Joseph Stalin

I am a mother of four in my mid 30′s and I have been told that I have some psychic abilities, mainly psychometry, paranormal, and lately remote viewing. Things come to me in the form of pictures in my mind, feelings and impressions, and sometimes sounds. I typically get them when asked to focus on specific objects or events. I clear my mind, think of the question or object and this blog is an example of what I get. This blog is a way for me to organize all my thoughts. Q. Can you please do a reading about Joseph Stalin, like you did about Hitler, and see what he was actually like? 
I think a reading about Stalin will be just as enlightening as the reading about Hitler. Thank you so much.
A. [As I go into this, much like the Hitler reading, I have to really "shut down" the programming and see what will come forward...]

When I first tune into Stalin, I get an image of him and feel myself staring into his eyes.  Then I hear that not too many people looked him right in the eye, but can’t help myself from staring.  Then my perspective changes and see myself looking through his eyes, and taking in the world as he sees it…. 

I go back to being a little kid (though Stalin’s perspective).  I see a woman (mother?) who looks to be quiet, loving, but very submissive.  There is a man (dad?) and he is wearing a military uniform.  I am unable to tell if he was in the military or if this is symbolic for his strict nature. I also get the impression that his dad was either physically not there much, or emotionally not there- there is a distance that I often feel and associate with neglect.  His did comes through as a very dominant man.  I hear he “ruled with an iron fist” and was showed his power over the family verbally and physically.  The way to survive was to do what you were told, be seen as little as possible and never heard.

As Stalin grew up he found himself trying to fulfill others expectations (schooling, work) rather than go against the norm (which is what he really wanted to do).  He was conformed as a child to be quiet and suppress his feelings.  Then I see something happening during his late teens / early 20s…it was like he had enough and snapped.  I see this look in his eyes that looks as if this sudden change was related to violence or a violent act.  He quit caring and there was this veil of fear that he pealed off.  It was a trying economic time and he felt that if a revolution of some kind began he could make things more fair and create a solid economy.  

I see at first him forming a resistance type group that later evolved into a political party.  He showed others his vision of what the possibilities were, and gained a following that drew attention and eventually propelled him to become the leader.  He was well spoken and I get the impression he had support, but also used some manipulation of words as well to get into the leadership role (he knew the right people to lobby to get what he wanted and needed).  

Once in power his words feel like they quit working, and went to the primal tactics he grew up on to motivate people- and those tactics were abusive and nature, and strengthened by fear.  Stalin really did have a vision for Russia, and if people would just do what he demanded, the country would be great- “The world would see” is the phrase I hear.   He had hopes of proving his governmental ideas and expanding because he saw his way as the only real way to govern… 

Instead of being seen as a leader, he was viewed as a commander and demander..  Even people that worked for him had little to no autonomy.  Then I hear that Stalin did give choices- but be clear that there was a right and wrong choice, so consider your options wisely.  

He controlled the government and military.  He wanted for Russia to succeed into a superpower so strongly, and believed so passionately in his way of ruling that he would do what it took to make it happen.  He justified his actions by disassociating himself from them- meaning, if someone was out of line, and they needed to be punished, he didn’t see it as having any other choice- he felt he did what had to be done in the name of “saving Mother Russia.”  He didn’t take the blame and guilt, but rather shifted it on saying it was done for the betterment of Russia’s success.  He had no tolerance or weakness or unaccountability, and people were held to the highest standards.  Anything less, and they were made an example of…

Q. Was he guilty of war crimes?  
A. I get yes, and he didn’t care.  He was doing what he felt needed to be done.  I also get he didn’t use the word “wanted or liked” but rather needed- everything was matter of fact and void of wish washy language.  He wasn’t driven by the humanistic side of his being, but rather the goal-oriented, primal directive.

I also see that he did horrific things to people, but in every instance he shifted the guilt onto something or someone else.  There feels like such a contradiction with him because he was against hearing excuses from others, but always had a justification for his actions in his own mind.  

Q.  What did he feel about WW2 and the allies he had to make?
A.  I see he did what was necessary to stop Germany.  Germany was the biggest threat of everyone.  He felt confident that if he had them out of the way, Russia would be able to expand.  He didn’t see the US, Britain or any other country as strong enough to stop him.  He really had very little respect (and no fear) for anyone outside of Russia.. His goal was to stop Germany (or make them weak) and slowly take over areas within Europe to expand.

Q.  How did he see himself?
A. He viewed himself as a great leader.  In his mind he accomplished a lot, and set up a good template for how to run things.  There was still a lot to do to get people to fall in line (and keep them submissive- outspoken people annoyed him!), but he felt confident that his vision could be realized.

And that is all I have for this reading… I realize there is SO much more, but I am closing this portion for now.  Thank you.  Love and light-