[rod-class] New DC Rod Doc Filed - New Private Calls - PAG Training School Update

A “private attorney general” is not some type of fake, unlicensed, lay person “attorney” who can represent others in court. Likewise, a “private attorney general” is not some type of lay person with special knowledge, training and expertise in the law.

Instead, a “private attorney general” is simply a “public interest plaintiff” who files AND WHO WINS a certain type of civil suit (ex: civil rights violation, environmental violation or securities violation) that benefits others outside of court. The purpose of the “private attorney general doctrine” is to relieve the WINNING public interest plaintiff of the burden of paying his/her own attorney fees (the court orders the losing defendant to pay the winning public interest plaintiff’s attorney fees). Newman v. Piggie park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (1968)(only a public interest plaintiff can be a “private attorney general”, the purpose of the “private attorney general doctrine” is to relieve the winning public interest plaintiff of the burden of paying his/her attorney fees out of his/her own pocket). Case available of Google Scholar for free.

This means that if you have paid money for “training” as to how to become a “private attorney general”, then you have been defrauded. You are a victim. No training is necessary to become a “private attorney general”, because a “private attorney general” is merely a civil plaintiff who hires a real licensed attorney who wins the public interest case for the public interest plaintiff/private attorney general.

If you would like the truth about whether Rodney DALE Class is now or has ever been a “private attorney general”, then ask him to show you his loses in the following two cases on that very subject: In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset, Debotrs, 492 BR 232, Case No. 11-15607, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, D. Ohio, Western Division, Decided March 5, 2012; In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset; Debtors, Case No. 12-8014, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, 6th Circuit, Decided December 18, 2012. Both cases are available on Google Scholar for free.

If you would like to know the truth about how well other fraudulent impersonators are doing by pretending to be “private attorneys general”, then go to Google Scholar and look up: Malinay v. Nishimura, Civil No. 13-00372 SOM-KSC, United States District. Court, D. Hawaii, August 14, 2013 (Anthony Williams, who is not a licensed attorney at law, may not represent persons in court even if he calls himself a “private attorney general”, an “attorney in fact” or a “power of attorney”, only a real licensed attorney may represent persons in court); Wilfong v Meeker, No. 5:12-CV-674-D, United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division, April 22, 2013 (“private attorney general” can not represent persons in court, only a real licensed attorney may represent persons in court). Both cases are available on Google Scholar for free.

Rod Class (whose full name is “Rodney DALE Class”) pretends to be “Judge DALE” (which uses his middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke) in connection with fake legal articles which reveal fake legal information which are posted online. In fact, Rod Class is a failed amateur legal theorist with barely has a high school education who was never a judge anywhere at anytime. Rod Class has LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (39 CONSECUTIVE COMPLETE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING).

A person with a 100% failure rate in the courts should not be pretending to be “private attorney general”, posing as a “retired federal judge” or masquerading as a “legal scholar”. More importantly, a person with a 100% failure rate in the courts should not be charging victims $1,000 for “training” on how to become a “private attorney general” (something he has absolutely no clue about). If you have paid Rod Class money for such “training”, then you have been defrauded. You are a victim.