctrinating students into the normalcy of chemtrails as part of a necessary development in the environmentalist’s attempts to combat man-made global warming. In Canada, the University of Victoria’s Climate Research department asserts chemtrails are a “conspiracy theory” and want to change social understanding and concept of chemtrails to simply be normal water vapor contrails.

Climate change alarmists in America claim that their demonization reduces their ability to freely speak about their research findings. Scientists who are outspoken about their doubt concerning man-made climate change are subject to hate mail and viable threats to their families and livelihood. In the UK, the government funds climate change studies which translate into public support and eventual reduction of personal freedoms of British citizens in the name of saving the planet.

The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (YPCCC) is injecting propaganda into the American social meme to convince the general public that man-made global warming is real and their fault.

The YPCCC, through alleged scientific study, has surmised that climate change skeptics lack fundamental cognitive capabilities which impede their ability to grasp complex concepts. In other words – the globalists think skeptics are stupid.

Working with the Obama administration and the IPCC, the YPCCC have provided numerous studies in favor of man-made climate change in order to provide necessary influence over the perception of the public.

However, proof of their fear-mongering has been exposed with developments in Climategate and Penn State professor Michael Mann who created the infamous “hockey stick graph” that became the crux of climate change alarmists and was an absolute fabrication.

Mann and his theory influenced an entire movement to intentionally manipulate scientific data to make global warming appear direr than it actually is.

This scheme has involved such agencies and governmental bodies as:

• The US Environmental Protection Agency
• The National Science Foundation
• The British House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
• Penn State University
• Various independent panels

New data published shows that rising temperatures between 1997 and August of 2012 have shown no discernable aggregation and demonstrate a “plateau” on global warming. Figures prior to that period were observed as stable or declining for the previous 4 decades.

The research shows a clear cooling trend while alarmists continue to claim that the planet is heating up and because of human activity and greenhouse gas emissions, there must be severe restrictions in industrialized nations before we cross “the tipping point”.

Klaus–Ekart Puls, physicist and meteorologist points out that climate change is normal as the planet goes through phases of climate warming “many that even far exceeded the extent we see today. But there hasn’t been any warming since 1998. In fact the IPCC suppliers of data even show a slight cooling.”

He explains that the IPCC climate change computer models are based on “speculative model projections, so-called scenarios – and not prognoses. Because of climate’s high complexity, reliable prognoses just aren’t possible.”

Alarmist scientists have come forth to disagree with the findings of this study. And those professors who work for climate change departments at prestigious universities have a personal investment in the continuation of climate change research. Should the public consensus shift to only accept scientific data and not the alarmist perspective, those professors would be out of a job.

In 2011, the technocratic investment corporation E.L. Rothschild, LLC., headed by Chairman Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and CEO Lynn Forester de Rothschild, purchased 70% voting stock and acquired controlling interest in The Weather Channel. This acquisition afforded the Rothschild banksters the ability to further the propaganda of man-made climate change.

The post Fake Climate Change Studies Aim to Influence Public Opinion Through Propaganda appeared first on Susanne Posel.

Source: http://www.occupycorporatism.com/fake-climate-change-studies-aim-to-influence-public-opinion-through-propaganda/