Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Court testimony showed confusion, contradictions in command during Bundy standoff

Monday, March 6, 2017 6:29
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Bundy standoff

Supporters — many of which armed — of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy confronting officers with the Bureau of Land Management in April 2014. (Photo: AP)

Testimony by federal officials in court Thursday revealed contradictions and confusion with the chain of command as the 2014 standoff with rancher Cliven Bundy and his supporters came to an end.

After nearly a week, the standoff came to a climactic end on April 12, 2014, after authorities stayed through the night despite being told by the federal agent in charge the day before to cease all operations and leave, The Arizona Republic reported.

About 1,000 people, many of whom were armed, came to the area in support of Bundy, who was involved in a decades-long battle over grazing rights with the Bureau of Land Management. Federal authorities had moved in to seize Bundy’s cattle as payment for the more than $1 million in grazing fees they say he owed.

Authorities already began rounding up Bundy’s cattle when, according to BLM director Neil Kornze, there became serious concerns over the safety of officials as well as the public, causing the federal government to make a decision to back down.

Dan Love, BLM special agent in charge of operations, announced to officials at the site on April 11, 2014, that they were to stop seizing Bundy’s cattle, pack up, and leave, and a news release was set to be sent out the following day announcing the decision. Despite this, according to court testimony, law enforcement officials were commanded by their own supervisors to move forward and engage with the protesters using non-lethal means.

“We were still under threat,” U.S. Parks Police Officer Tara McBride said in court last week, adding it was her understanding that they were to stop gathering the cattle but remain at the standoff “to provide security for the (incident command post)” because her supervisors anticipated a bloody battle with the protesters.

“We had intelligence from the FBI that individuals on a domestic terrorist watch list had arrived and were camped out at the Bundy compound,” said U.S. Park Police Officer Brandon Novotny. “We received intelligence there was going to be an attack.”

Nonetheless, McBride and her team expressed concern over engaging the protesters. More specifically, they feared the non-lethal pepper rounds would be mistaken for live rounds, causing armed protesters to return fire.

“I was scared that as leader of my team, I was not going to get my people out. I thought I was going to see one of my friends’ heads explode,” McBride said.

In fact, McBride said as her team positioned themselves as directed, they discussed the risks amongst themselves. Additionally, McBride said, her team twice requested permission from her supervisor to fall back, but both times the requests were denied.

Defense attorney Richard Tanasi said the multiple commands were not only confusing but contradictory and could have contributed to a violent escalation between federal officials and protesters. Tanasi also added the situation could have more quickly been defused had officials simply followed the original commands to cease operations.

The post Court testimony showed confusion, contradictions in command during Bundy standoff appeared first on Guns.com.



Source: http://www.guns.com/2017/03/06/court-testimony-showed-confusion-contradictions-in-command-during-bundy-standoff/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 4 comments
  • apache5

    because of the LACK of leadership OR the LEFTIST view of the fed leadership is what caused this to escalate and become what it was, WE the people WILL NOT tolerate this kind of action against the people whom they are SERVING!! FEDS YOU WORK FOR US!! NOT the other way around!! the screwed up views also got Finicum MURDERED by the OSP and the FEDS!! they ALL should be on TRIAL for his murder!! time to STOP the crazy out of control feds!! replace there leaders with SANE people!!

  • Anonymous

    People view poor people as enemies who should die cause they aint rich and the words domestic terrorist was created to put a negative thought in your mind when they say it. People we are all in this together the federal gov. has been operating in an unlawful form we do not follow a constitution but the Word of God.

  • Anonymous

    “Despite this (order to withdraw), according to court testimony, law enforcement officials were commanded by their own supervisors to move forward and engage with the protesters…”

    Umm, yeah, poke a bear and you are not going to like the outcome.

  • LADYBRADY

    Which BLM Agent admitted it was normal and regular part of her job to shred documents? I think there should be a new rule…if ANY part of the governments case has any deliberate misconduct, all charges must be thrown out! I’m waiting for Jeneatte Finicum’s Lawsuit of the death of LaVoy Finicum…to show Oregon’s huge misconduct too. Either Clean house, President Trump, or We The People will be forced to do it for you….tick tock…

    #FreeTheHammonds
    #FreeBundyEtAl
    #FreeJoeRobertson
    #FreeSamGirod

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.