ISLAM: 1,400 YEARS OF INBREEDING. FORWARDED BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA - NOVEMBER 13, 2013

INTERESTING ARTICLE ON THE EFFECTS OF MULTI-GENERATIONAL IN-BREEDING IN THE
MIDDLE EAST WHERE IT IS CULTURALLY ACCEPTED TO INTRA-MARRY COUSINS.
IT IS CERTAINLY TRUE ABOUT ANIMAL IN-BREEDING.

I’ve (my correspondent has )seen this first hand in my 3 employment trips to
Saudi Arabia . During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130
with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night
vision, even on the brightest of moon lit nights. Their training retention rate
was minimal including maintenance personnel. Some had dim memories and had to
be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before.
Needless to say, an American, British or any other western instructor gets
burned out pretty quick. It actually took C-130 pilots years before they could
fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a
city. Ask any Marine, airman or Army guy whose been trying to train Iraqis and
especially Afghans. They will say, “Yep, dumber than homemade dodo”.
Islam is not only a religion, it’s a way of life all the way around. 
  Yet another set of revealing facts about  Muslim beliefs and
traditions and ways of life.

I found this to be interesting–didn’t know whether to believe it or
not–To research I went to Wikipedia, “Cousin Marriage”, and far down
in the article “Genetics”–It seems there is a lot of truth here.

A
huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding

Nikolai
Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a
little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim
inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.

This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since
the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50
generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since
Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including
marriage.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually
irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its
intelligence, sanity, and health.

According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred.
In Pakistan , the numbers approach 70%. Even in England , more than half of
Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the
number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries:
67% in Saudi Arabia , 64% in Jordan , and Kuwait , 63% in Sudan , 60% in Iraq ,
and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar .

According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to
explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times
as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis
are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK , they account for
33% of children with genetic birth defects.

The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic
fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death
due to malformations is 10 times higher.

Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the
risk of still births and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will
die during labor.

Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim
marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of
consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social
abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower
than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,”
increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.
(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in
the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant
period of time.)

In Denmark , non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to
fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.

Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract
thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the
Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone
does.

In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into
Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have
never even read a book.

Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed
in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical
thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our
high-tech knowledge societies.”

Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the
“Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce
just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research
measured by articles per million inhabitants.

In Denmark , Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over
represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for
Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70%
of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant
background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated
that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10
years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high
schools is twice that of the native-born.

Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the
risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why
more than 40% of patients in Denmark ‘s biggest ward for clinically insane
criminals have an immigrant background.

The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans
shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less
educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”

Sennels concludes:

There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages
among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’
religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from
adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to
their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years
ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect
human and societal consequences.

Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to
the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest
victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and
a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam
dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous
religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish
public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building
of mosques in the U.S.

Let’s hope the civilized West and the North Americans wake up before a blind
na?vet? about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Judeo-Christian
culture and our domestic tranquility.