MH 17 bullet holes

This article is quite interesting.  It does a good job of providing evidence that MH017 was shelled by Ukrainian jets and not downed by a missile.  The photo of the cockpit does look A LOT like shelling. Can you elaborate? I thought the US tracked “a missile” but wouldn’t reveal where it came from.  Maybe the US actually didn’t track anything and that is why they didn’t call of the Ukrainian Military? If it was shelled, why would they want the public to believe it was a missile? [and from another] http://www.anderweltonline.com/wissenschaft-und-technik/luftfahrt-2014/shocking-analysis-of-the-shooting-down-of-malaysian-mh17/  The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that at these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent – outwardly! In the case of flight MH 017 it becomes abundantly clear that there also an explosion took place inside the aircraft. Russia recently published radar recordings, that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 in close proximity to MH 017. This corresponds with the statement of the now missing Spanish controller ‘Carlos’ that has seen two Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the immediate vicinity of MH 017. If we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s cockpit segment! Because the interior of a commercial aircraft is a hermetically sealed pressurized chamber, the explosions will, in split second, increase the pressure inside the cabin to extreme levels or breaking point. An aircraft is not equipped for this, it will burst like a balloon. [and from another] http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/19/airline-horror-spurs-new-rush-to-judgment/  I’m told that some CIA analysts cite U.S. satellite reconnaissance photos suggesting that the anti-aircraft missile that brought down Flight 17 was fired by Ukrainian troops from a government battery, not by ethnic Russian rebels. According to a source briefed on the tentative findings, the soldiers manning the battery appeared to be wearing Ukrainian uniforms and may have been drinking, since what looked like beer bottles were scattered around the site. But the source added that the information was still incomplete and the analysts did not rule out the possibility of rebel responsibility. [and from another] http://joostniemoller.nl/2014/07/brekend-er-was-nog-distress-call-van-piloot-mh17-bij-snelle-daling/  There was contact with the pilot at the time that there was an emergency. It indicates that the device is not, as claimed, shot out of the sky at once. [and from another] http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=39b_1406899661  OCSE monitor Michael Bociurkiw mentions bullet holes (seems to be 30mm size, SU-25 gun) in MH17, unable to find any evidence of a missile strike.

Russia has been patient, while being accused of arming rebels who shot down a passenger plane, as they know the truth will eventually come out. The Ukraine government , desperate to push back the pro-Russian separatists, had attempted to destroy or suppress all evidence of their deed. They have refused to release the air traffic control tapes, and have of course been doctoring them in anticipation of being forced to do so. Anyone not cooperating with their story (such as Carlos the Spanish air traffic controller who released tweets during the incident) has been killed. They have denied their fighter jets near MH 17, as reported by Carlos based on conversations from the pilots, and as reported by witnesses on the ground and Russian radar. And they attempted to gain control of the crash site by refusing to honor a ceasefire. 

The US government has not released their satellite imagery, which shows that the missile shot was done by men in Ukraine uniforms, and the BUK battery returned to Ukraine territory afterwards. There have at most been leaks by officials within the US government. The Ukraine fired the BUK missile from near rebel held regions to give the appearance that the shoot down was caused by a missile. It is notable that the Netherlands, who lost the most in this crash, has not affixed blame, nor has most of Europe. Without a smoking gun, and without the cooperation of the US in providing satellite images, would this issue ever be resolved? Now a German expert and a OCSE monitor on site have come forward with the smoking gun. 

Undeniable evidence of 30 MM holes in the cockpit area, which are designed to explode within a tank, thus rupturing the plane from the inside out. A BUK missile explosion would have been immediate, no time for cockpit communications. There are also indications on radar that MH 17 tried evasive maneuvers. It is likely the final report will call this an accident, at the hands of the Ukraine government, or a suspected assassination attempt against Putin by rogue Ukraine air force officers. That this was a deliberate false flag incident to encourage partners to engage in warfare will never officially be admitted.  

Source: ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for August 9, 2014