Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By The Daily Sheeple
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

No Driver’s License Required

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


You know I sound like a broken record here, but I cannot, again, believe the level of outright fraud perpetrated on all Americans by those elected to represent us.  And, once again, all of it is done with our consent because we do not know our rights.  Please indulge me briefly as I recap what I have discovered so far.

Your Warrant Deed is basically useless as it pertains to the true ownership of your land.  Your Warrant Deed falls under Administrative Law, and makes one subject to the confines of such.  Your Land Patent, on the other hand, places the patent owner outside the confines of Administrative Law, and nullifies its powers over the patented land owner.  Ron outlines all of this here

On that same note, once you bring your land patent forward you are no longer subject to property tax or building permits.  Now, a knee-jerk reaction for some will be that I am trying to help people avoid paying what the rest of us have to pay for.  Please do not fall into that trap.  Understand that by paying property taxes and fees for permits, we are supporting a CORPORATION and not a government.  The only thing keeping this whole charade going is our compliance.  You can see Ron’s explanation of this here.

Speaking of compliance, did we somehow volunteer to be subjects of the corporate state?  Well, not exactly.  Out of ignorance, we have agreed to give up our constitutional rights, for corporation granted rights, by simply not objecting.  Ron lays things out very clearly on the video which can be seen here.

Lastly, one may think that since the criminals in charge have found a way to steal our true identity, to steal ownership in our land and to steal the future of our posterity that they would leave our vehicles alone.  Yea, not so much.  In the spirit of the Warranty Deed fraud, the Title of your vehicle is merely a representation of true ownership and not actual ownership.  Who really owns it?  That’s right…the State.  Ron covers this in, likely, the final video I will release until the full DVD package is ready.  By the way, Ron doesn’t have a Driver’s License and you do not need one either.  You can view the latest video below.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by James White of NorthWest Liberty News.

James White of NorthWest Liberty News  hopes to inspire you to take action.  Future generations will look back at this time for many, many years to come.  How the narrative of history reads is up to all of us.  The time to take action is now.


Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/no-drivers-license-required_062014


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 9 comments
    • The Real Deal

      Do you really think the thugs with badges give a crap about your “Natural” rights? You will always be railroaded through the system. Try that sovereign stuff where i live and they’ll jerk you out of your vehicle and have you eating pavement.

    • becomingme

      The problem with a Land Patents is that, since you are not paying property taxes anymore, you will not have access to infrastructure, such as calling 911, (police & ambulance) having the road in front paved, street lights, etc. Which might have some advantages and probably some disadvantages. The main advantage is your freedom and sovereignty.

      • tward3

        Never call 911 they will come and kill your child and/or your dog. Haven’t you seen them shooting all of those dogs? What about those two teenagers that they shot in the past few weeks when the parents called 911 for medical help but the pigs showed up and shot them? You are MUCH safer if you protect yourself and your loved ones and NEVER call 911.

    • highwithaltitude

      COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE

      CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVER LICENSE COLORADO County of_MesaOFFICE OF THE CLERIC_Recorder , ColoradoCONSTITUTIONAL DRIVER LICENSETHE UNDERSIGNED Common LawCitizen_ per se: hereby Certifies, by RightsSecured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America, the Constitution of the several states, Common Law, Natureand Laws of Natures GOD, that these Rights are retained in FEESIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with special regard toRights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOTE Rights andProperty are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUISBRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT.NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMEDINVIOLATE: 1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBEred, and UNFETTEred isguaranteed as a RIGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right toTRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentionedfor it is SELF-evident by Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society to come and go from length andbreath FREELY UNENCUMBEred and UNFETTEred distinguishes thecharacteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. PleaseSee SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U.S. 618 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way canNOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVELwhen such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT ORGAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. Theabove named Common Law Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCEand as such is thereby EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS SUCH. Further, Coloraco state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW fromconverting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSEand or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if Colorado,state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES andrequire a License or FEE a Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEEWITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please seeSchuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if aCitizen exercises a BASIC RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is to thecontrary of such exercise of that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of ANY state is a FICTION OF LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONALand NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIred TOOBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT. Please seeMARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never beenoverturned in over 194 years, see Shephard’s Citations. Now further, if a Citizen relies in good faith on the advice of Counsel and or on the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has aPERFECT DEFENSE to the element of WILLFULNESS and since the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to prove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT, said tas or burden being totally impossible tospecifically preform there is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEFMAY BE GRANTED BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412U.S. 346. OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING ABASIC Right to TRAVEL for a regular Common Law Citizen NOT INCOMMERCE on the common way Public HlGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! Theabove named Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY ANDANY PARTY MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OFTRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!!2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United StatesSupremeCourt is ALL actions in which a State may be party, thrusubdivision, political or trust. This includes ALL state approvedsubdivisions and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Townships, Municipalities,and Villages, Et Al . Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1) and (2), U.S. Constitution.3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and nowingly entered into ANY Contract or Contractual agreement givingup ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by the CONSTITUTION,the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. This Common Law Citizen has NOT harmedany party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes has NOTthreatened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and would leave any claimant otherwise to their strictestproofs otherwise IN A COURT OF LAW. The above named Citizen ismerely exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL UNENCUMBEred andUNFETTEred on the Common public way or highway, which is their RIGHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held theRIGHT TO TRAVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!!4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and orCRIMEIs Fraud and clear and direct conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION,SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any state, which are clearlyin direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOTWITH STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE ANDTHEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUNDTO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to obey sucha FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITYOR FICTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!5) The payment for a privilegerequires a benifit to be received As the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is alreadysecured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without directdamage to the specific party . Nor may a Citizen be charged with anoffense for the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486 .Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTIONUNDER THE LAW.6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, andcertify ANY AND ALL their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GODand secured in THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTIONOF THE state wherein they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZENexisting and acting entirely AT THE COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE’S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAWGIVER.7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen andWILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OFTHE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSOTAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!! SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen issigned____ Ami Lyn: Thompson W/O PREJUDICE 1-308UCC SIGNATURES ON RECORD RECEPTION # 2623085BK/PG 5347/378 AUG. 8 2012County Clerk state of MESA COUNTYGRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO

    • highwithaltitude

      COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE

      CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVER LICENSE COLORADO

      County of_Mesa

      OFFICE OF THE CLERIC_Recorder , Colorado

      CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVER LICENSETHE UNDERSIGNED Common Law
      Citizen_ per se: hereby Certifies, by Rights
      Secured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of
      America, the Constitution of the several states, Common Law, Nature
      and Laws of Natures GOD, that these Rights are retained in FEE
      SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with special regard to
      Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO NOTE Rights and
      Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUIS
      BRANDIS U.S. SUPREME COURT.NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED
      INVIOLATE: 1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBEred, and UNFETTEred is
      guaranteed as a RIGHT and not a mere privilege. That the Right to
      TRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentioned
      for it is SELF-evident by Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a
      BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society to come and go from length and
      breath FREELY UNENCUMBEred and UNFETTEred distinguishes the
      characteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. Please
      See SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U.S. 618 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL
      by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can
      NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL
      when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR
      GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. The
      above named Common Law Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE
      and as such is thereby EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS
      SUCH. Further, Coloraco state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from
      converting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE
      and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BASIC RIGHT. Please SEE
      MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if Colorado,
      state does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and
      require a License or FEE a Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE
      WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please see
      Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if a
      Citizen exercises a BASIC RIGHT and a Law of ANY state is to the
      contrary of such exercise of that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law
      of ANY state is a FICTION OF LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
      and NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIred TO
      OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE REQUIREMENT. Please see
      MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been
      overturned in over 194 years, see Shephard’s Citations. Now further,
      if a Citizen relies in good faith on the advice of Counsel and or on
      the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has a
      PERFECT DEFENSE to the element of WILLFULNESS and since the burden
      of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to prove beyond a
      REASONABLE DOUBT, said tas or burden being totally impossible to
      specifically preform there is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF
      MAY BE GRANTED BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S. vs. Bishop 412
      U.S. 346. OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A
      BASIC Right to TRAVEL for a regular Common Law Citizen NOT IN
      COMMERCE on the common way Public HlGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The
      above named Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND
      ANY PARTY MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF
      TRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!!
      2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States
      SupremeCourt is ALL actions in which a State may be party, thru
      subdivision, political or trust. This includes ALL state approved
      subdivisions and/or INCORPORATED Cities, Townships, Municipalities,
      and Villages, Et Al . Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1) and
      (2), U.S. Constitution.
      3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and
      nowingly entered into ANY Contract or Contractual agreement giving
      up ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by the CONSTITUTION,
      the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. This Common Law Citizen has NOT harmed
      any party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes has NOT
      threatened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of
      any party and would leave any claimant otherwise to their strictest
      proofs otherwise IN A COURT OF LAW. The above named Citizen is
      merely exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL UNENCUMBEred and
      UNFETTEred on the Common public way or highway, which is their RIGHT
      TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the
      RIGHT TO TRAVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!!
      4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or
      CRIMEIs Fraud and clear and direct conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION,
      SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any state, which are clearly
      in direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT
      WITH STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE AND
      THEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUND
      TO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO Citizen is bound to obey such
      a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITY
      OR FICTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND
      TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!
      5) The payment for a privilegerequires a benifit to be received As the RIGHT TO
      TRAVEL is already secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without direct
      damage to the specific party . Nor may a Citizen be charged with an
      offense for the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the
      RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486 .
      Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL PROTECTION
      UNDER THE LAW.
      6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and
      certify ANY AND ALL their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD
      and secured in THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION
      OF THE state wherein they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZEN
      existing and acting entirely AT THE COMMON LAW, and retains ALL
      BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
      NATURE AND NATURE’S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW
      GIVER.
      7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS
      CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and
      WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF
      THE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSO
      TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!!

      SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is
      signed________________________________
      Ami Lyn: Thompson W/O PREJUDICE 1-308 UCC
      SIGNATURES ON RECORD RECEPTION # 2623085BK/PG 5347/378 AUG. 8 2012
      County Clerk state of MESA COUNTYGRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO

      http://www.scribd.com/doc/105591714/Constitutional-drivers-license

    • jimmythehat

      where is coloraco

      • 69ingSquirrels

        Right in the middle of insanity and paranoia, where most reporters here live.

    • Ideas Time

      Great Job High with altitude. I working on a way to shut down the fraud courts too. One good tip comes from a land mark case in England. This is a work in progress. Lots of good stuff here in rough draft form.

      Make sure you apply for copy of long form birth record.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ELJKQctSpKA

      I would challenge Jurisdiction because corporations are not sovereign the people are the sovereigns and King and queens of the court room.

      The interesting thing about the BAR is that in my thinking when they swear an oath to the BAR aka the British Accredited Registry and serve the queen, they become a foreign agent and we are protected by the 11th. Amendment from foreign prosecution.

      I would also wonder how can you swear an oath to the constitution and also to the BAR or the queen. Would that not be treason?

      Admiralty Jurisdiction must have a valid international contract in dispute. Motion to dismiss.

      Common Law Jurisdiction Requires a sworn complaint by the injured party and no injured party present in court. Motion to dismiss. As King of this court room I Demand this case be dismissed. Proof of claim.

      If no one was damaged or injured there is no case. No harm no Foul.
      A fictitious claimant is fraud upon the court. Blacks Law fourth addition.

      Call yourself a “Defendant in error”. Demand formal charges be presented. No Victim and cops are witnesses.

      UCC commercial Code no jurisdiction.

      Sign your driver’s license Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 asserts rights

      Do you understand the charges against you? SAY NO! I do not wish to contract and do not consent as they have no jurisdiction. They must have formal charges on file with the court clerk.

      They do not have subject matter jurisdiction and they cannot practice law from the bench.

      I do not consent and I waive the benefits. I claim Common Law Jurisdiction
      Are you upon your oath of office?

      First — I do not consent to these proceedings
      Second – Your offer is not accepted. I do not accept your offer to contract.
      Third — I do not consent to being surety for this case
      and these proceedings
      Fourth — I demand the bond be immediately brought forward
      so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.

      Constructive Trust Fraud under the color of law. Look up name in sec of state to see if you are listed as a corporation.

      BAR (British Accredited Registry/Regency), owned and operated by the Crown, for the purpose of contracting the fiction

      8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

      9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
      Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
      Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own cause
      No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause.

      In landmark case, John Anthony RE: Therefore, never having been Lawfully crowned, she has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s “authority” comes from her. with malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus has never been lawfully crowned.
      The person who purports to be queen was, in fact, as proven above, never rightfully nor Lawfully the Sovereign/Crown. Therefore never having been Lawfully crowned, the Crown/Prosecution/Regina has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s “authority” comes from her.
      The act being debated the Cestui Qui act was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea).
      The state (of London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust, the state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles and can also claim damages. (Reclaim using UCC 1 and PPSA)
      The rule of the use of CAPITAL LETTERS used in a NAME: when CAPITAL letters re used anywhere in a NAME this always refers to a LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION, COMPANY or CORPORATION no exceptions.
      CEST TUI QUE TRUST: (pronounced setakay) common term in NEW ZEALAND and AUSTRALIA or STRAWMAN common term in USA or CANADA is a LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION created and owned by the GOVERNMENT whom created it. I repeat owned by the GOVERNMENT.

      Legally, we are considered to be a FICTION, a concept or idea expressed as a NAME, a symbol. That LEGAL PERSON has no consciousness; it is a juristic PERSON, ENS LEGIS, a NAME/word written on a piece of paper.

      This traces back to 1666, London is a state, just like Vatican is a state, just like Washington DC is a state. The Crown is an unincorporated association. Why unincorporated, its private, the temple bar is in London, every lawyer called to the “bar” swears allegiance to the temple bar. You can’t get called, without swearing this allegiance. The Crown already owns North America and everything in it.

      Your only way out is to reclaim your dead entity (strawman) that the Crown created, become the trustee of the cest tui qui trust and remove yourself from the admiralty law that holds you in custody.
      Honour and dishonour. To remain in honour you have to accept a claim and settle it. Then you add conditions. I accept on proof of claim and proof of loss. This gives the liability back to them. The legal fiction is always guilty. Only in the high courts, can the real man or woman appear. Games are played on courts; hence the name court is a game with actors (acting on acts). It has to be treated as a game and just business. Court room dramas are misinformation. In the public, we are operating in bankruptcy and you receive benefits. It takes a lot of time, effort and study to use these tools. You have to be prepared to go fully through the process, get the right tool out of your toolbox at the right time. People need to learn how to act as creditors.
      In summary…
      • Money is backed by labour.
      • We cannot exchange it fairly for gold or silver.
      • Capitalisation of “name” means a dead entity, a legal fiction.
      • Know who you are, you are not your strawman or dead fictitious entity.
      • Learn how to become a creditor in commerce.

      Ces tui Qui Trust pronounce set-a-kay Are you saying that the trust which you are now administrating is the JOHN DOE trust?”
      JOHN DOE is, indeed, in the court!” Point to the JAT. “It is YOU! As trustee, YOU are JOHN DOE, today, aren’t you?!”
      “Are you the CQV’s trustee who has appointed this judge as administrator and trustee of the constructive trust case #00000-00? Did you also appoint the prosecutor as executor of this constructive trust?” Then point to the JAT: “So you are the trustee”, then point to the prosecutor, “and you are the executor? And I’m the beneficiary, so, now we know who’s who and, as beneficiary, I authorize you to handle the accounting and dissolve this constructive trust. I now claim my body so I am collapsing the CQV trust which you have charged, as there is no value in it. You have committed fraud against all laws!
      We have exposed their fraud of the CQV trust which exists only on presumptions. The CQV has no corpus, no property, ergo, no value. Trusts are created only upon the conveyance of property and can exist only as long as there is value in the trust. But, there is no value in the CQV trust, yet, they continue to charge the trust. That is fraud!
      Affidavit is treated as “Evidence” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act. However, it was held by the Supreme Court that an affidavit can be used as

      A living, breathing human being, as opposed to a legal entity such as a corporation.

      “Every person (this includes EVERY government official) who under color of law, deprives any citizen of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution is subject to civil and/or criminal penalties pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 241 and 242. Penalties include up to $10,000 fine and/or 10 years to life imprisonment, or both, if death results.”

      GENERAL CASE LAW ON JURISDICTION
      “Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2nd 906 at 910.
      “The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).
      “Where there is absence of proof of jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings are a nullity, and confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no justification, and may be rejected upon direct collateral attack.” Thompson v Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L. Ed. 381; and Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3 L. Ed. 471.
      They took an oath to uphold and preserve the constitution.. Perjury of oath is a FELONY!
      18 U.S. Code § 1001
      o Brookfield Construction Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.”
      o Jurisdiction “We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given that to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.” Cohen v Virginia. 19U.S. 264
      Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

      The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel & this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.

      Bullet proof defence.
      For those of you in the United States who may be thinking “hey, we aren’t a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?” all you really need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., stand for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn’t matter whether it is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head of the BAR.
      Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God.

      “BAR” attorney’s are AGENTS of a FOREIGN power and most of them KNOW it.
      Under the Common Law & the Laws of America, nowhere is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. “Corporations” are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people & are operating under implied consent & power which they have usurped & otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY, OR JURISDICTION, & must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.

      All seats of government have been vacated!
      December
      26, 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 ( Convention on Rights and
      Duties of States ) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international
      law, placing all STATES under international law.
      December 9, 1945, the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of United States to United Nations.
      22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.
      Title
      8 USC 1481 states once an oath of office is taken, citizenship is
      relinquished, thus one becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That
      means every public office is a foreign state, including all political
      subdivisions. ( i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign
      entity ).
      Title 22 USC ( Foreign relations and Intercourse ) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.
      Title
      28 USC 3002 Section 15A states United States is a Federal Corporation
      and not a government, including the Judicial Procedural Section.
      Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( FRCP ) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign state.

      The
      11th Amendment states “The Judicial power of the United States shall
      not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or
      prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another
      State, or by Citizens or Subjects of a Foreign State.” ( A foreign
      entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States
      citizen without abiding the following procedure. )
      Title
      22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified
      of any suit, and in turn has to notify the United States citizen of
      said suit.
      Title
      28 USC 1330states that the United States District Court has to grant
      permission for the suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied
      sufficient proof that the United States citizen is actually a corporate
      entity.
      Title 28 USC 1608 One has Absolute Immunity as a Corporation.
      Title
      28 USC 1602-1611 ( Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ) allows the
      jurisdiction of a court to be challenged, and a demand of proper
      jurisdiction to be stated.
      July
      27, 1868, 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 “Acts Concerning
      American Citizens in a Foreign State,” expatriation, is what is broken
      when jurisdiction is demanded, and is not met with an answer.
      Under
      the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6, the prosecution has failed
      to provide adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation
      are actually corporate entities. There is ample proof that the
      prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.
      In
      1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined
      that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under
      definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R.
      will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.
      In
      1933, elected officials and the alleged “country” have been given to
      the United Nations Government system. Under Senator Barack Hussein
      Obama’s Bill, SB2433, the Poverty Act of 2007, the UN military forces
      can step on American soil to confiscate weapons from U.S. citizens.
      Under the Bush Administration, B.A.R. Attorney General Ashcroft and
      Haliburton established FEMA Concentration Camps for U.S. citizens who
      refuse the new world order/one world government.
      “That
      the Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933 (49 STAT 3097) Treaty Series 881 –
      (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced
      STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international
      law.
      That
      the International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 – – Congress
      relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up
      to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the
      right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the
      right to tax the States.
      That
      the International Reorganization Rescind Act- Congress put this into
      form but they never took action to rescind the act. Fairly recently an
      Ohio judge filed suit claiming that Congress did not have the right to
      relinquish government authority over to the UN (a corporation or foreign
      country) and that the Congressional act was a constitutional violation
      because they didn’t put it to the States or the people to agree on it.
      In 2005 the US Supreme court declined to hear the case therefore all
      public offices are under UN jurisdiction & they are not American
      Citizens.

      That the Oath of Office – Title 5 USC 331, 332, 333 backed up by Title 22
      CFR Foreign Relations 92.12 – 92.31 and Title 8 USC, section 1481 – the
      public official relinquishes his national citizenship and are thus
      foreign agents as stipulated under Title 22 USC, chapter 11, section
      611, loss of national citizenship – Public officials are no longer US
      Citizens, but rather are foreign agents and must register as such.
      That
      Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is
      relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That
      means every public office is a foreign state, including all political
      subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign
      entity).
      That Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.
      Title
      28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal
      Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural
      Section.
      That the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign State.
      That 28 USC CHAPTER 176 – FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE.
      The Federal Debt Collection Procedure places all courts under equity and commerce and under the International Monetary Fund.”
      That
      in 1950 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined
      that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under
      definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R.
      will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.

      All “judicial power” of the “inferior courts” comes from the
      Judiciary Act of 1789, as did the Attorney General position. “Judicial
      power” comes from Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. The
      Eleventh Amendment removed all “judicial power” in law, equity,
      treaties, contract law, and the right of the State to bring suit against
      the People.
      “There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since
      1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive
      Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. There have not been any
      Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.” (FRC
      v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)

      The Eleventh Amendment removed all “judicial power” from the “inferior
      courts” and the prosecutor’s office as well as from all court officers
      in law, equity, and so forth. The Eleventh Amendment also makes a
      foreign state separation from the position of the Public
      Office positions to throw off the People. The People have Eleventh
      Amendment immunity, because there is NO “JUDICIAL POWER” of the
      “inferior courts” AND the People have FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. Article
      III, Sec. 2, U.S. Constitution
      That Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

      All seats of government have been vacated!
      December
      26, 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 ( Convention on Rights and
      Duties of States ) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international
      law, placing all STATES under international law.
      December 9, 1945, the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of United States to United Nations.
      22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that an oath is required to take office.
      Title
      8 USC 1481 states once an oath of office is taken, citizenship is
      relinquished, thus one becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That
      means every public office is a foreign state, including all political
      subdivisions. ( i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign
      entity ).
      Title 22 USC ( Foreign relations and Intercourse ) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

      __________________________________________________________________________________

      The United States is a “Federal Corporation”: 28 U.S.C. § 3002 Which only has power within the 10 mile sq Look up the Act of 1871
      The specific method for reserving your common law rights – for choosing to operate under common law jurisdiction – is to write below your signature “Without Prejudice UCC 1-207.” You could use this phrase on your driver’s licence, on bank signature cards, and on contracts.
      _____________________________________________________________________________________
      Without sovereignty, you could not lawfully enter into a valid contract.
      My thoughts. The court has to agree that you are sovereign or they cannot contract with you. By admitting that you are sovereign they then admit they have no jurisdiction.
      ____________________________________________________________________________________
      The famous phrase, “a government of the people, by the people, and for the people”, means that in the United States of America, the Constitutional Republic form of government was set by the will of the sovereign people.
      In this nation, other than God, there is no power greater than the will of the people. The sovereign people are constitutionally secured to their right to pursue: life, liberty, happiness and property to their heart’s content.
      sov•er•eign
      [sov-rin, sov-er-in, suhv-] Show IPA
      noun
      1.
      a monarch; a king, queen, or other supreme ruler.
      2.
      a person who has supreme power or authority.
      3.
      a group or body of persons or a state having sovereign authority.
      4.
      a gold coin of the United Kingdom, equal to one pound sterling: went out of circulation after 1914.
      adjective
      5.
      belonging to or characteristic of a sovereign or sovereign authority; royal.
      6.
      having supreme rank, power, or authority.
      7.
      supreme; preeminent; indisputable: a sovereign right.
      8.
      greatest in degree; utmost or extreme.
      9.
      being above all others in character, importance, excellence, etc

      6th. Amendment US Constitution

      In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

      • highwithaltitude

        A lot to digest. I will definitely will read later when I have more time to dig into all this information.

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.