Pissed off flat brainers in the 3… 2… 1… ohh already missed one, @NewsPaperBoy

This is why, and as simple an explanation as I could find,
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/139348/why-does-the-sea-horizon-line-always-seems-to-be-at-the-same-height-as-ones-eye

Now stop asking stupid questions.

So, I saw this on one of those flat earth videos:

I placed two identical empty 4″ cube boxes and set them on a board on the ground. One was in direct full moonlight, the other was in shade. I then waited an hour. Then I took the temp of each.

Curiously the one in the direct moonlight was 1.5 degrees cooler than the one in the shade.

Did this three months in a row. Same thing every time.

I thought that reflected sunshine was warm?

I find it very amusing.
They didn’t pop out of the wood work (flat earthers) until I posted the video showing the poles visible on the planets.
its possible its a pys op, that they are all popping up now. But more to the discredit of the round ball floating, than anything else. What is most clearly evident, to any one with eyes and no preconditioned concepts of ‘science’ when they view satellite imagery of the solar system planets – from any space agency on earth, is that the planets are NOT ’round balls’ floating freely in space. The Poles are one thing, but the shadows on the background wall with ‘stars’ is quite another.
As for ‘gravity’, its long ( and I do mean LONG, Since Keely ) known that its controlled by sympathetic vibration, which can be produced by sound frequency. The 1908 worlds fair had the first ‘movie’ made, and they photographed the first ‘anti grav’ prototype. I remember the man, had a remote control smaller than todays tv remotes, and as he ‘lifted’ the missile casing which was hundreds of pounds, he proudly said, we could now go to explore the moon, all we needed was to figure out how to capture oxygen! Lenard Nemoy did a special on it, much later in the 70′s…and then not only was that particular worlds fair simply erased from all the archives, the video Nemoy did, was ‘syndicated’ and taken. So even the secondary videos of the original, are locked up now. No one can get copies of ‘In Search Of’ and most especially, not that particular footage. Unless you have a copy at home, from the original.

I think that most of these people who are proponents of the flat earth theory are doing so because it is either new (to them), cool, neat, different, controversial and/or can be condescending to us…the ‘stuffy’, ill-informed, gullible inhabitants of this world, who, through ignorance, still believe what the science books have written about for centuries.

If the earth was flat, there is every reason in the world to believe that SOMEONE would have discovered the edge by now. How many ships have sailed out to sea in the past 3-4000 years? And yet no one has ever reached the ‘end’? How come there ALWAYS seems to be water at these supposed edges and not any land? I’m sure, by now, an enterprising person would have already found a way to set up some sort of dock (or deck), and, for a fee, let people take a peek over the edge. Ever heard of “Lover’s Leap”? That would be the ultimate!

Do we have earth quakes? Of course!! For centuries already! Some severe! What is causing them if the earth was flat? Depending on how ‘thick’ this flat planet is suppose to be, according to these people, one would think that the earth would have cracked in half by now…or worse! I guess tectonic plates are a myth too!

Do we possess atomic bombs and have they ever been detonated? You bet! Some even deep underground! How much abuse could a flat earth take as far as holding itself together with all those un-natural events taking place.

Do we have volcanoes spewing up hot molten lava? Of course! Where is that magma coming from? You need pressure from tons and tons of rocks at deep levels to cause that! Are there still active volcanoes around? Look at Hawaii. Again, where is all that coming from?

But I guess the biggest question is: What, pray tell, would the underbelly of this ‘flat’ earth look like? Is it just a bunch of roots hanging down? Can we see the exposed cement floor of Macy’s basement? Is there a huge hole under the ocean with a rubber plug to prevent the loss of the water? One would think that by now, with the technology we have today, that someone would have already climbed over the edge or flown under the earth to see what is there.

They could even take photos from a satellite, for Pete’s sakes…oops, forgot, there is no such thing!!!

Sure the earth spins over 1000 mph. That is why Felix Baumgartner went to subspace and dropped straight down onto his target, hitting it over 4 minutes later.

FLAT ! FLAT ! Like it’s flat as flat as a flat can be!

Ever notice as soon as you mix it up with one of these flat earther types they immediately drag into the argument every other viable conspiracy fact? Like fluoride is bad and chemtrails and every other thing they can? That’s the whole purpose of this. They tarnish the reputable facts surrounding other fringe ideas and theories by inserting their ludicrous crap in with it. It’s like the proverbial barrel of apples. Flat Earth theory is the bad apple. It diminishes the value of all the other apples by its very presence. Refuse the bad apple and kick it out of the barrel.

Ball Earthers please explain why Polaris never moves and the stars form circles around it in long-term exposure photos. Why does this phenomena only show the spin of the Earth and not the much faster movement of the Earth around the Sun or the even faster movement of the Sun around the Galactic Center or the even greater speed of the expansion of the Universe from the “Big Bang”?

Why are the constellations exactly as they appeared to the earliest observers and not spreading out and moving further away from each other as science says that it does? Shouldn’t we see a completely different sky than the ones recorded in Mesopotamia if modern astronomers are correct in their theories?

If the Earth is spinning as it travels around the Sun, why is the Sun always above us at noon? Shouldn’t this only occur once a year and slowly move towards the Sun being above us at midnight 6 months later?

Also, please explain how rivers work on a ball, do they not have to travel uphill on a ball before going back downhill to the sea?

Mathematically the curvature of the ball Earth is 8″ per mile squared meaning that a 6′ person would not be visible at 3 miles at sea level because they would be behind the curve, at 10 miles he would be 66′ below the horizon. How about explaining that math Syco? How can realtors sell 20 and 30 mile views if they are scientifically impossible?

And another thing, why don’t flights between South America and Australia go over Antarctica as this would be the most efficient route?

Please use your 5 senses and a rational brain to answer these questions and not something you learned in a government textbook. Thanks!

I trust Eric Dubay. He is just a truth seeker, and makes so very good points…although I’m still not convinced.

Item #3…..when the globe-alist first provide a photo of EARTH, then the Flat Earthers will provide the photo of the edge of the flat earth. In all the years and Billions of dollars spent shooting rockets into the sky, to orbit and land on the moon, not ONE real photo of earth from the fraudsters, NASA. Rockets don’t work in the vacuum of space. Getting past the Van Allen belt hasn’t been done yet. Guess the ‘globalist’ had to come out with this story to continue the Big Lie.

Hey Flat Earthers, I would like help in understanding a few things that I can’t make work in the flat earth model.

1. Seasons. Why does it get warmer and colder? More daylight vs less daylight?
2. Water draining the opposite direction in Brazil vs the USA
3. Wouldnt it be more efficient to fly over the N pole from S America to Austrailia?

I am sure there is more, but those stuck out to me.

A little history lesson from: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/09/21/who-discovered-the-earth-is-ro/

“…One of these scientists was the Ancient Greek Astronomer, Eratosthenes of Cyrene.

While living in Alexandria, Eratosthenes received some amazing correspondence from the city of Syene in southern Egypt. In particular, it said that, on the Summer Solstice,

the shadow of someone looking down a deep well would block the reflection of the Sun at noon.

In other words, the Sun would be directly overhead at this time, not a single degree to the South, North, East or West. And if you had a completely vertical object, it would cast absolutely no shadow.

But Eratosthenes knew that this wasn’t the case where he was, in Alexandria. Sure, the Sun came closer to being directly overhead at Noon on the Summer Solstice in Alexandria than at any other time during the year, but vertical objects still cast shadows.

And — like any good scientist — Eratosthenes did the experiment. By measuring the length of the shadow cast by a vertical stick during the solstice noon, he could figure out what angle the Sun made with the vertical direction at Alexandria.

And the answer he got was one-fiftieth of a circle, or 7.2 degrees. But at this time, in Syene, the angle the Sun was making with an identical vertical stick was zero degrees! What could be causing this? In perhaps a stroke of genius, Eratosthenes realized that the Sun’s rays could all be parallel, and that the Earth could be curved!

If he could then figure out the distance from Alexandria to Syene, since he knew the angular difference between the two cities, he could figure out the circumference of the Earth! If only Eratosthenes had a grad student, he could have sent one to make the trip, and measure the distance! Instead, he was forced to rely on the reported distance between the two cities. The most “precise” measurement of his day?

Travel-by-camel. (So I can understand criticisms of his accuracy.) Nevertheless, his results were that the distance between Syene and Alexandria were 5,000 stadia. The question, of course, is how big is a stadium? The answer depends, of course, on whether Eratosthenes, a Greek living in Egypt, was using an Attic stadium or an Egyptian stadium, something still debated among historians. An Attic stadium was used more commonly, and is 185 meters in modern terms. Using this value, one gets a circumference of the Earth of 46,620 kilometers, a number that’s only about 16% bigger than the actual value.

However, an Egyptian stadium is 157.5 meters, and it’s conceivable that’s what Eratosthenes meant. In that case, we get a value of 39,375 kilometers, which is off by less than 2% from the modern value of 40,041 km!

Regardless of what the actual values were, Eratosthenes went on to become the world’s first geographer, inventing the concepts of latitude and longitude that we still use today, and constructed the first models and maps based on a spherical Earth.

Although many things were “lost” during the subsequent millenium, neither the idea of a spherical Earth nor the rough knowledge of the Earth’s circumference were one of them. In fact, anyone can perform this same experiment today with two locations at the same longitude, and with simultaneous measurements of shadow lengths, you too can measure the circumference of the Earth! Not bad, considering that the first direct, photographic evidence of the Earth’s curvature would not arrive until 1946!…”

Hmmm…

259 idiots!

263 – morons!