|
CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS FOR THE IMPEACHMENT AND
FRAUD UPON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, ET AL.
1. IMPROPER FAILURE TO REPORT,
2. CONTINOUS ABSENCE FROM HIS U.S.
PRESIDENTIAL DUTIES,
3. REFUSAL TO ACCEPT THE ELECTORAL VOTE
DECISION OF THE AMERICAN
POPULACE MAJORITY,
4. CONTINUING VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC TRUST AND
EMPLOYMENT, WITHOUT DUE
PROCESS, INCLUDING ATTEMPTS
TO SUBVERT THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL
CONSIDERATIONS
The Declaration of Independence and
the Constitution for the U.S.A. [hereafter the U.S.
Constitution, or Constitution] are jointly the contract of specific
performance between the U.S. citizens as the parties on one side of the
agreement, and the U.S. government, its officers, employees, agents, and
subcontractors as the parties on the other side of the agreement.
The duty to take care is affirmative. So is the duty
faithfully to execute the office. A President must carry out the
obligations of his office diligently and in good faith. The elective
character and political role of a President make it difficult to define
faithful exercise of his powers in the abstract. A President must make
policy and exercisediscretion. This discretion
necessarily is broad, especially in emergency situations, but the
constitutional duties of a President impose limitations on its exercise.
The “take care” duty emphasizes the
responsibity of a President for the overall conduct of the
executive branch, which the Constitution vests in him
alone. He must take care that the executive is so organized and operated
that this duty is preformed.
The duty of a President to “preserve, protect,
and defend the Constitution” to the best of his ability includes the
duty not to abuse his powers or transgress their limits — not to violate
the rights of citizens, such as those guaranteed by the Bill of Rights,
and not to act in derogation of powers vested elsewhere by the
Constitution.
Please Note : - Each of
the thirteen American impeachments involved charges of misconduct
incompatible with the official position of the officeholder. This conduct
falls into three broad categories: (1) exceeding the constitutional
bounds of the powers of the office in derogation of the powers of another
branch of government; (2) behaving in a manner grossly incompatible with
the proper function and purpose of the office; and (3) employing the
power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.
Definition : Political –
Pertaining or relating to the policy or the administration of government,
state or national …. As political theories … seek to determine or
control its public policy …
(Black’s Law 6th Ed.)
Considerations and Background :
“ The President, Vice President and all
civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on
Impeachment for, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and
Misdemeanors.”
Title 18 USC 3 : Accessory after the
fact Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United
States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or
assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial
or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Title 18 USC 241 : Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18 USC 242 : Deprivation of Rights Under
Color of Law
Title 18 USC 1951 : – Interference with
commerce by threats or violence
(2) The term
“extortion” means the obtaining of property (our
Civil Rights including our time and our right of Due Process of
Law is our Property) from another, with his consent, induced
by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under
of official right.
Title 42 USC 1986 : Action for Neglect to
Prevent
Justice Joseph Story wrote :
” Not but that crimes of a
strictly legal character fall within the scope …; but that it has a
more enlarged operation, and reaches, what are aptly termed political
offenses, growing out of personal misconduct, or gross neglect, or
usurpation, or habitual disregard of the interest in the discharge of the
duties of political office. These are so various in their character, and
so indefinable in their actual involutions, that it is almost impossible
to provide systematically for them by positive law. They must be examined
upon very broad and comprehensive principles of diplomacy of public
policy and duty. They must be judged ofby the habits,
and rules, and principles of diplomacy, or departmental operations and
arrangements, or parliamentary practice, of executive customs and
negotiations, of foreigny Harvey / AP )
”Maybe the court should have said,
‘ we’re not going to take it, goodbye,”‘ O’Connor told the Chicago
Tribune editorial board, in reference to the controversial Bush v. Gore
decision ren of justice, and are far removed from the reach fo
municipal jurisprudence.“
If the public official refuses to provide the
contracted public service (e.g., justice) in compliance with the U.S.
Constitution, then he/she must be imprisoned. Otherwise, the
public service is undermined and rendered ineffective. [ MLR-C4]
COMMENT of U.S. Supreme Court Reporter
Jeffrey Toobin :-
” To know Justice O’Connor as I am
privileged to do is to know that the word ‘regret’ never passes her
lips,” Toobin said. ” Did she regret her vote in Bush v. Gore?
Did she regret the Bush presidency? You bet she did, and you bet she
does.” 20apr13
Sandra Day O’Connor. ( Troy Harvey / AP )
”Maybe the court should have said,
‘ we’re not going to take it, goodbye,”‘ O’Connor told the Chicago
Tribune editorial board, in reference to the controversial Bush v. Gore
decision resolving a dispute over the 2000 election in George W.
Bush’s favor. “It turned out the election authorities in Florida
hadn’t done a real job there and kind of messed it up. And probably the
Supreme Court added to the problem at the end of the day.”
“…those offences which proceed from the
misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation
of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar
propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as
they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society
itself.”
“It has too often happened that powers
delegated for the purpose of promoting the happiness of a community have
been perverted to the advancement of the personal emoluments of the
agents of the people; but the powers of the President are to well guarded
and checked to warrant this liberal aspersion.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ambassador Leo E Wanta
|
I’ll believe it when I see it, more bs.