Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Split votes on gun ballot measures bring mixed results on both sides

Wednesday, November 9, 2016 6:28
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

California Democrat Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom was able to get his Prop. 63 ammo regulation measure, approved by voters. (Photo: Merced Sun-Star)

California Democrat Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom was able to get his Prop. 63 ammo regulation measure, approved by voters. (Photo: Merced Sun-Star)

Voters in California, Nevada, Washington and Oregon approved stricter gun control initiatives while those in Maine, Kansas and Indiana leaned towards protecting the Second Amendment.

In a win for California Democrat Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, voters gave his “Safety for All” referendum, on the ballot as Proposition 63, a big thumbs up with nearly two of three voters supporting the measure as of Wednesday morning with 83 percent of precincts reporting. Funded by $5.2 million from the state’s Democratic Party and wealthy donors, the measure not only further protects new gun control bills signed earlier this year but also requires background checks prior to all ammunition sales – a first for any state.

In another solid victory for gun control advocates, voters approved Washington’s Initiative 1491. Funded by $4 million from former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords’ Americans for Responsible Solutions PAC, and wealthy donors, the 21-page proposal, establishes protection orders in the state to allow families and law enforcement to ask the courts to issue a temporary restriction on an individual’s gun rights.

In Oregon, nearly three of four voters approved Measure 100, which saw some $1 million in funding from anti-hunting groups, and aims to ban the sale and possession of certain animal parts. Pro-hunting groups nominally opposed Measure 100 saying it would likely do little to protect endangered species while otherwise law-abiding gun owners in turn could be criminalized if they sell a vintage item, say a handgun with old ivory grips.

Nevada’s Question 1, a background check expansion that had received $19.7 million in funding largely from Bloomberg, went to the wire with the Secretary of State’s office reporting a 50/50 split most of the night and losing in 16 of 17 counties. In the end, the Associated Press called the race at 3:02 a.m on Wednesday as a “yes” victory though official results may prove otherwise. Gun rights groups, primarily backed by the NRA, contributed some $6.6 million towards stopping the measure, easily making it the most expensive single-issue gun control fight in the country.

In a rebuff for gun control advocates, Maine’s Question 3, a mirror image of Nevada’s Q1, polled high with likely voters but as of Wednesday morning was losing by four points with over 89 percent of the ballots counted.

Voters in Kansas and Indiana, both states with a large population of sportsmen and anglers, showed up and approved amendment to their respective state constitutions to enshrine a right to hunt and fish. In both instances, the amendments were approved in landslide votes.

The post Split votes on gun ballot measures bring mixed results on both sides appeared first on Guns.com.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.