Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Jimstonefreelance (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Circumstances Prove The Maldives Sighting Legit

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

Circumstances prove the Maldives sighting legit

Here is the main argument against, and it’s dirt simple to skewer.

From http://www.jimstonefreelance.com

The prevailing argument against the Maldives sighting is the fact that the Maldives are slightly off course for Diego Garcia. But there is an enormous hole in that argument -

The reason why the plane was taken over the Maldives is because Iran, Russia, India, and many other nations have warships occasionally frequent the Indian Ocean, and there are also many oil tankers and other shipping vessels. Flying over one of those would be far worse than flying over the Maldives, where people are simple, sparse and isolated from the rest of the world.

ALL COMMERCIAL AND ALL MILITARY SHIPS ARE EQUIPPED WITH RADAR. The radars are more limited than ground based radars, but the ships still have them. On top of this, ships are going to be staffed with people more capable of making observations. The path flight 370 took would have been a tradeoff of distance and risk of being seen and recognized. So the Maldives was the obvious best choice of routes.

 

I see the Maldives route as absolute proof of a U.S. military hijacking of flight 370 for the forementioned reason, and another huge one, which is -

Eyewitnesses said the plane was LOUD, and they were able to get out of their homes and see it before it was gone. There’s a huge problem with that – to meet airport regulations, 777 aircraft, which are modern, are also very quiet. But fighter jets are extremely loud. They are not quiet because they go supersonic, and even at subsonic speeds, any airplane that can fly at supersonic speeds cannot be quiet.

 

Subsonic planes which can be quiet, such as the 777 use an airfoil shaped wing to stay aloft. An airfoil produces a negative pressure on the top of the wing, and the plane literally gets pulled into the sky by vacuum pressure built up on the top of the wing. But as soon as supersonic speeds are approached, an airfoil won’t work because the vacuum pressure region moves towards the back of the wing, and at too high a speed the wing no longer generates lift and the plane will drop like a rock.

Supersonic planes use pressure on the bottom of the wing to generate lift, and if they also need to have performance, there is no way a plane of this design can ever be quiet. Rather than lift their way into the sky, they punch their way into the sky and the engines have to be very powerful and be revved hard for enough force to be generated to keep them aloft even at subsonic speeds. This along with size to performance considerations makes them very loud.

Even if flight 370 had been loud, it likely would have been there and gone before anyone got out of their house to see it. But if a cloaked fighter jet was in front of it as an escort, and a cloaked fighter jet was behind it, the people would have heard them and been out of their homes on time to see only what was not visibly cloaked – flight 370. And since flight 370 would have been the only thing visible to simple people, all noises would get blamed on it regardless of where they originated in the sky.

The extremely loud noise basically check mates the sighting, it’s legit. Flight 370 was electronically hijacked and flown over the Maldives to avoid being sighted by whoever was out on the ocean and received escort from two or more visibly cloaked fighter jets.

 

THAT is my FINAL ANSWER with regard to the Maldives sighting.

UPDATE: The most common straw man argument against the report above is that jumbo jets are loud when flying low.

This is NO LONGER TRUE, especially with the 777. The Federal Aviation Administration’s noise mitigation regulations forced airline makers to make quieter engines, and the newest ones, such as what are on the 777 are now practically whisper quiet from the front even on takeoff. Regulation started in 1979, was significantly enhanced in 1998,  and since then has been improved in advance anticipation of further regulation. Now, once flying even at low altitude, there is no way a passing jet would be enough to get someone out of bed unless the wings practically touched the house and at that altitude the plane would be out of sight before anyone could tell there was a line painted down the middle. There is still some noise out the back, but it’s not even 10 percent of what it was in the 70′s.

I am not going to waste additional time with any more of this topic, many people have noticed this just from living everyday life.

 



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 13 comments
    • Nicole Morgan (Investigative Reporter)

      Shared-

    • hostile177

      Two possible reasons I can think of why the plane may have sounded louder to them as opposed to the average city dweller. It was flying low and perhaps they never see planes that large and that low over that particular part of the islands.

    • tk-3839

      The US took the plane. Why? To prevent technology from getting to China. How? They plantdd agents to mark the tech’s on the plane. They used another aircraft to cyber/remote the plane also used stealth aircraft to jam all other communication, passenger sat/cell phones. The pilot actions look like they tried to regain comm by taking evasive action. They probably gave up under duress to save the passengers and flew then landed where they were told.

    • Болеслава

      Fascinating lesson in aerodynamics as well.

    • Stēkō

      Jim,
      I’ve been following your website since this happened, and up to today have been impressed with your logic and knowledge.
      But today you over thought yourself.
      How? Because you stated that there were ” cloaked ” fighters ( inferred, unstated ) accompanying flight 370.

      Firstly the physics of installing an operable cloak ( visual ) is highly doubtful at this time.

      Secondly, it’s totally unnecessary to the plot. Meaning to the residents who witnessed this jet ( likely between 1,00-200 ft ) it would be abnormally loud TO THEM. Consider the facts of where they are, they don’t hear Jets, if they see one it’s a tiny tiny silent dot way up there, correct ? If they do hear a plane, it’s a puddle jumping prop job: a 777 is monstrously loud in comparison.
      I too believe they saw it, I DON’T buy cloaked jets, it’s unnecessary considering the circumstance.

      However, I do agree that the 777 is no longer there, painted olive drab and gone, likely to groom lake.

      Os. I’ve done extensive research into making vehicles invisible to the naked eye, it is infinitely more doable on a ground or sea born vehicle than one that is an airframe. The military already has armored vehicles that are ” static blend “.
      The physics put upon an airframe is what has up till now prevented that same system being employed on them. In addition to the physics of airflow, flex action, stressors ( wind, rain, ice ), temperature all play an active role in the surfaces of an airframe and those conditions change rapidly.

      Anyway, just my 1/2 penny.

      God bless
      Steadfast.
      Stēkō pharrēsia Iēsous

    • Mike

      I’m waiting for the day when the government/media propaganda ministry lay blame on Iran as a pretext to an all-out assault.

    • LifeIs

      Entirely wrong.

      (1) Wings don’t work that way. Wings — all of them — generate lift by directing air downward.

      You have repeated an old myth, about wings. And all you need to do, to understand that, is consider that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

      If you could “generate a vacuum” on top of the wing, and get lift that way, you could
      make propellers that way, and get thrust without regard to the 3rd law of motion.

      Never mind that. Look at an airplane climbing. The nose is pitched up, yes? The underside if the wing is angled up, yes? To deflect more air downward.

      (2) “Quiet from the front” doesn’t mean they aren’t quite noisy – as every jet engine is. Of course you would notice it flying over at low altitude, unless you already lived close to an airport.

      There is more noise at low altitude.

      (3) What the heck is a “cloaked” fighter plane. And why would the airliner need one?

    • CosmicKiwiPerth

      20 m object spotted by satellite, 2500km west of Perth, Western Australia. Planes & ships are heading for the area.

    • Anonymous

      Every airplane is registered ….. but on 9/11/2001 ASSAULT AIRPLANES murdered 3,000 innocents.
      Now an ASSAULT AIRPLANE has murdered 239 people.
      An ASSAULT AIRPLANE murdered many innocent people from Egypt
      ASSAULT AIRPLANE Flight 800 murdered many INNOCENTS off of New York
      ASSAULT AIRPLANES have murdered THOUSANDS more INNOCENT CHILDREN then ASSAULT GUNS!!
      ASSAULT AIRPLANES must be BANNED and chopped up for scrap.
      ASSAULT AIRPLANES are EVIL.

    • Dim

      @Mike: they just have and look at the title and the reactions. Former security official???? The reactions are timeless for an article like this. Psy-ops at it’s best.
      http://pamelageller.com/2014/03/former-israeli-security-official-iran-likely-involved-mh-370.html/

      @Jim: thanks for your razer sharp analyzes. Truly appreciated. You were the one that made me believe the plane deviated to Diego Garcia and it’s hard to override my skeptic mind to accept these kind of theories. As long as the plane is not found any theory is as good as another. But yours a very good and solid one!

      But decline to the idea a military jet followed the MH370. If hijacked by wire why would that be necessary? The unbreakable autopilot makes the outcome a sure thing, whatever the pilots tried to do. If these people call the overfly of the airliner as ‘LOUD’ it’s most probably due to the nature of their surroundings. They don’t live in a city or near a busy hospital/police station. For them any noise louder than a chicken or a dog is noisy. I know this because I live in the Philippines in a very quiet village. I can’t stand noise myself anymore. Even a passing motorbike when near a highway hurts my ears. And I was a DJ in younger years :lol:

      Do some plane spotting for fun one day, at the high end of a landing strip. Like in Koh Samui, Thailand, there is a beach right next to the runway. Any airplane, even small ones, make a lot of noise once they pass by at low altitude. Let alone a 777 and it’s huge engines.

      Apart from this remark Jim, thanks for your excellent work. You have a new fan.

      • LifeIs

        I was willing to overlook his misunderstanding of how a small nuclear bomb would fit into a Magna BSP camera. (He thought the periscope was part of the bomb. Which over-estimates the size of the bomb and under-estimates the amount of shielding required to hide it.)

        But the nonsense about airplane wings here is just inexcusable.

        And then, we get to “cloaked” fighter planes.

        And how quiet jet engines are, which is just as silly as cloaked planes.

        This article appears to be written in such a way as to discredit the idea it pretends to endorse.

        • Dim

          You have a point and by choosing your words you reflect exactly how I feel about it. It looks like Jim was/is so close to the truth that the powers that be forces him to deviate slowly but surely to a place to contradict himself. Sad but maybe true. ‘They’ know how to do that. They’ve done it to Alex Jones for since a year or 2 Alex doesn’t take the word Israel anymore in his mouth. He can say and write all he wants but that’s a no go zone, apparently.

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.