Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Globalists interviewed: they admitted they controlled the government

Thursday, March 2, 2017 7:29
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Globalists interviewed: they admitted they controlled the government

By Jon Rappoport

This is a bombshell. It’s a crucial piece of history that has been ignored by mass media.

I’ve published this interview before. Here I want to make new comments.

First of all, David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission was born in 1973, in part because the Globalist plan to ensure “free trade” (no tariffs paid by predatory mega-corporations) had run into a glitch.

That glitch was President Richard Nixon. He began laying tariffs on certain goods imported into the US, in order to level the playing field and protect American companies. Nixon, a substantial crook in other respects, went off-script in this case and actually started a movement to reject the Globalist vision.

After Nixon’s ouster from the White House, Gerald Ford became president, and he chose David’s brother, Nelson Rockefeller as his vice-president. It was a sign Globalism and free trade were back on track.

But David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Brzezinski, wanted more. They wanted a man in the White House whom they’d created from scratch.

That man was a peanut farmer no one had ever heard of: Jimmy Carter.

Through their media connections, David and Brzezinski vaulted Carter into the spotlight. He won the Democratic nomination (1976), spread a syrupy message of love and coming together after the Watergate debacle, and soon he was ensconced in the Oval Office.

Flash forward to 1978, the second year of Carter’s presidency. An interview took place.

It’s a close-up snap shot of a remarkable moment. It’s a through-the-looking-glass secret—in the form of a conversation between a reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper.

The interview concerned the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating and controlling US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations [!], and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches.

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

SOURCE: “Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management,” ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980. South End Press, Boston. Pages 192-3.

Of course, although Kaiser and Cooper claimed everything being manipulated by the Trilateral Commission committee was already out in the open, it wasn’t.

Their interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was ignored and buried. It didn’t become a scandal on the level of, say, Watergate, although its essence was far larger than Watergate.

US economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission had been created in 1973 as an “informal discussion group” by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Brzezinski, who would become Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor.

Shortly after Carter won the presidential election, his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We have lost. And I will quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Flash forward again, to the Obama administration.

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Four years before birthing the Commission with his boss of bosses, David Rockefeller, Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of Trialteral goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington and Technocracy Rising, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America.

Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example: Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
James Jones, National Security Advisor;
Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

Here is the payoff. The US Trade Representative (appointed by Obama in 2013), who was responsible for negotiating the Globalist TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) treaty with 11 other nations, was Michael Froman, a former member of the Trilateral Commission. Don’t let the word “former” fool you. Commission members resign when they take positions in the Executive Branch of government. And when they serve in vital positions, such as US Trade Representative, they aren’t there by accident. They’re operatives with a specific agenda.

Flash forward one more time. Trump, who squashed the Globalist TPP treaty as soon as he was inaugurated, has been busy making staff appointments. Patrick Wood writes (2/6/17):

“According to a White House press release, the first member of the Trilateral Commission has entered the Trump administration as the Deputy Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs, where he will sit on the National Security Council:

“Kenneth I. Juster will serve as Deputy Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs. He will coordinate the Administration’s international economic policy and integrate it with national security and foreign policy. He will also be the President’s representative and lead U.S. negotiator (“Sherpa”) for the annual G-7, G-20, and APEC Summits.”

Juster’s duties will take him into the heart of high-level negotiations with foreign governments on economic policy.

Keep your eye on Mr. Juster. Will he take actions in line with Trump’s avowed anti-Globalist stance?

Or will Juster work as one more covert Trilateral operative in the center of American decision-making?

If the answer is “covert operative,” does Trump know this? Does he condone what Mr. Juster will do?

Or is this a case of secret infiltration, on behalf the most powerful Globalist group in the world, the Trilateral Commission?

Filed under: Uncategorized Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • Canderson

    Project Syndicate: George Soros’ Oracle

    To truly grasp the magnitude of Project Syndicate’s influence on the circulation of ideas, it suffices to mention a few of their columnists: Soros himself, Tony Blair, Peter Singer, Mikhail Gorbachev, Ban-ki-Moon, Kofi-Annan, Jimmy Carter, Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), as well as intellectuals such as Umberto Eco and economists such as Joseph E. Stiglitz, Jeffrey D . Sachs and presidents of the European parliament. The Brazilian contributors are former president Fernando Henrique Cardoso, poster boy for the legalization of drugs, and former Foreign Minister, Antônio Patriota.

    Politics and public opinion
    Jürgen Habermas referred to the public sphere as the stage of political legitimization which public action claims to represent and through which it justifies itself.

    Therefore, control of the public sphere is an absolute must for any movement bent on exercising hegemony of ideas. Nevertheless, Habermas, the social engineers of

    his time and the members of the Frankfurt School didn’t have much faith in the potential of democracy to become a venue of popular decision making. As a result, these

    scholars became increasingly convinced of the necessity of controlling opinions in order to guide society in the appropriate direction, in accordance with the best ideals.

    This utopian democracy remains a self-justifying symbol in the minds of the masses while intellectuals and politicians control the means to plan and make real change happen. Walter Lippmann, the brains behind the CFR, recommended the following:

    “My conclusion is that public opinions must be organized for the press if they are to be sound, not by the press as is the case today. This organization I conceive to be in the first instance the task of a political science that has won its proper place as formulator, in advance of real decision, instead of apologist, critic or reporter after the decision has been made. I try to indicate that the perplexities of government and industry are conspiring to give political science this enormous opportunity to enrich itself and to serve the public.”
    (Public Opinion; 1922)

    Rule from the Shadows – The Psychology of Power – Part 1
    “the manufacture of, consent” – Walter Lippmann, the brains behind the CFR (01:00 ->)

    Bill Cooper: “We Live in a Constitutional Republic, Not a Democracy

  • Canderson

    excerpts from:
    May 1, 2006

    Rosicrucianism the Rosicrucians
    Alan: When you go into the history of John Dee, who had the largest library in England at the time in fact, John Dee was a courtier at the court of Queen Elizabeth I and

    he was also an advisor to her and an agent when he traveled abroad, and just by coincidence his code number that he signed his letters by was 007.

    Dr. Stan: Right.

    Alan: He laid out the plan – he was the first person to coin the term “Brytish,” (he called it B-r-y-tish Empire), “a Brytish Empire should be formed on the basis of free

    trade and with favored nation trading status.” That’s in the 1500′s and he said that countries that would not join this commonwealth would be excluded by taxation, by

    importation duties and so on, and bypassed in trade; and that was the beginning of this whole free trade business.

    Dr. Stan: Of course, it was really a plan to unite the world under British rule, wasn’t it?

    Alan: It was and he even said in his writings that even though Britain would start it off, someone would take over in the future. We find that happening in the early 1900′s

    when Kipling came over and he read his poem to the Senate of the U.S., the one about “The White Man’s Burden” and what they would have to do, and that was the

    handing over the flag as he wrote in his poem: To you, we hand the torch over to you to take over.

    Dr. Stan: That was really what it was all about. America then would take over from Britain to bring about the New World Order, the New World religion and the

    destruction of all freedom.

    Alan: Once again, you find this tremendous movement down through the centuries beginning with what they called Rosicrucianism and the underground stream. That’s

    how they refer to themselves and they also call themselves “The Invisible College” because they did have their own secret societies where they taught their members

    their part in the agenda.

    Dr. Stan: All right. What is that “Great Work?”

    Alan: The “Great Work” you’ll find going back for thousands of years is to “perfect that which was left imperfect,” and this tongue-in-cheek phrase they use is talking

    about the recreation of humanity itself, the reshaping of man, and they go by the laws of nature. By the laws of nature they mean science and they believe that they will

    conquer all nature and reshape it into serving themselves, the elite; and man himself, the workers – we find this goes back to even Plato who wrote about it in the

    “Republic” where he talked about the Guardian class and the working class he called the “its” and he said these are basic building material. He said we can do the same

    as we have with domesticated animals. If we want tall people to pick apples, we’ll breed a male and a female and keep interbreeding them until we have tall ones. If we

    want someone to work down a mine, we can breed them short and squat and muscular for that task; and so basically they were talking about a form of eugenics.

    Reshaping society to serve what they claim is the elite themselves, the Illumined Ones.

    you’ve commented that you find the platonic influences, writings of Plato, and of course modern day occultists all go back to Plato. Plato really was almost like a

    watershed event in the history of mankind, wasn’t it? Didn’t he more or less codify a lot of this?

    Alan: He did and he gave the religion they believe in away. He told us what the religion is based upon, and the religion of the elite in his day and today in fact is no

    different; it was based on a “special kind of reincarnation,” and he does that in his dialogues and his books where he asks the question, “why are we so intelligent, we the

    aristocracy?” as opposed to the ordinary people. Then he goes through the basis for believing that they were all reincarnated into the same family dynasties over and

    over, so hence the need for the inbreeding of selected families down through the ages to make sure the same spirits come back into the same bodies. That’s what they

    believed in.

    Dr. Stan: And of course some of the writings of Albert Pike say exactly the same thing: If you don’t get it right the first time, you keep on coming back. Albert Pike was a

    civil war general. His statue sits there in Washington, D.C. today. He is buried in the House of the Temple in Washington, D.C. the headquarters of International

    Masonry, or at least American Masonry, so pick up the story there.

    Alan: Albert Pike let so much out too. In one of his parts of “Morals and Dogma,” he said that the good mason must get to the top by all means possible. By any even

    devious means, even using the stock market, he says, and he said then we must subjugate inferior men’s minds by our will and then we shall become the masters over

    the Masters of the World. Now does that sound like a benevolent organization to you?

    Dr. Stan: They shall come to us for their princes and for their popes. He made it very clear that they would end up ruling the world through their secret societies and this

    is all in Morals and Dogma,” and you can get a copy. They’re still available in used bookstores, those that haven’t been burned, and of course people have to understand

    they lay everything out. It’s all very obvious. They know exactly what they’re doing. They just don’t want the American people to know what they are doing.

    Alan: Also, Albert Pike, we know that he trained Giuseppe Mazzini, which is just Italian for Mason, Mazzini, and he led off the revolutionary party because they use

    revolutions – the circle, of course, of a revolution to get to their–

    Dr. Stan: Hold that thought right there. Our guest is Alan Watt. He’s talking about how the Masons created a man in Italy known as Giuseppe Mazzini, a word for Mason,

    and he of course formed a secret society there known as the Carbonari and they were involved in creating the revolutions that would sweep across Europe during the

    19th Century. Ultimately then this World Revolution went into Russia and created the Russian Revolution in 1917 and the Cuban Revolution in 1958 and the World

    Revolution is as it’s continuing until this day. If you read President Bush’s second inaugural speech where he talked about when our founders declared a New Order of

    the Ages, why they were acting out an ancient hope that’s meant to be fulfilled and then he talks about how we’re going to bring democracy to nations throughout the

    world. You know we’re going to bring freedom to people throughout the world. You really think we’re bringing freedom to the people of Saudi Arabia? Are we bringing

    freedom to the people of China? Of course not. We’re supporting totalitarian regimes throughout the world, so they use code words to cover what this is about. It’s about

    a world dictatorship under a ruling elite, all tied into secret societies, so you pick up this one. Alan, do you have a web page or any place where people can go?

    Alan: Yes. It’s called

    And they play both sides of Socialism. (both are left sides)

    (Part three of a five-part series excerpted from Chapter 19: The Eight Families: Big Oil & Their Bankers…) by Dean Henderson
    “Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society and Bulwer-Lytton’s Rosicrucians joined forces to form the Thule Society out of which the Nazis emerged.”
    The Federal Reserve Cartel: Part III: The Illuminati Roundtable

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.