Watch Bill Nye/Ken Ham Debate LIVE Right Here! Feb 4/2014

To believe in evolution is to be ignorant of the fossil record.

The theory of evolution is a propaganda-laden farce that is fraught with folly and lacks empirical evidence from the fossil record. Consider the following lack of evidence for the theory of evolution in the fossil record:

* There is no physical evidence from the fossil record of anteaters with shorter and progressively longer snouts. The theory of evolution would have it that the anteater evolved its long snout gradually over millions of years. So at one point, according to the theory of evolution, there had to be an evolutionary ancestor to the modern anteater with a short snout, let’s say a 1 inch snout for arguments sake. And gradually over the years, there would have been an anteater with a 2 inch snout, an anteater with a 3 inch snout, and so forth up to the modern day anteater with its long snout. So does the fossil record shows such a progression? Nope.

* Likewise, there is no physical evidence in the fossil record of a sequence of giraffes with shorter and progressively longer necks.

* There is no sequence in the fossil record showing one species or kind of animal changing into another species or kind of animal. Darwin himself acknowledged that his theory implied that the number of transitional links between all species must be great in number. The excuse for the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record during Darwin’s time was that much of the fossil record was yet to be uncovered. Well, since then we have uncovered quite a bit and no intermediate fossils have turned up in the fossil record.

* Unless there is some breaking news somewhere, the Missing Link is still missing!

While the fossil record is missing evidence for evolution, what do evolutionists do when they find evidence in the fossil record that doesn’t fit their theory and supports what the Bible says? Why they cover it up of course! Consider the subject of giants. The Bible speaks about giants in Genesis 6:4, Numbers 13:33, and Deuteronomy 2:10-11 among other places. And do you know that skeletons of giants have been found in America? They didn’t teach you that in school did they? American Indians are very familiar with giants who lived in North America. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, there were numerous accounts of discoveries of giants in America. Here are some newspaper accounts of some of them:

http://www.sydhav.no/giants/newspapers.htm

But what happened to the skeletons? There are several accounts of the Smithsonian whisking away giant skeletons. Here is an article from Xpeditions Magazine entitled “Holocaust of Giants The Great Smithsonian Cover-up”:

http://www.xpeditionsmagazine.com/magazine/articles/giants/holocaust.html

Another technique evolutionists use when they come across evidence that doesn’t fit their theory is they come up with laughable explanations. What if I told you that evolutionists believe that soft tissue from a dinosaur bone they dug up is 68 million years old ? That’s right, I kid you not:

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html

If you want to know what supposed 68 million year old soft tissue looks like, how it is flexible and pliable and returns to its original shape when stretched, you can see it at the 9:10 mark of this video from 60 Minutes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5658449n&tag=contentMain;contentBody

Isn’t it ironic that evolutionists make fun of the beliefs of Bible believers and yet, here is science making the ludicrous claim that 68 million year old soft tissue is flexible, resilient, and stretchy? One question I have is, when an evolutionist finds a dinosaur bone with soft tissue that is 68 million years old, do they straight away put it into a zip-lock plastic bag in order to prevent spoilage?

Another more important question is this: Why wouldn’t the dating calculations be questioned when someone says soft tissue from a dinosaur bone is 68 million years old? Here is why: Because a dinosaur bone that is not millions of years old would contradict the millions of years old paradigm of the evolutionary model and evolutionists won’t let that happen to their religion .

They’d rather look like fools claiming soft tissue is millions of years old rather than give up their ridiculous theories. So don’t look for science to contradict such an absurd claim.

Let’s examine how the model of the theory of evolution fits the reality of the fossil record shall we? And let us put aside for now the “Frankenstein type” story of how the first cell came to life by being zapped with electricity—it’s alive!—and just start with the infamous single cell starting point for evolution. The model of evolution would have it that from that from one single cell evolved all the various life forms we see on earth today. So the model of evolution is basically a triangle. It starts at a single point on top and expands downward to a wide base on the bottom producing the various higher life forms we see on the planet today. However, this model of evolution does not fit the raw data of the fossil record. In the Cambrian explosion, we see a vast multitude of higher life forms appearing fully formed in the fossil record without any precursor forms like the model of evolution requires. And the number of classifications, called phyla, that existed then is greater than the number of phyla on earth today. So, unlike the model of evolution, which must start with one life form with the number of life forms expanding and expanding, we see in the physical fossil record a multitude and vast spectrum of life forms appearing fully formed in the fossil record without any precursors in the fossil record and then we see the number of phyla actually decreasing, not increasing.

All in all, the model of the theory of evolution is a poor excuse to explain how the various life forms on the planet today came into being.

The BOTTOM LINE: If evolution means the gradual change of one kind of organism into another kind, the outstanding characteristic of the fossil record is the absence of evidence for evolution!

And yet, our kids today in school are being indoctrinated and brainwashed with this nonsense. What the fossil record does support is like begets like, as the Book of Genesis states. So if you want rock solid unchanging truth to stand upon and you want to know how everything came into existence, then seek out the Book of Genesis and the Word of God. But if you want conjecture on where we came from along with fruitless and laughable theories, seek out monkey-men-wannabes who will spin you a laughable yarn, a fanciful tale!

Total 33 comments

^ I just had to break the 33. It was bothering me