If the Moon Landings Were Real, Then Why is NASA Stumped by This?
Buck Rogers, Staff Writer
Waking Times
During the cold war era the Soviet Union and the United States were locked in an arms and technology race, each nation wanting to prove their dominance over the other, each striving to be the next reigning superpower in a world still shattered by the second world war. The Soviet’s took the lead when in April of 1961, cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin successfully orbited the earth and returned home safely. In May, president John F. Kennedy made his special message to Congress on urgent national needs, declaring America’s intention to send a man to the moon.
“I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space.” -President John F. Kennedy, Address to Congress on Urgent National Needs, May 25, 1961
And so we did. In 1969, under the leadership of President Johnson, the entire world watched in grainy, black-and-white awe as the ‘giant leap for mankind’ was broadcast on television sets around the globe. Neil Armstrong planted the American flag in the coarse lifeless dust of the moon, and the space race was over. America victorious. Take a look at this marvelous achievement here:
Fast forward 45 years to a much more technologically advanced and interconnected age, where ideas spread like wildfire, and questions that have gone unanswered for generations are easily put to millions of people. One person’s ideas and understanding of our world can swiftly be supplemented by the knowledge of many others, dots are easier to connect, and truth is more freely revealed.
Were the Apollo moon landings faked by the government to gain political advantage at a time when it was not technologically possible to land a man on the moon then bring him home safely?
Many alternative researchers and skeptics of government and cultural narratives have put together a substantial and rather captivating case that the moon landings were faked with the help of emerging television and film technologies.
They posit that the government hired acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick to stage the landings by creating a convincing movie set in a secret location. Evidence to the support the idea that the video is indeed an elaborate forgery includes anomalies such as the appearance of multiple sources of light in the footage, the flag planted by Armstrong seems to be waving in an environment with no wind, there does not appear to be an impact crater from the lunar landing module, unexplainable objects appear in reflection on helmet visors, the unusual slow-motion effect of the astronauts walking on the lunar surface, the lack of visible stars in the background, and more.
The footage is one thing, but many point to the existence of a dangerous concentration of solar and cosmic radiation that surrounds the earth as proof that Apollo never made it to the moon. Between the earth and the moon lie what is known as the Van Allen radiation belts.
“The Van Allen radiation belts are a torus (doughnut shape) of energetic charged particles circling Earth around its magnetic equator and held in place by Earth’s magnetic field. The main belts extend from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar wind and other particles by cosmic rays.” -Robert A. Braeunig
In order for the Apollo, or any lunar mission, to be successful, the equipment and crew aboard the spacecraft would have to be adequately shielded from exposure from the intense radiation surrounding planet earth.
Robert A. Braeunig, author of Rocket & Space Technology has put together a compelling scientific refutation of the Apollo hoax theory, making the scientific case that the trajectory of the Apollo spacecraft allowed the vessel to avoid the highest concentrations of energy in the torus shaped Van Allen belts which do not fully encircle the earth. With the right trajectory, he purports, it would only be necessary to shield against the possibility of an unexpected increase in solar activity, something Apollo was indeed prepared for.
This makes sense and would seem to close the case, but for many the question still remains, especially so in light of the fact that there have since been no more lunar missions, and almost 50 years later NASA’s Orion mission is apparently just now trying to solve the challenge of the Van Allen belts.
In the following video clip a NASA engineer working on the Orion project explains the challenge of bringing a ship and crew into space well above low earth orbit, and beyond the radiation belts. Speaking about their effort he remarks, “we must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space,” implying that this question had not already been solved by the research and accomplishments of Apollo.
If in the 1960’s we were able to successfully overcome the challenge of reaching the moon and beyond, then why is it an issue now?
In addition to the questions raised by the Van Allen belts and the footage of the moon landings, there are many other interesting scientific and political anomalies surrounding the authenticity of the Apollo lunar missions. A quick look down this rabbit hole can easily suck you in all the way.
For a more comprehensive view of the information supporting the theory that the moon landings were faked, take a look at the following presentation or search online for more resources. And for a reasonable refutation of some of the alternative theories on this, take a look at the work of Robert A. Braeunig.
About the Author
Buck Rogers is the earth bound incarnation of that familiar part of our timeless cosmic selves, the rebel within. He is a surfer of ideals and meditates often on the promise of happiness in a world battered by the angry seas of human thoughtlessness. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com.
Sources:
http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/
http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/VABraddose.htm
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/van-allen-probes-spot-impenetrable-barrier-in-space/
©2015 Waking Times, all rights reserved. For permission to re-print this article contact [email protected], or the respective author.
~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with friends and family…
The post If the Moon Landings Were Real, Then Why is NASA Stumped by This? appeared first on Waking Times.
Source: http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/03/20/if-the-moon-landings-were-real-then-why-is-nasa-stumped-by-this/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,599,358,538 |
| Stories: | 8,138,835 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
yep. the belt and so many more anomalies. all stinks to high heaven. good story.
The moon landing was without a doubt a hoax, completely fake.
An unbiased look at the moon landing hoax:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73ALChMNlFE
All I heard was a gigantic sucking sound and my money floating away at 20,000 miles an hour!
Nasa is another satanic organization deceiving the lost sheep of this world!
What a waste of good money and yet our economy no one gives a mars about! lol!
Ready when you are Jesus! Amen!
Listen, we did not even have the technology to fake this back then. There isn’t just 10 minutes of footage, the stuff we’ve all seen a million times…there is hours upon hours of footage, all of which would have had to have used special effects not even available at the time…the technology just did not exist for that. Anyone with a knowledge of camera lighting can debunk why there were no stars in the footage (look at ANY space footage, like space walks for example, there is NEVER stars. The sun is too bright being right in space and drowns out the light from stars, much as if you held a match behind a spotlight being shined in your face, the spotlight would drown out being able to see the lit match behind it).
Them being able to doctor the footage up so that the whole thing is in proper slow motion AND showing no signs of the astronauts being on cables to be able to jump, etc. Using regular slow motion (especially the sort available at that period of time) could NOT reproduce such clean error-less motions. I mean, there is just so much more proof to debunk that we didn’t go to the moon than to prove it was a lie. Watch this video from a pro film maker describing how this hoax theory is complete nonsense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_loUDS4c3Cs
Astral Silence that’s just not true. The “moon walks” were a couple of hours each. The only doctoring you need for slow motion is to videotape it at one speed and play it at another.
The techniques — wires you don’t see- background projected on a screen– were used routinely in those days.
Never mind the stars. The Moon’s surface is too bright in ALL the pictures.
The Moon absorbs 90% or more of the light that strikes it.
With a WHITE space suit in the picture, the Moon should look black.
We didn’t know until about 5 years ago that the Moon’s surface is radioactive, from cosmic ray bombardment.
Gamma rays and neutrons from the Moon’s surface, and neutrons from the Sun, would ruin photographic film.
Why didn’t we know how much radiation to expect on the Moon? Until 5 years ago?
http://news.discovery.com/space/history-of-space/moon-radiation-gamma-rays.htm
‘”The moon is a source of radiation,” said Boston University researcher Harlan Spence, the lead scientist for LRO’s cosmic ray telescope. “This was a bit unexpected.”‘
“Overall, future lunar travelers face a radiation dose 30 percent to 40 percent higher than originally expected, Spence said.”
That’s from 2009.
UNEXPECTED? HIGHER THAN EXPECTED?
You sound like the little boy who’s just been told that Santa isn’t real.
You will probably need to watch Capricorn Rising, and 2001, before you will begin to acknowledge that these special effects were available at the time.
And the flashes from the suspensory wires are clearly visible in many of the shots.
If you think that space walks are real, and the ISS, then please hold your hands in front of your eyes next time you see those bubbles rising up past the “astronauts”, whether Chinese or American.
And do not, whatever you do, start to think that the space station laydees’ hair looks awfully stiff and permed, as they dance about in zero-G.
Especially, do not look at the astronauts’ ring fingers, lest you see the telltale setsquare and mitre symbol, which ensures their absolute discretion whilst the goyim are robbed blind for further “space missions”.
Funny when a reporter asked all the Apollo Astronauts to swear on the Holy Bible they went to the Moon and NOT ONE would swear on the Holy Bible!
GOD messed up their lie!
Ready when you are my sweet Jesus! Amen!
The moon landing is a hoax, anybody with two brain cells should know this. Stanley Kubrick oversaw the whole project. In addition, how did they get past the Van Allen radiation belt? And really? They got there on the power equivalent to that of a pocket calculator. How is that possible? It’s not. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the whole thing was faked from top to bottom.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to spam Crapallah’s articles ON CRAPALLAH’S ARTICLES? I agree that he’s an idiot and a homophobe (wait. You guys have something in common), but he hasn’t even posted a comment on this story…
What in the blue hell does Kingy have to do with this story?
Yes Larry, I had a look at the site you suggested and yes there is some good stuff there . . but there is barely a mention of the “J” word – which always rings alarm bells for me at any rate.
The Jews have a great talent for blame shifting and I’m afraid you have fallen for the ole . . “Its the Jesuits” or . . it’s the “moooslims” scam – anyone but them!
The Jews OWN the Roman Catholic Church lock, stock and smoking barrel – have since the 16th century. the author proves it here . . .
http://www.globalgrey.co.uk/occult-theocrasy/
Well said.
you religious people make me lol.
do you know what the evidence is for your deity,and all other deities past and present?
zip,zilch,nada,zero!
you sing to an invisible man in the sky. you go down on your knees and talk to him.
there is nothing more amusing than a modern ‘educated’ individual worshipping a deity.
thanks for the laughs.
Migratory birds fly from Alaska to New Zealand every year in six days, which is 11,000 km. If the Earth was really a Globe like we have been told, then the distance would be more like 20,000 km. making it impossible for them to make it in 6 days. There is no curvature to the earths surface, and there is no outer space, you are in a Spiritual Prison, most every thing is a lie to keep us dumbed down and controlled. No one has ever circumnavigated the Earth north south, because it is impossible. Antarctic is a no fly zone and heavily guarded, it is part of the puzzle that keeps humans from realizing that we are Devine beings, living in a Devine World. The Satanic Agenda is to deceive us of who we are and the powers we would have if we knew the truth.
now i really am laughing…
Bulls-eye
No Time, you are completely right!! You even can bring the Van Allen band to discussion.
We live under a dome.
No Time the 11,000 kilometers or so is the distance on the surface of the Earth. Or parallel to it in flight.
I don’t know where the 6 days comes from.
The average speed for that flight would be 76 kilometers per hour.
That’s 47 miles per hour.
And you can be sure the birds are taking advantage of prevailing winds.
You are right again, but the sheep are to busy grazing to notice this. They live in a world that they are told exists, they find it hard to break out of the fields.
After you’ve finished laughing, ( and btw, “For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fool” ) you may wish to visit the YT pages illustrating what has been found beneath the Gulf of Aqaba, which curiously enough, confirms the Biblical story of the Exodus.
Which on the basis of the evidence, and using Occam’s razor for confirmation, seems to lead us to what for you will be a very uncomfortable conclusion.
a few chariot parts does not indicate the parting of the red sea!
i assume you believe in creation yes?
every city in the world has a museum crammed with so much fossil evidence for evolution over millions of years that they do not have the space to exhibit it all.
god must be even more cunning than you think. who else but an all-seeing deity would think to plant false evidence. it must have taken ‘him’ a while.
i have an ammonite which i found on a beach years ago. presumably ‘the lord’ put it there for me to find 6,000 years ago
BTW,have you ever wondered why all monotheistic gods are male?
simple answer,they were all INVENTED in medieval times,when man was thought superior to woman. the idea of a female christ/allah etc would have never even been contemplated.
we as a species must cast off this ridiculous notion that there is an invisible man up in the sky looking after us.
we have the benefits of modern education,science and freedom of thought.
okay,i understand that third world muslim populations are so uneducated and indoctrinated that they believe this stuff.
however,there really is no excuse in a first world,free,educated society.
you may have been indoctrinated by well-meaning relatives when you were a child.
however,now,you you have the freedom and the means to think for yourself.
give it a shot. it might be refreshing!
plsnogod said:
“every city in the world has a museum crammed with so much fossil evidence for evolution over millions of years that they do not have the space to exhibit it all.”
Yeah, but do you actually believe their claims about that fossil evidence and the dating calculations of modern science?
If you truly do, then you believe in some very foolish and silly things and ought not to be taken seriously.
Case in point: what if I told you that evolutionists believe that soft tissue from a dinosaur bone they dug up is 68 million years old? That’s right, I kid you not:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html
If anyone wants to know what supposed 68 million year old soft tissue looks like, how it is flexible and pliable and returns to its original shape when stretched, you can see it at about the 9:00 mark of this video from 60 Minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJOQiyLFMNY
Isn’t it ironic that evolutionists make fun of the beliefs of Bible believers and yet, here is science making the ludicrous claim that 68 million year old soft tissue is flexible, resilient, and stretchy?
So I have a couple questions for you plsnogod, one, do you believe the pliable, stretch-it-and-it-expands-and-then-it-contracts-again-like-foam-rubber, soft tissue is actually 68 million years old?
If you are willing to go on record and answer that question—do you believe the soft tissue is 68 MYO—and your answer is in the affirmative, I will try my best not to ROFLOL, but I can’t guarantee I will be successful!
And question #2: when an evolutionist finds a dinosaur bone with soft tissue that is 68 million years old, do they straight away put it into a zip-lock plastic bag in order to prevent spoilage?
Another more important question I have for all evolutionists is this: why wouldn’t the dating calculations be questioned when someone says soft tissue from a dinosaur bone is 68 million years old?
I’ll tell you why: because a dinosaur bone that is not millions of years old would contradict the millions of years old paradigm that the evolutionary model requires and evolutionists won’t let that happen to their religion o no!
They’d rather look like fools claiming soft tissue is millions of years old rather than give up their ridiculous theories and admit the truth.
Now then, about those fossils you talk about in the museums plsnogod, do you believe the museum’s explanation of those fossils? If you do, then again, you believe in something very silly things indeed!
Take a look at the following video:
“Scientific Age of the Young Earth – Dr. Don Patton”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1GJjHXX0Ic
You can watch the above video for many more examples of fossils that indicate the fossil record was not something recorded over millions of years but was something recorded in a short period of time (in a little something called the flood of Noah). Here is but one more example:
ANSWER: It doesn’t.
You monkey-men-wannabes sure do have some laughable yarns and fanciful tales I’ll give you that!
Speaking of which, I have one more question regarding this foolish theory you believe in plsnogod. Can you riddle me this:
Can you tell me just how did the laughably absurd idea come about that natural selection and mutations could account for how speech came about? I mean, considering some of the components necessary for speech to take place, like first, there is the FOXP2 gene. It’s not a stretch of the imagination to see how mutations can account for a FOXP2 gene popping up in a monkey at some point. However, consider the following other components necessary for speech:
“What makes humans different from all other animals? There are few better answers than the ability to produce and recognize speech. Speech is so much a part of being human that people with IQ scores as low as 50 or brains as small as 400 grams can fully comprehend and speak at a competent level [11]. The human head and brain are uniquely evolved to produce speech [4, 11]. Compared to other primates, humans have remarkably well-developed and controllable muscles around the lips and cheeks. Indeed, more of the motor cortex (particularly Broca’s area) is devoted to vocalization than any other function (see Figure 1) 1, in sharp contrast to every other animal, including primates. Only homo sapiens can use the tongue, cheeks, and lips, together with the teeth, to produce 14 phonemes per second [11]; even Neanderthal man could not sustain speech because of the structure of their breathing apparatus [4]. Humans are also exquisitely tuned for speech recognition. Infants as young as one day old show relatively greater left hemisphere electrical activity to speech sounds, and relatively greater right hemisphere activity to non-speech sounds”
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.93.6514
Here is where we are asked to suspend logic and common sense and accept folly if we were to believe in the foolish theory of evolution. You have this mutated monkey with a useless FOXP2 gene in him. There would be no reason for natural selection to amplify or advance the FOXP2 gene in the species since the monkey with the FOXP2 gene could not communicate any more effectively with other monkeys than he could without the FOXP2 gene. So what happened, did the monkey with the useless-for-him FOXP2 gene and lacking the other components for speech suddenly mutate remarkably well-developed and controllable muscles around the lips and cheeks necessary for speech and also mutate his motor cortex (particularly Broca’s area) so it had speech functionality and so everything fell into place perfectly one fine day and the monkey-man-wannabe was then able to speak and say “well I’ll be a monkey’s uncle”?
For more on the follies of the theory of evolution, see:
“The BIBLE vs. EVOLUTION. To Believe in Evolution is to Believe in Folly”
/religion/2014/03/the-bible-vs-evolution-to-believe-in-evolution-is-to-believe-in-folly-2467556.html?currentSplittedPage=0
great argument neo. you sure got me on that!
You won’t be laughing for too much longer, make the most of it.
am123,
thankyou for the information.
you are clearly an intelligent and sentient being.
which makes me even more suprised that you believe in a deity.
evolutionary anomalies abound for sure,and you mention a few of them.
however new evidence is being unearthed every minute of every day,gradually stacking up the fossil story. there is now overwhelming evidence of our progression from ramapithicus via australopithicines to homo habilis and homo sapiens.
i know this because i have dug some of them up in my archaeology days!
your argument is essentially that these were all planted by ‘the lord’ 6,000 years ago.
so he cleverly built up geological strata,infested them with fossils,and gave us the means to date the strata.
why would he do that????
what would be the purpose of giving us fossils to dig up when he presumably wants us to believe he created the earth????
you can pick holes all day long in the framework of evolution,but your alternative that some mythical man created everything in 6 days 6,000 years ago is franky absurd,and it amazes me that any thinking modern human being can subscribe to the idea.
“your argument is essentially that these were all planted by ‘the lord’ 6,000 years ago.
so he cleverly built up geological strata,infested them with fossils,and gave us the means to date the strata.”
No, my argument is the fossil record was laid down abruptly in the sudden, catastrophic flood of Noah and the dating calculations of modern science are way off. And I didn’t point out any anomalies, the foolish and erroneous dating calculations are quite common in modern science. Here are some more ridiculous examples:
“The mystery of soft tissue fossils 500 million years in Canada”
http://en.wikinoticia.com/culture-science/Science/10709-the-mystery-of-soft-tissue-fossils-500-million-years-in-canada
“The feathers preserved in a 150-million-year-old fossil of Archaeopteryx ….“People have been looking at these [feathers] a long time and thought they were just impressions, but there’s actually remains of soft tissue there,” says Roy Wogelius, a geochemist at the University of Manchester in England.”
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/archaeopteryx-fossil-seen-new-light
“Proteins, Soft Tissue from 80 Million-Year-Old Hadrosaur Add Weight to Theory that Molecules Preserve Over Time”
http://www.physorg.com/news160320581.html
“Infrared mapping resolves soft tissue preservation in 50 million year-old reptile skin”
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/03/12/rspb.2011.0135
“Soft-Tissue Preservation in a 95 Million Year Old Marine Lizard …”
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4524795?uid=3739832&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103882100083
“Ancient Fossils with Preserved Soft Tissues and DNA”
http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilizeddna.html
“525 Million-Year-Old Fossil Discovered in China”
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/news-525-million-year-old-fossil-feathered-helmet-beyond-clouds-1
am123
“your argument is essentially that these were all planted by ‘the lord’ 6,000 years ago.
so he cleverly built up geological strata,infested them with fossils,and gave us the means to date the strata.”
”No, my argument is the fossil record was laid down abruptly in the sudden, catastrophic flood of Noah.”
that was exactly my point. even if you do believe a deity created the world,and everything was jumbled up and de-stratified by a flood,why would there be a sequential fossil record?
and there is,whatever you choose to ignore.
far from being created,i think we have probably had a number of human civilisations over thousands of millions of years,explaining many out of place artefacts that crop up,including some caused by those only attained hunter-gatherer status before being wiped out by natural events.
the earth is such a volatile planet,whole advanced civilisations can be obliterated in a few million years.
the majority of evidence now,is from our most recent incarnation.the one we are living now.
i think we would have a very impertainent self-important view of ourselves if we believe that some deity waved a magic wand and conjured us into existence.
we are a tiny civilisation,on a tiny planet, in a huge galaxy,somewhere on the fringes of an incalcuably large universe.
the universe must be teeming with life of many forms.
yet we invent various gods to explain it all away,with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
we always have done,and sadly,we probably always will do so.
OH NO!
Everyone know USA go to Moon a long time ago.
Before I born.
Shhhhh……How did you get on this floor, honey? The guard at the door should have told you there is
no admittance. This is the Psych Ward. Here……I’m going to lunch….I’ll see you safely outside.
Michael get your head out of that comic book!….(snatches security Guards badge off shirt)…your on report!
the moon missions were fake just like the scum bags in the whitehouse are now! we are controlled by other sinister forces
VeteransToday already covered this, they actually used Tesla technology to get to the moon and to protect the astronauts. They highly charged the lunar lander and reduced the mass of the craft. That’s how they were able to blast off from the surface with only a very small motor that could have never done the job without this technology taking away most of the mass. They also lowered down to the surface using this technology and never fired their rocket engine as they said they did. Stew Webb’s friend Ed Slade (search on youtube) designed that rocket and in the video he talks about how he knew they didn’t use his motor land because no dust was on the gold covered legs. Gordon Duff has articles on this too and they shielded the craft with this same technology. We’ve had free energy since 1945! We went to the moon, they just didn’t do it the way they told you and they probably did fake some things too. We’ve had antigravity since 1945 and had bases on the Moon and Mars since the 70s. This information is known but of course the normal NASA guys and engineers at Lockheed are kept in the dark about the secret space program that even has faster than light travel now. We’re not in Kansas anymore.
The polar route myth is a recent invention. Nothing at the time of Apollo even hinted at a high-inclination earth orbit. Or a change in orbital plane after achieving orbit. It’s a total lie.
Glenn Canady electrical charge does not block gamma rays or neutrons.
A positive charge would attract electrons from the solar wind, not repel.
A negative charge would attract protons and ions, not repel.
And the gamma rays and neutrons- from the moon’s surface- and the solar neutrons would still have ruined photographic film.
And in all the photos and videos the moon’s surface looks the same… too bright. Compared to a white space suit, the Moon is black.
To recap: the radiation belts and solar wind cannot be protected against by “highly charging the vehicle.” Positive charge doesn’t repel electrons. Negative charge doesn’t repel protons or ions.
The pictures and video you saw were all made in a movie studio.
The only real moon rocks we studied were picked up off the ground after they fell here as meteorites.
The story that we really went to the moon with secret technology is a pathetic lie.
The Moon Rock that was given to the Dutch by Mr Aldrin was not a meteorite, but a piece of fossilized wood.
No-one knows how the samples got so mixed up.
There you go making sense again, Lifels.
Hey Glennda, I see you’re being a hypocrite again. You disable comments on your own articles, but then you post comments on others. I wouldn’t expect anything less from a payaso like you.
NASA is a cover for the REAL space program. LifeIs you are wrong on a number of levels. A high energy plasma will block all sorts of rays. The patents do not lie, read them for yourself. Here’s a good place to start:
/r2/?url=http://www.scribd.com/doc/228767307/Peculiar-Patents-v1-Feb2014
Neo the “charge” mentioned is not the same as plasma.
And the plasma concept would have no effect on neutrons or on gamma rays. If it worked at all.
No doubt there is a secret space program.
But if we had been to the Moon, we’d know the radiation level there. We’d know about the gamma rays and neutrons there. We’d have realistic pictures.
We would know the things we learned recently about the Van Allen belts.
Glenda Canadouche exposed.
http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/snake-oil-salesmen-stew-webb-glenn-canady-join-forces-for
http://truthbroadcastnetwork.com/stew-webb-and-glenn-canady-exposed/
GLENN!!
great to see your comment!!!
many here will see the irony that you disable comments on your own articles.
plsnogod that’s why i don’t read them.
I’m sorry, Mr Canady, but your application for weekend release has been denied.
“Doctor!”
“Yes, sir?”
“Increase that man’s medication four-fold.”
“Yes sir”.
why do you comment,but not allow comments on your articles?
are you afraid of being questioned?
or do you think that people will be averse to your views?
hello?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zctgq6f
I saw no flag movement in the original, other than when he stuck it in the ground … when, of course, it would move from reverberations of his own actions in trying to get it planted.
Everyone knows that all of the Moon Landings were faked!
Just like the Dollar!
A BIG Fake.
Really dumb arguments on the window, too. The “expert” defeats his own argument. He says that, “If the photos were taken standing back from the window, the edge of the window would have been blurred.” Well, the edge of the window IS blurred. When it first shows the earth being obscured, a blurred black edge is what obscures the world. In his mock-up he also shows that most of the earth would be obscured around the edges because of the size of the window, but that’s a completely inane argument because that all depends on how far from the window you are. When even he makes the point that it doesn’t make sense for them to stand far back, why does he assume in his mock-up that they would be far back. Rather, they were at a medium range where the earth can move around within the frame of the window and not be obscured but where sometimes their own movement caused it to go past the BLURRED edge of the window. It’s a straw-man argument where he sets up his mockup to look deliberately like it cannot be that they are standing back a bit from the window by having them stand back far enough to where it wouldn’t look like it does in the original. (Only thing is, he says himself, there is no reason they would want to stand that far back.) It is not an either/or of far back or right up close. There is the possibility that the photographer stood only a few feet back from the window because that was less awkward than trying to get the camera in close and trying to get the right angle for a view.
Your arguments are confused and illogical.
The individual doing the fakery states that the camera was filling the window; any evidence that it was actually at the far side of the cabin therefore proves that he is a liar.
And we find that he was at the back of the cabin, because they suddenly uncovered the other window which had been blacked out, and sunlight streamed in to the cabin, revealing exactly where the photographer had been all along.
You also defeat your own argument.
You agree that the edge of the window is blurred, therefore, the camera was not placed next to the window.
If you add this to the crescent-shaped piece of paper that one of the conspirators removed from the window, to give the impression of a terminator line, then the whole sorry episode begins to turn from the amateurish to the frankly ludicrous.
And we won’t even go into the mysterious voice which suddenly whispers to Armstrong, “Talk!”
That would have been his CIA handler in the next room.
Oh, sorry, I meant “In the adjacent spacecraft”.
Nice finger to the face signal you’re giving them, Knave.
http://waitingtorot.blogspot.com/2007/11/12-masonic-signs-of-recognition_27.html
In every “mission” photo there is distinct line across the image where the backdrop meets the floor, when you know what to look for it’s clear as day…In the photo above for instance; On the right side about mid frame you’ll see a single rock, right above that rock and proceeding across the photo is the demarcation line…You can see the different colored background dirt in the projected image. Kubrick developed this style of camera trick before 2001 space
truthzilla very true that EVERY photo on the moon was shot on a stage — and the background was projected on a screen–
– and the lines are there in every picture.
It’s called Back Projection.
Great video! I already saw this on Rense this morning. The reason why they faked it is because they would’ve lost face to the Russians had they NOT done it. And it could’ve been done without the knowledge of all those thousands of employees at Houston! They could’ve been duped into thinking they were actually communicating with guys on the Moon, while they were faking it in the New Mexico desert. Don’t forget that all 12 men that landed on the moon were Freemasons, sworn to secrecy.
It’s a bit deeper than that.
Recall that the USSR was set up, and financed, and staffed, by NY jews. Remember that conflict creates cash, so the entire Cold War period was simply an elaborate and extremely successful hoax ( there have been other hoaxes too, but this is not the place ) purely and simply designed to strip both sets of goyim of as many of their readies as possible in the shortest possible time.
Recall that “Presidents” are not put in place by their own efforts, but because someone else sees them as useful pawns in the bigger game. I suspect that Kennedy knew nothing of the real underpinnings of the “Cuban Missile Crisis”. He would have been far more interested in where Marilyn was going to be that night.
So, in the same vein, the “Space Race”.
Both sets of protagonists were playing opposite sides of the same game, with the same modus operandi.
This is why the Soviets would never betray the dirty little secrets of their opposite numbers in DC.
You’ve been had, big time.
Now see if you can fill in a few more dots for yourselves.
I know about the Soviet fake movies of them landing on the moon. They were so bad you could actually see the strings holding up the models and that was almost instantly debunked with the Soviet Union itself. They also had a fake video of them destroying an entire Chinese battalion with a particle beam weapon during the Russo-Chinese war. 911 was also a fake based on Operation Northwoods.
It’s the whole Hegelian manipulation, in reference to the Cold War, that is constantly used.
Kennedy was a pawn and when he started to buck the system (silver backed treasury notes, second thoughts on Vietnam, etc.), he was ritually sacrificed. All of the Presidents are from the same bloodlines and those with the occult heritage have shown no hesitation in sacrificing their own.
Everything is trapped in the web of Luciferianism. They truly rule the world and do their best to ride the herd to their benefit. Jews are just as much frontmen and pawns as Freemasons and all of the other secret societies, New Agers, fundamentalists of any kind, etc. Some are more in-the-know than others and therefore more or less aware of for whom that they truly work. The moon landing was so much more than just ” ‘Merica, f*ck yeah!” It was also an assertion of the superiority of Man. “Look how great Man is; we have begun to conquer space!”
Солнечный зайчик UM….what are you talking about? The Soviet Union never claimed to have landed on the Moon.
And there was no Russo-Chinese war.
Maybe you’re thinking of the 1979 war between Vietnam,
a Soviet client, and China. Vietnam DID use lasers to blind
Chinese soldiers.
In 2009 I did some tests to find out if it was possible to pass un heavily shielded photographic film stock through the Van Allen belts without any damage or fogging of the negatives, as I had seen monochrome photographs and cine footage taken at Chernobyl site with black dots where it had been exposed to radiation, as far as I could make out. I took some photographs with a standard 35mm camera in daylight of the ground in my back yard ( moon surface..) with some silver foil wrapped rock on the ground for the moon Lander. I then took the exposed 35 mm film colour cassette undeveloped and placed near an enclosed radium ( high gamma radiation, alpha and beta component blocked by enclosure) test source for a few hours then turning around for a further few hours. Then had film developed and printed as normal at photographic shop. This would simulate the many times higher for a shorter period of travel through Van Allen belts and give an idea of the radiation unshielded film and crew would have been exposed to outward and return journeys. ( heavy lead shielding not possible due to weight to fuel supply ratio in vehicle probably equivalent to extra person and equipment or more).
http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/moonradtest.jpg
As you can see from the fogging on picture moonradtest.jpg the fine pattern of dots are radiation particles going through the negative. I do not think it would have been possible to take undeveloped film to the moon and back without damage from radiation, even if it was a very slow ASA type.
I also placed a digital camera next to the enclosed test source and time exposed in dark as a control. The source had no effect on the digital medium at all, although much higher levels could have possibly damaged the camera electronics.
These levels would probably have killed or made crew very ill as well see:
http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/RADIOACTIVITY%20AND%20HOW%20IT%20AFFECTS%20YOU.pdf
http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/radiationinfo.pdf
“Then had film developed and printed as normal at photographic shop.” Radioactive film. I wonder how those shop employees are doing today?
http://uk7.valuehost.co.uk/17,O_mkfyta6OM/juegos/NOT-FOR-US-PUBLIC-TO-KNOW
This clip pretty much nails it.
And also, for those with ears to hear, and a heart to understand…
“And no man hath ascended into heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of Man which is in heaven…”
John 3, 13.
don’t be a silly-billy
Hey, My name is Billy. I think I am offended. LOL.
billyP, then don’t be silly
not intending to be rude. it is just a saying in the UK.
ciao.
The other unreconciled facts!
Temperatures on the moon are extreme, ranging from boiling hot to freezing cold depending on where the sun is shining. There is no significant atmosphere on the moon, so it cannot trap heat or insulate the surface.
The moon rotates on its axis in about 27 days. Daytime on one side of the moon lasts about 13 and a half days, followed by 13 and a half nights of darkness. When sunlight hits the moon’s surface, the temperature can reach 253 degrees F (123 C). The “dark side of the moon” can have temperatures dipping to minus 243 F (minus 153 C).
So if you were standing on the surface of the Moon in sunlight, the temperature would be hot enough to boil water. And then the Sun would go down, and the temperature would drop 250 degrees in just a matter of moments.
Layers of insulation?
Astronauts on the moon were protected from the extreme temperatures by their spacesuits. The suits had several layers of insulating material covered by a highly reflective outer layer. The suits also had internal heaters and cooling systems.
The technology for such cooling and heating of the Spacesuits did not exist during the time of the alleged Moon Landings. Nor did a capable Spacecraft for vertical landing and take off exist at that time or today.
Habitable Temperature extremes on Earth.
According to the World Meteorological Organization, the coldest place on Earth is Vostok Station in Antarctica, where it reached minus 128.6 F (minus 89.2 C) on July 21, 1983. The coldest inhabited place is Oymyakon, Russia, a small village in Siberia, where it dips down to an average of minus 49 F (minus 45 C) and once hit a low of minus 96.16 F (minus 71 C).
Which location holds the record as the hottest place on Earth is a matter of some contention. El Azizia, Libya, held the top hot spot for 90 years. Temperatures allegedly climbed to 136.4 F (58 C) on Sept. 13, 1922. But the World Meteorological Organization stripped the town southwest of Tripoli of that distinction in 2012. A committee of climate experts from nine countries concluded that the temperature had been documented in error by an inexperienced observer.
So the “new” hottest place on Earth is Greenland Ranch (Furnace Creek) in Death Valley, Calif., where it reached 134 F (56.7 C) on July 10, 1913. But even that distinction depends on what is being measured. Death Valley’s record is for the highest air temperature. A higher surface temperature of 159.3 F (70.7 C) was recorded by a Landsat satellite in 2004 and 2005 in the Lut Desert in Iran.
Do you still believe that the Moon is realistically habitable?
And how about the constant bombardment of C.M.E. from the Sun!
Funny how Technologies took off after the Roswell cover-up, and also the simulations I watched were from computer animations that weren’t even out yet, but they were as good as any today, and also Star Trek all the computer stuff is Hollywood’s way of letting you know what exists before you know it really exists! The illuminati secrets to keep you far behind and igornant for control! Yes I said IGORNANT! Why didn’t they land it on the light side of the moon by the way? To keep you in the dark my little prissy!
Come on! Everyone is just Jelly that we can’t do this today! We should and we can! BTW – They have wind in a Hollywood studio????
“preVenger“
“Then had film developed and printed as normal at photographic shop.” Radioactive film. I wonder how those shop employees are doing today”
————————————————-
The amount of radiation was small over extended period has same effect as large over short period. In this case.
A very large amount would have over exposed the film so nothing would have been seen. The 35mm film cassette would not have been at all radioactive as it was not in contact with anything radioactive just exposed to a fixed output radioactive test source through its sealed case, which was very small in size and output, and strong enough to be thrown hard against concrete surface without any leakage. The whole experiment had radiation counters running all the time inches from it. There was no residual radiation on cassette as this would have been impossible.
More danger of cancer or similar from chemicals used in developing and printing than radiation! Carefully read the other links about radiation on post, to try to understand these things.
The farce moon landing made the NASAHOLES very, very rich, and all of you ‘Merikan terrorists poorer. They have never been out of our atmosphere.
If the lunar landing was a hoax, how come I can see the moon at night?
So my question is; Why fake eight Apollo missions? They could’ve gotten away with one. Yay, we landed on the moon, mission accomplished! Why provide more and more fake footage to be made available to scrutiny or the possibility of some technical foul up being uncovered? And why stop with Apollo? Were the Mercury and Gemini mission bogus as well? Skylab? Mir? The ISS? What’s real, what isn’t?