Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Psychic Focus
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Sexodus

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


I am a mother of four in my mid 30′s and I have been told that I have some psychic abilities, mainly psychometry, paranormal, and lately remote viewing. Things come to me in the form of pictures in my mind, feelings and impressions, and sometimes sounds. I typically get them when asked to focus on specific objects or events. I clear my mind, think of the question or object and this blog is an example of what I get. This blog is a way for me to organize all my thoughts. Q. Just wondering if you were able to do a reading on sexodus please? Are we really being programmed as females to unrealistically expect more from men? I read somewhere that it is a ploy to destroy society. I see it so often with friends and family and know I tend to do it myself. Thanks heaps.
A. [I want to start by saying that I understand the term sexodus to mean a society in which men are withdrawing from the desire to be in relationships / get married].
Society in general is being programed (both men and women).  I see a shift going from a more value/moral based society (not that people don’t have values or understand right/wrong, but those qualities don’t seem to be promoted or seen in repetitive clear messages) to be a more materialistic, “me-centric” society.  I also see that there isn’t a push for working hard to earn x-y-z, but rather people just inherently deserve things/objects which creates an entitled society. 

Media perpetuates this by commercials, advertisements and tv shows (programming) telling people what they should look like, buy, wear, drive, etc…  Then I get an image of a woman saying, “I don’t care about all that. I’m just going to be myself.”  Then she goes to meet her friends for lunch, and when she gets there her friends all have designer purses.  Instantly (out of a need to compete) she wants one too.  If the messages aren’t directly “programmed” into us, they sneak in through indirect means. There are people that fight through this, but it is a conscious decision to do so, and many people feel weak to it.

I get that both men and women are exposed to this, but the target is the women. I ask, why are women targeted? 
A. I get it is for a few reasons.  Many times (not all, but many) women run on emotion before rational thoughts kick in- it is a gut reaction.  Men (not always, but many times) can rationally process something instantly and then emotion about the decision kicks in as a more delayed response.

I then get an image of a woman standing in the middle of a circle and she is surrounded by her husband, children, house, dog, etc.  She looks to have influence over all these things- and if she is happy, the house is happy.  The inverse is true of this too. The man (knowing this) wants to make his woman happy (to make everyone happy) and will try hard to give her what she wants.

Q. How did this start?
A. I see this started when many homes converted from being single income families to dual income families.  I see an image of Rosie the Riveter as I type this. Earning money this way was a huge step for women and gave them an experience that they had not had before.  Along with the experience came the programming and telling women what they deserved, how they should feel and what they should expect.  Women had their own money now, and the media was telling them how they should spend it to “feel good.”

Q. How did all of the above lead to a “sexodus?”
A. Everything that did happen, and is happening has created a confusion in roles, and the confusion led to unhappiness.  Rather than women staying home and raising their children and managing the house, many feel forced to work either out of necessity (for a lifestyle they are told they need) or because they feel a lack of glory or feeling of pride staying home.  Many women are natural nurturers and when that is removed from their life, they look to fill that empty spot with other things (i.e materialistic things that marketing says they need to feel better, appreciated or valued).  Rather than look inward to see what would make them feel more complete, I see them looking toward their man (I see an image of a woman giving her man “a look” as if to say “make me feel good” and the man just has a sad and lost look on his face (like he genuinely wants to help, but doesn’t know how or what to do).  

I get that the “sexodus” behavior is further created by shows like The Bachelor / Bachelorette. Women that are seeking out happiness see shows like this which create unrealistic expectations on men. Women are told and shown fairly tales, and movies depicting men doing extreme things to make their women happy.  

Men really do (at least most) want to make their women happy.  Men like to be viewed as heroes (I see a caveman beating his chest and running to rescue a woman).  When they can’t be the hero, or viewed like one, they start to deflate (I see a man’s chest deflating like a balloon).  It is easier for them to retreat than to feel bad about themselves.

Q.  Is this intentional to destroy society? 
A.  I don’t see it as intentional, but rather an unintended consequence that has enabled many people to get wealthy.  The profits made outweigh the detriment that is created within families.  

In closing, do what makes you happy because that will make you a more positive person and attract positivity back to you.  Take pride in your contributions and feel good about what you do.  Put value in the qualities in life and realize that the media and marketing telling you what to think is simply “noise.”

And that is all I have for this reading.. Thank you.


Source: http://psychicfocus.blogspot.com/2015/01/sexodus.html



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 1 comment
    • Dustdevil

      Now that you’ve spewed all this ‘accidental’, ‘unintentional’ garbage about how the breakup of society through destruction of the nuclear couple is all just ‘a mere coincidence’, you might want to go and read the little book by Marx called ‘the Communist Manifesto’, paying special attention to the itemized ‘points of attention’ that the Communist mindset seeks to change or otherwise eliminate.

      Marx as a total pervert. He did NOT want ‘couples’, his idea of ‘sex’ was as a relaxant, pure-and-simple. Children, in his mindset, were to be benign wards-of-the-state if they came, and those who did have a spouse were to be expected to ‘share’ them. His world was a mix between Hillary’s ‘takes a village to raise a child’, Socrates ‘take them away at birth and train them to the career that the state requires’, and Silverberg’s ‘idealized relationships devoid of ownership’ (read the book, ‘The World Inside’, Silverberg).

      None of this is accident. That you are unaware of any of this just goes to show, that those who plot against you are far more intelligent and informed than you are, even when you ‘slightly notice’ what they have intentionally done to you.

      Either that, or you are a disinformation shill furthering their cause. Tell us, which one ARE you?

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.