Profile image
By Deborah Dupre (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Farmer Who Defied Monsanto Mafia Beaten Down: Stalked, Terrorized, Ruined

Tuesday, August 9, 2016 17:59
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

by Deborah Dupré

Special Report, BIN Exclusive

An Indiana farmer, stalked and terrorized to ruin his life on the land for attempting not to use Monsanto’s Roundup and its genetically engineered soybeans, learned what over one million other multi-stalked targeted individuals (TIs) say they have after they were involuntarily placed on a spy hit-list: Corporations rule America and there is no justice for TIs. He also learned a shocking truth hundreds other American farmer TIs learn each year: A shadowy army of gang stalking ops are paid to terrorize innocent farmers trying to protect fellow citizens from being poisoned.

(Feature photo above credit: MonsantoMafia.com)

Farmer Rejects Playing Genetic Russian Roulette with Monsanto Mafia

Refusing to play Russian Roulette with Monsanto – the chemical giant forcing him to spray Roundup and then genetically engineer his soy crops with RoundUp Ready seeds, and risking a cancer diagnosis, as local farming friends have been, the Indiana farmer, whose name is withheld to avoid further retaliation, took a stand. According to his neighbors who recently revealed his story to Deborah Dupré, the farmer privately vowed not to use Monsanto products. In today’s surveillance-abuse nation, however, there is no privacy.

As though he’d made a public statement about his decision, he was soon followed on the road toward his crops every day. The human right to privacy has been destroyed through U.S. presidential orders and also surveillance technology, contributing to over 1 in 4 stalking victims reporting cyberstalking used against them, such as e-mail (83%) or instant messaging (35%). (1)

Although the most naive of Americans continue to deny such surveillance of innocent individuals and call the notion “nonsense,” researchers show that:

  • Electronic monitoring was used to stalk 1 in 13 victims.
  • Video or digital cameras were equally likely as listening devices or bugs [such as covertly placed in or near homes and used by stalkers near victims when they are out] to be used to electronically monitor victims (46% and 42%).
  • Global positioning system (GPS) technology comprised about a tenth of electronic monitoring of stalking victims. (Baum et al)

Objecting to Monsanto propaganda myths’ claims that Roundup increases yields and is cost effective, etc., the farmer continued to attempt using his right to choose whether he’d poison himself and others. He tried outsmarting his stalkers by taking different routes to his farmland. Still, he was followed, harassed and intimidated — easy for gang stalkers with GPS attached to the victim’s car and with cell phones to alert each other of the target’s precise location.

[READ: Secret Neuroweapon Attacks. Immediate Global Security Call: DARPA Scientist ]

The Monsanto Gangstalking Army

Gang-stalking, the “catchphrase” for what stalking experts call multi-stalking, has increased across the nation, according to researchers. Not only advanced communications such as the internet, cellphones and voice over internet protocol, but also American fascism, or corporatism, and acceptance of torture have accelerated growth and networking of these organized criminal groups. Few other than Tis would have believed this covert terror could happen to anyone had they not become victims themselves. It’s even tougher for single-stalked victims to get loved ones to believe them. Of course, the TI phenomenon that the U.S. created based on Nazi Germany persecution behaviors and torturous experiments is not only being applied in the U.S. The U.S. has applied it globally.

READ: NSA Whistleblower: US Has Created Nazi Germany Worldwide

Despite controversy over precise boundaries of stalking behaviors, consensus is that such behaviors can include loitering nearby, following, harassment by telephone or mail, ordering goods on the victim’s behalf, threats, physical and sexual assaults, murder attempts or actual murder. Fear that stalking victims feel is natural and can be life-saving.

Stalking findings included in the 2010 data collection, published in 2011 included:

  •     7.5 million people were stalked in one year in the U.S.
  •     61 percent of female victims and 44 percent of male victims were stalking by a current or former intimate partner
  •     An estimated 15 percent of women and 6 percent of men have been a stalking victim during their lifetimes. (4)
  •    31% of stalking victims are multi-stalked (by two or three stalkers) (5) Baum et al.

An ultra-conservative legal definition of stalking still used in the U.S. depicts stalking inaccurately. For example, survey respondents have been only classified as stalking victims if: 1) they experienced multiple stalking tactics or a single stalking tactic multiple times by the same perpetrator, and 2) they felt very fearful or believed they or someone close to them would be harmed or killed as a result of a perpetrator’s stalking behaviors. This definition fails to account for levels of fear often reported by victims (i.e. somewhat fearful, slightly fearful…).  This is despite 46% of stalking victims feeling fear of not knowing what would happen next, a precursor for stalking victims’ Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Pathé and Mullen (1997)) and other mental injuries (not mental illness as uneducated observers prefer to insinuate, and thus re-victimize stalking targets). (6)

Fear increased with every new tactic the Indiana farmer’s multi-stalkers employed against him. One study showed that over 1 in 4 stalking victims reported some form of cyberstalking used, such as e-mail (83%) or instant messaging (35%). Electronic monitoring was used to stalk 1 in 13 victims. Video or digital cameras were equally likely as listening devices or bugs to be used to electronically monitor victims (46% and 42%). Global positioning system (GPS) technology comprised about a tenth of the electronic monitoring of stalking victims.

Undeterred, the farmer tried changing his routine. He began going to work at odd hours of the night and wee hours of the morning. Frightened, he’d leave home at 2:00 or 3:00 am to try to avoid being followed.

“As interviews and reams of court documents reveal, Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country. They fan out into fields and farm towns, where they secretly videotape and photograph farmers, store owners, and co-ops; infiltrate community meetings; and gather information from informants about farming activities.” (7)

The most common reasons victims perceived being stalked were retaliation, anger, spite (37%), or desire to control the victim (33%) — all of which the Indiana farmer justifiably believed. Justifiably, the Indiana farmer believed the same.
 

“Farmers say that some Monsanto agents [stalkers] pretend to be surveyors. Others confront farmers on their land and try to pressure them to sign papers giving Monsanto access to their private records. Farmers call them the ‘seed police’ and use words such as ‘Gestapo’ and ‘Mafia’ to describe their tactics.” (8)
 

Monsanto typically slings financially draining lawsuits at farmers for “patent infringement.” The multinational’s “seed police” pursue and catch farmers with Monsanto’s patented seed and pollen, that drifted and contaminated organic crops with genetics from Monsanto laboratories.  Every year Monsanto “investigates” over 500 farmers for patent infringement with their now-notorious “seed police.“ According to OSGATA, every year, some 144 farmers without a binding contract with the corporation have had lawsuits brought against them by Monsanto. Another 700 farmers were been forced to settle out of court for undisclosed sums.   

This farmer is not the first to have been traumatized by Monsanto, as singer/songwriter Neil Young exposed in his short film about Micahel White. [WATCH: Singer songwriter Neil Young’s film, SEEDING FEAR - The Story of Michael White vs Monsanto  Interview and Trailer (below)]

“Monsanto is known for bullying farmers by making baseless accusations of patent infringement,’“ said attorney Dan Ravicher of the nonprofit legal services organization Public Patent Foundation, representing plaintiffs in a 2012 suit against Monsanto. “They’ve sued and harassed many other farmers who wanted nothing to do with their genetically modified seed, and now that organic and conventional farmers are fighting back, they claim they would never do such a thing without backing up their words with an enforceable promise.“   

One Missouri farmer TI Gary Rhinehart recalls a Monsanto op threatening him, “Monsanto is big. You can’t win. We will get you. You will pay.” The op then began verbal attacks, saying he had proof that Rinehart planted Monsanto’s genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company’s patent. “Better come clean and settle with Monsanto,” Rinehart says the man told him “—or face the consequences.”

Attempting to survive the financial burden of a lawsuit, record actions of his stalkers, missing days of work rather than face what they might do to him next, remaining in a state of hyper-vigilance as targeted individuals must to survive, and suffering trauma of 24/7 threatening intimidation, his physical and financial resources were depleted. He was forced off his land, out of his lifelong beloved career, and into dependence on one of his grown children with whom he now lives far from Indiana.

Today, Arkansas, Tennessee and Missouri farmers are reporting extensive crop damage from dicamba herbicide used on Monsanto’s latest GE soy. Particularly prone to drift into neighboring fields and onto farmers and their families, dicamba is toxic to broadleaf plants such as fruit, nuts, vegetables — and non-GE soy.

Monsanto claims to have reformulated dicamba to be less drift-prone. Pesticide Action Network (PAN) says that since EPA has not approved the new formulation, it’s the volatile, old-style version still being applied.

“And even when ‘new and improved’ dicamba is available, there’s no guarantee that the older, cheaper — and more damaging — version of the chemical won’t continue being used in the field,” says PAN.

The pesticide drift problem is no surprise. “So why are new herbicide-resistant crops — like Dow’s “Enlist Duo” (engineered for use with 2,4-D and glyphosate) and Monsanto’s “Xtend” line (resistant to dicamba and glyphosate) — approved?” asks the PAN in an email Monday.

A process is now underway to review and update national genetically engineered (GE) rules that are impacting every American family.

“Urge decision-makers to protect farmer livelihoods and community health over Monsanto’s marketshare,” asserts PAN. This problem is urgent and life threatening. PAN says, “Tell the leaders of USDA and EPA to fix their broken GE/pesticide rules, today.

“After 20+ years of Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready seeds, consequences of herbicide resistant GE crops are quite clear: super-weeds, crop damage and contamination, and increased exposure to health-harming chemicals.”

How many farmers with integrity are bullied by Monsanto thugs to the point of ruining their livelihoods? Why aren’t federal decision-makers taking a closer look at the real-world impacts of both corporate targeting of individuals and this Monsanto’s failed  technology? “Under current rules, reviewers don’t even consider the spikes in pesticide use that come along with GE seeds,” states PAN.

To wit: “In 2010, President Obama announced he was recess-appointing pesticide lobbyist Islam A. Siddiqui to Chief Agricultural Negotiator, Office of the US Trade Representative. Siddiqui is Vice President for Science and Regulatory Affairs at Crop Life America, an agribusiness lobby group representing the infamous Monsanto.”

Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are poison pushers, both joined at the hip to Monsanto. Trump holds between $15,001 and $50,000 worth of Monsanto (NYSE:MON) stock in one of his two wealth management accounts with Deutsche Bank. (11) Clinton’s ties to Monsanto run so deep,  she’s dubbed the “Bride of Frankenfood” and hired a prominent Monsanto lobbyist to run her campaign. (10)

One candidate now quickly climbing in the polls, the Green Party Candidate for president Dr. Jill Stein, has strongly advocated mandating GMO food labels and says to “rein in Monsanto,” that has spent 250 million dollars on a U.S. coup. [WATCH Dr. Stein speaking at the March Against Monsanto in Tampa, FL on May 25th, 2013 (below).]

PAN asserted Monday regarding the GE/pesticide rules, “And once on the market, GE crops are never reviewed again. The way GE crops are reviewed — and approved — needs to change, now.”

It takes an army of paid criminals with impunity to ensure the poisoning of Americans by stalking the hundreds of farmers of integrity until the terror destroys them and they give up. It would take a stronger army of Americans to conquer them. It happened in the EU. It can happen the U.S.

For the sake of your children, your children’s children, that of the Indiana farmer, an estimated 3.4 million American stalking victims, and an estimated  1 million multi-stalked victims like him, take action here.

References

(1) Katrina Baum, Ph.D., Shannan Catalano, Ph.D., and Michael Rand, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Kristina Rose, National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report, National Crime Victimization Survey, Stalking Victimization in the United States, January 2009, NCJ 224527

(2) Baum et al.

(3) Harmon, Rosner, & Owens, 1995; Meloy & Gothard, 1995; Mullen & Pathé, 1994; Zona, Palarea, & Lane, 1998

(4) Matthew J. Breiding et al., “Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization – National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011”, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 63, No. 8 (2014): 7; Online at Stalking Resource Center)

(5) Baum et al.

(6) Ibid.

(7) (Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele, “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear,” April 2, 2008; online at www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/05/monsanto200805)

(8) Bartlett and Steel

(9) Dupré, Deborah, Vampire of Macondo, 2012

(10) Mike Adams, Hillary Clinton Pushes GMO Agenda, Hires Monsanto Lobbyist, Takes Huge Dollars from Monsanto, Global Research, May 2015.

(11) Sean Williams, 3 Surprisingly Controversial Stocks in Donald Trump’s Portfolio, 2016.

Related Articles by Deborah Dupré

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 17 comments
  • Deborah Dupre

    How much proof do Targeted Individuals’ loved ones need to break denial about the surveillance state targeting innocent people? How long will Americans support presidential candidates reaping benefits from such criminal corporate targeting with impunity?

  • Paul Brown

    This extensive article really nails the stalkers, especially Monsanto. I recommend the video “Genetic Roulette” on this page, so readers can see just how extensive the damage from GMOs is. It was an eye-opener for me.

    • Deborah Dupre

      Thank you loyal reader, Paul Brown.

  • 2QIK4U

    SCREW MONSANTO BEFORE YOUR SCREWED ! :???:

    • Deborah Dupre

      The EU did it. Why not Americans? Too mind-controlled?

  • megatargeted

    I appreciated this article Deborah in that you tried to expose the targeting of people for simply not going along with their criminal agendas. Corporations like Monsanto are the tip of the iceberg. It is much more serious than that. People are also targeted who are victims of corruption at county, state and federal levels on a mass scale;
    even people who challenged anyone on the government paycheck be it police, judge FBI director etc.
    It is so much worse than you described and the truth is that targeted people are afraid to tell people how
    bad it is because unknown technologies are involved that people will not believe exist because it is not public knowledge, because they always run psychops programs on the targeted person making them look crazy in varying degrees depending on how much they want to isolate you, and because the criminality. unconstitutionality, visciousness and evil involved is more than most people can wrap their minds around. Make no mistake about it,
    the government has already chipped you, entering your home in the middle of the night while they put you in a deep sleep by using some type of satellite technology to put you and anyone else in your house into a deep sleep which you will not awake from, even if they are loud. They do not rely on GPS or phones. In addition
    they will put brain chips/electrodes in anyone you come in contact with and nobody will believe you because they will control everyone around you. It is extreme. They have an awful lot of manpower, time and money to focus on you….to a point which no-one can comprehend. It doesn’t make sense. But when was the last time that the government made sense to you? Nothing they do makes sense anymore. They play by a different set of rules and are listening to the beat of a different drummer. Megatargeted Michele

    • Deborah Dupre

      Thank you, megatargeted. Yes, as I highlighted, the 1 million TIs in the US alone is a conservative number based on a conservative definition. I agree that government is hiding the real figures because they are climbing so fast. People living in La-La Land choose to not see how serious this is: people of goodwill trying to protest others from corporate genocide are those being targeted. Yes, there’s also increasing evidence of forced RFID chips, but people still don’t get the seriousness of that, either. I really appreciate your detailed comment, your wisdom and strength.

    • Arlene Johnson

      Dear Megatargeted Michele,

      Those who lead the government have no conscience unlike we who do. That’s why they do things differently than we would if we were in the government. After all the top secret history I learned when I lived in Los Angeles, CA, I learned a piece of history in NYC that put the pieces of the puzzle together for me in 1993. After an over 5-1/2 year struggle to disseminate this history to international acclaim, because when I learned the history in 1993, I knew that the whole world had been betrayed when that event occurred which was in 1963 in Dallas, TX, I knew I had to get this documented truth out to people.

      Later I exposed Monsanto in my 15th edition, and still later I devoted an edition to TIs too. That is my 36th edition. Prior to that time, I published isolated TI’s stories. See my 9th and 24th editions for those.

      God bless all legitimate TIs,

      Arlene Johnson
      Publisher/Author
      http://www.truedemocracy.net
      To access my editions, click on the icon that says Magazine.

      • Deborah Dupre

        Thank you, Arlene. Great to learn about your published work. Congratulations. Best to you always.

  • rocorollo

    No wonder Hillary got sick, she must have ate a GMO BLT.

  • s jill

    The technique used today on whistle blowers is called Zersetzung, originating from East Germany’s dictatorship. It is a way to “neutralize” independent thinking and ruin people’s relationships/reputations. Another technique used with Zersetzung to attack free-thinkers is satellite and/or local devices microwave energy focused on certain frequencies and body areas to hurt and torture, and remote neural monitoring to mess with the brain (no internal chips needed). It is a “brave new world” due to the abuse of remote technologies.

    • Deborah Dupre

      S jill, I agree that Zeretzung is what the program is that innocent TIs are being enrolled against their will. Paperclip Nazis covertly winning over Americans to their torturous ways for decades, ever since the US government brought the best of their mad scientists over to settle here into great paying jobs and partner with the CIA. And yes, now they’ve advanced their technologies that are so horrendous, Americans no longer have the capacity to understand just how torturous they are.

      Pathological patriotism is the result of cognitive dissonance – being unable balance one’s personal view of reality with what is real. So, people refuse to come to the aid of TIs, just as Germans did not help stop abuses toward innocent people in Nazi Germany. They either pretend they do not know or think deep down inside TIs surely must deserve the treatment, or the government would never allow the injuries to them. I’m sorry to see you are probably a TI.

      Stay strong and never ever allow yourself to give into being provoked to do what you know is wrong.

      • Vagabond

        People are waking up to what really happened in Germany prior to World War 2. If you want to know the truth about the miracle economy of 1930′s Germany and who really started the war watch the movie; The Greatest Story Never Told by Dennis Wise.

        If you want to know the truth about Gangstalking go to; http://www.dataasylum.com/ …and click on Awesome. Military technology is at least 20 years ahead of the mainstream.

  • Pedro

    This confronting and harassment of people by operatives of large corporations, is sickening. Is it a character fault in the people running these corporations? Is it a character fault in the people that do their bidding? Whatever, it appears to be a growing American problem, initiated by American companies both locally and internationally; so what’s behind it? Is it just the bully-boy mentality? or is it something more sinister in the psychological makeup of the American corporations’ management personnel? And as these are generally American-born citizens, is it indicative of cultural divergences taking place in the management class? But why are non-management personnel, the thugs doing the actual dirty work, doing this so willingly? Once again I ask, what is wrong with the American people that are involved in this growing phenomena? Is this the dark underside of the American psyche, that side which encourages bullying and stand-over tactics seen in government foreign policy, military and defense contractors? Maybe a carry-over from the past, such as the Indian wars that decimated the Native American population?

  • Pedro

    Of course I should have said the mulyiple cultures of America, the WASPs of the north, the “born again” evangelicals of the south, the Hispanics, the negros of the north, the “Jim Crow” negros of the south, the catholic Irish of the borth, the Jews of Brooklyn, the Zionists Jews of Washington DC, Chicago and New York, ad infinitum. And we must recognise the cultural difference between the urban and the rural American, which just adds to the complexity of the problem.

    At an international level the American is seen as an uncultured, conniving bully-boy with little integrity. And since the government offices like the CIA, and the military have the reputation for serious interference in the affairs of nations around the world, this is to be expected.

    For as long as the decent people of America continue to tolerate the status quo, the rest of the world will turn their back on you for your complicity in such corporate bastardry as the TPP and similar “trade pacts” that favour American corporations with multinational reach.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.