NASA Is a Trillion Dollar Hoax. You Have Been Played (Video)
THANK YOU TO CAPTAIN OBVIOUS YT CHANNEL.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,603,596,504 |
| Stories: | 8,150,704 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
When I was 10 years old in 1969 I somehow knew the Moon landing was fake. I was correct.
I was 14. And I believed it was real for over 35 years. Conceit has a lot to do with it. Those of us who read and understood “science” imagined ourselves superior. And we thought those who doubted Apollo were ignorant.
Okay having viewed the video:
(1) Of course telemetry data can be faked. It’s called a “simulation.” That’s what the controllers trained with. Simulated flight data.
(2) Of course unmanned vehicles were sent.
(3) The “flat earth” evidence can be explained like this:
(a) The linear curvature across 400 miles is about 267 feet. I think the whole curvature problem can be solved like this:
Space is 4 dimensional. Spheres are 4 dimensional objects. And as such, they have 3 dimensional surfaces.
The formula for the curvature of a sphere (linear curvature times the distance squared) gives you a lot more curvature, but we’re looking at a 3 dimensional slice of it, when we draw a line across Kansas. Linear curvature ONLY is what we use there.
(5) The plumb line problem depends on gravity being properly understood, and it isn’t. The Tamarack mine experiment proved that plumb lines don’t point toward the center of the Earth.
you can’t ‘send’ manned or unmanned vehicles to a luminary. the moon is not terra firma.
and your math is wrong on your curvature……8 inches per mile SQUARED.
But LifeIs is never wrong or so he keeps telling me
No, no, I gave it to you right. You square the distance, not the 8 inches part.
8 inches of curvature the first mile (1) x (8 inches)
32 inches of curvature the second mile (2 times 2) x (8 inches)
72 inches of curvature the third mile (3 times 3) x (8 inches)
etc.
And that’s from the formula for the curvature of a sphere.
The Moon is a spherical body illuminated by the Sun. And the first successful soft landing was by the Soviet Union’s (unmanned) Luna 9 in 1966.
The moon is not a star dummy, eventhough you will hear people say the sun actually acts as a portal for space-travel and is not something that instantly melts spacecraft. Of course that is “science fiction” material for now.
So why can’t you send vehicles to the moon?
godzilla,
no need to call me a dummy, but since you broke the ice….
dummy, a luminary is not a star, necessarily.
a luminary is a light that has no terra firma. the moon radiates it’s own light and it’s not reflecting the sunlight.
i don’t know how it works, obviously, but i feel it is like a lighthouse light, turning slowly. also, the moon light is colder than the moon shade……therefore, it’s light is not a reflection of the sun’s light.
ok, dummy?
https://youtu.be/74aG1fbtvwo
Well Mayhem, you could stop trolling for a minute and post a factual response. Okay, you can’t.
That’s why I did.
400 squared, times 8, divided by 12, does not equal 267
Fact.
Mayhem missed this:
“The linear curvature across 400 miles is about 267 feet.”
The linear curvature is about 8 inches per mile.
The curvature of sphere is something else. (square the distance and multiply by the linear curvature)
Well this is the kind of conversation one has, with Mayhem.
I’m still waiting for a fact.
What are you on about, LifeIs, “linear curvature” what does that mean? Got any links to explain it or can you show the math so i can get some idea?
Even if the 400 miles is taken as a chord the height of the circle segment is still over 5 miles.
Oh, wait, i think i get it now. You were declining to acknowledge reality because you imagine the path to truth is through the detailed study of falsity.
Reality isn’t something that can be declined so no wonder you lost me.
Sure thing though – if you don’t square the distance then the height calculated won’t meet the curve – but no one had made that mistake – so you were just trying to muddy the waters – because you like the sound of your own voice – or something.
“…you imagine the path to truth is through the detailed study of falsity.”
Brilliant.
And hilarious.
The video discussed the curvature of the Earth.
There is a formula for that. Which I gave in my very first post above.
It’s very simple and very real. Distance squared times linear curvature.
The reason for mentioning linear curvature is: When we travel on the surface of the Earth, we follow the linear curvature.
If you travel all the way around, to reach your starting point again, the curvature you follow is about 8 inches per mile.
If you squared the distance and multiplied by 8 inches/mile, you would not end up with ANYTHING CLOSE to the Earth’s circumference. You’d miss your starting point.
So, yes, there is a MISTAKE being made, by flat-earthers and three-d earthers, too.
And I gave you the very simple and very real resolution.
An object of n dimensions is bounded by surfaces of (n minus 1) dimensions.
Example: a 2-d plane is bounded by 1-d lines.
Example: a 3-d cube is bounded by 2-d planes.
The Earth’s surface is three dimensional. There’s an up, down, east, west, north, south.
Spheres in the real world are 4 dimensional. THAT is why we have two different kinds of curvature. Linear curvature is a very real SLICE of a very real 4-d object.
Another way you may know that space and planets are 4 dimensional is:
To penetrate a 4 dimensional object, you must make a 3-dimensional hole.
When you make a 3-dimensional hole, the force of the penetration has magnitude but no direction.
This is why impact craters are always circular. It’s why a rock thrown into a pond, at any angle, always produces a circular pattern of ripples.
Another way you may know: the AURORAS –ribbons and sheets of glowing particles. Those are three dimensional flows of particles into a 4 dimensional world.
And the line-of-sight anomalies (Bedford Level and the like) can be explained this way. Light is a 4 dimensional wave in 4 dimensional space.
It’s the REAL explanation of the double-slit experiment.
Yes, quantum physics is all wrong. And physics in general is all wrong.
And that is reality.
Quantum Physics is wrong because the maths breaks down as the zero point is approached not because the number of dimensions is off.
At this point, what difference does it make?
Understand tricks, this site is, a zio-fag honey pot. Yep, it is me, BillyP. (sic, drinking, drunk). get on these nuts.
billy,
this site has been usurped, about 5 or so months ago, and is now a total zio hangout. true words. all the good guys are gone.
still plenty, or some, truth being presented though.
have a drink for me.
Mayhem:
Linear curvature is (slightly less than) 8 inches per mile. The circumference of the Earth is linear.
That 8 inches per mile makes a circle 24,900 miles (40075 km) around.
Four hundred miles across Kansas, times 8 inches, is 3200 inches.
3200 inches divided by 12 is 267 feet.
The formula for the curvature of a sphere is not linear. You square the distance and multiply that by the 8 inches per mile.
http://www.cohp.org/local_curvature.html
Do you mean the arc length is around 8 inches longer than the chord length? Yeah that’s not a linear relationship either.
If that’s what you meant you could have said so and there’d have been less confusion because arc length, while a function of curvature, is not the most direct or clearest method of discussing curvature.
No, I don’t mean that.
Nobody means that. They mean that the vertical drop, from curvature, does not vary linearly with distance.
And when you travel one mile, you drop 8 inches.
Our curvature of a sphere formula says we descend 8 inches the first mile. And 32 inches the second mile. And 72 inches the third mile.
Circumference of the Earth is derived from a 2-dimensional slice of the planet. That’s where the 8 inches per mile comes from.
And it varies linearly.
Problem with the curvature of a sphere formula: when we travel one-fourth of the earth’s circumference (24,901 divided by 4) = (6,225.25 miles)
That distance squared is 38,753,737 miles
Times 8 inches is 310029896 inches
Divided by 12 is 25835824 feet
Divided by 5,280 is 4893 miles.
And compared to your starting point, you SHOULD HAVE dropped to a point level with the earth’s center.
Like if you started at the north pole, you’d be at the equator, halfway down to the other pole.
And 4893 miles is too much. It should be more like 3958 miles.
And my point is: we are looking at a 3 dimensional slice of a 4 dimensional sphere. And that is why curvature is problematic.
Don’t you see the paradox? Look at a diagram of Earth. The circumference is a circle. Travel along that circle, the curve doesn’t change with increased distance.
Now look at a globe. Different story. The farther you travel on the globe, the more the earth falls away — in TWO directions.
That’s why “distance squared times 8 inches.”
But as seen above, the figures don’t add up.
Okay i think i’ve caught up now. You do know that the 8″ has been rounded up, don’t you? It’s an approximation for ready reckoning.
Do the calculations with the exact number and you’ll end up back where you started exactly.
No, you wouldn’t get nearly a thousand miles difference that way.
By using 7.98 inches instead of 8 inches. Here:
6335.25 squared is 38753737.6
that times 7.98 inches is 309,254,826
that divided by 12 is 2,577,1235.5 feet
that divided by 5,280 is 4880.91581 miles
And the equatorial radius of Earth is 3963 miles.
(polar radius 3949.9 miles)
It doesn’t work.
I will never figure out the extent of the fakery.
Was it simulated video for public consumption,
or was the whole program faked. My data is too
limited. Charlie said the moon rocks were full
with Tritium, but I am too ignorant and do not
have his sources.
To Paraphrase and accentuate (and roughly translate)
Goebbels,
“Tell a Lie, and make it Giant and Preposterous,
and just keep Repeating and Repeating that Lie,
And in the End, the People will Believe You.
Maybe the Chief at NASA has a picture of Goebbels
in his office.
(Very likely Thinning Veil has one in his Office too.)
Please Mr. Thinning Veil,
I am waiting for the Navigable Charts and World Map:
You Know, the Ones That are not constructed from assorted
“Map PROJECTIONS”, which are made by taking measurement
points from the surface of a sphere, and then transferred to a
flat plane, complete with localized aberrations.
(The art and sort of the aberration
lies with the type of projection used).
I am waiting for a precise and accurate, free of failure,
Navigable Chart and Map Set. While Flat Maps of a
sphere are by nature supposed to be highly inaccurate,
A Flat Earth Map is supposed to be a work of extreme
accuracy.
Please do not tell me that all who believe in the Flat Earth
are too Ignorant and Uneducated to engage in such a
endeavor and deliver a Product of Exceptional Quality!
Please deliver those Navigable Charts of what Spherical
believers incorrectly refer to as the “Southern Hemisphere”
These Maps should not be a Tightly Guarded Secret.
Do not lead me to believe that they are as badly faked as
the Moon Landing. (AND NO YOUTUBE SCHEISS!!!!)
I wait with Bated Breath
RR
(Could someone help me? Why does a Whirlpool spin
in one direction inside of the illusory line called the
Equator, and spin in the opposite direction “outside”
of the illusory line called the Equator???)
Distantcousin,
You have been shown a “navigable map” again and again yet you keep repeating the same question like a parrot. Here it is again. Latitude and Longitude degrees clearly marked and airplanes are following this map to take direct routes. You cannot still be fooled so the only reasonable answer is that you must be trying to deceive folks.
I suggest anybody still fooled to enlarge this and study it closely. There are named settlements all the way around the Antarctic Circle and there isn’t much excuse anymore for you to keep repeating the same stupid question.
http://maps.bpl.org/id/15442
To Anonymous,
I worked in a Harbor,
Had my own sailboat,
AND YOU’?
And you are darnned right like a Parrot,
until there is an answer.
Australia has a measured East West distance
of roughly 2,400 Nautical Miles as the Crow Flies
American Air Distance from Seattle to New York
is roughly 2,060 nautical miles. Control this
yourself. I am discussing nautical miles.
Scale it yourself!!!!
Australia on this globe that you gave me the
link to is nearly double the length (East West)
of America. Making it roughly 3,700 Nautical
Miles East West. The map you showed me is
identical to other Polar Projection maps.
Wiki or Google the Word Projection. It is good
enough to fuel Flat Earth Phantasies,
AND NOTHING ELSE.
This Bloody Parrot wants an Answer!
One that nobody has given.
When you send a link to a non projection based
Map, I send my apologies for calling you
Unprofessional.
No Captain that has not been fed Mind Altering
Drugs would give you the time of day.
Same Stupid Question???
Same Worthless Answer???
Why do you think Thinning doesh’t Answer,
(Or maybe he did under Anonymous in case
I came back with an ugly answer)
UNTIL KNOW, There is NO ANSWER!
This Stupid Parrot Wants an Answer.
This Parrot doesn’t want a Pretzel Logic!
RR
Come back again, I am not finished with you.
Nobody answered how to deliver the slaves to
Brazil without most of the dying on the ships!
Anonymous
http://www.flightstore.com.au/assets/thumbL/VNC.png
This is the link to the outline of Australia,
used for ordering specific Navigation charts of the
coastline used for ship or aircraft.
As I said, there are discrepancies in all map Projections,
but the projection that is used with navigation bears
no resemblance to the shape as seen in the Gleason
Polar Projection that is used in the link that you
Posted. The outline I sent you is consistent with road
maps and other maps based on regional projection that
is used to minimize distortion. The Gleason is truly a
cool projection that I like in many ways. But it is just
a projection. Which is a FAIL for a Flat Earther.
If you were to sail a ship around Australia based on the
Gleason, I hope your insurance is paid, and the Insurance
adjusters are lenient.
RR
Hey ANON, are you just the “Alter” of some well known
Flatter???
“Hey ANON, are you just the “Alter” of some well known Flatter???”
Don’t be silly, Cuz. Of course she is. And if you want to know which one, just listen for the constant string of complaints about OTHER folks having more than one account coming from a particular infamous FLATTER source.
It looks like you got it wrong,
There is a parabolic style effect the
further you go from your start point.
I do not have my Trig formulas out, so
I am of no help right now.
Have a good day,
R.
Please Disregard,
I think I misread the original comment.
R.
You didn’t take a very good look at the map or is it that you already know the truth and are trying to deceive? How do you get a “polar view” when the Antarctic Circle is shown to have thousands of more miles than the North Pole? It is supposed to be a ball, correct? Why did it take every explorer 3-5 years, including the recent British Navy expo to bump around that ice wall and cover 60,000 miles?
@Mayhem: linear curvature is called a geodesic. For that, the best is to understand what is a line and what is a curve according to mathematical definition.
There are some great video on the net describing this (spacetime channel for example)
IT DOES NOT MAKE ONE CONCEITED WHEN THEY ARE BLATANTLY LIED TO BY PEOPLE IN POSITIONS OF TRUST AND AUTHORITY.
it is not our fault, we were lied to.
period.
they must shoulder all of the blame. all of it.
ANOTHER FAILED FLAT ATTEMPT FROM THE SHILLING WHALE. NEVER ANYTHING SOLID AND ALWAYS REVERTS TO MORE CONSPIRACY. YOU STILL CAN’T SHOOT ME A LASER !
I can’t decide on who the biggest deluded liars are, NAZA or THE FLATHEAD SOCIETY ? Either one is bad for your health.
Only one of those that you mentioned can be proven liars again and again and again, so when are you going to live up to your handle and get a clue?
At least when an Anonymous is proven
to be a fool, he can leave everyone
confused which Anon is the Idiot.
Seldom is an Anon afraid he will not get
the respect he is due for making an
intelligent statement.
R.
Mr. QIK
Could it be that – -
First you embrace and understand to the
Full Depth of Your Soul, – - – -
The Teachings of Goebbels
And after this Orientation,
You are prepared to embrace the Truth
and Facts as explained by Thinning Veil
and Nasa????
RR
“I Truly Believe I Could Love Big Brother – -
While Dancing on the Flat Earth!!!”
SOLID EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE – You can do this YOURSELF ! Unless you don’t have a cell phone with a camera. This is another piece of empirical evidence I have presented but you STILL can not give 1, just 1 proof we live on a sphere, egg-shaped sphere, or whatever shape NASA ( Never A Straight Answer ) claims we live on now. So….let me get this straight, we go to the moon, get pictures and the Earth is perfectly round but now it’s egg shaped ? WTH ???
Keep up the good work Thinning Veil.
Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9pLoDo94po&list=PLoyN7UPQveBAInIWcJtHeJaoTj0rzYTTt&index=42
mot,
BAHAHAHA! EXACTLY!!!
the levels of cognitive dissonance in some of these commenters is preposterous.
nasa shows us PERFECTLY SPHERICAL images for decades and then they tell us the earth is not a perfect sphere! this is to weed out the ones with a brain.
most commenters here will be left alone by the cabal as they pose no threat to the establishment! they will believe anything, literally anything, their masters tell them is true!
bahaha
they never address this fact. never. what about the PERFECTLY SPHERICAL IMAGES, BALLERS???
ha
Haaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaa……. Ballers ! Goof-Ballers !!
A Man with truly Precision Eyes.
Where are the Navigable Charts that
should have been in use for the last
THREE HUNDRED YEARS???????
You can see a discrepancy of 0,1% in
Nasa Photos, where the circumference
difference is smaller than the LENS DISTORTION!
But in the Maps you can not see 30%
or 50%?????????
Inconcievable!
RR
Aww, poor Veil, has that mean NASA been lying to you again? Aww, you poor
thing! Waaaaaa.. Waaaaaa…Waaaaa! Do you want us to hold your little hand
and make it alright for you again?
All of the math is totally flawed in the video.. Once again we are watching
basement scientists telling us falsehoods to steer their dumbdown agenda!
So, I have been across Kansas a hundred times and it’s quite flat alright,
however, that doesn’t mean that everywhere is flat, just because Kansas is.
What a foolish example! Downright childish as a matter of fact! So if
one balloon is red, all balloons are red then? How blatantly stupid can
the maker of this video possibly be? Just using that opening example
to try to “sell” Kansas as proof of a flat earth, totally takes the rest
and throws it in the dumpster! If we are using Kansas as an example,
for the rest of the earth, sorry, total fail.. But I am happy so many
fools believe in the flat earth.. Survival of the fittest brains! And y’all
are total fails! If you can’t see the failure in the video’s “proclamation
facts”, it just proves how far backwards your reasoning skills are,
and there truly is no hope for you. If the statements make sense
to you, I am sorry, but you are just not worthy!
I think you folks that think Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landings
should read the letter that his daughter recently wrote to folks such
as yourselves! She worked on every project with her father, and
does she have some damning statements for you! But whatever
you do, don’t believe someone who was actually there at his
side, but listen to a bunch of non-scientist youtubers for the
truth, okay? I am on his daughters side when she says,
that you people should be ashamed of yourselves! Go read
her letter, as it’s out there on the web.. Go find it and read it!
Don’t try to tell the sheep this, they will just baaa more.
BAAAA!
ANON DUDE!
RR
It’s Obvious CAPTAIN THE WORLD AIN’T FLAT ALSO
Oh no, NASA is real. Its “just” that the public gets censored data, quite censored. The important stuff is classified and not for public distribution despite the fact the gullible public pays for their operations. NASA is an adjunct of the DOD!
Richard Hoagland said that the moon landing hoax is simply a fall back conspiracy to distract from the real conspiracy. That is we went there and high level masonic astronauts recovered as many artifacts as they could for the privilidge of the elite on earth.
Just like the flat earth nonsense serves as a distraction for the hollow earth theory that has plenty of circumstantial evidence for its validity.
anyone can determine if they live on a sphere or not! it’s not rocket science, people. use the brains god gave you. flat and hollow, yes.
plenty of evidence for hollow earth.
Not sure if you are being sarcastic or truthful, but I think I have seen you post the flat earth nonsense in the past. If I am wrong then I apologise.
All they need is a good zoom camera or telescope and a large body of water and the proof is right there.
https://youtu.be/O2tG8PGySVI?list=PLJPTsKcd8v8n_aUxgPuzU6QKQaV3zsNZ8
What else is new
Great Video. Did you know that both the Bible and the Quran teach that the earth is flat and stationary? You can find the scriptures here
/prophecy/2016/07/flat-earth-confirmed-by-the-bible-and-quran-check-out-the-scriptures-2482739.html
I am glad to see that you voice your belief in the teaching if
Yahweh and Mohammed. I could ask my wife what the
Buddhists have to say.
RR
This is just what i thought but then I have some Jehovah witnesses knocking me door looking for old people that are about to peg it so these parasites can worm there way in to get a mention in the will.
I blinded them with science and facts and this subject popped up and they showed so ramblings from, well a bible i guess where it said the earth was round which surprised me.
Now if you religious fruit and nut cakes cannot even agree on the shape of the earth then can we trust anything you say at all and that “Virgin birth, killed, rises from the dead” story was being told in various forms 5000 years ago but the woman’s name always started with a “M” for some reason.
Good to see you mention the Quran because many of your fellow bible bashing friends here that go to church in Sunday and want to kill, sorry get others to kill the Muslims on a Monday seem not to be with the plan are are reading the wrong story book so credit to you where it’s due.
The good news is that you is god or at least a part of god as in brain cells are part of you but the bad news for you is that gods is inside of computer simulation, might be thought of as being the CPU or Program and he might be part of the original programming team but that’s not so important because the A.I writes it own code but i am only telling you this because i am the devil that god could cast down to any other planet in the universe but because he loves you so much he cast him/me down here.
Hello Virus Guard.
Its quite interesting what you have written.
Its odd you say you are the devil, as I had always
considered Lucifer to be a Team-Player with the
“Three Wise Men of the Flat Earth”.
Regardless of who you are, ’tis a shame we can’t
sit down for a game of Chess. Playing repeated
games of Chess with the Village Idiot will not
improve your Skill-Set.
RR
As always no solid proof. “Proving” someone “wrong” doesn’t make you right. Proving something means providing repeatable evidence. Just saying “Mike says Kansas is flat but says earth is round” is not evidence. It only makes you look silly. You clearly have no idea how to prove something with solid evidence. If you’d be able to you’d have done it already.
There have been third parties following the moon landings. The Russians among others. Don’t you think the Russians would’ve told the world the moon landing is a hoax during the cold war?
https://www.fastcompany.com/3035937/nvidia-takes-on-apollo-11-moon-landing-deniers-with-technology#4
JACKO,
there is never enough proof for someone who does not want to see.
The Russians may have been in on the scam from the beginning because they were exploring the Antarctic back in the 50s when Americans were and both agreed to put it off limits to explorers. Now China as well. The common denominator is that these countries now suck billions of dollars annually from their respective sheeple and that money is very usefull in all the Black Ops that are so obvious today.
Think about it. While the USSR and Amarican cold war was raging, they were both cooperating and sharing a “space program”.
I don’t know if we landed on the moon or not but something is stopping us from returning but it could just be a secret deal between the USA and the old USSR.
NASA keeps throwing the “ET” freaks a bone now and then or else the finance would be stopped but at least they are cheaper and better than CERN that gives us nothing but theory’s and big bills that the poor old tax payers has to pay.
The moon is only 11 light seconds away and we cannot see the moon rovers from earth using the best telescopes known to man but NASA says that we can see black holes four billion light years away cus we is stupid
Consider this:
1. Six perfect landings and takeoffs on the moon, with not one practice landing. 237,000 miles from earth. No deaths. Evidently a piece of cake easy.
2. Space Shuttle. A mere 200 miles from earth. 14 horrific deaths. Finally scrapped as being ”unsafe”.
Which one was a fake?
NASA says that we can’t go back to the moon for 20 years because its too difficult and there are many problems to be solved….lol. Hey guys, I thought we already went to the moon and it was easy. Has NASA suddenly gone stupid???
don,
good observations.
glad to see my distant cuz is at least entertaining these ideas! it takes balls, pardon the pun, to admit one might have been wrong.
i had to admit it too.
no shame in readjusting one’s beliefs when presented with new info. it’s the only alternative for those with sense and control of their ego.
Yes Truly Amazing!
Two Horrific Accidents,
14 Dead,
Which all took place – - -
Under The Firmament!
(In Earnest, No Disrespect to you, Don.)
RR
I think Veil and likes don’t even know if they exist (they probably think they are a conspiracy construct of the nasa-nazi-masson-gay-jewish-reptilian-communist-KOS-whatever-banking lobby).
must be tough.
Guess our generation was a lot better at details and space flight!
Your gen can’t do anything right including launch our own
astronauts at all these days!
Only think fake about this story is THE STORY! Twaddle, get bent bible humpers, the moon is not a danged hologram or “luminary” it is friggin rock locked in orbit with a planet. With my telescope I can clearly see the surface and the craters, how is it a “luminary” has impact marks sparky?
Shhhhh let them live in their ignorant bliss…
Hello Syco,
Kind of a real shame to see you use the term Bible humpers.
I have felt that the only real use for the Flat Earth Movement
is to link Pure Idiocy to the Bible and those who believe in
G-d. When Someone says “Bible Humpers”, I should feel
proud, and stand with my chest puffed out, for the fact
that I have been proven correct. Unfortunately, I’ll take no
Victory Lap. Instead, I am saddened by their success at
making Christians appear to be idiots.
I have to truly ask, could anyone be born so stupid,
(among the Three Wisemen of the Flat Earth),
That they are accomplishing this destructive feat,
without “Malice of Forethought”?
RR
When you put it like that, without being to PC and coddling the snowflakes, what would a better term for terminally infatuated with a fairy tail be?
Thanks for the question for an answer
I don’t see the Bible as a Fairy Tale, but I
don’t see it like some here claim to see it.
I find it odd that those who will shamelessly
Lie, are also thumping on the “Good Book”
The Loudest. That is a problem with internet
anonymity is that I have no idea what lurks
behind someone’s Blog identity. I cannot
judge the motivation or level of mental health
of other posters. Some of what is written here
could be ignorance, or true malice, or some sort
of high functioning Schizophrenia. Their
tying this absurd topic together with Christianity
is what I find aggravating.
Have a good day (or evening),
RR.
“Snowflakes”, you say, This whole topic and the
function of BIN is quite a statement about the
Mental Collapse of our Modern World.
Good answer, and good observations “This whole topic and the
function of BIN is quite a statement about the
Mental Collapse of our Modern World.”