Articles of Impeachment for Barack Hussein Obama Have Been Delivered to Congress

Have Been Delivered to Congress…..

Before I even get into the most recent Articles of Impeachment, it is worth noting that if Congress leveled with the American people, more people would know that, technically, Obama  CANNOT be impeached. Factually, it is not a matter of political will power, but rather a Constitutional IMPOSSIBILITY! In my post titled: 
CONGRESS NOT NEEDED – ARREST OBAMA FOR IMPERSONATING A PUBLIC OFFICIAL, it says the following:

I never use the word “bastard” because one was born of parents not married. But when it comes to a person who has usurped a public office, e.g., the highest office of our nation, I do. OBAMA IS A BASTARD !!!

NOTE: All children born of parents who are not married are gifts from God and they are to be raised as such. They are not mistakes and punishments, as Obama claims in his argument to murder unborn children.

The fact is that Obama is illegitimate and any attempt to impeach him would be an unlawful attempt to validate his “presidency” — nothing can be done to validate him as “the President,” so he cannot be lawfully impeached … If the House of Representatives UNLAWFULLY IMPEACHES Obama, then they will also say that everything Obama has signed is legal.

If the House acknowledges that Obama is a USURPER and therefore CANNOT BE IMPEACHED, they will for the first time be formally acknowledging the fact that Obama has USURPED the Office of the President.

NOTE: Congress has been avoiding the word “usurper,” because they knew he was ineligible in 2008 and 2012 when they counted the electoral votes without objecting to his ineligibility. For the members of Congress to come to the conclusion now that Obama is a usurper would be like PUTTING THE ROPE AROUND THEIR OWN NECKS. So, I doubt that they will change direction now.

I believe that if they unlawfully try to impeach Obama, it will not be for usurpation but some other reason. They want the American people to think they are working for and representing them when, in fact, they are avoiding the fact that Obama is a USURPER 
and therefore willfully violating our representative form of government.

Has anyone here read the articles of impeachment filed by Michelle Bachmann? Is usurpation mentioned in the articles? Probably not.

Our Constitution specifically provides that a president can be impeached. It does NOT    provide for the impeachment of a USURPER.  Obviously a usurper is NOT a president.

Dr. Vieira in Thought Must Precede Action states:

“Although Mr. Obama may have succeeded in gaining physical access to the office-space a legitimate President of the United States occupies in the White House, he never acquired legal access to “the Office of President” because, not being “a natural born Citizen,” he was never constitutionally eligible and is not now eligible for that “Office”. For Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution declares (in pertinent part) that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President”. If words have any meaning, a “Person” whom the supreme law of the land declares not to be “eligible to the Office of President” can never “gain access to” that “Office” in the sense of legally holding it or asserting any claim to it.”

Definition of “Office”

“Office” is defined to be a right to exercise a public or private employment, and to take the fees and emoluments thereunto belonging.

NOTE: We know that Obama’s father was never an American citizen, so the evidence proves that Obama is not a natural born Citizen and, therefore, he does not have the right to be a president of the United States of America.

We need go no further to prove that Barack Hussein Obama II was never constitutionally eligible, and is not now eligible for the “Office of the President.”

NESARA- Restore America – Galactic News