Rod Class Deconstructs The Secret Formula Used By The Banking Cartel

ROD CLASS & THE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX”

FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P…Rod+Class%22&*

THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims to be a “Private Attorney General” (“PAG”) and that as such, he is EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and that he represents an EXTREME threat to government agencies and officials in that imaginary capacity. But, none of this is so.

BACKGROUND: The terms “attorney”, “attorney general”, “judge” and “prosecutor” are all “professional titles” for highly-educated, legal experts in powerful and important public positions. Class wanted to be what these people were. So, he created an appropriate TITLE, COSTUME, VEHICLE and some imaginary POWERS for himself to help him in this regard. For his title, Class picked the term, “PAG” because this term actually appears in the case law (ONLY) and because it would help him create the prestigious IMAGE he wanted.

Class falsely claims that: 1). the term, PAG, is a professional title for a non-attorney who is somehow authorized to practice law without a license; 2). the purpose of the PAG is to “do accountability” against our ELECTED representatives and their appointees for doing their jobs; and that 3). his “authority” as a PAG comes from “Congress” (two federal CIVIL RIGHTS statutes and a FORGER “PAG CERTIFICATE”). But, none of this is so.

THE TRUTH:
1). Class is NOT a PAG. As used in connection with the two federal CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies (and throughout this document), the term, PAG, is a TEMPORARY NICKNAME jokingly used by the federal courts when referring to an ordinary, WINNING civil rights CLIENT who was actually represented by an attorney in WINNING the case. The TEMPORARY NICKNAME, PAG, is NOT a professional title in the first place (the way Class fraudulently uses it), much less a professional title for a FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed “attorney” (or “attorney general”) who is somehow authorized to practice law without a license.

2). The purpose of a PAG is NOT to “do accountability” against our ELECTED representatives or their appointees for doing their jobs.

3). Class has NO authority from Congress to practice law without a license. Indeed, Congress has NO POWER to authorize any person (including Class) to practice law. Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (listing ALL OF THE POWERS of Congress). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/pa…le-i-section-8 (Note that the power to authorize a person to practice law IS NOT on this tiny list of Congressional powers). Under the tenth amendment, ONLY THE STATES have the power to authorize a person to practice law. http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment .

4). The “concept” of a PAG relates SOLELY to providing PAYMENT to attorneys who WIN cases for CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIMS.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

5). What a REAL PAG looks like.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22c…&bih=613#spf=1.

6). What a FAKE PAG looks like.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22P…Rod+Class%22&* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

7). DEFINITION: The term, PAG, is a TEMPORARY NICKNAME jokingly used by the federal courts. A PAG is the actual CLIENT of an attorney who has already WON a federal civil rights lawsuit. Such a PAG must have been the actual VICTIM of the federal civil rights violation and must have been the actual PLAINTIFF in the federal civil rights case. A PAG has NO powers, NO authority and NO importance that any other CLIENT of an attorney does not already have. None. Zero. Nada.

8). The subject federal civil rights statutes (and the statutes to which they refer) only do two things: a). they permit the actual VICTIM of the federal civil rights violation TO SUE the violator in FEDERAL court; and b). they permit the FEDERAL judge TO AWARD ATTORNEYS FEES to the winning side’s attorney. There is nothing in either of the two federal civil rights statutes that authorizes a non-attorney to practice law without a license or to use the TEMPORARY NICKNAME, PAG as if it were a professional title (the way Class fraudulently uses it). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1988 (See section (b))
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUT…E-78-Pg241.pdf (See Section 204(b))

9). An attorney IS an attorney IN EVERY sense of the word. But, a PAG IS NOT an attorney IN ANY sense of the word. An attorney represents a party in court. But, A PAG IS A PARTY IN COURT. An attorney represents a client in court. But, A PAG IS A CLIENT IN COURT. An attorney acts on behalf of people WHO ARE IN COURT. But, a PAG acts ONLY on his OWN BEHALF and ONLY on behalf of people WHO ARE OUT OF COURT. A person’s status as an attorney CONTINUES AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, a person’s status as a PAG ENDS (FOREVER) AT THE END OF THE CASE.

NO PERSON (including Class) CAN BE A PAG AFTER THE END OF THE CASE in which he/she was the actual VICTIM of the federal civil rights violation, the actual PLAINTIFF in the federal civil rights case and the actual CLIENT of an attorney who actually WON that federal civil rights case. The term, PAG, is NOT a professional title (the way Class fraudulently uses it).

10). ORIGIN: A REAL governmental “Attorney General” WINS civil rights lawsuits which benefits society as a whole. Likewise, an ordinary CLIENT who WINS civil rights lawsuits also benefits society as a whole. Noting the similarity IN FUNCTION between such litigants, federal courts began jokingly referring to such ordinary, winning, civil rights CLIENTS as PAG’s. The federal courts still jokingly use this term to remind the parties that a such an ordinary, winning, civil rights CLIENT has rendered a public service and is, therefore, statutorily eligible for an award of attorney fees to pay his/her attorney who WON the case.

11). EFFECT: Thus, in jokingly using the TEMPORARY NICKNAME, “PAG”, the federal courts: a). were NOT somehow elevating non-attorneys to the professional level of REAL attorneys or REAL attorneys general; b). were NOT somehow recognizing a “special class” of FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed “attorneys” (or “attorneys general”) who were somehow authorized to practice law without a license; and c). were NOT somehow creating a professional title for non-attorneys (like Class) to use in defrauding his own followers.

CONCLUSION: Rod Class is not a PAG. He doesn’t even know the meaning of the term.

THE LAW:
Note: Not a single case below has anything to do with “doing accountability” against a government agency or official.

1). PAG DEFINED:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

2). CLASS NOT A PAG:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006 (READ FOOTNOTE 8, INCLUDING ITS FINAL SENTENCE)

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006 . (See Ruling 35.).

Note: More Class LOSSES with identical rulings (to the above) are available on Pacer.gov. which will not allow us to link to its cases.

3). OTHER FAKE PAG’s:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006 . Cites to Class’ LOSS in Pertuset above as authority.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006 . Same FAKE PAG who stars in video below.

FAKE PAG VIDEOS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8 (another FAKE PAG goes to jail for pretending to be a PAG just like Rod Class does)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCisCCMQqng&t=630s (CLASS describing his imaginary powers as a PAG)

FAKE PAG VEHICLES:
http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/d…actant.159266/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=8s (Go to video FIRST. Then, go to :05-:20).

FAKE PAG COSTUME:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZEY…QfXTA0a1t-O7ux

FAKE PAG PAPERS:
https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/…_18TH_2013.pdf

ROD CLASS SEMINARS THREE TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK!

If you have PAID to attend ANY SEMINAR (or “webinar” or “class”) involving Rod Class’ IN RELIANCE of his FRAUDULENT claims that: 1). He is a “Private Attorney General”; OR 2). He can “TRAIN” you to be a “Private Attorney General”; OR 3) He KNOWS THE LAW; OR that 4). He (rather than an attorney) has “won” ANY case in ANY court at ANY time, THEN YOU MAY RECOVER THREE (3) TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK, PLUS ATTORNEY FEES, PLUS OTHER LEGAL COSTS UNDER FEDERAL RICO!

THE LAW ON ROD CLASS SEMINARS & CLASSES UNDER FEDERAL RICO:

1). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

2). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

3). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

4). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…n&as_sdt=40006

EXAMPLE OF AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR SUCH A ROD CLASS RICO “SEMINAR” OR “CLASS” FOR WHICH YOU MAY RECOVER THREE TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK:

(Begin Quote)

>> Potential PAG Seminar at the end of August ! <<

This is a P.A.G. Inquiry only at this time ! In the last six months, we have had new interest asking when the next P.A.G. Seminar might be. We have a Camp Ground available with an air-conditioned auditorium that will seat 30 people. This next P.A.G. Seminar can be confirmed by 30 people confirming with a deposit donation of a non-refundable pledge of $300 cash to help with setting up costs. The rest of the fee donation to attend the next P.A.G. Seminar of $700 cash would be due at the door. The total P.A.G. Seminar cost will be $1000 which includes FIVE 8 hour days of training with the following weekend Saturday/Sunday reserved for one-on-one consultations with Rod Class and Carl Weston. As some might know we have worked on many types of cases…assisting with Administrative and Judicial cases through the years and have many WINS including money Judgments. If you feel you might be able to attend the next P.A.G. Seminar and help out with a $300 Deposit for costs to set up please forward your interest response to: [email protected] PLEASE put "August PAG Seminar" in the subject
line ! The P.A.G. Seminar date will be set for late August.

Note: Motel and food costs will be your responsibility.

(End Quote)

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google "Judge DALE Hoax", "Debra Jones Hoax", "Private Attorney General Hoax", "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax", "FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax", "Property Into Other Peoples' Names Hoax", "Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax", "Right To Travel Hoax", "My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax", "The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax", "The Private Attorney General 'Certificate' Hoax" (A.K.A. "Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?"), "The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax" (A.K.A. "The Harold Stanley Case Hoax"), "The Federal Government Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax" and numerous other hoaxes.).

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH: Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.

PART I: ROD CLASS & THE “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE ‘PRIVATE ENTITIES’ OR ‘PRIVATE CONTRACTORS’ HOAX” (A.K.A. “THE BOMBSHELL: FOURTH ADMINISTRATIVE RULING HOAX”)

FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/…p?q=1350315108 . http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/WE-ARE-C…ages/43090012/ . http://wp.nesara.news/?p=26944 . https://scannedretina.com/2012/10/15…es-are-vacant/. And, speaking of “BOMBSHELL” hoaxes, for more “BOMBSHELL” hoaxes by one of the same charlatans involved here, go to: /alternative…s-2978738.html http://meetnigerians.net/members/vid…hoTszlL_G6tQ6Q . http://www.takdownloadfree.com/-LIIw…h-Tavares.html .

THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims that he obtained “FOUR” “administrative rulings” to the effect that “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” are “private entitIES” or “private contractors”. But, this in not so.

THE TRUTH: Rod Class NEVER obtained even one single ruling to that effect, much less “FOUR” of them.

HOAX SIMPLIFIED: This HOAX arose out of TWO cases that Class LOST. In BOTH of these two cases, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. Like all of the cases that Class files, he LOST these two cases too. In their DISMISSALS of these two cases (throwing them out of court), the judges in BOTH OF THESE TWO CASES referred to the private corporations that Class had sued and to the government agencies that Class had sued SEPARATELY (one ruling DISMISSING the government agencies that Class had sued and a different ruling DISMISSING the private corporations that Class had sued). But, in trying to explain away these two LOSSES to his followers, Class fraudulently “SWITCHED” the judges’ words about the private corporations that Class had sued with the judges’ words about the government agencies that Class had sued. By “SWITCHING” the judges’ words about the private corporations with the judges’ words about the government agencies, Class fraudulently created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually talking about the private corporations, they were instead talking about all of the government agencies. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judges words (from one group of defendants to the other group of defendants) created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually referring to THE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as a SINGLE “private entitY” as applicable, they were instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as “private entitIES”, as applicable. But, that was not so.

THE TRUTH. FIRST CASE: In this case, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. In his DISMISSAL of the first case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the term, “Corporate Appellees”, when referring (BY NAME) to a private bank and to two private insurance companies that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL of this case, the judge was instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class had sued in the same case as “corporate appellees”. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s words (from one type of defendant to the other type of defendant) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled that “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” were “corporate appellees”. Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this hoax can be found here. Go to page 6, lines 13-15. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOUR…07-05026-0.pdf . After reading what the judge in this case actually said, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class sued as “corporate appellees” OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer ONLY to the private bank and the two private insurance companies that Class used as “corporate appellees”?

THE TRUTH. SECOND CASE: In this case, Class sued a STATE-WIDE government “agency”, a “LOCAL unit of government” and a SINGLE “private entitY”, ALL IN THE SAME CASE. Specifically, Class filed an administrative suit against the North Carolina Department of Transportation (a STATE-WIDE government “agency” which was immune from suit by statute), against a “LOCAL” city police department (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a “LOCAL” “UNIT OF GOVERNMENT”, rather than a STATE-WIDE “agency” under the Governor) and against a SINGLE private contractor that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a SINGLE “private entitY”). In his DISMISSAL of this second case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the SINGULAR term, “private entitY” when referring ONLY to that SINGLE “private entitY” that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL, the judge used the PLURAL term, “private entitIES” and fraudulently told his followers that the judge was instead referring to ALL THREE DEFENDANTS that Class had sued as “private entitIES” (including the state-wide government “agency” and the “local unit of government” that Class had sued). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s actual word, “entitY” (a SINGULAR term) to the FRAUDULENT word, “entitIES” (a PLURAL term) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled “ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES” were “private entitIES” (a PLURAL term that does not appear in the ruling). Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this hoax can be found here. Go to “Conclusions Of Law” paragraph. 4, sentence 2. (Look for the SINGULAR term, “entitY”.). https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpre…y_complete.pdf . After reading what the judge in this case actually said in this case, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL THREE DEFENDANTS” that Rod Class had sued as “private entitIES”, a PLURAL term OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer ONLY to the SINGLE private contractor that sold license plates for the State of North Carolina as a SINGLE “private entitY”, a SINGULAR term?

In fairness to Class, who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate, CLASS MISTAKENLY BELIEVED THAT HE HAD SUED THREE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES in this case. That is why he sued all three defendants in state administrative court. (He mistakenly believed that all three defendants were state-wide government “agencies” over which state administrative courts usually have jurisdiction.). But, in fact in this case, Class had actually sued ONLY TWO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (OR “UNITS”) and a SINGLE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina. Class mistakenly believed that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he had mistakenly sued in this case was a government agency because he did not know that FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA HAS USED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS TO SELL VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES TO NORTH CAROLINA VEHICLE OWNERS.

If Class had bothered to do a little research before filing suit, he would have discovered that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) was a not a governmental agency at all. Unknown to Class, almost all of the vehicle license plate agencies in the State Of North Carolina (outside the Charlotte & Raleigh areas) are now owned and operated by private contractors of the type that he mistakenly sued in this case (in the mistaken belief that it was a government “agency”). Despite that the State of North Carolina uses private contractors to sell its vehicle license plates, IT DOES NOT USE PRIVATE CONTRACTORS FOR ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY-TYPE FUNCTION. It only uses private contractors to sell vehicle license plates (includes titling services). This has been PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE to everyone except Rod Class for over half a century.

WHAT CLASS DID NOT KNOW THEN (AND DOES NOT KNOW NOW):

http://www.ncleg.net/ped/reports/doc…ags_report.pdf (Scroll down to “BACKGROUND” on the 4th page, marked “page 2″).

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/…s.aspx?r=10646 http://www.wral.com/dmv-defends-syst…ices/11753455/

http://myfox8.com/2015/01/15/dmv-see…stokes-county/

http://www.journalnow.com/news/local…a4bcf6878.html

CLASS MAKES MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES: So, not knowing any better, when the judge in this case DISMISSED (threw out) Class’ lawsuit against this SINGLE private contractor on the grounds that it was a SINGLE “private entitY” (and not a STATE-WIDE government “agency” over which the administrative court usually has jurisdiction), Class mistakenly believed he had “forced” the courts to “admit” that a SINGLE “private entitY” was a SINGLE “private entitY” (something that everybody except Class has known for over half a century). This means that Class’ own IGNORANCE (of the fact that North Carolina has used private contractors to sell vehicle license plates for more than half a century) led to him reach the mistaken conclusion that he had miraculously become a “legal genius”. To this very day, Class does not know that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) had actually been a SINGLE “private entitY” all along. It would be funny if it weren’t so sad.

CLOSING NOTE: Remember, Class falsely claims to have obtained “FOUR” administrative rulings to the effect “all government agencies” are “private entitIES” or “private contractors”. But, this is not so. In truth, Class NEVER even obtained ONE such administrative ruling to that effect, much less “FOUR” of them. According to Class, the two DISMISSALS described above (throwing his two cases out of court) constituted TWO such imaginary rulings to that effect (one of which was NOT an “administrative” ruling in the first place). According to Class, the ruling AGAINST HIM in his LOSS of his appeal of his LOSS of the second case (described above) constituted the THIRD such imaginary ruling to that effect (which was likewise NOT an administrative ruling either). Finally, according to Class, an ordinary “Motion To Dismiss” filed by the state Attorney General’s Office in this case constituted the “FOURTH” such imaginary ruling to that effect (which was NOT A RULING OF ANY KIND, administrative or judicial)! This “FUZZY MATH” is how Class reaches the FRAUDULENT total of “FOUR” administrative rulings to the effect that “all government agencies” are “private entitIES” or “private contractors”.

(CONTINUED IN THE “PROPERTY INTO OTHER NAMES HOAX”)

PART II: ROD CLASS & THE “PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES’ NAMES HOAX”

FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:
https://adask.wordpress.com/2011/10/…ne-elses-name/ . http://2013rainbowroundtable.ning.co…=06v6zf7ohrnts . http://landrightsnfarming-landrightn…7_archive.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZe9-QDsqG4 .

THE HOAX:
This hoax is unique in that Rod Class created it to support another hoax, the “BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”. (Read that comment first.). In this particular hoax, Class falsely claims that, IN DIRECT RESPONSE to his having obtained “FOUR” “Administrative Rulings” to the effect that “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” are “PRIVATE ENTITIES” (imaginary rulings which Class NEVER obtained), a North Carolina judge “WARNED” ALL NORTH CAROLINA “POLICE OFFICERS” TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES’ NAMES (to protect their property from the consequences of lawsuits that the public would file against such “police officers” now that they would no longer be protected from such lawsuits by governmental immunity). But, these claims are not so.

NOTE:
First of all, if Class had known ANYTHING at all about North Carolina law at the time, then he would have NEVER created the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax” in the first place, because doing so only demonstrates the extent of his own IGNORANCE of North Carolina law (explained below).

THE TRUTH:
1. No such “warning” was ever issued BECAUSE CLASS NEVER OBTAINED THE IMAGINARY UNDERLYING RULINGS THAT WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE NECESSITATED SUCH A “WARNING” IN THE FIRST PLACE. (See the “BOMBSHELL: Fourth Administrative Ruling Hoax”.). This is why Class has never published a copy of this imaginary “warning” online (something that he would have certainly done if this imaginary warning had actually been real).

2. Unknown to Class, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL ACT IN NORTH CAROLINA FOR OVER A CENTURY FOR DEBTORS (like police officers facing future lawsuits) TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES’ NAMES in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (like future lawsuit judgment creditors).

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…=2&as_sdt=4,34 (citing Aman v. Walker, 165 N.C. 214, 81 S. E. 162 (N.C. 1914) (for which no link is available and which held that any such purported transfer is “VOID”, which means, “it never happened”). Thus, any such purported transfer would be absolutely POINTLESS. But, Class does not know this.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…=2&as_sdt=4,34 (also citing Aman, Supra).

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…en&as_sdt=4,34

http://law.justia.com/codes/north-ca…ection-39-23.1

3. Unknown to Class, FOR SEVERAL DECADES, BY STATUTE, any attempt by creditors (like police officers facing future lawsuits) to put their property into other peoples’ names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (like future lawsuit judgment creditors) HAS BEEN “VOIDABLE” (which means, “REVERSIBLE like it never happened”), which, of course, defeats the purpose of putting property into other peoples’ names in the first place (because doing so WOULD NOT protect a debtor’s property from lawsuit judgment creditors ANYWAY). Thus, any such purported transfer would be absolutely POINTLESS. But, Class does not know this.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…=2&as_sdt=4,34

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…en&as_sdt=4,34

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_ca…=2&as_sdt=4,34 http://law.justia.com/codes/north-ca…-39/article-3a

4. Unknown to Class, FOR CENTURIES, IT HAS BEEN AN ILLEGAL ACT in North Carolina (and a violation of the Judicial Code Of Conduct) FOR A JUDGE TO ILLEGALLY “WARN”, COUNSEL, ADVISE OR RECOMMEND that anyone (including police officers facing future lawsuits) “BREAK THE LAW” by putting their property into other peoples’ names in an effort to avoid paying their creditors (AN ILLEGAL ACT that would not protect the debtor’s property anyway). Any REAL judge who issued such an ILLEGAL “warning” would be removed from office and disbarred. But, Class does not know this.

Thus, in manufacturing the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax”, Class was so IGNORANT of North Carolina law that he did not know then and does not know now that ALL OF THE “FACTS” that he alleges in this hoax are LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNDER NORTH CAROLINA LAW, which conclusively establish this lie as the hoax that it is. THIS IS BECAUSE NO REAL NORTH CAROLINA JUDGE WOULD “BREAK THE LAW” — BY “ILLEGALLY” WARNING POLICE OFFICERS TO “BREAK THE LAW” — BY DOING SOMETHING “ILLEGAL” (PUTTING THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES’ NAMES IN AN EFFORT TO AVOID PAYING LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS)— IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUITS WHICH WILL “NEVER SUCCEED” (DUE TO IMMUNITY)— OR FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS WHO WILL “NEVER EXIST” (DUE TO IMMUNITY) — ESPECIALLY GIVEN THAT ANY SUCH “ILLEGAL ” ACT IS “REVERSIBLE” ANYWAY AND THEREFORE WOULD NOT PROTECT THE DEBTOR’S PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS IN THE FIRST PLACE (MAKING SUCH AN EFFORT ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS). But, Class does not know this.

5. If more be necessary, North Carolina law already makes the EQUITY IN A HOMESTEAD (a residential property occupied by the owners), VEHICLE AND CERTAIN OTHER PROPERTY “EXEMPT” (“protected”) from the claims of lawsuit judgment creditors up to a certain amount ANYWAY. THUS, IN MOST CASES, THIS EXEMPTION WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR POLICE OFFICERS TO “ILLEGALLY” PURPORT TO PUT THEIR PROPERTY INTO OTHER PEOPLES’ NAMES, EVEN IF THAT “ILLEGAL” ACT WOULD PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY FROM LAWSUIT JUDGMENT CREDITORS (AND IT WOULD NOT). But, Class does not know this. Constitution of the State Of North Carolina Art. 16 § 1C-1601.

http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislat…Article_16.pdf

For more information on the “Property In Other Peoples’ Names Hoax”, see Class’ internet radio show, “Episode 966″ on Talkshoe (spelled correctly) AIB radio, recorded or posted on 12-12-2015 http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web…=2&pageSize=15 or simply Google “Post Oak Public Relations”. https://www.linkedin.com/in/harvey-wharfield-0b56746 . Further, be sure to look into William H. Gilpatric, IV of Middlesex County, Maine (address and contact information withheld). Gilpatric is aware of all the parties involved in the hoax and how it was manufactured and marketed.

ANALYSIS:
Suffice it to say, this is one of Class’ more embarrassingly-amateur hoaxes. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT — AND CLASS DOES NOT.). Class does not lie to people for whom he has respect. Class only lies to people for whom he has no respect. The lies reflected in this particular hoax speak volumes about what Class REALLY thinks of the American people. Class pretends to be a humble public servant who is only revealing the “hidden truth” about the law and the legal system to the down-trodden masses. But, this is not so. Class is actually a calculating and manipulative charlatan with no conscience whatsoever and no moral compass whatsoever. Class’ sole mission in life is to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of “We the People” and their appointees for doing their jobs. If he has to lie to the American people and commit fraud upon the American people in the process of inciting this hatred, that is perfectly fine with him. Class has no intention of telling you the truth. None. Zero. Nada.

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST.

Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people. (Google “Judge DALE Hoax”, “Debra Jones Hoax”, “Private Attorney General Hoax”, “14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter Hoax”, “All Government Agencies Are ‘Private Entities’ or ‘Private Contractors’ Hoax” (A.K.A. the “BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”), “Property Into Other Peoples’ Names Hoax”, “Lawyers Have No Authority Hoax”, “Right To Travel Hoax”, “My Paperwork Would Have Overturned Every Prior Case Hoax”, “The Supreme Court Loves My Paperwork Hoax”, “The Private Attorney General ‘Certificate’ Hoax” (A.K.A. “Why Was Rod Class In Washington, D.C. In The First Place?”), “The Federal Reserve Notes Are Not Money Hoax” (A.K.A. “The Harold Stanley Case Hoax”), “The United States is a Corporation Hoax” (A.K.A. “Title 28 U.S.C 3002(15)(a) Proves That The United States Is A Private, For Profit Corporation Hoax”), the “Court Registry Investment System Hoax” (A.K.A. The “C.R.I.S. Hoax”), the “Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax” and numerous other hoaxes.).

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGES that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class’ role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have exposed this information here.

The message to all hoaxers and charlatans? Just tell the truth.