The Ugly Truth Behind Apple’s iPhones

New product releases from Apple often are a time for analysis, comparison and celebration. But the arrival of the iPhone 7 has brought unwanted attention to the company’s darker side of globalization, oppression and greed.

In a report from The Guardian, Aditya Chakrabortty says that Apple oppresses Chinese workers, does not pay its fair share of taxes and deprives Americans of high-paying jobs while making enormous profits. 

Apple’s iPhones are assembled at three firms in China: Foxconn, Wistron and Pegatron. While Apple CEO Tim Cook says the company cares about all its workers—any words to the contrary are “patently false and offensive”—the facts on the ground show the opposite.

In 2010, Foxconn employees were killing themselves in high numbers—an estimated 18 attempted suicide and 14 of those died. The company responded by putting up suicide nets to catch them before their deaths. Apple vowed to improve workers’ conditions at the plant, yet this past August, after reports surfaced that changes of overtime policies caused great stress on workers, two employees killed themselves. 

At the Wistron factory, a Danish human-rights organization found the factory forces thousands of students to work the same hours as adults for less pay. Students were told they were required to work if they wanted to receive their diplomas. Using young people to work is not a new revelation for Apple. In 2010, the company admitted that 15-year-old children were working in factories supplying Apple products. At a plant run by Wintek in Suzhou, China, workers reportedly were being poisoned by n-Hexane, a toxic chemical that causes muscular atrophy and blurred eyesight. 

At Pegatron, the other iPhone assembler, U.S.-based China Labor Watch found staff members work 12-hour days, six days a week. They are forced to work overtime, and 1 1/2 hours are unpaid.  One researcher working there had to stand during his entire 10 1/2-hour shift. When the local government raised the minimum wage, Pegatron cut subsidies for medical insurance. 

The Guardian reports: 

While iPhone workers for Pegatron saw their hourly pay drop to just $1.60 an hour, Apple remained the most profitable big company in America, pulling in over $47bn in profit in 2015 alone.

What does this add up to? At $231bn, Apple has a bigger cash pile than the US government, but apparently won’t spend even a sliver on improving conditions for those who actually make its money. Nor will it make those iPhones in America, which would create jobs and still leave it as the most profitable smartphone in the world.

It would rather accrue more profits, to go to those who hold Apple stock—such as company boss Tim Cook, whose hoard of company shares is worth $785m. Friends of Cook point to his philanthropy, but while he’s happy to spend on pet projects, he rejects a €13bn tax bill from the EU  as “political crap”—while boasting about how he won’t bring Apple’s billions back to the US “until there’s a fair rate … . It doesn’t go that the more you pay, the more patriotic you are.” The tech oligarch seems to think he knows better than 300 million Americans what tax rates their elected government should set.

When the historians of globalisation ask why it died, they will surely find that companies such as Apple form a large part of the answer. Faced with a binary choice between an economic model that lavishly rewarded a few and a populism that makes lavish promises to many, between Cook on the one hand and [Nigel] Farage on the other, the voters went for the one who at least didn’t bang on about “courage”.

According to a new report from Global Justice Now, a group based in the United Kingdom, 69 of the top 100 economies in the world are corporate entities (an increase from 63 a year ago). Apple is one of those corporate entities. With $234 billion in revenue in 2015, Apple is the ninth-largest company in the world and wealthier than most countries.

— Posted by Donald Kaufman   

Related Entries

• September 20, 2016 A Vote for Trump Is a Vote to Undo Vital Progress on Climate Change
• September 14, 2016 Why Corporate Tax Deserters Shouldn’t Get the Benefits of Being American Corporations (Video)