Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Shocking! Obama to Pardon Hillary at 11:59 PM? He Pardoned Chelsea/Bradley Manning (Videos)

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

January 18 2017

 

VERYcurious this is happening at the very end of Obamas tenure!

CHARLIE SAVAGE for the NYT reports, President Obama on Tuesday largely commuted the remaining prison sentence of Chelsea Manning, the army intelligence analyst convicted of an enormous 2010 leak that revealed American military and diplomatic activities across the world, disrupted the administration and made WikiLeaks, the recipient of those disclosures, famous.

Plus 

Yes, Obama can pardon Hillary BEFORE an indictment: http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/05/opi…

Based on the testimony of Jeff Sessions, Trump’s pick for Attorney General of the United States, an investigation of Hillary’s emails and/or the Clinton Foundation could result in an indictment. If this happens, MANY OTHER PEOPLE/ENTITIES could be implicated, including Barack Obama himself, in Hillary’s crimes. 

Hillary is guilty, already, of numerous crimes including harboring classified information on an undesignated, non-governmental server. Several brave military men in the U.S. have been convicted with FAR LESS evidence, and some of these people are facing lengthy prison sentences. James Comey of the FBI, however, decided to ignore Hillary’s obvious crimes and not indict. This was purely political and will tarnish his reputation.

We know that Comey was influenced by a rogue operative in the state department named Patrick Kennedy, who has worked in the department since the 1970s. Based on reports in the media and confirmed now by the FBI report that was declassified, Patrick Kennedy engaged in a quid pro quo with Comey’s FBI in order to keep Hillary safe from an indictment. He got what he wanted, Comey dismissed the opportunity to press charges on at least two occasions, despite testifying before Congress that Hillary Clinton did, indeed, store classified intelligence on her server.

Interestingly, Patrick Kennedy appears to have his fingers in other situations at the State department as well. Kennedy has inherited the title of Hilary’s “fixer.” A fixer is somebody who covers up the wrongdoing of another. Two other notable situations occurred at the State Department when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state that Kennedy covered up.
 


From The Next News Network

Read More/Source/Credit(FAIR USE):
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/us…


From C. Ervana

Will Obama Pardon Hillary at 11:59 PM? MSM Silent about FBI Classified File Dump

From Guardian Wires

Who is Chelsea Manning?

Whistleblower Chelsea Manning will be released from military prison in May after her sentence for leaking classified information was commuted by the outgoing US president Barack Obama. 

CONTINUED

The first occurred in January of 2010, involving a missionary named Laura Silsby and her organization. They were in Haiti to “rescue orphans” from the destruction of the earthquake, however Silsby and 9 others were convicted of attempting to traffic 33 children to the Dominican Republic. Bill Clinton was instrumental in freeing the missionaries from prison, and it was exposed in Wikileaks that Patrick Kennedy and other top Hillary aides were trying to cover up the situation from the U.S. media. In one Wikileaks, Cheryl Mills, Kennedy, and other aides were shown how to keep the missionaries away from media as they entered back into the United States. For some reason, they did not want the missionaries to tell their stories. Could it be because they were trying to traffic children? Laura Silsby, now Laura Gayler, is currently a top executive at AlertSense, which is a security firm that provides technology for the Amber Alert System. The Amber Alert is an emergency signal that broadcasts when a child goes missing. 

The second occurrence was in 2013, when Patrick Kennedy scrubbed OFFICIAL records that showed the 33rd Ambassador to Belgium, Howard Gutman, was guilty of recruiting and soliciting children in a Brussels park. The State Department promised justice would be done in this case, but it wasn’t. Gutman served as 33rd Ambassador to Belgium under Hillary for 4 years. It appears he was a mega-fundraiser for the Democrat party. He was such an important figure that John Podesta discussed him in an email found in Wikileaks. Upon learning of Gutman’s crimes against children, the State Department promised that justice would be done in the case involving Gutman, except that never happened. Because of Patrick Kennedy.

What is hiding in Hillary’s 33,000 missing emails? I suspect they aren’t lost. Somebody has them and is, perhaps, waiting to produce them at the right moment. If my hypothesis is correct, the emails could uncover a very dark world, an entire network and crime syndicate. This is not so far-fetched. Intelligence journalist Wayne Madsen suggested that Hillary’s email server was the front end of a massive intelligence operation involving a number of entities. If Obama does not pardon her, he could be implicated in her crimes. He said he knew nothing about Hillary’s server. This was proven to be a lie by Wikileaks. 

What is hiding in Hillary’s 33,000 missing emails? Could there be further evidence about the case of Gutman, the 33rd Ambassador to Belgium, or Silsby, and the 33 children she abducted? As I have pointed out in prior videos, 33 is a number with great significance among the Illuminati. They hide secrets in plain sight.


OBAMA GRANTS CLEMANCY to MANNING: But Will WIKILEAKS’ ASSANGE go to PRISON?

BREAKING: Obama Just Pardoned ‘Whistleblower’ Who Leaked MILLIONS of US Military Secrets!


 
Sign up for more on my Website and more stories from Jonathan Lee on Before It’s News  & #followMe on Twitter #CCOT
 
If you like the articles that I share, be sure to click the ‘Recommend’ Button near the top of the page & I thank you in advance. Please leave your comments below!
 
#beforeitsnews #jonathanlee #viral #trending #followme #christianteaparty #deplorable #alternativenews #altnews#2a #askWL  #1a #currentevents #fakenews #proisrael #trump #conservative #manningpardon #hillarypardon



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 23 comments
    • Boo

      Lets apply some simple math here. You can’t pardon anyone of anything if they haven’t been convicted yet. Hillary made have been convicted in the court of public opinion, but she has yet to be convicted of anything in a court of law. So speculating on this subject as if it’s premise has meat, will only land you in the straight jacket of fanatical missteps.

      • GUNNY

        “Lets apply some simple math here. You can’t pardon anyone of anything if they haven’t been convicted yet.”

        Why does everybody keep saying this?

        Nixon was pardoned and had been convicted of NOTHING.

        Full stop. End of conversation.

        • Boo

          ELB… I stand corrected.
          In the case of President Nixon, he was granted a pardon by Gerald Ford in September 1974 for any crimes he might have committed during the Watergate scandal, even though Nixon wasn’t charged with or convicted of federal crimes. (This is known as a pre-emptive pardon.)

          • DK

            Which means they can still stand trial, get convicted and have the preemptive conviction pardon voided by the next White House resident by the executive order system Obama is so fond of as soon as the sentence is given and quashed. It is just a matter of the next chief in charge making sure by appointing ‘independents’ to office to get to the point of trial by actually making arrests.

        • Eggzactly

          Nixon Resigned, He Committed no crime. He was aware of the crime he did not commit. He did it to save the face of his party. Tell me what they would have charged him with. :wink:

    • jdpent01

      jdp…Two wrongs don’t make a right. makes no sense .

    • jdpent01

      jdp…The photo ops were always great between obama and Hillary but disliking each other was also high between them, so I don’t see any pardons.

    • jdpent01

      jdp…Not a preemptive pardon, but a political pardon

    • jdpent01

      jdp…It appears that a pardon can be rejected, and must be affirmatively accepted to be officially recognized by the courts. Acceptance also carries with it an admission of guilt, She Hillary is not about to say she was guilty of anything. Since Obama is on his way out Trump can reject the pardon if one is made.

    • Canderson

      No, Hillary hacked his Autopen.

    • Eggzactly

      Jon Lee, You do realize that she has to be charged with a crime to be pardoned for a crime, Right? Oh well, Another click for your click counter.

      • LifeIs

        No, she does not have to be charged first.

        How is this hard to understand ? Nixon was pardoned in advance of any charges.

        • Andy

          seems alot like religion hey!! get saved and be pardoned in advance for future sins !!

          :shock:

    • desertspeaks

      All that effort into putting together the above story, coming up with a slick headline and ITS ALL BULLSHIT! Dear god how long would it have taken you to GOOGLE the specifics of a pardon??

      Well here is what you WOULD HAVE FOUND had you bothered to taken a few seconds out of your oh so busy day!
      https://www.justice.gov/pardon/pardon-information-and-instructions

      2. Federal convictions only
      Under the Constitution, only federal criminal convictions, such as those adjudicated in the United States District Courts, may be pardoned by the President.
      WHICH MEANS SHE WOULD HAVE HAD TO ALREADY BEEN CONVICTED OF THE CRIME!

      3. Five-year waiting period required

      Under the Department’s rules governing petitions for executive clemency, 28 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 et seq., an applicant must satisfy a minimum waiting period of five years before he becomes eligible to apply for a presidential pardon of his federal conviction.
      THIS IS ALSO SELF EXPLANITORY BUT YOU DIDN”T KNOW THAT EITHER!!

      Did you wake up this morning and say to yourself, Hey I’ll just make up some shit from MY OWN OPINIONS and post it just like it has some basis in reality!

      • LifeIs

        You have misread your source.

        And misunderstanding in all caps is still misunderstanding.

        Read this, it was written by a lawyer.

        http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/05/opinion/l-constitution-allows-pardons-before-conviction-590688.html

        ‘The leading Supreme Court case is Ex parte Garland (1867). Justice Stephen J. Field, writing for the Court in a 5-4 decision, held that the President’s pardoning power is ”unlimited,” and ”It extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”’

        Note: “…either before legal procedings are taken, or…”

        Note the 1975 Murphy v. Ford precedent also:

        “In Murphy v. Ford (1975), a Federal District Court in Michigan rejected a suit for a declaratory judgment that President Ford’s unconditional pardon of Richard M. Nixon was unconstitutional. The court found that the President had the constitutional power to grant a pre-indictment pardon, citing Ex parte Garland in its support.”

        “….the President had the constitutional power to grant a pre-indictment pardon…”

        It’s not self-explanatory. You have to read and understand.

    • jdpent01

      jdp…That pardon would be big news on MSM its already 11:30 pm and no mention of a pardon in the MSM has been declared, not even foretasted. so keep looking. To pardon one must admit guilt and that ain’t going to happen with Hillary.

      • LifeIs

        No you DON’T have to “admit guilt” directly, to accept a pardon.

        Hillary has admitted guilt many, many times. It’s just that nobody cares to uphold the laws about handling classified documents, accepting bribes, and war crimes, where Clintons are involved.

        https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/case.html is the law in question, Burdick v. United States.

        President Wilson tried to make a newspaper editor testify to a grand jury about leaks to the news media. By granting him a pardon. No legal jeopardy, no 5th amendment right to remain silent. That was the plan.

        The editor, George Burdick, refused to accept the pardon and refused to testify. The Supreme Court ruled that a pardon must be accepted. The government couldn’t force the pardon on him.

        AND here’s the important part: The Court said refusing to testify does not establish guilt. Only that what one says might be used in bringing charges.

        You can say acceptance of a pardon implies guilt, if you want to. But acceptance of a pardon might mean you’re afraid someone will bring charges that are NOT true. And you’re not guilty. And you just don’t want to go to trial.

    • jdpent01

      jdp…PARDONS…Facebook
      Twitter
      Share
      Pardon Power
      The President…shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

      ARTICLE II, SECTION 2, CLAUSE 1
      Teacher’s Companion Lesson (PDF)

      The power to pardon is one of the least limited powers granted to the President in the Constitution. The only limits mentioned in the Constitution are that pardons are limited to offenses against the United States (i.e., not civil or state cases), and that they cannot affect an impeachment process. A reprieve is the commutation or lessening of a sentence already imposed; it does not affect the legal guilt of a person. A pardon, however, completely wipes out the legal effects of a conviction. A pardon can be issued from the time an offense is committed, and can even be issued after the full sentence has been served. It cannot, however, be granted before an offense has been committed, which would give the President the power to waive the laws. The possibility of a President pardoning himself for a crime is not precluded by the explicit language of the Constitution, and, during the summer of 1974, some of President Richard M. Nixon’s lawyers argued that it was constitutionally permissible. But a broader reading of the Constitution and the general principles of the traditions of United States law might lead to the conclusion that a self-pardon is constitutionally impermissible. It would seem to violate the principles that a man should not be a judge in his own case; that the rule of law is supreme and the United States is a nation of laws, not men; and that the President is not above the law. OBAMA CAN’T PARDON WHERE NO GUILT BY A COURT OF LAW HAS BEEN DEEMED NOR GIVE CLEMENCY FOR A TO BE CHARGE, BUT POLITICAL EXPEDIENT, PARDON CAN BE GIVEN AS IN Nixon’S CASE.

      • LifeIs

        jdpent01 look. I pasted the Supreme Court and the federal district court precedents above. That is the law.

        Here is an article written by a lawyer. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/05/opinion/l-constitution-allows-pardons-before-conviction-590688.html

        Here is what the Court said in Ex parte Garland: “…”It extends to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken….”

        Can you read ? “…BEFORE legal proceedings are taken…” the President can grant a pardon. That is exactly what President Ford did, when he pardoned Nixon.

        What the hell does “political expedient” mean? Nixon was accused by the House Judiciary Committee of the crimes of obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress. He was at risk of a conspiracy charge also. Ford’s pardon prevented indictments, charges, a trial.

        Nixon’s pardon was only “political” in the sense that him being charged, and tried, would be an embarrassment to Republicans.

    • ButtPincher

      I don’t think you can pardon treason.. Maybe someone can correct me..

      • LifeIs

        The President can.

    • Andy

      hopefully,,,,,,

      OhBummer will be declared an illegitimate president usurper, undoing ALL his harm in one go – if Trump declines to do so, surely that tells us who Trump really is no?

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.